Tesla Model 3 vs Toyota GR 86

What's the difference?

Tesla has done enough with the introduction of this Premium Long Range RWD variant to keep the Model 3’s head well and truly above water in an increasingly competitive segment. After more than six years it still looks good, with a pleasant cabin environment, plenty of performance and leading energy efficiency. Safety is top-shelf and it stands up well in terms of practicality and driving dynamics. 

That said, the ownership proposition is average, the determination to make so many functions screen-based is frustrating and the optional Full Self-Driving system is unconvincing. With the Model S and Model Y now discontinued globally it will be interesting to see how the Model 3 continues to evolve.

If you’re expecting a faster, angrier and more focused version of the original 86, you’re going to be happy with this car. If you’re expecting it to be as fun and chuckable as the first one, you might be upset.

It has a different character, this GR86 - certainly with more GRRRR than ever before - and it still represents a strong sports car option for buyers, even if it is a fair bit more expensive this time around. It'd be hard not to recommend the GTS version to anyone considering it.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

After four years in market, a heavily upgraded version of the Model 3 arrived in Australia in 2023, the biggest visual changes being a reshaped bonnet, aero massaged overall profile and angular slimline headlights.

The boot lid now incorporates a lip spoiler and the tail-lights were remodelled to create a truncated, two-layer effect. And in true Tesla fashion, the standard 18-inch alloy rims are fitted with matt black-finish aero elements filling the gaps between the satin black wheel spokes. Two new body colours - ‘Stealth Grey’ and ‘Ultra Red’ - were recently added to the available palette. For reference, our test car's finish is 'Quicksilver'. 

It’s still clearly recognisable as a Model 3, but these relatively minor design changes have helped the mid-sizer keep up with the slew of sleek newcomers it now faces.

The interior was also given a substantial makeover, the expansive 15.4-inch central display screen backgrounded by an all-new wrap-around dash and revised console treatment, the former featuring a raised insert and the latter a two-device wireless charging station.

Introduction of this Premium Long Range RWD model also brought the small but significant addition of a physical indicator stalk on the left-hand side of the steering column, replacing buttons on the steering wheel. Big ergonomic tick for that.

Customisable ambient lighting lifts the tone, soft materials look and feel good and the doorcards, bins and armrests have been reprofiled into a more sophisticated arrangement.

Our test car’s dark grey and white synthetic leather trim combination lifts the mood as does light from the huge, two-panel glass roof. But beware, while white trim looks dazzling on the showroom floor it takes some extra work to maintain its schmick appearance in the day-to-day grind.

After seven years in market the Model 3 has aged well and still looks sleek and contemporary.

The GR badges mean a lot, here. Not just because they signify that this is a proper Gazoo Racing product for Series 2, but also because they help you pick it as the Toyota and not the Subaru BRZ.

They are even more closely aligned in terms of exterior design this time around, and while both are good looking sports coupes, I wish more had been done to differentiate the two.

Sure, if you’re paying attention you’ll see the shape of the intake / grille area is different, and it has a different bumper shape to the BRZ, too - and both of them are bloody good looking cars, if you ask me.

The rear is particularly smart, I reckon - a more sporty and sleek appearance than the last one, and even if the tail-lights are somehow familiar, I think it’s a neat rear end. Can’t wait to see who makes the best looking aftermarket rear spoiler for it.

If you’re curious about the size and dimensions of the new GR86 compared to the old one, Toyota says it measures 4265mm (up 25mm) on a 2575mm wheelbase (up 5mm), sits 1310mm tall (down 10mm), and has the same overall width of 1775mm excluding mirrors.

There have been some big design changes in the cabin, though the overall layout is tremendously similar to the last car. It has similar controls for the air-con, a new touchscreen above, and similar layout to the storage, too. 

The interior design is a bit plain, though - the screen is big and colourful, and I’m thankful for that. Because unless you option the GTS with the red carpet, it’s a bit bland in there.

At just over 4.7m long, more than 1.8m wide and a bit over 1.4m tall (with a 2875mm wheelbase) the Tesla Model 3 is a low-slung medium-size sedan. 

There’s plenty of space up front, a feeling enhanced by the standard panoramic glass roof and our test car’s white trim brightening up the cabin.

There are long, wide bins on the front doors with enough room for large bottles, a slim glove box (which opens only via an on-screen button, which is annoying) and a generous lidded storage box between the seats that doubles as a centre armrest.

The console houses two cupholders with another storage cubby ahead of them (both with sliding covers over the top) and the dual device wireless charging bay on the lower part of the dash under the media screen.

Switching to the rear, at 183cm I have a surprising amount of foot, leg and headroom when sitting behind the driver’s seat set to my position. The rear door aperture is surprisingly large which helps entry and egress.

Technically able to accommodate three passengers, the back seat is best for two full-size adults on anything other than a mid-length journey, although the flat rear floor helps ease pressure on the centre occupant.

There's a well-hidden fold-down centre armrest with cupholders, there are useful bins in the doors and hard shell map pockets on the front seatbacks.

The crisp 8.0-inch rear screen is a welcome entertainment option for back-seaters and there are adjustable air vents underneath it.

For power and connectivity there are two USB-C ports and a 12-volt socket in the front compartment, a USB-A in the glove box (mainly for dash cam and ‘Sentry Mode’ data storage) and two USB-C ports in the rear under the vents.

Boot space is a ample at 682 litres (the bootlid is adjustable for opening height) with an 88L ‘frunk’ in the nose. And if you need to tow a relatively light load like a box trailer or Jet Ski (or two) you can hook up a 1.0-tonne braked trailer (750kg unbraked).

While we understand it helps maximise battery space and reduce weight, we’re not on board with Tesla’s policy of providing a repair/inflator kit rather than a physical spare tyre. Even though this is likely to be a primarily urban cruiser, it’s not good enough. 

Then, there’s the Tesla app, an electronic Swiss Army Knife that facilitates everything from remote vehicle access and cabin ‘preconditioning’ to planning your route (complete with charging stops) and monitoring Sentry Mode (checking the vehicle’s surroundings and receiving alerts of potential threats).

The list of functions goes on and on, but suffice it to say the app is hugely handy. For example, ‘Dog Mode’ keeps the air con on with the car locked for the benefit of your four-legged friend and lets passers by know the doggo is safe via a bold message on the central screen. An internal camera, accessible via the app, lets you check-in remotely, too. Nice. 

Given its overall size and despite its conventional sedan configuration, the Tesla Model 3 offers efficient packaging and a heap of thoughtful features to enhance everyday practicality.

You’re not buying a sports coupe if you value practicality as a primary purchase consideration, but rest assured, the GR86 has a decent level of usability to the interior.

There are bottle holders in the doors, storage sections in front of the gear selector, and a pair of cup holders with a closing lid that doubles as a centre armrest, if you don’t have drinks. Thing is, the one on the car I drove at launch was pretty hard to open with a single press of the button.

The 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen is straight from Subaru, with Subaru graphics and fonts still included. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, as the screen is colourful and has easy menus and controls, and thankfully there are still knobs and dials for things like volume and tuning.

It has the requisite Apple CarPlay and Android Auto phone mirroring tech, but I had the system lose connection with my iPhone 13 Pro on the launch. (Note: I have a long-term Subaru WRX Sportswagon that drops the phone connection all the time, so it’s a bit annoying to see this characteristic mirrored on other models.)

Below the screen are the ‘they-look-familiar’ air-con controls, with dials for temp and fan. They’re nice and chunky so you can easily locate them when you’re focusing on driving. I like that.

The newly designed folding seat mechanism is supposed to allow you easier access to the back seats, not that you’ll want to be in there if you’re an adult. Or anyone over, say, 10 years old.

I got in there (for scientific research purposes) and found it was, as you’d expect, not very comfortable for someone my size (182cm / 6’0”). My head was at an awkward angle, I had little leg or toe room even with the seat ahead of me pitched way forward, and there’s not much in terms of rear-seat amenities, either.

But, if you have younger children, there are ISOFIX points and top-tether points for both of the rear seat positions.

Boot space is 237 litres - which isn’t enormous. But the opening is wide enough to easily slide suitcases in, and you can fit four wheels and tyres in with the back seat folded down (according to Toyota - and it folds down in a single piece, there’s no split-fold rear seat).

Oh, and the last one used to be available with a spare - this one isn’t. Just a repair kit.

I was there, that fateful day in June 2012 when Toyota Australia announced that the base model 86 manual was going to come in at less than $30,000. My jaw dropped, as did almost everyone else’s in that shed near the track where the launch was being held.

Fair to say my jaw also dropped when the price of the new 2023 Toyota GR86 was announced in the shed near the track (this time it was Phillip Island, not the Sutton Road driver training centre outside Queanbeyan).

That’s because the new model is between 15 and 35 per cent more expensive than the original 86. 

The GR86 GT six-speed manual is now $43,240 (MSRP - before on-road costs). The price for the six-speed auto is identical, meaning - depending how you look at it - the manual is a rip-off, or the auto is compellingly priced. 

The GR86 GTS model also employs the manual-or-auto-for-the-same-price strategy, listing at $45,390 (MSRP).

You get a few worthwhile items to justify the extra $2150 over the GT, and you can read all about the standard equipment inclusions here.

But it’s fair to say the GR86 might well be angrier in a lot of ways, but customers might be angry about the increase, too. Toyota even admitted that if it had kept the original price in line with inflation, it would have only cost $38,000 for the base GT grade. But it argues there’s a lot more value for buyers in this new model, by way of the drive experience and upsized engine, primarily.

However, there are some startling safety equipment exclusions that you might want to consider. More detail below.

OK, so what about rivals and pricing? Well, you can get the mechanically-identical Subaru BRZ for less. It starts at $40,290 for the manual (and has additional standard safety kit), but you have to pay extra for the auto, which starts from $44,090.

Or you might wish to think about a Mazda MX-5, which has the added cool factor of being a convertible, and starts at $37,990 for the base manual soft-top, or $42,300 for the hard-top.

The Tesla Model 3 Premium Long Range RWD is powered by a single permanent magnet synchronous electric motor producing a handy 235kW and in excess of 400Nm.

It sends drive to the rear wheels only via a single-speed, direct-drive automatic transmission. 

Kerb weight is 1747kg and Tesla claims 0-100km/h acceleration in a rapid 5.2 seconds.

It’s a bigger engine - now a 2.4-litre horizontally-opposed ‘boxer’ four-cylinder petrol unit - and that increase of 20 per cent engine capacity has yielded some good horsepower increases, too. And it has a Subaru badge on the engine cover. Because it’s a Subaru engine.

The new model pushes out 174kW of power (at 7000rpm), which is up from a max output of 152kW on the old model.

It’s the torque figure that’s interesting, though. There’s 250Nm at 3700rpm, which isn’t huge. But Toyota claims there’s 240Nm available from 3500-6500rpm, meaning a long flat torque build-up. The old model had 212Nm for the manual.

Now, both the six-speed manual and six-speed automatic transmission have the same power and torque outputs - in the last gen, the auto was held back by 5kW and 7Nm compared with the max-power manual.

Of course, it’s rear-wheel drive, and has a Torsen limited slip differential in the mix. 

Toyota says the 0-100km/h time for the manual is 6.3 seconds, which is 1.8sec faster than the last manual. The auto’s 0-100 is claimed at 6.8sec.

Wondering about weight? The new one has four different masses to consider: GT manual - 1287kg; GT automatic - 1308kg; GTS manual - 1291kg; GTS automatic - 1312kg. Toyota says the bulk of the additional circa-44kg increase across the board is down to the larger capacity engine.

Tesla claims a WLTP range of up to 750km for the Model 3 Premium Long Range RWD, the official EV term for which is… a lot. 

As mentioned earlier, at the time of the car’s local launch in October last year Tesla claimed it as the longest-range EV in Australia and at the time of writing nothing had arrived to change that.

Unlike the standard Model 3, which is powered by a CATL-sourced LFP battery, the Long Range RWD is fitted with a lighter, more energy dense NMC pack from LG with a total capacity of 82kWh (78kWh usable).

In terms of energy consumption, Tesla claims 12.5kWh/100km on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle and on test we experimented with liberal use of the accelerator pedal, higher than average freeway running and keeping the car constantly chilled during extremely hot weather, which resulted in an average of 15.7kWh/100km. 

Aside from that, more typical stop-start urban driving with occasional use of the ‘Chill’ (eco-focused) mode brings the number down to 13.1kWh/100km.

That’s an impressive performance, with even the upper test figure more than acceptable for a 1.75-tonne electric sedan.

Capable of accepting a 250kW fast charge, Tesla says the Model 3 Long Range RWD can take on 311km of range in 15 minutes, at that speed.

On a 150kW pylon we saw capacity go from 15-85 per cent (theoretically, 600km of range) in roughly 50min, although the charger fluctuated below peak output throughout.

Official combined cycle fuel consumption is also a matter of spec-by-spec: GT manual - 9.4L/100km; GT automatic - 8.7L/100km; GTS manual - 9.5L/100km; GTS automatic - 8.8L/100km.

On test, the GTS manual I drove on the road loop at the launch was showing 9.8L/100km on the display after a mix of mostly higher-speed country road testing around Phillip Island and surrounds.

The fuel tank capacity is 50 litres, but keep in mind you’ll need to be fueling up with 98RON premium unleaded. 

So, surprise, surprise, the Tesla Model 3 Premium Long Range RWD is quiet. But it’s quiet, even in the context of other EVs in this part of the market.

That’s thanks in part to acoustic glass in the front, rear and side windows as well as the dual-pane glass roof and the Bridgestone Turanza T005 EV tyres (235/45x18) featuring ‘B-Silent’ technology. Corny, but it works.

A kerb weight under 1.8 tonnes is relatively lightweight for an EV of this size and the Model 3 RWD is quick with 0-100km/h acceleration in a fraction over five seconds. There’s always plenty of pulling power under your right foot. 

Suspension is double wishbone front, multi-link rear and ride comfort is respectable rather than exceptional. Smaller bumps and irregularities find their way into the cabin but never to an alarming degree.

Steering sits in the middle-of-the-road between tactile and wooden, which is par for the EV course, although it's accurate and pleasingly progressive. Body roll, even in enthusiastic cornering, is modest. 

The physical brakes are ventilated discs front and rear although they don’t come into play all that often because the Model 3’s regenerative braking system is so good. Single-pedal operation soon becomes the norm. 

Our test car’s optional ‘Full Self-Driving (Supervised)’ will set you back $10,100 as a one-off payment, or $149 per month and Tesla says when using it, “Under your supervision, your car will be able to drive itself almost anywhere with minimal driver intervention”.

We engaged it for a 30km trip through suburbia, across the Sydney Harbour Bridge and into the city’s inner south. 

A rainbow-coloured magic carpet in front of the car graphic on the nav map tells you the system is engaged and although things went smoothly at first we soon sliced a bit off the inner oncoming lane as we turned right at a T-intersection, which was alarming. 

The system also has a consistent tendency to stick to the far right-hand side of the lane, stay five to 10km/h under the signposted speed limit and it continued to operate without my hands on the wheel, although I kept them there for 99.9 per cent of the drive (which is tiring when you’re not doing the steering).

Having been squeezed to the point where we couldn’t merge safely into a particular arterial road the nav took us on what’s known in the trade as a wild goose chase that had to be nipped in the bud. If I hadn’t known my way around it could have been a huge waste of time and (vehicle) energy. As much a nav issue as an FSD one, but overall, let’s just say, I’m not convinced.

Under the heading of miscellaneous observations, I’m not a fan of the on-screen gear position slider in place of a physical control. It’s needlessly fussy, although its ability to automatically switch between D to R (and back) during slow-speed manoeuvres is helpful. 

The software behind the car’s multitude of functions is exceptionally good, as is the ability to swipe in the vicinity of the temp and audio volume screen sliders, rather than having to hit them bang on and the blind-spot camera view which pops up on the screen when indicating on either side is handy.

Have you ever been cutting veggies for dinner and realised you need to sharpen your knife? And then, once you’ve done it, you realise what the knife is really capable of?

That’s kinda the feeling between the last generation of the Toyota 86 and this new Toyota GR86.  

I loved the old 86. Still do. Would have one in a heartbeat. But this - as the analogy suggests - is a much sharper tool.  

The engine is a big improvement on the old 2.0-litre - it feels considerably more urgent, and it gathers pace without fuss. You can really rely on the torque of the engine more in the new GR86 - that wasn’t so much the case in the last car, which you had to row through the gears more in. Now you can leave it in fourth and allow the engine to do the work, whereas in corners in the old car, you’d probably have elected to downshift to third, maybe second. 

The manual transmission is good, for the most part. It’s easy enough to operate, though the shift action can still feel a little bit notchy (first to second, fifth to sixth in particular in the car I drove). The clutch feel was reasonable, but not stall-proof at low speeds. 

The sound of the engine is a bit more pleasant now, too. It doesn’t have the nasal overtones of the last one - with a deeper, more enjoyable noise. It’s not the best sounding boxer engine, but it’s not the worst, either.

I only had a short amount of time in the GR86 automatic, and it was on the Phillip Island race track. It has paddles, which I appreciate - but the gearbox will overrule you if you try and downshift and haven’t managed to get the engine revs down. Self preservation at the expense of outright fun? Yeah. A bit. A dual-clutch auto would be an interesting development in this car - but it’s not going to happen.

Drivers who live in areas where there are lots of potholes and bumpy sections of road - so, most of Australia, then - might feel the now-stiffer chassis is a bit too rigid at times.

It feels much more like a sports car than a sporty car, with Gazoo Racing having honed the suspension to the tastes of Toyota president and master driver, Akio Toyoda. I’ve been to Japan. I know the roads there are a heck of a lot more agreeable than here.

Look, it mightn’t be a deal-breaker for the enthusiast, but the curious customer might find the ride a bit hard. 

The trade-off, of course, is terrific handling. It tucks into corners nicely, and with the reworked suspension (Macpherson front, multi-link rear), there’s less of that playful “please keep pushing me so we can have some slidey oversteer” character to it. It will drift, no doubt. But in the last 86, it didn’t take much effort to make that happen.

The steering is excellent, with terrific accuracy and weight, and decent feel through the wheel, too. You don’t feel every single thing at the front axle, but you do have a better gauge of it than you might have in the last GT grade, which famously ran those Prius tyres that were part of the reason sliding it around was a lot easier, too. The rubber on the new GR86 is far better - the GT runs Michelin Primacy HP (215/45/17), and the GTS has Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (215/40/18).

Look, it's still a lot of fun. But it’s fun in a different way. I actually prefer the last one in terms of the drive experience - even though this one is technically more impressive in all the important ways.

If you buy the manual version of the Toyota GR86, you’re getting a car that isn't as safe as the auto. It’s that simple.

That’s because the manual models miss out on now-expected (and, frankly, embarrassingly absent) potentially life-saving safety features like forward autonomous emergency braking (AEB) or lane keeping assistance.

You get AEB in the auto, as well as a form of rear AEB (parking support brake) with rear parking sensors, and adaptive cruise control, as well as lane departure warning.

Another kicker? You have to choose the GTS if you want blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert, which is on both manual and automatic models.

The BRZ gets that rear-facing safety gear on all versions. Advantage Subaru, I guess.

There’s no ANCAP crash test safety rating for the new GR86. 

From January 1, 2026 all new Teslas sold in Australia have been covered by a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty (including roadside assistance for the duration), up from four years/80,000km, previously.

A big step forward, no doubt, but that just gets Tesla to a base, mainstream market level with a dozen brands now at seven years, several at eight and three at 10 years (conditional).

The drive battery is covered for eight years/192,000km, which is in line with the category norm. And a Body Rust Limited Warranty covers rust perforation for 12 years, unlimited kilometres, which is reassuring.

Tesla servicing is condition-based, so there’s no fixed schedule, with a summary on the car’s touchscreen providing a record of when vehicle maintenance was last carried out and prompts for when they should be performed next.

In the absence of a combustion powertrain the emphasis is on things like wheel rotation, balancing and alignment, brake fluid testing, air-con servicing, camera precision, radiator cleaning and high-voltage battery maintenance.

Theoretically, if a workshop visit is flagged in the car’s system, it could include actions like a ‘Vehicle Health Check’ ($270), ‘General Diagnosis’ (270 per hour), brake fluid flush ($240.80) and replacement of both cabin air filters ($106.60).

Things like air-con desiccant bag replacement ($89.18), tyre rotation ($81.00), a wheels check - if tyre wear is abnormal ($81) and a wheel alignment ($225) are also set inspection and service items. All prices exclusive of GST.

In the States, the brand provides a range of estimated annual service pricing of between US$257 - US$499 ($367-$712), based on data collected by car buying specialist CarEdge. The suggested service range is around 20,000km and the first five annual estimates are at US$300 ($430) or less.

Tesla has 25 stores in Australia, not surprisingly covering mainly urban and larger regional centres, including four each in Melbourne and Sydney, three in Canberra, two each in Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth as well as one in Hobart.

Toyota’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty runs to the GR86, too. And if you maintain your car with the brand, that extends out to seven years for the powertrain.

The brand offers a capped-price servicing plan for five years/75,000km - meaning servicing intervals of 12 months/15,000km. 

Is it fairly priced when it comes to maintenance costs? Well, at $280 per visit for the first five services, it represents an annual saving of about $215 over the equivalent Subie. So that’s a nice way to recoup a bit of the cost.

There’s no included roadside assist, which you do get if you buy a BRZ.