Volvo C40 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class

What's the difference?

The C40 becomes a compelling option in the electrified small SUV space, offering a premium look and feel, great range and tech inclusions at the price, as well as awesome on-road dynamics.

Its main downsides are the rear seat, which is compromised by its platform and design-led roofline, and the overwhelming power and added traction of the dual-motor makes the single motor less attractive on the value front.

Still, regardless of variant chosen, the C40 looks to offer a stand-out balance of price, range, and performance, against its traditional rivals and newcomers alike.

The new Mercedes-Benz GLC200 might be the base-grade, but it doesn’t look or feel like it. From the outside, it’s stylish and refined, and inside, it delivers that signature Benz luxury with premium features, impressive tech and a beautiful cabin.

While the engine isn’t wildly powerful, it’s more than capable for everyday driving and long stretches on the highway and the ride quality overall is smooth, quiet and composed. It loses points for being more expensive than its entry-grade rivals and for those steep ongoing servicing costs, which could be a sticking point for some buyers.

Volvo has become a brand with a distinctive and consistent design language which embodies the kind of beautiful minimalism normally associated with Scandinavian brands.

I have always liked how Volvo says more with less design elements, with only gentle touches of chrome or gloss black, and a lack of over-the-top sporty pieces avoiding the temptation to over-sell the sporty potential of the brand’s range.

The C40 takes the small SUV formula, well established by its XC40 relation, and gets a bit weird and experimental. It’s slightly lower and has a more coupe-styled rear, with a strongly raked rear window giving it a sportier and more aggressive look than the rest of Volvo’s SUV range.

The styling is sold by an angular spoiler piece running atop the boot, and the rear light clusters have gone all minimalist, constructed of individual pieces rather than a single transparent housing, and they give a nod to the C30 hatchback which this car is the spiritual successor to, by name and nature.

The interior offers up no surprises, sticking to the formula Volvo has established across all of its current models. An effortlessly premium space with, again, a minimalistic dash dominated by the portrait touchscreen, the C40’s premium nature is confirmed by its finely patterned inlays, simple chrome pieces, and abundance of soft-touch surfaces.

The big upright vent fittings with clever rhomboid patterns on their adjustment dials are always a highlight piece of modern Volvos, and the pattern work is continued on the central volume adjust dial and even on the little rotating pieces of the light and wiper stalks. Clever.

Even the software is paired back on the multimedia suite and digital dashboard, with easy to use shortcuts and simple menus which suit the car.

Volvo might turn off some buyers with the more unconventional shape of the C40. But for those looking for a more traditional SUV it also offers the XC40 in the same two variants, and the Polestar 2 caters to those not looking for an SUV at all.

The GLC is a handsome SUV with a strong, confident stance. It looks fit and premium, but not overly sporty, especially with the standard 'Avantgarde' exterior styling seen on our test car.

The entry-level grade rolls on 19-inch alloy wheels, features slimline running boards, LED lighting all around and an interior ambient lighting package that even includes logo 'puddle light' projection from the side mirrors.

Inside, the GLC200 doesn’t skimp on style. You get sports seats trimmed in synthetic leather (available in a range of colours), plus a panoramic sunroof, flashy dual displays and a black headliner that adds a cocooned feel.

The ambient lighting is a real standout and reminiscent of sci-fi films like Tron! It adds to the cabin’s upmarket vibe.

Combined with the soft-touch surfaces and neat trim details, the interior feels luxurious. And to be frank, it should at this level. But not every base-grade SUV in this segment gets it right. This one does.

The C40 is essentially a XC40 with a cropped down roofline, and there are some obvious downsides which this new shape brings.

The front seat throws no surprises, though, offering plenty of room for two adults with a welcome level of adjustability for the seat and wheel. The seats could be more comfortable, though, with a notable lack of padding in the base compared to some luxury (or even non-luxury) rivals. 

I’m a fan of the fabric trim which comes on both grades, bucking the trend of needing to have leather or leather-like trim for a car to feel ‘premium’.

The ample window space up front, including the massive glass roof helps the C40’s cabin feel spacious, but the view out the rear with its aggressive design is all but a very limited letterbox aspect, particularly if the rear seat headrests are in the upright position. 

While some controls are exclusively via touch interface, there is a physical volume dial, and shortcut buttons for the defogger functions. 

Temperature is controlled by touch, however, and the detail settings have some smaller toggle adjustments. Tricky to jab at when you’re on the move.

The digital dash is refreshingly simple, but minimally adjustable, with the choice of either a nifty navigation screen, a blank screen, or trip details being the only options.

Cabin storage is good but not stellar. There are bottle holders and big pockets in the doors, a set of two cupholders in the centre (beats the Polestar 2’s single cupholder), a small tray with a wireless charger under the multimedia screen, and a smallish console armrest box.

The rear seat is where the real problem exists. Unlike the XC40, the C40’s cropped roofline means my head was hard up against the roof (I’m 182cm tall). 

I did have decent knee room behind my own seating position, however the seat comfort in the back still isn’t as good as some rivals. 

The middle position is also compromised, thanks to the raised centre floor piece the C40’s platform needs to facilitate all-wheel drive in its combustion relations.

A bottle holder appears in each door pocket, and in a rare inclusion, there are heated outboard rear seats, adjustable air vents, and USB-C charging ports.

The boot has a quoted capacity of 413 litres with the rear seats up. The floor is comparatively high suggesting a smallish space when loaded with luggage cases, for instance. Stay tuned for a follow-up review so we can see how well it holds our three-piece demo set.

The floor itself has an adjustable, pop-up divider and multiple luggage hooks, making it quite versatile, and there is a cavity beneath which can hold your charging cables as well as the inflator kit in place of a spare wheel.

The cabin is spacious in both rows, with decent access thanks to wide door apertures and 195mm of ground clearance. That said, it’s the kind of cockpit you sort of tuck into and I knocked a knee or elbow on the steering wheel getting in (my husband joked this was just a user issue). My eight-year old had no trouble hopping in and out, though.

The front seats are best described as sumptuous, with features like expandable under-thigh and lumbar support. It’s super easy to get comfortable and stay that way, a big plus for anyone who does long drives, like I do.

The rear seats are equally comfy, with generous padding and deep bases. You’ll find three top-tether points in the back row, but realistically, it’s a space better suited to two child seats.

Keeping the cabin tidy is simple thanks to thoughtful storage throughout. There are deep door bins with drink bottle holders, a couple of cupholders in each row, a largish glove box and a dual-lid centre console.

Up front, there’s also a phone cubby, two USB-C ports and a wireless charging pad. In the rear, you get another two USB-C ports and some handy map pockets.

The boot has proven to be a practical space, with 620L of capacity and a level load floor. There’s a reversible mat and underfloor storage, which is also where you’ll find the space-saver spare tyre.

This grade now includes a powered tailgate, a welcome addition, and the second row folds electrically in a 40/20/40 split, giving you more flexibility when you need it.

The updated media display is easy enough to use once you spend a bit of time with it. The touchscreen is responsive, and wireless Apple CarPlay maintained a steady connection throughout our test. I also appreciated how the instrument cluster and head-up display pull through directions from either your phone or the in-built sat nav system.

There are five variants in the GLC range, and for this review we’re testing the new entry-level GLC200, priced from $84,455, before on-road costs.

While it’s definitely more affordable than the next step up, the GLC300, it still wears the highest price tag among its base-grade rivals, with the Audi Q5 35 TDI starting from $73,400 and the BMW X3 xDrive20i from $77,601.

That said, the GLC200’s generous equipment list could easily convince you it sits higher in the range. Standard features include 19-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather trim as well as electric front seats with memory, heating and Mercedes’ ‘kinetic’ function.

You also get a panoramic sunroof, a slick 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, a colour head-up display and a vertical 11.9-inch media screen running an upgraded operating system with satellite navigation plus wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

Practicality hasn't been overlooked, either. There’s a space-saver spare tyre (a welcome change from the run-flat tyre solution often employed by Euro brands), a handsfree powered tailgate, adaptive LED headlights, dual-zone climate control, four USB-C ports, two 12-volt sockets and a wireless charging pad.

Our test car also includes the optional 'Plus Package', which adds $5846 to the price. It bundles in a 15-speaker Burmester sound system, digital matrix LED headlights, heated and noise-insulating glass, augmented reality navigation and a digital key via the Mercedes-Benz app.

You’ll also find a few extra safety additions here, such as a lane centering aid, emergency steering assist, interior monitoring and external surveillance for added occupant protection and theft deterrence.

Overall, a bit more expensive but you get an impressive amount of features.

Great news here, the C40 can be chosen with two powerful layouts, either a front-wheel drive 170kW/330Nm set-up, or a dual-motor all-wheel drive arrangement, able to make use of nearly double the power at 300kW/660Nm. The dual-motor is capable of sprinting from 0-100km/h in just 4.7 seconds.

The front-drive is backed by a 69kWh battery allowing it a 434km range, while the dual motor ups the battery size to 78kWh to allow a 420km driving range.

The GLC200 is powered by a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine paired with a 48-volt mild-hybrid system, producing up to 150kW of power and 320Nm of torque. It’s the least powerful engine in the GLC range, but still manages to feel punchy when you need it to.

This all-wheel-drive variant is paired with a nine-speed automatic transmission. While it can feel a little twitchy at lower speeds when the auto start/stop system is active, it’s otherwise a smooth and well-matched combination for everyday driving.

Surprisingly, energy consumption is quite high for both C40 variants. The single motor is the more efficient of the two, consuming 16.8kWh/100km on the more lenient ADR testing schedule, while the dual motor officially consumes 22.2kWh/100km to the same standard. I saw around 23kWh/100km overall in my short test of the dual-motor variant.

Energy consumption could be better for both, as I have achieved more consistently impressive results particularly from Hyundai and Kia electric cars.

Where the C40 is more impressive though is its charging specs, which are exactly where they need to be for a car this size. On a rapid DC charger, the C40 can charge at a rate of 150kW meaning a 10 - 80 percent charge in 40 minutes for the dual motor, or 32 minutes for the single motor.

On the slower AC standard, the C40 charges at a rate of 11kW. Expect a 10 - 80 percent charge time of around five or six hours on this standard. 

The C40 uses a European-standard Type 2 CCS charging port, although it misses out on the handy two-way charging feature offered by some rivals.

The GLC200 has an official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption figure of 7.5L/100km and with its 62-litre fuel tank, you’re looking at a theoretical driving range of up to 826km which are solid figures for a family cruiser.

In real-world testing, I averaged 7.8L/100km, mostly around town with one longer trip thrown in. Overall, I’m pretty happy with its efficiency.

Mercedes-Benz recommends a minimum of 95 RON premium unleaded petrol for this model.

If you’ve driven any kind of XC40 or even a Polestar 2 before, the C40 will offer no surprises. It’s pretty much exactly the same from behind the wheel with a few subtle tweaks.

This is a very good thing. The C40 is quiet, easy to drive, and its electric motor and regen system offer a smooth single-pedal experience.

It is also alarmingly, overwhelmingly, rapid. While its massive set of batteries under the floor make it feel heavy off the line in stop-start traffic, sticking your boot into the accelerator will remove any doubt, particularly in the dual-motor variant, that this Volvo means business.

The dual-motor also has an incredible torque-vectoring system, making it extremely difficult to elicit so much as a squeak from its tyres. It also feels as though torque is distributed quite evenly between its two driven axles, making it feel neither prone to over- or understeer.

This has the effect of making the C40 feel somewhat indestructible in the corners, with absurd levels of grip. 

The same feeling is present in top-spec versions of the Polestar 2, only the feeling of ever-present weight is more noticeable in the higher-riding C40, which can make it unsettling to take corners at the kinds of speeds it is capable of.

The steering tune is interesting. Volvo offers two software-controlled modes, either heavy or standard, and the standard mode is heavy enough. 

Despite its electrical assistance, the wheel does continue to offer some organic feedback, making the C40 a pleasure to steer on countryside roads.

The ride is also surprisingly good, despite massive wheel options. I was impressed how easily the C40 handled most bumps and undulations, communicating little to the cabin. 

The ride can approach its limits with such big wheels and the weight of its batteries, generally these are communicated via unsettling thuds from underneath the car. Regular undulations at higher speeds also had the C40 bouncing around a little.

On the whole, though, the cabin is kept relatively insulated and serene, adding an element of total confidence, similar to that offered by Teslas, whilst offering better ride quality with a softer edge. At higher speed, at least on the 20-inch wheels, road noise does pick up, however.

In terms of electric driving, there is a single adjustable setting for regen. The car either offers a full single pedal mode with maximum regenerative braking to bring the car to a halt with the motor alone, or a ‘standard’ mode which tones the regen down and offers it blended in via the brake pedal. 

Single pedal mode is more efficient. I suggest you stick to it if you want to make the most of this car’s efficiency.

I was surprised to have so few complaints about the C40’s drive experience. This is a balanced and capable EV which is yet another example of how even vehicles which use combustion platforms are improved out of sight by full electrification.

Despite having the ‘baby’ engine in the range, the GLC200 doesn’t feel underpowered. Power delivery is generally quick, and there’s enough in reserve when you need to get up to speed or overtake. It’s responsive and confident in everyday driving.

That said, the auto start/stop feature is frustrating around town, especially at give way signs or roundabouts where you’re more likely to pause than come to a full stop.

It will cut the engine, and then when you want to accelerate, there’s a delay - sometimes even a little rollback. Not ideal, and definitely something that takes away from the otherwise polished drive.

The suspension hits a lovely balance, it’s forgiving but not floaty. You feel the road just enough to stay connected without it ever feeling harsh, which means the ride stays smooth and composed. It’s also a lovely highway cruiser, easily settling into long stretches with comfort and ease.

Visibility is solid, with minimal blind spots thanks to slim pillars, and the steering is responsive. It corners with confidence, too, with very little body roll, which isn’t always the case in a mid-size SUV.

Parking is straightforward thanks to a clear 360-degree camera system and park assist. The reversing camera turns with the steering wheel, which takes a moment to adjust to, but ultimately makes tight manoeuvres that little bit easier.

The GLC carries a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating, based on testing conducted in 2022. It scored an excellent 92 per cent in both adult and child occupant protection, which gives plenty of peace of mind for families.

It’s also well-equipped when it comes to safety tech. There are 10 airbags in total, including a front centre airbag and side chest airbags for both rows; a solid showing in this segment.

Even without the optional Plus Package, the GLC comes loaded with safety features including blind-spot monitoring, side exit assist, lane departure alert, lane keeping aid and traffic sign recognition.

There's also driver attention warning, a 360-degree camera view, front and rear parking sensors, forward collision warning, intelligent seatbelt reminders and rear cross-traffic alert.

With the Plus Package, you add interior and exterior monitoring systems, along with something called 'Pre-Safe Impulse Side'; a clever feature that gently moves front occupants away from the doors if a side impact is imminent.

Autonomous emergency braking is also included, with pedestrian, cyclist, car and backover detection. It operates from 7.0-80km/h (or up to 250km/h for vehicles), which is slightly higher than most systems that usually activate from 5.0km/h.

In the back, there are ISOFIX child seat mounts on the outboard seats and three top-tether anchor points across the row.

The C40 is covered by Volvo’s five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with a separate eight-year, 160,000km warranty for the battery. There is also eight years of roadside assistance attached.

It is pleasing to see the service intervals for the C40 are long, as they should be for an electric car with so few moving parts, set at two years or 30,000km. 

The first 24 month service is free of charge, and Volvo tells us service pricing after this period will average out to around $100 a year ($200 per visit).

The GLC is backed by a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which puts it on par with key rivals in this space. Servicing intervals are generous, too, at every 12 months or 25,000km. Great news if you rack up a lot of kilometres.

But the catch? Servicing costs are steep. Mercedes-Benz offers pre-paid servicing plans in three-, four-or five-year bundles, and the five-year package will set you back $7350. That averages out to almost $1500 per visit. Oof.

For comparison, the Audi Q5’s five-year plan is $3520, and BMW’s five-year 'Basic Service Inclusive' package for the X3 is $2475. So, while the GLC might win on features and finish, it definitely asks more of you when it comes to ongoing costs.