Smart 3 vs Cupra Terramar

What's the difference?

The #3 Brabus is very nearly one of the great bargains of 2024, with the sort of style, luxury, features, performance and grip you’d expect from the much-more-expensive GLA AMG 45. It’s that good.

What would make it great is a sunblock for the hot glass roof on a sunny day, Australian road tuning for the infuriating ADAS tech and a revised steering tune that didn’t make it feel inconsistent at times.

See past these, though, and the #3 Brabus exceeds expectations.

We’re glad Smart is back.

The Cupra Terramar VZe looks fantastic on the road and confidently handles most things you throw at it. The plug-in hybrid set-up offers a nice blend of performance and efficiency. But… when you start digging into the price and ownership promise and what you do (and don’t) get for your money, it doesn’t always feel like the most compelling package. Sexy and sporty? Definitely. Value-for-money? Mmm.

Smart says Mercedes designed the #3 and it shows.

In silhouette, or when glanced peripherally, it could be the love child of the A-Class and EQA. Only the friendly face betrays its non-Benz heritage.

Longer and wider than the #1, it is also 80mm lower – achieved via a lower ride height, flatter seats and a thinner floor.

Helped by a 35mm wheelbase stretch, it provides a nicely-balanced and proportioned crossover, with a decent drag coefficient of 0.27. The Brabus’ big wheels also fill out the arches very nicely.

Key length/width/height/wheelbase dimensions are 4400mm/1844mm/1556mm and 2785mm, respectively.

Unusually for a coupe/crossover mash-up, there’s slightly more room inside compared to the upright donor model.

Let’s take a longer look in there.

Design is one of the areas where the Terramar makes a strong first impression. It’s sharply styled, and very much aimed at buyers who aren’t quite ready to let go of their sportier tastes, even if their car choice suggests otherwise. The stance is wide, the proportions are tidy and those 20-inch copper alloy wheels do a lot of the heavy lifting visually.

Up front, the grille features a triangular LED lighting signature that, for anyone who grew up with it, looks a little like the Triforce (Zelda). Around the back, there’s a full-width light bar with a 3D illuminated logo which enhances the overall 'cool-edge' style the Terramar has.

Inside, that same theme carries through. The cabin is clean but still visually interesting, with plenty of soft-touch materials and leather throughout. Copper-coloured accents are used generously but not to the point where it feels overdone and give it a firm identity.

The optional panoramic roof lifts the space and the 12.9-inch central display sits front and centre, giving the cabin a properly high-end feel.

On first approach, you ask yourself whether the #3 is a crossover or a small-to-medium SUV. The low roof and cool frameless doors certainly suggest the former, as do the comparatively small apertures.

That said, with the windows down, those sash-less doors help entry and egress.

Once ensconced inside a long if slightly narrow cabin, the #3 offers ample room for even the tallest adults up front, as well as a reasonably spacious back seat area, though you’d call that more of a '2+1' seater given the lack of girth for three. Most folk shouldn’t struggle to find the right driving position, either.

Presumably keen to impart a generic Mercedes vibe, the #3’s interior is somewhat reminiscent of a GLA’s, albeit from last decade – down to the pronounced T-shape dash featuring a trio of circular vents in the middle, a standalone screen above and (unconvincing) metal-look plastic trim below.

Understandably, like so much of the Brabus, this might appeal to aspiring A45 AMG owners, but it seems oddly dated, given the advanced electrification going on underneath.

Likewise, none of the minimalism cleverness of the ForTwo city-car original is referenced, even digitally. A lost opportunity, really. The OG Smart is an icon.

Meanwhile, ahead of the driver, a narrow digital strip looks twee and cheap, as if ripped from a Japanese 'Kei' car. It’s a strange design detail for a $71K SUV.

Still, the #3’s cabin layout is largely a success, and much of that is due to the first-class quality and finish. Unlike some of the aforementioned Benzes of the previous decade, squeaks and rattles are notable by their absence.

Depending on your body, the racy sports seats up front are either perfectly bolstered or far-too snug, but they provide a decent level of comfort and support. And they position you just right for controlling the centre display, which dominates all.

The 12.8-inch touchscreen feels slick, responsive and right-sized for the car. At first, it can also seem like info-overload and perhaps a bit cheesy with its animal animations, but real thought has gone into it to provide an extraordinary level of functionality.

Across the top are icons for access to media, sat-nav, apps and camera view settings, while the bottom row is for various climate and trip info. While somewhat logically presented, the charging-station list seemed outdated and/or at-times incorrect in our test car.

Mercifully, the Smart has a row of short-cut buttons for 'Vehicle Modes' (including turning off the infernal lane assist and one-pedal accelerator/braking), 'Driving Mode' ('Eco'/'Comfort'/'Sport'/'Brabus'), glass demisters, climate and display-off.

Annoyingly, the latter is closest to reach, revealing the #3’s left-hand drive market bias, as the driver must stretch across to access the first two (and more important) settings.

There are also several handy screen-activated modes including 'Entertainment Mode' that temporarily leaves the accessories and climate control on; 'Rest Mode' reclines the driver’s seat down flat and dims the interior lights; 'Energise Mode' is designed to pep you up; and 'Pet Mode' keeps a climate-controlled atmosphere while deactivating all buttons that a stray paw might press. Clever.

There’s lots more besides, and using the touchscreen is better in this than most other Chinese vehicles, but it remains fiddly and distracting.

It’s also worth pointing out that the fixed glass roof needs a blockout for Australia. A Smart spokesperson said an aftermarket cover is available, but as supplied to us, sitting under it over a run of hot days is almost unbearable without a hat. This is not good enough.

Thankfully, the other basics are all A-OK.

The climate system coped well the hot sun bearing down through the glass, plenty of useful storage makes up for the disappointingly shallow glove box, while the chilled centre console and massive door bins proved especially handy.

USB access is easy, the wireless Bluetooth/Apple CarPlay performed more consistently than in any recent test vehicle and the standard Beats audio brings brilliant sound.

Out back, most people under 180cm should at least avoid scraping that glass ceiling, and there’s a reasonable amount of room for boots and long knees if the front occupants are sympathetic, but you’d be stretching the truth calling the rear seat packaging SUV-esque.

On the other hand, it’s beautifully presented, boasts a comfy and supportive backrest/cushion for outboard passengers and even a do-able centre pew for shorter-distance riders.

And it provides every expected amenity, including air vents, USB-C ports, door storage, a folding centre armrest with cupholders, and overhead handles/lighting/coat hooks.

And while we’ve already complained about the glass roof, it floods the cabin with light, to make it seem airier than it is. Narrow front seats with a see-through slit further enhance this feeling.

Further back, the 370-litre boot is reasonably long and surprisingly deep thanks to a removable upper floor that’s good for stuffing the optional home charging cables in.

And, of course, it can be extended to 1160L via the split-fold backrests to provide extra loading practicality. And there’s even a small (15L) amount of storage under the bonnet.

Maximum towing capacity is 1600kg for a braked trailer.

In terms of practicality, the Terramar feels a little mixed depending on where you’re sitting.

Space and comfort first. The front row is where it feels most at ease. The sport seats are supportive, with enough adjustment to stay comfortable on a longer drive and the added heating and driver’s memory function round things out nicely. That said, elbow room can feel a little tight if you’re sitting alongside someone broad-shouldered.

The rear row is more of a compromise. Legroom behind my driving position is on the tighter side, and for context, I’m 168cm, though headroom holds up reasonably well, even with the panoramic roof. The shape of the seat base and storage cut-outs also make the bench feel narrower, so it’s better suited to two adults than three.

Storage is about what you’d expect, without really exceeding it. Up front, the glove box is the largest cubby, supported by a centre console, a phone cradle and a pair of cupholders, although they’re different sizes, so only one emotional support bottle will fit.

In the rear, it’s a similar story. You get a couple of bottle holders and cupholders, but you miss out on map pockets.

On the tech and amenities front, most functions are housed within the 12.9-inch media display. The graphics are clear and the touchscreen is responsive, though the touch-based climate controls underneath it can be fiddly at times. That said, the overall layout becomes fairly intuitive after a short adjustment period, even if physical buttons would still be welcome.

Connectivity is well covered, with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, the former holding a steady connection during my time with it, along with built-in navigation. Charging options are solid, too, with four USB-C ports across the cabin, a 12-volt outlet and a wireless charging pad.

The rear gets its own climate control, though without fan speed control, and again, at this price point, it feels like there’s room for a little more in the way of convenience features - particularly things like heated outboard seats.

At the back, boot space comes in at 400L, which is the smallest in the Terramar range due to the battery placement. It’s broadly in line with key alternatives like the BYD Sealion 6 Premium, which offers slightly more capacity, but the difference isn’t dramatic in day-to-day use.

In practice, it’s been enough for a week of errands with a small family, and the flat loading floor and powered tailgate make it easy to live with. There’s no spare tyre, though, just a puncture repair kit, which won't suit everyone.

The new Cupra Terramar is available in four grades, and we’re in the flagship VZe, the only one to feature a plug-in hybrid powertrain, priced from $77,990, before on-road costs.

Given where it sits, there’s still not a lot that lines up neatly against it. The closest is probably the Volkswagen Tiguan eHybrid R-Line, expected to land at around $74,550, before on-roads, along with the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV EV GSR from $73,990 MSRP.

Beyond that, you start to drift into more value-focused territory with options like the BYD Sealion 6 Premium ($52,990, MSRP), Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Ultimate ($43,990, drive-away), and GWM Haval H6 GT Ultra ($50,990, drive-away). So, significantly cheaper, while still offering a fairly generous level of equipment.

As for the Terramar VZe, it doesn’t arrive empty-handed. You get leather upholstery, electric front seats with heating, a heated steering wheel, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, 20-inch alloy wheels, a full LED light suite, a 12.9-inch media display, 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster and a 12-speaker Sennheiser sound system. There’s also built-in navigation, four USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket and a wireless charging pad.

It’s a solid list but at this price point a couple of omissions stand out. Front seat ventilation isn’t offered, there’s no heating for the rear outboard seats and the panoramic sunroof, which feels like it would round things out nicely, is still a $2000 option.

None of those are deal-breakers on their own, but in this part of the market, they’re the kind of details that you'll notice.

The #3 Brabus employs one permanent magnet synchronous electric motor per axle, for dual-motor, all-wheel drive performance via a single-speed ‘transmission’. 

They provide plenty of poke, totalling 315kW of power (115kW front, 200kW rear) and 543Nm of torque (200Nm front, 343Nm rear).

Tipping the scales at 1910kg, this means the Brabus delivers an impressive power-to-weight ratio of 165kW/tonne – enough for it to scoot from zero to 100km/h in 3.7 seconds, on the way to a 180km/h top speed.

To put those figures in perspective, the similarly-priced VW Golf R only manages 156kW/tonne and 4.8sec to 100.

Under the bonnet, the Terramar VZe pairs a 1.5-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine with a single electric motor, for a combined output of 200kW and 400Nm.

On paper, those figures sit a little behind some of the more value-focused plug-in hybrid options, like the BYD Sealion 6 Premium and GWM Haval H6 GT, and it’s also front-wheel drive, where some rivals offer all-wheel drive.

In practice, though, it doesn’t feel underdone. The six-speed automatic shifts cleanly and the transition between electric and petrol power is smooth. As a whole, the set-up feels well calibrated.

All #3s headed to Australia for now are fitted with the larger of the two battery packs available – a 66kWh lithium nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) item.

In the Brabus, it is rated to average up to 415km of WLTP-certified range, which is between 20-40km shy of the mid-spec Premium version.

Smart says the WLTP average energy consumption is 17.7kWh/100km. Our 3000km-old test car’s trip computer displayed a life-cycle average of 14.6kWh/100km since delivery.

During our week with the Brabus, we managed an average of 19.4kWh/100km, and that was over a 95km period of sustained highway driving at 114km/h with cruise control on and climate control set at 18 degrees (to combat the radiant heat from that glass roof).

With a big 22kW AC charger and 150kW DC charger capability, the former will replenish that 66kWh battery in about 32 hours using a home plug or 10 hours with an optional 7.0kW Wallbox, while the latter will need just over an hour from 10-80 per cent with a common 50kW DC charger.

The VZe uses a 20kWh lithium-ion battery, which is on the smaller side compared to some alternatives but it still delivers a useful amount of electric driving range at 109km (WLTP).

With its Type 2 CCS charging port, you can access DC fast charging at up to 50kW, with a claimed 0-80 per cent top-up taking around 26 minutes. On AC, it’s more of an overnight affair, so it suits a home charging routine.

Officially, energy use is rated at 1.8L/100km on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, and after a mix of highway and urban driving, I saw a trip computer figure of 1.5L/100km.

That’s an impressive result but it comes with a bit of context. I'm charging it daily to make the most of the claimed electric-only range, and that has a big influence on the numbers you’ll see in the real world.

Whatever notions ‘Smart’ might evoke, the #3 Brabus obliterates them. This is no buzzy little city-car runabout, but a surprisingly mature and athletic driving machine. This is a seriously rapid performer.

A trio of driving modes give you a hint of what you’re in for. Eco is lightness and fluff. Not very Brabus, but smooth and calm enough for relaxed commuting. And it’s far from slow, scooting off the line with zip and zest. Enough for most.

Comfort is actually a good all-round setting to be in, with an eager yet controlled level of performance. Strong acceleration and instant accelerator reaction show you mean business – if you’re in the mood. Still civilised and serene otherwise.

Sport ups the ante, as you’d expect, providing a decent whack of speed and immediate response. Actually, this is enough to keep up with most sports car costing thrice the price, while maintaining the driver-assist safety net. Fun without the fear.

Brabus mode is off-the-leash fury, turning the #3 into a convincing AMG alternative thanks to blistering thrust and a powerful punch across the spectrum. More (artificial) noise, more drama, more speed, more fireworks. The 'Launch Control' pins you to your seatback.

Yet even in the latter setting, the Smart behaves with a maturity beyond the brand’s reputation, capable of quick corners with exceptional (AWD-enhanced) body control and roadholding grip, without a punishing ride.

Underneath, a unique suspension tune for the MacPherson-style struts up front and multi-link rear end keep the Brabus hunkered down more effectively at speed.

And even in pouring rain, there are no complaints about the Brabus’ assured and confident handling. Yes, the suspension is firm, but it’s far from uncomfortable, so, an acceptable trade-off.

Plus, though not strictly one-pedal driving, the regenerative braking pressure is enough for slowing down and speeding up in the ebb and flow of traffic in its strongest mode.

Where we’re less happy is in the #3’s steering. It brings three weight modes to the table – but only two are useful, 'Light' and 'Standard'. Super-easy yet not totally devoid of substance, Light is great for around town and general commuting.

But when you lean on it at speed, the steering, whilst crisp and reactive, is not always linear in feel or motion, especially when accelerating at the same time, as you might when coming out of a fast corner.

Depending on how hard you are on the accelerator, there can be a visible step when turned from the straight ahead that can be quite disconcerting. It’s a bit like when slurping in a lumpy bit in a smoothie.

So, what about 'Sport' mode? Here, the steering is just as described above, but with added weight and not much more. Not worth it. Best is Standard mode.

Another disappointment is the advanced driver-assist safety (ADAS) tech’s state of tune. It’s in a state, literally.

The intrusive and apparently non-permanently switch-off-able lane-keep systems, especially, end up resisting what the driver intends, and even fight to steer the car where it thinks it needs to be. This is frustrating and potentially dangerous.

It’s been reported that Geely, and not Mercedes, undertook the development of these ADAS systems. We’re getting sick of (mostly Chinese) manufacturers rolling the arm over and imposing this sort of nannying and ultimately counter-intuitive driving interference tech.

This needs to be fixed. It stops the #3 Brabus from being a great performance bargain.

On the road, the Terramar VZe makes an immediate impression. Power delivery is prompt, and even with the battery depleted, it feels responsive off the mark. There’s enough in reserve that you don’t feel like you’re chasing performance, even when you lean on it.

The handling follows a sporty brief. Suspension tuning does a good job of smoothing out the bigger bumps, but it still lets a fair amount of road feedback in, particularly when you’re pushing through a corner. The steering is on the firmer side and the brakes are quite sensitive, which takes a moment to adjust to, but together they give the car a more engaged feel. That said, it won’t be to everyone’s taste.

Visibility is one area that takes a bit more effort. The lower window line and thicker pillars give it a more enclosed feel than a typical mid-size SUV, so you find yourself being a bit more deliberate with blind spot checks, particularly around the A-pillar.

Ride comfort holds up despite the firmer set-up, and the sports seats do a good job of keeping you settled. Around town and under electric power, the cabin is impressively quiet, though you notice more road and engine noise creeping in at highway speeds or under heavier acceleration.

Around tighter spaces, it feels smaller than it is. The 11.5-metre turning circle and quick steering make it easy enough to manoeuvre, and the 360-degree camera is a useful addition, although the image quality doesn’t quite match the expectations set by the price point.

On the safety front, the Terramar holds a maximum five-star ANCAP rating from 2025 testing and comes equipped with seven airbags.

The standard active safety suite is comprehensive, covering the essentials like lane keeping aid, lane departure warning, lane centring, forward collision warning, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, driver attention monitoring and a side-exit warning system.

In use, the adaptive cruise control is well calibrated, though the steering assist is a little overzealous. It requires quite a firm hold on the steering wheel to override warnings or prevent emergency intervention... like braking, as it did me going 80km/h in a tunnel.

It’s also worth noting a couple of omissions. There’s no emergency call functionality, and hill descent control (HDC) isn’t included.

The autonomous emergency braking has junction, car, cyclist, motorcyclist and pedestrian detection and is operational form 5.0-85km/h (up to 250km/h for car detection).

The #3 offers a (decidedly-average) five-year or (disappointing) 130,000km warranty, whichever comes first. There is also roadside assistance available for free during this period.

Given other EV manufacturers are going seven and even 10 years in the case of MG, with most including unlimited kilometres, this could be better.

Scheduled maintenance is every 12 months or every 20,000km.

Smart provides a pre-paid four-year/80,000km service plan for $3120, which comes to $780 annually. This seems quite expensive for an EV, even a premium one.

In terms of ownership, the Terramar is covered by Cupra’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. That’s fairly standard for the segment, though it sits behind some rivals now offering longer seven-year plus programs. Inclusion of five years' roadside assistance is a welcome addition.

Servicing can be pre-purchased with either a three- or five-year plan, with the latter priced at $2590, which is in line with what you’d expect for this class. Intervals are set at every 12 months or 15,000 kilometres.

One thing to keep in mind is the size of the Cupra service network. It’s still relatively limited, with around 14 centres nationwide, so depending on where you’re based, that may take a bit more planning.