What's the difference?
There’s a fairly big change hiding under the metal of one of Australia’s favourite utes. The Isuzu D-Max has a new 2.2-litre engine, replacing the 1.9-litre unit, and it brings a couple of other things with it.
A bigger engine designed to be more powerful and more efficient can only be a good thing, surely, especially with Isuzu looking down the barrel of stringent emissions laws with only two models in the line-up, both diesel powered.
But is this new 2.2-litre engine any good? Isuzu’s gone to the trouble of a new gearbox and some new tech to go with it, so we check it out to see if it stacks up against the increasingly strong competition.
It’s been a long time coming, but this new ute is a big deal for Nissan Australia.
The latest (D27) generation 2026 Nissan Navara is finally here, and Nissan reckons the extra time it’s taken to get here after its badge-engineering twin, the Triton from alliance partner brand Mitsubishi, has been worth the extra work by Aussie engineering firm Premcar.
It comes at a vital time because, here in Australia, Nissan is changing, with a couple of models on the way out and a need for the company to find stability.
The new Navara is part of the plan, but will it win the hearts and wallets of Australians and help keep this storied brand’s head above water?
We’ve spent a couple of days with the new Nissan ute in our nation’s capital to find out for ourselves if a re-engineered Mitsubishi Triton holds the key to Nissan’s U-turn.
The new engine makes the D-Max a much more likeable ute than it already was, which is high praise.
It’s smoother and quieter and makes for a more pleasant drive. The added efficiency is a bonus both for your wallet and Isuzu’s emissions credits.
The 3.0-litre engine will probably remain the favourite, but anyone who test drives a 2.2L might even be tempted to opt for the smaller unit. Isuzu sure hopes so.
Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.
While it won’t appeal on the value front as much as its Mitsubishi Triton engineering twin, the Navara’s tweaks from Premcar make it a more comfortable and livable thing.
The extra cost is worth it for how much better it is on the road, plus you get more features, regardless.
Whether the changes to the Navara are sexy enough to get people in the dealership door is another question, but anyone who takes this over a Triton won’t be disappointed.
If it's for work, the SL or ST will do. If it's doubling as a family car, the Pro-4X is worth the outlay.
Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.
The look of the D-Max depends on the grade you end up with, but the 2.2-litre SX and X-Rider variants down the lower end of the model-run are still pretty standard-looking utes. Inside and out.
You get fairly rugged styling that fits in for both work and play, and the interior is functional, if getting a little outdated.
The black trim (and extra features) that comes with the LSM X-Rider as opposed to the SX is worth it if you’re keen to get a 2.2-litre-powered D-Max for the family rather than one for a fleet as it just elevates things slightly.
Inside, it also means nicer cloth, and not having the vinyl flooring looks a little less ‘farm ute’.
Nissan has done well to inject its own design flavour into the ute, because even though there’s inevitable similarity in the silhouette, it doesn’t just look like a Triton.
Impressive given a lot of the car is the same, and Nissan couldn’t change any of the hard points the Triton comes with. In fact, the Navara’s dimensions are largely the same as the Triton, coming in at 5320mm long, 1930mm wide and 1815mm tall.
The biggest Nissan-specific design element is a nod to the Navara’s heritage, the three little vent lines above the grille hark back to the original D21 generation ute which had these holes in the bonnet.
It’s subjective to some extent, but I reckon the Navara has the Triton beat on the design front.
Depending on the variant, you get some other indicators that this is no Triton, including a sports bar on the rear of the cabin with ‘Navara’ cut into it, or Pro-4X decals if that’s the variant you go for.
Given the lifestyle and off-road focus of the Pro-4X, it also has a bit more trim inside and out to feel more rugged and premium.
The Navara’s new interior is a big step up over the previous generation, even if it is genuinely all-Triton in there. The biggest change is the Nissan badge on the steering wheel.
It’s a ute, so there’s still a lot of plastic, cheap materials and even the nicer looking surfaces are in a few spots made of gloss black plastic (sometimes called piano black) which gets smudged easily and after a short while.
The D-Max remains straight-forward inside, given nothing has changed with the update aside from the 2.2-litre engine and the addition of stop-start - there’s a button for that now.
The interior and usability of the D-Max, especially in the lower-end variants where the 2.2L engine is available, is focused on the basics.
Tech remains at a relative entry point, where the 8.0-inch screen and its software feel outdated but do everything you need. Plus of course there’s the phone mirroring workaround.
The D-Max is comfortable and spacious enough, there’s also physical buttons for everything including media and climate settings, and adjustability in terms of the seating position means not needing to reach.
In dual-cab versions, there’s enough space for an adult to sit in the second row behind another adult, so the D-Max also holds its own as a family hauler. Tick.
Importantly, Isuzu is now able to claim a 3500kg braked towing capacity across the full D-Max range thanks to the new 2.2-litre engine.
It’s a bit of a shame the Navara doesn’t benefit from the changes Nissan has been making to its interior design and layout recently, because it leaves older Nissans in the dust, in terms of design and ergonomics.
But, the Mitsubishi Triton’s interior isn’t a bad one for the Navara to have inherited, because it just works. It’s uncomplicated and sensible, if a little boring.
There are physical buttons for shortcuts, and the tech is relatively straightforward, even if it does also carry the downside of Android Auto being wired-only. It adds to the somewhat dated feeling the Navara’s interior carries, but the physical space itself is rather sensible.
The Navara’s seats are comfortable, and as the driver it’s easy to find your own preferred position, with the electric adjustment in higher variants being an extra help there.
The driving ergonomics and visibility are also good, which lines up well with the Navara’s driving dynamics and makes it feel less like you’re pedalling a big dual-cab around.
Behind the driver, there’s not heaps in the way of amenity, but the addition of USB ports once you’re past the base SL is welcome for second-row passengers, and the space isn’t cramped by any means.
The Navara has a tub capable of easily fitting a Euro pallet, according to Nissan’s specs, but with its distance of 1135mm between wheel arches, it won’t fit an Aussie pallet. The tub is almost square, at 1555mm long and 1545mm wide, and 525mm tall.
Plus there’s the 3500kg towing capacity and its payload ranging between 964kg for the Pro-4X or up to 1064kg in the base SL.
Pricing is up across the board for D-Max (and its MU-X sibling) regardless of drivetrain, but we’ll stick to the 2.2-litre variants here to stay on track.
Most of the lower-level D-Max variants are $1500 more than the previous equivalent, and with the manual gearbox dropped, the cheapest grade is the 4x2 single-cab chassis SX with a 2.2L engine at $36,200 before on-roads.
You can get the SX in crew-cab with a chassis or ute back in either 4x2 or 4x4 with a 2.2L engine, which is also available in the LSM X-Rider 4x4.
That one will set you back $59,500, which is still far from the most expensive D-Max around. That’s still the Blade, with a 3.0-litre engine and 4x4 only, but it’s now $80,900.
Back to the 2.2s, and the SX grade comes with the basics. Cloth upholstery, polyurethane steering wheel and gear selector, vinyl flooring and even halogen lights.
There’s basic air-conditioning, but it does have a HEPA filter, and rear vents for crew-cab models, plus there’s wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, auto wipers, and USB-C power ports as well as a USB-A port.
The central multimedia touchscreen is 8.0 inches, but the driver display is a little 4.2-inch unit between physical dials.
Stepping up to the LSM X-Rider brings with it auto-levelling LED headlights and LED daytime running lights, black styling trim, nicer cloth trim upholstery and gloss black 17-inch alloy wheels.
The rest of the D-Max line-up is 3.0-litre-only, and remains as it was before.
The new D27 generation Navara starts from $53,348, before on-road costs, so it’s already more expensive than the Triton it’s based on, but we’ll get into the main, somewhat oily reasons for that in a bit.
The Navara’s available in four variants at launch, SL, ST, ST-X and Pro-4X. They’re all 4X4 dual-cabs, so it’s mainly the features for each trim level that make the difference when it comes to pricing.
The SL starts off with a lot of the basics covered. There are LED headlights and tail-lights, climate control, the same 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen as the rest of the range and digital radio as well as Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.
Its aforementioned touchscreen is also a little larger than the one in the Triton it’s based on. Then there’s the 7.0-inch driver display screen which lives between the two physical dials.
At this point in the range the steering wheel is polyurethane and the floors aren’t carpeted, just covered with vinyl. It’s a work ute and it feels like one.
Things pick up slightly with the ST, which starts from $56,765, and gains alloy wheels, auto-folding mirrors, a leather-accented steering wheel and floor carpet, plus now side-steps and a sports bar. It also adds USB ports in the second row for charging, so it’s probably the minimum grade you’d want if you’re ever going to have kids in the back. Essentially, it gains a few things that make it feel a little more livable without getting too fancy.
The ST-X is a fair step up in price, it’s $63,177, but gets better suspension, 18-inch alloys, leather-accented and heated front seats and a power adjustable driver's seat, dual-zone climate and a wireless phone charger.
It also gains a centre limited-slip differential, drive modes more compatible with off-roading, different styling elements and push-button start, so you don’t need to use the physical key.
The top-of-the-range (until the Warrior arrives) is the $68,418 Pro-4X with more design changes, all-terrain tyres, a black sports bar and roof rails, contrast stitching and specific seats with Pro-4X styling. It’s the variant Nissan Australia expects to be the most popular, too. It also has the same diff and better suspension the ST-X gains.
The new 2.2-litre turbo-diesel four-cylinder comes with 120kW and 400Nm, that’s 10kW and 50Nm more than before. Isuzu also says there’s 60 per cent more torque ready from near-idle at 1000rpm.
An eight-speed auto replaces the six-speed, but the brand has also culled the manual options that remained in the line-up.
As ever, that sends power and torque to a part-time 4WD system capable of 2H, 4H and 4L with a rear diff-lock.
A 150kW/470Nm four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine lies under the bonnet, which falls a little short of some rivals, but isn’t glaringly weak.
Its power lines up with, for example, the Toyota HiLux, but torque falls short of its rival’s 500Nm. It’s the same story for the Ranger, though that ute slips a nose ahead with 4.0kW more than HiLux and Navara in its four-cylinder guise.
The Navara’s six-speed automatic transmission also sends that power and torque to all four wheels, though how exactly it gets there depends on the spec and whether you have a centre differential or not.
The biggest advantage for the new drivetrain from Isuzu’s perspective is that it’s more fuel efficient.
The old engine’s 6.9 litres per 100km become 6.6L/100km in the new engine, in part thanks to a new stop-start system. That system is also now on the 3.0-litre engine, where 8.0L per 100km drops to 7.1L.
With its 76L diesel tank capacity, the D-Max should theoretically be able to travel more than 1000km on a single fill, although that comes down to a lot of variables - that 6.6L figure was achieved in almost lab-like conditions.
From the Navara’s 75L tank, a claimed 7.7L/100km is used on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, though on the launch drive we saw the trip computer hovering around 9.0L/100km.
With a few hundred kilos in the tray, that jumped up to the low 11s.
Hypothetically, if you manage to get close to Nissan’s claimed consumption, you should be able to get more than 900km out of a single tank of diesel. Nissan’s claim isn’t too outrageous, either, considering the type of driving a car launch generally consists of isn’t normally conducive to favourable fuel consumption figures.
Let’s start with the most important part of the updated D-Max. The new 2.2L is smooth.
It feels so much more refined physically, but it's also quieter. Paired with the new eight speed, it makes the D-Max a much more likeable ute than it was with the rattly 1.9L.
At the launch, Isuzu had a bunch of MU-Xs to drive (keep an eye on a review coming soon), and the new drivetrain actually suits that big family SUV down to a tee.
The power and efficiency changes are second to how much it changes the characteristics of the thing.
If anything, the D-Max sits in a slightly higher gear than necessary, probably to try and eke as much out of the diesel dual-cab as possible in terms of fuel efficiency, but put your foot down and a more appropriate gear is close-by, and without much fuss.
There's also a relatively good stop-start system. It's not seamless but it's better than some. You take your foot off the brake and the engine rattles back to life, rather than waiting for you to put your foot back down.
The rest of the D-Max’s behaviour is pretty standard ute stuff, as it was before.
The steering is on the light side, but accurate enough even though it has a slightly doughy spot dead-straight. It’s not anything you wouldn’t expect from a ute.
Similarly, the brakes are a bit spongy but predictable, and once you’re used to where the ‘bite’ point is it’s easy to live with.
The suspension is a bit busy, but easy to keep on top of and doesn’t jostle you around.
Now we get to the biggest reason you’d consider a Navara over the Triton it’s based on.
While the Navara benefits from having a relatively new platform underneath it - thanks Mitsubishi - it’s still a ladder-frame dual-cab ute so expectations weren’t exactly on the floor, but they also weren’t sky-high.
And sure, a lot of the details about the new Navara aren’t groundbreaking, nor is much of the way it drives - but the changes Premcar has made to the suspension in this ute are well worth the extra outlay.
What Premcar has done with the Navara, on what we would guess is a relatively constrained budget, is find the most cost-effective way to make the ute better to drive.
They went with upgraded dampers which have been tuned to balance control and comfort with the ute’s off-road ability.
The result? A very controlled front-end, more communicative steering and confidence on the road to drive over even rough surfaces without fear of being flung off the road. Ladder-frame utes don't normally feel so controlled over rough surfaces at high speeds.
It’s worth noting that while the SL and ST still benefit from the suspension upgrades, the ST-X and Pro-4X in particular are much better to drive than you’d expect from a dual-cab ute.
Some of the roads around Canberra are particularly rough, even close to town where the speeds are lower, but the Navara handled myriad surfaces and conditions on- and off-road, in the soaking wet and when it was bone-dry.
Aside from one particular section of the launch that may have just been a little unkind to the ‘stiffer’ sidewalls on the ST-X compared to the Pro-4X, the Navara’s behaviour was not only confidence-building, but allowed for a degree of fun not normally present in the class.
The steering feel left no guesswork necessary, and there’s not a huge on-centre dead-spot as is often the case in a dual-cab. Nice and direct without being too heavy.
The Navara’s weak point, which still gets a pass mark, is probably that its drivetrain now feels older than the ute in which it lives. The outputs are passable, and the transmission finds the correct place well enough, but in a world of 10-speed autos in Rangers or petrol plug-in hybrids, a bog-standard turbo-diesel with six gears has to be bang-on perfect to keep up.
The Navara’s is adequate, but once you’re used to it, the drive experience is a step above most in the ute segment in terms of control, something that’s hard to come by in this segment.
It translates well to off-roading, where the ute’s front-end settles very quickly over ridges and undulating surfaces without the harshness of a too-stiff set of dampers.
Unsealed roads feel easily dispatched even at relatively high speeds, and with the right tyres (a la Pro-4X) the Navara is a seriously capable thing.
If you find yourself the owner of a D27 Navara and never leave the bitumen, you’re missing out.
Isuzu has done well to include pretty much the full range of safety features across all its variants, with the SX only missing out on rear parking sensors - it still has a camera though, obviously.
Key features like rear cross-traffic alert with braking and adaptive cruise control are standard, plus the D-Max achieved a five star crash safety rating from ANCAP, even though that was under slightly easier testing back in 2020.
The biggest (but only) gripe on-test with the D-Max’s safety gear was its lane-keep during adaptive cruise. There seemed to be a need for the ute to sit close to either the centre line or shoulder during cornering, which led to some discomfort on fast country roads.
The new Navara inherits the Triton’s maximum five-star ANCAP rating from testing in 2024. It scored notably well in Child Occupant protection, though its score for Safety Assist isn’t as high as some rivals.
Eight airbags mean the Navara’s got occupants cushioned in case of the worst, while the whole range has the same suite of safety tech, including a surround-view camera, forward collision warning and AEB, front- and rear-cross traffic alert, driver monitoring and traffic sign recognition, front and rear parking sensors and trailer sway control.
The Navara’s driver monitoring, however, suffers the same overzealousness as the Triton. Nissan didn’t reprogram any of the ADAS systems which means the car will regularly accuse you of being distracted if you’re not looking directly at the road ahead. Checking mirrors or a map in the centre screen will trigger this.
Isuzu’s six-year/150,000km warranty covers the D-Max, which could do without the limited distance, especially for a workhorse.
There’s also five years of flat-rate servicing every 12 months or 15,000km, costing $469 each time.
That’s gone up about $20 per visit since the update, with total cost over the five years at $2345.
There are 164 Isuzu dealers across the country, so finding somewhere to service shouldn’t be a challenge.
Nissan’s 10-year/300,000km warranty is fantastic but applies only if you service with Nissan. It’s five years with no kilometre limit otherwise.
There’s five years' of flat-price servicing at $499 per visit, every 12-months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.
Roadside assist is also free for a decade if you service with Nissan, or a year otherwise.
Given there are around 180 Nissan dealers nationwide, finding one shouldn’t be a challenge.