Ford Ranger vs Gac Aion Ut

What's the difference?

The Super Duty is the most formidable workhorse in the Ranger fleet. It projects a feeling of immense strength each time you drive it, reflecting payload and tow ratings well beyond traditional limits for vehicles of this size combined with formidable all-terrain capabilities. For tradies wanting the ultimate Ranger workhorse, the Super Duty is clearly in a class of its own - a class which it created.

The Aion UT is a cleverly-specified little hatchback and a great entry-point into electric motoring. The software needs a bit of work from a usability perspective, plus the spongy ride and cutesy styling might not be for everyone. 

However, with strong points including driving range, cabin space and value, there’s even a pitch for it in some cases to be an only car compared to most of its price rivals, which are more likely to be thought of as a second car runabout in a two-car garage.

The pick of the range is definitely the entry-level Premium. It comes in at a headline-grabbing price with specs to blow rivals out of the water, while only missing out on a few luxuries.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The Super Duty, originally based on Ford’s F-series full-size US pickup range, has been a mainstay on farms, building sites and in remote terrain since its inception as a standalone model in 1998, but this is the first time the nameplate has been applied to the Aussie designed and developed Ranger.

Ford claims the Ranger Super Duty resulted from extensive consultation with workers in industries that depend on their trucks in the harshest remote environments, from forestry crews and emergency service workers to land managers and fleet teams.

The challenge was to create a medium-sized truck with higher payload/tow ratings and greater all-terrain capability, as the only vehicles strong enough to carry their gear were too big and unwieldy to access critical locations.

In response, the Ranger Super Duty features a unique reinforced version of the Ranger’s chassis frame, incorporating readily accessible mounting points for a variety of aftermarket accessories and specialised equipment.

There’s also a new heavy-duty rear axle assembly with the largest and strongest differential ever fitted to a production Ranger for enhanced load-carrying capacity, paired with a unique uprated version of the US Bronco Raptor’s front diff.

The two-speed transfer case also has larger and stronger components than the regular Ranger and its low-speed gearset has been upgraded to match the F-series Super Duty.

Other chassis enhancements include uprated eight-stud wheel hubs with stronger bolts, improved cooling system to manage engine temps under heavy loads and during sustained off-road driving, a sealed engine snorkel and high-mounted breathers for the drivetrain/fuel system to enable its 850mm wading depth (50mm deeper than standard Ranger) and more. There was also a brutal and prolonged durability testing program to validate its Super Duty status.

Off-road credentials include steep 36.3 degrees approach, 26.9 degrees ramp breakover and 29.3 degrees departure angles, 299mm ground clearance and an expansive 13.6-metre turning circle which is the largest of all Ranger variants including the wide-tyred Raptor.

GAC tells us the UT hatch was designed in Milan, Italy, but it also isn’t ashamed of the Chinese influence on its overall appearance, like the ultra-short bonnet and Chinese city-car style face.

Along the side it has a modern, aerodynamic profile, and the ultra-short overhangs and long wheelbase maximise the amount of room for batteries under the floor and interior space.

The rear feels a lot like a modern Mini, with its bulbous tailgate and protruding light clusters, spiced up with a sporty spoiler piece jutting out.

It’s not a bad looking thing and it’s available in an array of fun colours.

On the inside it seems to follow the established rule-book of Chinese automakers, with plush trims, big screens with minimal physical buttons as well as a contemporary two-spoke steering wheel.

There’s a trendy floating console which hosts the cupholders and wireless charger on the Luxury grade, and an array of interesting patterns and textures through the doors and dash which you wouldn’t have once seen on a car at this price-point.

However, it is worth noting that while the seats are quite nice, and the steering wheel is a stand-out touchpoint, the trims on the doors and across the dash-top are hard plastics, more so than some of this car’s rivals.

Proof of the increased solidity of the Ranger Super Duty single cab-chassis is its hefty 2518kg kerb weight, which in bare cab-chassis form (without tray) is 625kg more than a standard 2.0L Ranger XL single cab-chassis 4x4 equivalent.

The Super Duty’s 4500kg GVM results in a huge 1982kg payload limit. It’s also rated to tow up to 4500kg of braked trailer and with its towering 8000kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum 4.5 tonne trailer weight while hauling almost one tonne of payload.

These are big numbers when compared to our standard XL Ranger example, given that the Super Duty has a 645kg higher payload rating, 1000kg higher tow rating and 1650kg higher GCM rating.

The galvanised full steel tray is equipped with six internal load anchorages, each rated up to 1800kg, which lie flush with the checker-plate floor when not in use.

There’s also external rope rails beneath the tray along each side and a sturdy front bulkhead with wire-mesh rear window protection.

As previously highlighted, this tray ensemble includes a driver-side lockable toolbox and passenger-side water tank (complete with handwash pump bottle) mounted behind their respective rear wheels.

Its work-focused interior is a comfortably familiar place for Ranger single cab-chassis workhorse owners, with fabric bucket seats, wipe-clean vinyl floor and large ‘Super Duty’ lettering embossed in the passenger side dash.

Cabin storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, pop-out cupholders on each side of the dash, an overhead glasses holder, upper/lower glove boxes plus a well-equipped centre console with wireless phone charging, USB ports, two cupholders, 400W (230V) inverter and a storage box with internal 12V socket and padded lid that doubles as an elbow rest.

In terms of interior space, the Aion UT stands out with its spacious cabin. At 182cm tall, I am easily able to find a comfortable seating position, and visibility out the front sides and rear, while not as good as some small SUVs, isn’t bad.

There’s lots of headroom, and while I mentioned the hard plastic door cards before, there’s enough padding everywhere your elbows are going to touch to make it feel a bit nicer than perhaps it is.

The main drawback of this car for me is the lack of tactile buttons and the frustrating software.

The main screen isn’t particularly well utilised, being taken up by either a background or the navigation map, with an array of typically small shortcuts across the bottom for important features like the climate control or settings menus.

You can pre-set a few information panels which sit above the shortcut bar as in many rival cars and there’s also a shortcut tray which can be hosted on the driver’s side and configured with a variety of shortcuts and settings.

It’s just a bit clumsy to use, and the array of poorly-labelled settings menus for things like active safety equipment feel needlessly complicated.

I’d love to see this car with physical controls for climate and multimedia to make it easier to live with.

Up front the storage is decent. There are big pockets in the doors and a large storage tray between the driver and front passenger thanks to a flat floor. There’s also a slightly weird storage box under the touchscreen which has a net inside, good for more delicate objects you don’t want flying around the cabin.

On the floating console there are two cupholders which are a bit too shallow for my liking, and the wireless charger feels almost pointless because its made of a hard plastic, so your phone just slides right off in the corners. The cabled outlets are hidden beneath which allows for tidy cable management and the centre armrest console box is a healthy size.

The rear seat is comparatively basic, although touches on the key points. Its main advantage is how generous the space is. My frame was able to fit behind my own driving position with heaps of room for my knees, and just enough room for my head despite the dip in the roof for the sunroof shade in the Luxury-grade car we tested. There may be even more headroom in the base car.

The flat floor makes the space useful even for three across in a pinch and there’s a drop-down armrest with (again, shallow) cupholders. There are pockets on the back of both front seats and smallish pockets in each door. The array of soft trims continues, too, and the back of the centre console features a partially adjustable air vent. Luxury spec cars get a single USB rear power outlet.

As with many Chinese cars in this segment, the generous rear seat space comes at a cost to the boot. It measures just 321 litres, which is slightly smaller than its main opponents in this category, although larger than some hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla, for example.

It has its advantages, though. The floor is two-tiered, and can offer a flat load area with the rear seats folded down, or a deeper boot in its lower position. Underneath there’s a cutaway good for charging equipment and the tyre repair kit (sorry, no spare wheel in here).

Unlike some EVs, the Aion UT doesn’t get a frunk (front boot) for additional storage.

The GAC Aion UT starts from $31,990, before on-road costs, for the entry-level Premium grade, which makes it the third-most affordable EV you can buy in Australia after the city-sized BYD Atto 1 and the entry-level version of the BYD Dolphin.

It sits closer to price-parity with the GWM Ora, but is significantly more affordable than the rear-drive MG4 and more spec-competitive top-grade BYD Dolphin.

The bigger threat to the Aion UT is that a lot of buyers will be willing to spend slightly more to get into one of the most affordable electric small SUVs, like the BYD Atto 2 or Jaecoo J5.

Still, GAC makes a solid pitch for its hatch, which offers a higher spec level than its most direct price rivals.

For example, the Aion UT is more powerful than the entry-level Dolphin and Ora while offering a higher level of interior equipment. 

Even the just-arrived front-drive MG4 Urban also starts at $31,990, but that’s for a version with significantly less driving range.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say the entry-level version of the Aion UT (the confusingly-named Premium) is probably the pick of the two variant range.

Standard equipment levels on this car include 17-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting all around, synthetic leather interior trim with heated and power adjust front seats, a 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen with online connectivity and built-in nav as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

There’s also an 8.88-inch digital instrument cluster, heated steering wheel and the full array of safety kit.

With the same power and battery size, this leaves only arguably unnecessary luxuries for the Luxury grade, like a wireless phone charger, ventilated driver’s seat, auto dimming rear vision mirror with auto power folding wing mirrors, a powered tailgate and of course, a panoramic sunroof (with shade!).

All Ranger Super Duty models are powered by the same 3.0-litre V6 turbo-diesel, which meets tough Euro 6.2 emission standards using AdBlue. It produces 154kW of power at 3250rpm and a towering 600Nm of torque at 1750rpm.

This is paired with a 10-speed torque converter automatic with the choice of sequential manual-shifting using a toggle switch on the shift knob. It also offers seven drive modes to optimise performance in different terrain applications.

The full-time 4WD transfer case allows drivers to switch between high and low ranges and access other technologies when tackling difficult terrain including 'Trail Control' (low-speed off-road cruise control), 'Trail Turn Assist' (applies braking to the inside rear wheel to tighten turning radius), front and rear diff locks and more.

The Aion UT has a front-mounted electric motor producing 150kW/210Nm. That’s plenty punchy for any hatchback at this price, and I like the way the brand hasn’t messed around with a sub-100kW motor in the base variant to push prospects towards the top-spec car.

It’s more powerful than all of its closest rivals and at the time of writing you’ll have to spend four to six thousand dollars more to get into something equivalent from BYD, Chery, Jaecoo, Leapmotor or MG.

It even has a claimed 0-100km/h sprint time as low as 7.3 seconds.

Vehicles in this GVM class do not come with official fuel consumption figures. Even so, we clocked up 385km during our tradie-focused test which included our usual mix of suburban, city, highway and unsealed road driving, of which about one quarter was hauling its near maximum payload.

When we stopped to refuel at the end of our test, the dash display was showing average combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) consumption of 13.4L/100km which was lower than our own figure of 15.5 calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings.

That’s still decent economy for a heavy-duty off-roader driven in the daily grind of metro traffic, during which it hauled more than one tonne of payload for a day.

Therefore, based on our own test figures, you could expect a real-world driving range of more than 800km from its big 130-litre diesel tank.

The Aion UT has a 60kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery pack, which grants it a WLTP-certified 430km of driving range.

That’s more than its closest rivals, like the entry-level Ora Standard Range (310km), BYD Dolphin Essential (410km) or BYD Atto 2 (345km).

Claimed efficiency is 16.4kWh/100km and the car I tested returned a consumption of 14.0kWh/100km over a 130km route of mixed conditions, which isn’t bad at all.

Charging speeds are less impressive, but realistically appropriate for the relatively small battery. The peak DC charging capacity of 87kW means a charge time which the brand quotes at 24 minutes, but this is from 30-80 per cent. Expect closer to 40 minutes for a 10-80 per cent charge.

AC charging is decent, at 11kW. This should have you charging from 10-80 per cent between four and five hours.

It has a comfortable driving position with huge door mirrors providing commanding views. There’s also plenty of headroom for blokes my size (186cm) plus manual adjustment of the steering wheel and seat (including lumbar support) and a big left footrest for additional support.

The steering feels great like all Rangers, backed by sure-footed handling and strong braking response. The unladen ride quality is surprisingly supple for such a heavy lifter, given the combined effect of its baggy tyre sidewalls and the vehicle's substantial sprung weight helping to iron out the bumps.

Given its hefty kerb mass, acceleration feels slightly subdued compared to a standard V6 Ranger, as you’d expect. However, it still provides a satisfying surge of response in urban use thanks to 600Nm of torque and gearing that keeps the engine operating at or near its peak torque output at around 1800rpm.

It’s a relaxed highway cruiser with low engine and tyre noise. The most noticeable ingress at these speeds is mild wind buffeting around bulky fixtures like the engine snorkel, door mirrors and tray bulkhead, but it’s not overly intrusive with conversation not requiring raised voices.

To test its payload rating we firstly put our test vehicle on a public weighbridge. Unladen and with a full tank of fuel, it tipped the scales at 3130kg which after deducting the 2518kg base kerb weight revealed a sizeable combined accessory weight of 612kg.

So, given accessories are included in kerb weight, the Super Duty’s 'naked' 1982kg payload rating drops by the same amount to 1370kg, which is still a mighty capacity for a vehicle of this size.

We strapped 975kg on the tray, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 1150kg (still more than 200kg under its limit) which the onboard scales vaguely confirmed. The robust rear leaf springs compressed a mere 30mm in response, leaving ample bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming out on our test route.

The Super Duty carried this payload with arrogant ease, maintaining its surefooted handling and scoffing at our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb. It also displayed strong engine braking on the way down, in a convincing demonstration of its heavy load hauling ability.

The drive experience can be where a lot of Chinese cars fall down but I walked away less frustrated by the Aion UT.

That’s not to say it will behave as you might expect a low-slung hatchback to. The suspension, for example, is extremely soft as it maintains its original Chinese-market state-of-tune.

This makes the car waft over imperfections on city roads. And in that sense it offers supreme ride comfort in the scenarios it was designed for. However, at the extremes, like some speed bumps, or particularly deep pot holes there can be a surprisingly violent re-bound sending a thud through the cabin.

The other trade-off for soft suspension is less body control. I was surprised to find that the Aion UT holds it together mostly well on a flat country B-road, but when undulations and big dips introduce themselves, the soft suspension can be too slow to react, making the car lose confidence in higher-speed open road scenarios we’re more used to in Australia.

The steering, like many electric cars in this category, is relatively heavily electrically assisted. This makes it light and easy to adjust at low speeds for easy park and maneuverability in the confines of a city. It loses a little bit of road-feel at higher speeds but the Aion UT’s steering is far from the least connected I’ve experienced recently.

One thing it can’t be criticised for is a lack of power. With 150kW instantaneously available the Aion UT has some serious poke and while the ChaoYang tyre package is tuned more for efficiency than grip, it’s again not one of the worst I’ve driven with.

One thing which helps the whole experience along is this car’s hatchback layout. With the weight of the battery low and squat and the wheels all the way out to the edges of the frame, the Aion UT inherently handles decently compared to an electric crossover or small SUV.

Like all Chinese cars, the UT has a host of occasionally frustrating driver aids, which you can read about in the Safety section below. While I was inclined to turn some of the features off after testing them, the alerts are relatively quiet and non-invasive.

Is the UT any good to drive? It’s not bad for the segment, I was largely pleased with how it handled and the power on offer, and while it still has its annoyances, they’re not big deal-breakers. 

The MG4 rear-drive is a better allrounder, while the GWM Ora isn’t as good. I’d say it’s on par with the BYD Dolphin, but they excel in different areas. The Dolphin's a bit sharper in terms of handling but the Aion UT is more comfortable.

As with many Chinese cars the list of active safety equipment is long but that doesn’t mean it’s particularly well calibrated.

Standard gear includes the key stuff like auto emergency braking (AEB), lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and adaptive cruise control. There are also rarer features for an affordable car like this including traffic sign recognition, door open warning, auto high beams and front cross-traffic alert.

On the parking front you get a 360-degree parking camera view as well as front and rear proximity sensors.

There's also an annoying driver monitoring system and one I haven’t seen much in the form of an occupant warning system, which seems to imagine you’re not wearing a seatbelt when you are.

It’s not the only safety system I found myself reaching to turn off. The lane keep assist could occasionally be a bit heavy-handed and the traffic sign alert was typically frustrating. This, sadly, is what we’ve come to expect from these types of systems from many Chinese automakers.

It’s not the most annoying system I’ve used, though, and the alerts are quiet enough and far enough apart that they aren't as intrusive as they can be in some rivals. You can also adjust the tolerance of some of the systems in the (needlessly complicated) menus to make them less annoying.

At the launch, the Aion UT was yet to be rated by ANCAP.

The Ranger Super Duty comes with the same five years/unlimited km warranty shared by all Ranger models, with up to seven years of conditional roadside assist available if serviced at Ford dealerships.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Ford offers a pre-paid service plan that provides capped price servicing for the first five scheduled services up to five years/75,000km, which totals $2100 or a reasonable average of $420 per service.

Ford has a long-established network of around 180 dealers spanning all states and territories including key rural and regional areas.

GAC covers this electric hatch with an eight-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the brand’s “magazine battery 2.0” is covered by a separate eight-year and 200,000km warranty. Five years of roadside assistance is included.

The Aion UT needs to be serviced once a year or 15,000km. The service price schedule extends all the way out to 240,000km with yearly visits costing between $199 and $640 but for the life of the warranty the average yearly cost comes in at $352.

There are currently 19 GAC dealers in Australia, confined mainly to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane with a single store in Perth and an outlier in Cairns. No representation yet in Tassie, Canberra, the Northern Territory or SA.