Volkswagen Transporter vs MG Cyberster

What's the difference?

So has Volkswagen done enough with this new Transporter to win back buyers in what has become a highly-competitive van market?

Based on our initial test drive of the Transporter, it’s safe to say Volkswagen has a good chance of regaining some lost ground. But it won’t be easy because there isn’t any particular area where the Transporter really sets itself apart from the competition.

It’s a pleasant van to drive, with a roomy, modern cabin and a competitive cargo area, at least with the diesel engine. The electric Transporter provides an alternative choice for a small audience, but the huge price premium and limited range will mean it won’t suit the vast majority of buyers.

The real opportunity for VW will come when the PHEV arrives in 2026. That has the potential to help create some difference between itself and the likes of Toyota and Hyundai.

It’s noticeable that the brands dominating the commercial van market are the big name ones, rather than the cheaper Chinese competition, which suggests buyers are looking for a trusted name rather than the lowest price.

So from that perspective, Volkswagen has a decent chance of regaining lost ground given its heritage in the van segment.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with meals provided.

The Cyberster is certainly an impressive thing in a lot of ways, but if you were expecting a perfect sports car from MG, you'll be a bit disappointed. 

It's quite expensive if you're looking for a nice EV, but on the flip side it's quite cheap if being fast is your main concern.

If anything, the Cyberster is an exciting look at what the brand is capable of, even if it's a bit rough around the edges.

Commercial vans are typically not instruments of design, but rather a study in functionality. But credit to the Volkswagen designers because it clearly looks like a Volkswagen from the outside, despite its Ford lineage. While there are obviously some similarities between the Transporter and Transit Custom inside, the front-end design definitely has a visual connection to the previous generation models.

But, of course, functionality is important and by using the Transit Custom underpinnings, Volkswagen has been able to grow the Transporter. It is 150mm longer and the standard wheelbase has been stretched by 100mm, compared to the six-generation, which allows for even more cargo space.

The cabin is well laid out, with a new 12-inch digital instrument display and a 13-inch multimedia touchscreen taking prominence on the dashboard. The multimedia system includes built-in navigation plus wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, as well as digital radio.

MG reckons the Cyberster draws on the proportions of classic roadsters like its MG A and B from the ‘50s and ‘60s.

And I reckon that’s about where the comparison ends, really.

But don’t get me wrong, I think it’s got some pretty angles and nice elements.

It’s got the long bonnet, but its cabin isn't set so far back and its aerodynamic lines and curves probably weren't a priority back then either.

This is the standard colour, English White, which is more like off-white or cream or beige.

You can have a red roof on the lighter colours, white, silver, and grey, but red and yellow Cybersters have black ones.

The tail-lights at the back were inspired by the union jack, but they’re probably one of the elements on this car I'd put in the ‘tacky’ column.

This is the really important element for any good commercial van, both the practicality of the cabin (as drivers spend long hours behind the wheel) and the cargo capacity in the back (for the obvious reasons).

Up front there’s a wireless charging pad and seven USB ports spread around the cabin. There are plenty of small item storage spots, and some not so small items, with a large shelf on top of the dashboard and multiple in-door shelves.

Of course, it’s out the back that’s really important and, as mentioned earlier, there is more space thanks to the larger overall dimensions.

Both SWB and LWB vans come with a plastic floor cover as standard, plus there are load rated tied tie down points, a 12V charging port in the D-pillar and LED lights in the roof. 

Thanks to the extra length, the SWB has a 2.6m load length and 5.8 cubic metres of cargo space, while the LWB has 3.0m in length and 6.8 cubic metres. There’s also a steel fixed partition with window, window grille and load through hatch to stretch the usable space even more.

The total payload for the Transporter varies depending on the powertrain. The TDI 2WD can take up to 1062kg (SWB) and 1016kg (LWB), while TDI AWD can manage 963kg (SWB) and 917kg (LWB). The electric Transporter has a significantly lower payload, rated at 806kg (SWB) and 760kg (LWB).

Towing capacity also changes depending on the powertrain, the TDI 2WD can manage 2000kg, TDI AWD up to 2800kg and the electric 2300kg.

A three-screen dash sounds a little daunting at first, but it’s not that far from the giant screens in some new cars now.

The central 10.25-inch screen is info only, while the flanking 7.0-inch screens are touchscreens, as is the climate control screen in the console.

As much as I’m a fan of physical buttons where possible, this car shows that multiple screens means you don’t need many sub-menus.

Basically, this feels like a lot, but you get used to it relatively quickly.

And while it also seems like MG’s software has become more intuitive and less laggy, the placements of the screens is a little annoying - the side screens on the dash are blocked by the steering wheel, and the central touchscreen is a bit fiddly.

Like I mentioned, no wireless phone mirroring is a let-down and there’s not really an obvious place to put a phone, but the ability to level out the cup holders is kind of interesting and the central storage where the USB-A and C ports are is big enough.

There’s a narrow bit of storage behind the seats, but the boot is actually 249 litres and seems much more usable than you might expect.

It's also worth noting the Cyberster comes with an AC slow charging cable as standard, but not a DC fast-charging cable for plugging in at some charging stations.

The MG Cyberster finds itself here as the only electric convertible sports car on offer, which means it’s hard to compare its $115,000 price tag to any direct rivals.

The Kia EV6 GT and Hyundai Ioniq 5 N are the wrong shape, the Porsche Cayman has the wrong running gear and most other things with doors like this are a lot more expensive.

So what does $115,000, before on-road costs, get you?

It’s only available in one variant, with pretty much the only cost-option being paint colours.

Aside from the scissor doors, there’s the electric folding roof, triple-screen cockpit with another centre panel, an eight-speaker Bose sound system, heated electric seats and steering wheel, and ambient lighting.

The exterior lights are all automatic intelligent LEDs, and you can open the doors with the key fob.

It is, however, missing a couple of things.

No phone charger might be down to space, but no wireless phone mirroring is a bit annoying, and the manual steering wheel adjustment feels a little cheap in a six-figure EV.

As mentioned earlier, Volkswagen has been able to diversify the Transporter for now and into the future, which means the choice of diesel, electric and plug-in hybrid.

Despite the electrified additions, the most popular choice for buyers is overwhelmingly going to be the turbo diesel. The 2.0-litre four-cylinder unit makes 125kW of power and 390Nm of torque and is paired to an eight-speed automatic. It’s available either with front-wheel drive or Volkswagen’s '4Motion' all-wheel drive set-up.

The eTransporter is rear-wheel drive only, and has a single-speed gearbox attached to its 210kW/415Nm electric motor.

The PHEV isn’t here yet, but when it does arrive, Volkswagen has confirmed it will be producing 171kW/205Nm.

Okay, here’s where the Cyberster gets impressive.

Its dual-motor set-up combines a 150kW front motor and a 250kW rear motor for a total of 375kW.

Peak torque is a hefty 725Nm.

All that is enough to get you and two tonnes of MG from zero to 100km/h in 3.2 seconds.

Sure it tops out at 208km/h, but the rush of hitting highway speeds is already enough to put your licence at risk.

Fuel economy for the diesel is rated at 7.9L/100km for the two-wheel drive variant and rises to 8.4L/100km for the 4Motion AWD. 

Our test drive was limited, so we couldn’t get a fair real-world fuel figure, but if you can hit those claims, with its 70-litre fuel tank it has a theoretical driving range of 886km for the 2WD and 833km for the 4Motion - which should be enough to get even the more active delivery drivers through a few days.

As for the eTransporter, VW claims a driving range of 330km, with 125kW DC charging able to replenish the battery from 10-80 per cent in just 38 minutes. Volkswagen is confident that this should be enough to appeal to back-to-base-style operators looking to cut fuel costs and emissions.

The MG Cyberster has a 77kWh battery and a claimed efficiency of 19.1kWh/100km.

While that means its claimed driving range of 443km relies on a bit of energy to be recuperated from braking, something you don’t really get on the highway, it actually works in the car’s favour during dynamic driving.

After 264km of driving on a test loop that included some urban but mostly highway and rural driving, the Cyberster’s trip computer displayed a 19.4kWh/100km average consumption.

The battery sat at 27 per cent, with 108km estimated range remaining.

While 443km of total range seems optimistic for a car that’s likely to be driven relatively quickly a lot of the time, the efficiency of the Cyberster held up better than you might have expected.

Volkswagen is a company that prides itself on its driving dynamics, even when it comes to vans. Even with the Ford influence, the new Transporter unmistakably feels like a Volkswagen in the way it drives.

It's worth noting we drove the Transporter unladen, so it may respond differently when filled with cargo, but the fundamental behaviour should remain the same.

There’s no mistaking you’re behind the wheel of a big van, but the Transporter reacts well to your inputs, so it feels responsive and surprisingly agile for such a sizable vehicle.

The same is true for the turbo-diesel engine, which feels strong enough to pull the big van along with a minimum of fuss (although, again, that was without a full cargo load in the back). What the engine does well is perform quietly. The cabin is well-insulated from the outside world, so it makes for a more relaxed environment, which will be a welcome factor for anyone looking to spend their working day inside the Transporter.

We sampled the electric Transporter and it also performed well. Dynamically it felt very similar, despite being rear-wheel drive, but obviously the bigger difference is under the bonnet. The electric motor does a fine job, but it feels solid rather than being particularly punchy. The TDI feels like it does the work easier, even under acceleration which should be the electric motor’s strength.

There’s good news and bad news about the Cyberster from behind the wheel.

The good news is it’s quite easy to drive this thing very fast. 

The bad news is it feels like it would be quite easy to get sick of as a day-to-day car, depending on your situation.

The first thing I noticed is the seat feels a bit high, even at its lowest setting. That's likely due to the placement of the battery pack under the floor of of the car.

Following that, if you’re taller than me (I'm five foot 11), it feels like the wrong road surface will have you nudging your head into the roof liner.

That mechanical roof should take about 15 seconds to lower or raise, and that can be done at speeds up to 50km/h.

It could be a symptom of trying to keep 1985kg tied down, but some of Melbourne's highways and arterial roads between 70 and 100km/h had the Cyberster bobbing quite a bit.

But the suspension doesn't let individual bumps intrude too much into the cabin, so it’s not all bad.

Similarly, there’s good and bad when it comes to the steering and braking.

The first being that the steering seems pretty accurate, even though the feedback is a bit numb. 

The braking on the other hand is handled by some pretty capable Brembos up front that pull the heavy roadster up quickly, but don’t always clamp as hard as you might expect when approaching a traffic light at 60km/h.

But stopping’s one thing, and going’s another.

There are three main drive modes, Comfort, Sport, and Super Sport, which mainly alter the acceleration intensity. And they feel well calibrated.

Comfort keeps things calm and cruisy, Sport is plenty for the road, and Super Sport has the potential to draw the attention of the authorities.

There’s good adjustability when it comes to regen braking, and even a decent single-pedal driving mode.

Aside from a couple of particularly heinous roads, the Cyberster held mostly flat when cornering at high speeds, but the potential for its suspension to let its wheels lose their footing might - or should - stop you from pushing the MG too hard.

At high speeds, there’s a bit of wind noise that you really can’t complain about if you’ve just purchased a drop-top, but the noise, vibration and harshness is decent, all things considered.

My only gripe with the interior fit out is that the passenger seat wobbles a little, and rattles on the surface behind it before moving it forward.

It’s impressive what this car can do in terms of performance, it’s just a shame it’s not more playful.

The Cyberster hasn’t been tested by ANCAP but as a niche sports car, it may never get tested.

The good news is it rides on the same platform as the MG4, which has five stars.

It’s got frontal and side airbags, plus all the usual new-car tech like adaptive cruise, lane-keep assist, blind spot warnings, collision warnings and avoidance, and speed limit warnings.

The Cyberster’s active safety is actually mercifully restrained, giving a couple of relatively quiet dings when exceeding the limit before you turn it off, letting you do the steering even when lane-keep is on, and in my case, only giving me a driver attention alert when I yawned while at a red light.

Volkswagen says the Transporter and eTransporter require servicing annually or every 30,000km - whichever comes first.

The diesel is significantly more expensive to service, with even the cheapest visit costing $670 and the most expensive $892. Over the first five years the Transporter will cost $3880 to maintain.

By contrast, the eTransporter costs $410 for every visit, except the 90,000km major check-up which is $496. So over five years it will cost $2136 to service.

While VW has an expansive national network of dealers for servicing, and a history with commercial vehicles, that’s not a big advantage over its key rivals in this market - Toyota, Ford and Hyundai - which all boast the same.

MG has a 10-year/250,000km warranty that’s pretty impressive by industry standards, and the warranty also covers its EVs.

It’s important to note that the convertible roof is one of a few items (including 12-volt batteries and light bulbs) that MG covers for less than 10 years. In the case of the roof it’s only five.

It’s worth closely reading the fine print before you crack into buying a car, regardless.

There are also ten capped-price services which occur every 12 months or 25,000km, ranging from $246 to $785. The average price per service is $503.40.

MG also offers free roadside assist for the period of the warranty.