Infiniti Q30 vs Toyota RAV4

What's the difference?

The Q30 Sport is a left-field choice in the premium hatch segment. For those who don’t care about badge equity and are looking for something different, the Q30 provides maybe 70 per cent the feel of its well-established competition while offering decent value courtesy of standard safety and spec inclusions.

The biggest letdown is how much better it could be with just a little extra in every department. Even in this top-spec the drive experience is a bit generic, and it’s missing an up-to-date multimedia experience limiting its appeal to a younger audience.

Even with its promising mixed heritage, the Q30 hardly feels more than the sum of its parts.

The new Toyota RAV4 Cruiser Hybrid 2WD builds on what made it so popular in the first place. It’s easy to drive, efficient and well equipped, with enough features to suit a wide range of buyers.

The updated technology is a clear step forward and lifts the overall experience, but there are still elements that feel out of step with the flagship positioning, particularly the use of hard plastics and some less refined finishes. Even so, it remains a practical and well-rounded option in the segment.

The Q30 drew more than just looks for its badge. It genuinely looks like a concept car from a motor show stand. Not the paper mache Mars rover early prototype kind, more like the six-months-before-production kind.

It’s all swoopy with curves cutting all down the sides, and Infiniti has done a good job imprinting the brand’s signature design queues – like the chrome-framed grille and notched C-pillar - on the front and rear three-quarter views.

It’s genuinely hard to tell it shares major componentry with the last-gen (W176) A-Class from the outside and I’d place the overall look somewhere between Mazda and Lexus’ design languages for better or worse.

While the front is swoopy and resolved the rear is a bit busy with lines everywhere and bits of chrome and black trim all over the place. The tapered roofline and high bumpers set it apart from your regular hatchback fare. 

It might grab the eye for the wrong reasons, but it certainly gives the Q30 a slick look when viewed in profile. I wouldn’t call it a bad looking car, but it is divisive and will appeal only to certain tastes.

Inside is simple and plush. Perhaps a little too simple when compared with the new (W177) A-Class with its entirely digital dashboard or the 1 Series with its M bits. One could even argue the Audi A3 has done ‘simplicity’ better.

The seats are nice in the two-tone white-on-black trim and the Alcantara roof is a premium touch, but the rest of the dash is a bit too basic and dated. There’s a smattering of buttons down the centre stack which are replaced with more intuitive touchscreen functions on most rivals, and the 7.0-inch touchscreen looks small, distantly embedded in the dash.

The materials are all nice to the touch, with most important touch-points clad in leather, but it also feels a little claustrophobic, with the abundance of dark trim, thick roof pillars and a low roof-line, especially in the back seat. The switchgear, which is mostly dropped straight out of a Benz A-Class, feels good.

The previous RAV4 had a distinct, unmistakable look, particularly from the rear but the new design feels a little more subdued by comparison.

It leans into a more conventional SUV shape, with a front grille that borrows heavily from the HiLux, including a strong use of body-coloured panelling. It still presents well at the kerb, but it doesn’t quite have the same standout presence as before.

Inside is where the biggest changes have happened. The dashboard sits lower, there are more storage cubbies and the new displays modernise the space nicely. There are fewer physical buttons than before, with some seat and climate controls now integrated into the touchscreen. It’s not my preference, but overall the layout remains intuitive and easy to navigate.

Looking around the cabin, it still feels very Toyota in its execution. There’s a noticeable use of plastics, even in this flagship grade, though there are enough soft-touch areas to keep things feeling solid and well put together.

One small drawback is the dual-opening, reversible centre console lid as it tends to squeak and doesn’t feel quite as robust as the rest of the interior.

Infiniti calls the Q30 a “crossover” rather than a hatchback and this is best reflected through its pumped ride height. Rather than hugging the ground like the A-Class or 1 Series, the Q30 sits propped up, almost like a small SUV.

There’s also the QX30 which is an even more pumped version of this car complete with plastic guards in the vein of Subaru’s XV. The QX30 is also your only way to all-wheel drive now that the Q30 is front-wheel drive only. 

While the extra ride height means you won’t have to worry about scraping expensive body panels on speedbumps or steep ramps you won’t be wanting to get too brave off the tarmac.

Interior space is fine for front passengers with plenty of arm and legroom, but back seat passengers are left with a small, dark space which feels especially claustrophobic. Headroom is not great no matter which seat you’re in. In the front seat I could almost rest my head on the sun-visor (I’m 182cm tall) and the back seat was not much better.

Rear passengers do score nice seat trim and two air-conditioning vents though, so they haven’t totally been forgotten.

There’s average amounts of storage up front and in the back, with small bottle holders in each of the four doors, two on the transmission tunnel and a tiny trench – useful for keys maybe – in front of the air-conditioning controls.

Even the centre console box is shallow, despite a large opening. Once I had collected enough loose objects on my trip I started to run out of room for things in the cabin.

There are nettings on the back of the front seats and an odd extra one on the passenger’s side of the transmission tunnel.

Power outlets come in the form of a single USB port in the dash and a 12-volt outlet in the centre box.

The boot is a much better story despite the swoopy roofline with 430 litres of space available. That’s bigger than the A-Class (370L), 1 Series (360L), A3 (380L) and CT200h (375L). Needless to say, it ate up two large duffle bags and some extra items we brought with us for our week-long trip.

This is due to its impressive depth, but it does come at a cost. The Q30 only has the sound system’s base and an inflator kit under the boot floor. There’s no spare for long distance trips.

One irritation I have to mention is the shift-lever, which was annoying in its tilt-shift operation. Often when trying to change to drive from reverse or vice versa it would get stuck in neutral. Sometimes I wonder what’s wrong with a shifter which locks in position…

As far as mid-size SUVs go, the Toyota RAV4 still hits a solid beat when it comes to overall practicality. It doesn't get everything right but it does enough.

The space up front is generous and the seats are comfortable, especially with their added heat and ventilation functions. Access is decent enough with wide door apertures and an easy ground clearance and the only drawback is the high lip in the footwell, which can catch your foot slightly when getting out.

Storage is a highlight due the sheer number of options with a deep middle console, centre trays, sunglasses holder and dashboard shelving. Add in a couple of cupholders and drink bottle holders and it shouldn't be difficult to keep the cockpit tidy.

In the second row, there’s plenty of space for adults, with good leg- and headroom and a seat that’s supportive enough for longer trips. The leather trim feels nice, and practical touches like large map pockets and cupholders are appreciated.

However, for a flagship grade, it feels a little underdone on features. You get rear air vents and USB-C ports, but miss out on things like climate control, sunblinds and more thoughtful storage solutions. There are two ISOFIX points and three top-tether anchors, though realistically two child seats will fit best.

As mentioned, the technology upgrades are a big step forward. The new multimedia system is clean, responsive and easy to use, and while wireless Apple CarPlay can get confused if you have multiple device connections stored, it works seamlessly once pared back to one.

There’s built-in satellite navigation, a highly customisable digital instrument cluster that can display directions, and a solid mix of charging options including dual wireless pads, a 12-volt socket and four USB-C ports (two in each row).

Around the back, the boot is well-shaped and easy to load, with a claimed 705L of capacity when measured to the roofline. A powered tailgate, 12-volt socket and temporary spare tyre all add to its usability.

That said, the adjustable boot floor and cargo cover feel a bit flimsy and awkward in practice, which is slightly at odds with the otherwise practical and family-friendly focus.

There are six grades available in the new RAV4 line-up, split across a hybrid powertrain for now, with a plug-in hybrid set to join the range soon. We’re in the flagship Cruiser FWD hybrid for this family test, which is priced from $56,990, before on-road costs, and yes, that’s creeping close to $6.0K more than the outgoing model.

But here’s the twist, it’s still one of the more affordable options compared to its nearest rivals. The Hyundai Tucson Hybrid Premium starts at $58,350 MSRP, while the Kia Sportage GT-Line Hybrid FWD jumps significantly higher at $71,540 MSRP.

Even the Mazda CX-5 Akera, which sits in the same segment from $54,990, doesn’t offer a hybrid powertrain. So while the price hike stings a little, the value argument still stacks up.

Straight outta the gate, the biggest glow-up is the tech. The new 12.9-inch touchscreen runs Toyota’s 'Arene' operating system, bringing cleaner graphics, a more intuitive layout and over-the-air updates. It’s not as flashy as some rivals, but it’s a big step forward from the outgoing system and it’s easier to live with day-to-day.

There’s also a refreshed 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a colour head-up display and a digital rearview mirror.

Add in the nine-speaker JBL sound system, dual wireless charging pads, four USB-C ports and built-in satellite navigation and you have a nicely rounded tech package.

Being the flagship, the Cruiser leans into the premium feel with heated and ventilated electric front seats, leather upholstery, heated rear outboard seats and a panoramic moonroof. But interestingly, those last two are the only standout upgrades over lower grades.

Practical items include a powered tailgate, 12-volt socket and a temporary spare tyre but you miss out on some top-grade items in the second row that you might expect. Like climate control, device pockets and sunblinds. Omissions families will notice.

For 2019 the Q30 has had its list of engines trimmed from three to just one. The diesel and smaller 1.6-litre petrol engines have been culled, leaving a 2.0-litre petrol.

Thankfully, it’s a strong unit producing a once-V6-range 155kW/350Nm across a wide band from 1200-4000rpm.

It feels responsive and isn’t let down by a slick-shifting seven-speed dual clutch automatic transmission.

The new-generation A-Class equivalent, even in 2.0-litre A250 guise produces less torque with outputs of 165kW/250Nm, so for the money the Infiniti scores a solid serving of extra punch.

Under the bonnet, the RAV4 pairs a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with an electric motor as part of its updated hybrid system. Toyota doesn’t quote a combined torque figure, and total power has dropped slightly to 143kW, down 17kW from the previous front-wheel drive variant.

On paper, that reduction might raise a few eyebrows, but in practice it’s not something you notice often. What is more apparent is the improvement in refinement, with smoother transitions between electric and petrol power that make the overall driving experience feel more polished.

Over my week-long test the Q30 returned a figure of 9.0L/100km. I was a little disappointed with this figure given much of the distance covered was cruising at freeway speeds. 

It’s made worse when you pitch it against the claimed/combined figure of 6.3L/100km (not sure how you could achieve that…) and the fact that I left the irritating stop-start system on for much of the time.

For a leader in the luxury hatch class consider the Lexus CT200h which makes full use of Toyota’s hybrid drive and pitches a fuel consumption figure of 4.4L/100km.

The Q30 has a 56-litre fuel tank and takes a minimum of 95 RON premium unleaded.

Efficiency remains a strong point for the RAV4. Toyota claims a combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption figure of 4.5L/100km, and with a 55-litre fuel tank, that equates to a theoretical driving range of over 1000km.

In the real world, my average came in at 5.5L/100km across a mix of urban and open-road driving, which is an impressive result. The only caveat is Toyota’s recommendation for 95 RON premium fuel, which may add slightly to running costs over time.

Thanks to its shared underpinnings with the A-Class the Q30 Sport drives largely like you would expect a premium hatch to drive. It’s just lacking a bit of character.

The engine is responsive, the transmission is fast and the availability of peak torque from just 1200rpm will lead to spinning the front wheels if caution is not applied. Power is no real issue.

Although Infiniti says it has tuned the Q30 in Japan and Europe, the ride has an undeniably Germanic flavour. It doesn’t feel quite as tight as the A-Class or 1 Series but it doesn’t feel as soft as the CT200h, so it strikes a decent balance.

The Q30 uses MacPherson strut suspension in the front and multi-link at the rear, more suited to a premium car than the torsion bar rear on the new Benz A 200.

The wheel has a nice amount of feedback, and thankfully doesn’t use the larger Q50’s strange ‘Direct Adaptive Steering’ which has no mechanical connection between the driver and the road.

If you’ve driven a decently-specified A-Class before the drive experience will feel familiar. The added ride height seems to remove a bit of feel from the corners, however.

There’s also the inclusion of three drive modes – Economy, Sport and Manual. Economy mode seems to be the default with Sport simply holding gears for longer. Steering-wheel mounted paddle-shifters could be used to mill through the seven gears in 'Manual' mode, although this didn’t add much to the experience.

The addition of active cruise control and adaptive high beams proved to be fantastic for reducing fatigue on long highway stints during the night, but the lack of a padded surface on the inside of the transmission tunnel proved uncomfortable for the driver’s knee on longer trips.

I persisted with the stop-start system to test it, but it proved slow and irritating. Under normal circumstances it would be the first thing I’d turn off.

Visibility was also a bit limited out the rear three quarter courtesy of the low, swoopy C-pillars.

On the road, the RAV4 Hybrid 2WD performs confidently across most situations. It can sound a little strained when pushed hard, but there’s enough power on tap to keep up with traffic without issue.

The ride leans towards slightly firm, paired with responsive steering that gives it a more controlled feel through corners than you might expect. It remains stable at speed and around town feels punchy and easy to drive.

For those who prefer a stronger regenerative braking effect, switching to 'B' mode adds a noticeable increase, which works well in urban traffic. Refinement is another highlight. It’s impressively quiet on the move, even at highway speeds and feels well suited to longer trips.

One of the standout improvements is the 360-degree camera system. Where the previous version fell short, this one is clear and easy to use, making parking straightforward.

Due to myriad delays, Toyota wasn’t able to submit the new RAV4 for testing with ANCAP before the new and more stringent 2026 protocols kicked in, and thus it’s unrated for now, with a yet-to-be-detailed upgrade to come later to meet the stricter standard.

For now, it has a strong suite of safety equipment included, like eight-airbags, side exit assist, front and rear cross-traffic alert and emergency phone call capability. The adaptive cruise control is one of the better systems I’ve used in a long time and only the driver monitoring is annoyingly intrusive, otherwise the safety stuff seems well-calibrated for everyday use.

Other safety equipment includes lane departure warning, lane keeping aid, active steering assist, traffic sign recognition, and forward collision warning. There is also autonomous emergency braking (AEB), car, pedestrian and cyclist detection and junction turning assist.

For families there are two ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points.

As with all Infiniti products, the Q30 is covered by a four-year/100,000km warranty and a three-year service program can be purchased with the car. Pricing was not available for the 2019 Q30 model year at the time of writing, but its 2.0-litre turbo predecessor averaged $540 per service once a year or every 25,000km.

Credit where credit is due, the Q30 edges out the European competition by a year of warranty length and general service pricing. This market segment is still wide open for a manufacturer to take the lead offering five or more years of warranty coverage.

The RAV4 is backed by Toyota’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which now sits slightly behind some rivals offering longer coverage (upwards of seven-years on some).

Servicing is more competitive. A five-year capped price program comes in at $1625, averaging $325 per visit, with intervals set at 12 months or 15,000km. That’s well priced for the segment.

You also get complimentary roadside assistance, which is service-activated, along with a one-year subscription to the 'myToyota Connect' app. This allows remote access to functions like climate control and locking or unlocking the vehicle, adding a layer of convenience.