Volkswagen Id.4 vs GWM ORA

What's the difference?

It’s been a long wait for the Volkswagen ID.4 Pro, but it’s one that’s paid off. It's an electric SUV that delivers on the essentials - comfort, smart features, and an effortless driving experience. But it also keeps charging times, range, and running costs firmly in the 'very liveable' camp. The ID.4 Pro manages to feel polished and personable, which is a great combination.

The GWM Ora is a solid electric car for the city with an extremely competitive price, balanced with some flaws that might frustrate some - Android phone owners especially. But the GT variant doesn’t offer enough to justify how much more expensive it is than the variants below.

It has a slightly lower range, no more performance (not that it needs more power), a features list almost identical to the Ultra and arguably loses its appealing cutesy looks. 

While the rest of the Ora line-up has its strengths and a cute but daring design, the GT effectively offers only its bark-over-bite styling changes.

If the Ora is on your shopping list, it’s certainly worth checking out the $43,990 Ultra, or even the $40,990 Extended Range if its list of features suits you. But if you for some reason enjoy the GT’s styling, that extra spend might be worth it.

The ID.4 Pro leans toward the pillowy end when it comes to exterior shape but it’s as cute as a button. Soft curves aren’t uncommon in this segment, and the overall effect is friendly yet grown-up.

A chrome accent strip running from the roof to the C-pillars adds interest, as do the matrix headlights, which look a bit like Transformer eyes. They’re adaptive too, so they put on a little light show when you start the car - a fun party trick.

Around the back, customisable rear light profiles will earn nods from the cooler kids.

Step inside and the cabin shines. Space is generous, and any 'cute' impressions fade fast as it’s clear this cabin means business.

Visually, it’s slick and considered, with premium materials like leather, suede, and synthetic trims setting the tone. There’s still a touch of Volkswagen fun, though. Look out for the Pause and Play icons on the brake and accelerator pedals.

It feels airy and open, especially with the panoramic sunroof option, and both displays are impressively sharp. You might expect a larger digital cluster, but the 5.3-inch instrument screen does a surprisingly good job, keeping things tidy and focused on the drive.

I'm also quite fond of the adjustable front armrests, which can be folded up and out of the way when not needed. A small touch, but it adds to the car’s flexible, family-friendly feel.

Yep, as a step-up from the Ora Ultra, the GT’s main selling point is its styling. For a car with a 400km driving range, it’s so non-threatening it looks like it would get beaten up and have its lunch money stolen by dual-cabs if it left the city - but cute works, just ask Mini or Fiat.

Its headlights have a splash of Porsche 911 in them. There are some angles that even look a little like someone had an Abarth explained to them then tried to draw it. More than one friend has told me it reminds them of a VW Beetle.

None of that bothers me in particular, but the GT-specific additions to the Ora make it feel like a deeply unserious car.

The fake carbon trim is tacky on a car that has no performance improvement over its base variant sibling, the red strip under the number plate looks like a tongue poking out under an overbite, the wheels look like Tony Stark designed them, and the rear ‘wing’ and diffuser just don’t feel at home.

One thing that didn’t bother me as much as I thought it would was the lack of ‘traditional’ tail-lights, instead a light bar under the rear window takes that role.

The rest of the Ora range is cute, fun, and looks at home in the city where the Ora is at its best. The GT’s features are mostly the same as the Ultra, so the extra $3000 for the GT exterior doesn’t really feel like value.

Inside, however, the design is less in-yer-face. A tidy set-up features a Mini-style row of switches (for some of the climate control) under a bar that spans the dash with the vents integrated.

The steering wheel is big, arguably too big, behind it is the 10.25-inch driver display attached to the central multimedia display. Everything’s very tidy and minimalistic inside, even the gear selector is a round dial.

It looks like a reasonably fashionable interior, but when it comes to the functionality, it starts to fall apart.

The front row offers plenty of room for two co-pilots to settle in without bumping elbows. The seat padding is softer than you’d usually expect from Volkswagen, and with the extendable under-thigh supports and added seat functions, the ID.4 Pro proves itself a seriously comfortable road-tripper.

In the back, space is generous, and my eight-year old appreciated the wide door openings and cushy seating. It’s best thought of as a very comfy space for two adults, with room for a third in a pinch.

That flat floor makes a noticeable difference for the middle passenger, giving them more legroom than usual. The 'two is best' idea also applies to child seats and while there are three top-tether anchor points, realistically, using more than two at once would be a squeeze. I had no trouble installing my booster this week, though it did block visibility out the back window.

Storage up front is a strong point, with a glove box, cupholders, bottle holders, and a generous centre console. The console houses the wireless charging pad, two USB-C ports, and a large cubby that swallowed gloves, snacks, and two pairs of glasses with cases which is perfect for keeping the cabin clutter-free.

Rear passengers are well looked after, too, with climate control, directional air vents, two USB-C ports, a fold-down armrest with cupholders, bottle holders in each door and map pockets. It’s all very family-friendly.

The 543L boot handled everything we threw at it this week. I like the adjustable floor height; set it higher to create a handy space for your charging cables, or lower it to maximise room. There’s also a hidden pocket under the floor for the tyre repair kit (no spare of any description).

You miss out on a frunk, but the powered tailgate and stretchy luggage net help keep things secure and easy to manage.

Tech-wise, it’s mostly intuitive. While my husband isn’t a fan of the touchpad climate and steering wheel controls, I find them pretty straightforward to use.

What does bug me, though, is the lack of built-in sat nav and wireless Apple CarPlay. I don’t like leaving my phone charging all the time, and even when you reconnect the cable, you have to manually restart CarPlay every time you get in. Hopefully that’s something Volkswagen irons out in a future update.

I can see the appeal of the Ora, but there are some glaring issues that I suspect many will find frustrating over time during ownership.

I’ll start with the big one - Android Auto. Or the lack thereof. Apple CarPlay is available however, even wirelessly.

Being a car journalist in 2024 involves a lot of playing around with in-car tech, and it’s been an awfully long time since I wasn’t able to mirror my phone to a car’s central screen where those with an Apple iPhone could. About 70 per cent of the world uses a phone running Android, by the way. Mostly Samsungs, like mine, but pretty much anything else that isn’t an iPhone too.

It wouldn’t be as major an issue if there was a navigation function in the car’s native multimedia system, but there isn’t. Having only a Bluetooth connection and no map felt a little like taking a step back in time, with an old iPad tacked onto the dash. No Fruit Ninja though.

Smaller things come down to basic ergonomics. The touchscreen itself and the system on it are simple and easy enough to use, if a little unresponsive. The driver display is fairly simple and doesn’t fall too far into the trap of sub-menus on sub-menus.

Physically, the cabin is almost there - the seat and steering wheel adjustment, however, made it a little tricky for me to find a comfortable driving position. 

I’m pretty much dead-on the average height of an Australian man, and the lack of tilt for the base of the seat meant no under-thigh support if I was to be the right distance to have a proper hold on the steering wheel - not telescopically adjustable, by the way.

Another interesting ergonomic fail is the placement of the drive mode select button (one of the GT’s few unique features) being to the right side of the steering column, near where you’d expect rarely-used controls like the headlight height adjust to be - or in this case a couple of centimetres from the button that kills the power to the battery if pressed while not in motion.

This caused severe embarrassment at a set of lights while searching for the drive mode switch, with no obvious way to start the car again, short of opening and closing the driver door.

Oh, and switching through the drive modes elicits a unique videogame-style chime or jingle for each mode. Gimmicky at first, potentially rather irritating after some time.

A positive of the interior layout, however, is the space in the rear seats is fairly generous for a small car - at almost six-feet tall behind my own seating position, I wasn’t lacking space to move and the seat itself is comfortable enough for a decent trip.

Behind that, a relatively limited 228-litre boot is probably less useful for a decent trip, though its 858L of space with the rear seats folded down is more handy in a pinch.

The GWM Ora GT was once a mid-$50K car, once you got it on the road. Its former sticker price of $51,990 before on-roads has, along with every other variant in the range, been dramatically knocked into a more budget-friendly shape: $46,990 drive-away.

That’s pretty cheap for a top-spec electric car, or for an electric car in general in Australia, but it’s still $11,000 more expensive than the entry-level Ora Standard Range ($35,990 DA).

The Ora GT also shares most of the key draw cards on its features list with the Ultra.

Its panoramic sunroof, electric tailgate, heated and ventilated seats with massage function and its heated steering wheel are all available in the Ultra for $3000 less.

One of the only things the GT has in terms of functionality in the cabin is a light for the driver visor vanity mirror.

There are a couple of differences when it comes to driving functionality, and we’ll get to that in a later section of this review, but the rest of the tech in the cabin is standard across the range.

The 10.25-inch touchscreen and same-sized driver display, six-speaker sound system, wireless phone charger, electrically adjustable synthetic leather seats - it’s all in the base-level Ora.

What is missing, very notably, is Android Auto functionality. The Ora does however feature wireless Apple CarPlay.

The ID.4 Pro is fully electric and rear-wheel drive with a single motor on the rear axle producing 210kW and 545Nm. That supports a claimed 0-100km/h sprint of 6.7 seconds, which feels satisfyingly swift for a mid-size SUV.

There’s instant torque for easy overtakes and the RWD keeps things balanced and composed. You also get a choice of drive modes to suit your style, and regenerative braking helps recover energy smoothly. It’s subtle, but effective enough to make city driving feel more efficient.

All four variants of the Ora have the same outputs from its front-mounted electric motor - 126kW and 250Nm. Yes, even the GT.

What the GT does have over at least the base model is a larger battery shared with the Long Range and Ultra variants, but despite having the same weights and outputs, the GT is, on paper, claimed to be a tenth of a second slower to 100km/h than the rest of the range: 8.5 seconds versus 8.4sec for the cheaper models.

The ID.4 Pro is fitted with an 82kWh lithium-ion battery and offers a WLTP driving range of up to 544km, which is impressive for the segment.

Official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) energy consumption is rated at 16.7kWh/100km, and around town, where regenerative braking works harder, you’re unlikely to feel any range anxiety.

If, like me, you do a lot of regional driving or longer trips, you might find yourself keeping a closer eye on the gauge. My real-world consumption sat closer to 20kWh/100km, which still leaves you with solid usable range, but it’s something to factor in.

Charging is straightforward, with a Type 2 CCS port that accepts up to 175kW on a DC fast charger and 11kW on AC.

Both figures are useful and on a fast charger you can expect a 10-80 per cent top-up in around 30 minutes which is quick enough to squeeze in a coffee break or snack stop, even with a kid in tow.

That aforementioned larger battery is a 63kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery, over the 48kWh unit in the Standard Range base variant.

According to GWM’s brochure, the GT’s electric driving range under WLTP is 400km, 20km less than the Long Range and Ultra (and like the acceleration time, for no obvious reason).

With a 400km claimed range and 63kWh battery, the Ora GT should return a power consumption figure of around 15.75kWh/100km, though on test we saw 16.4kWh.

GWM claims charging with 11kWh AC power will take 6.5 hours to jump from 10 to 80 per cent charge, while 80kW DC charging takes 50 minutes to do the same.

The ID.4 Pro is simple to operate, and aside from the instant power delivery and lack of a traditional start/stop button, it behaves much like a combustion-powered car.

That makes it a great entry-point for anyone new to EVs because it's familiar, but has just enough electric quirk to keep things interesting.

I miss a true one-pedal driving experience in city traffic, but the set-up still works well. Regenerative braking isn’t particularly strong, but you can toggle between 'Drive' and 'B' mode, with the latter offering a bit more resistance. I’ve kept it in B mode most of the week as the extra feedback just feels nicer underfoot.

This week’s testing included winding mountain roads, regional backroads, as well as freeway stretches and the ID.4 handled it all with confidence. There’s enough precision in the corners to keep things fun, and it always feels well planted.

The suspension strikes a middle ground - not ultra-soft, but still comfortable. You’ll feel some of the sharper bumps, but most surfaces are smoothed out well, and the cabin stays quiet even at higher speeds. Ride comfort has clearly been a priority and it pays off.

From the driver’s seat, visibility could be better. The rear window is narrow, and the thick pillars don’t help, so I found myself relying quite a bit on the camera system when parking or manoeuvring.

That said, the ID.4’s size and clear 360-degree camera system make it incredibly user-friendly in tight spaces. Whether parallel parking or squeezing into small car parks, it isn't stressful to park.

As is the case with the GT’s outputs and features, there’s nothing to suggest the GT would be fundamentally better to drive than any other variant. Unless all those kids at school were right about red bits making cars go faster.

The Ora’s front-drive layout paired with relatively immediate electric torque delivery, however, means you probably wouldn’t want it to be much more powerful with this particular mechanical setup.

The Ora, as a city car, does its job reasonably well in standard drive modes, though its sport mode is possibly a little too eager for day-to-day affairs - and the way it quite conservatively understeers on corners suggests there’s not much ‘sport’ driving to be done in this cute EV.

The steering itself feels fairly numb (again, fine day-to-day) and becomes heavier or lighter in different drive modes, but with no real advantage - the wheel itself is also a little on the large side.

Its suspension tune is comfortable enough for the low-speed streets on which this car is likely to find itself most often, where most city cars aren’t exactly riding on clouds, though can more obviously start to feel a little underdone on rougher roads at high speed.

It’s not a light car, after all, a hatchback that weighs 1580kg and has a short wheelbase isn’t going to be a dynamic masterpiece, though it does at least feel stable enough through corners thanks to its low centre of gravity.

It’s not going to encourage any heroic driving, but it’s also more likely to deter rather than outright punish any silly behaviour behind the wheel.

The GWM Ora’s safety features are almost all standard across the range, which is great even if you don’t opt for the GT.

This means its seven airbags (dual frontal, side chest, curtain and centre) are all standard, as well as autonomous emergency braking, secondary collision avoidance, rear cross-traffic alert and forward collision warning, lane keep assist, traffic jam assist and even a surround-view parking camera. The Ultra and GT are the only variants with a front parking sensor and auto parking assist.

The features are all there, but some finer tuning when it comes to some driver assistance could be looked at - thus the slightly lower side of the scoring scale for a car that’s ticking all the boxes on paper.

The ID.4 Pro comes with a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which is standard across the Volkswagen range, while the battery is covered for eight years or 160,000km, giving buyers a little extra peace of mind when it comes to long-term EV ownership.

Volkswagen also offers a 10-year capped-price servicing program, which is excellent for the segment.

The total cost comes to $2890 over the full term, and the service intervals are spaced every two years or 30,000km, whichever comes first.

GWM offers a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, as well as an eight-year/unlimited kilometre battery warranty. The former is quite decent for the industry, the latter relatively par when it comes to battery warranties.

Five years or 150,000km of roadside assistance is also included.

The Ora’s first five services, each coming in at 12 month/15,000km intervals, are capped price, all at $99.