Skoda Scala vs Abarth 595

What's the difference?

In many ways, the Scala 110TSI Monte Carlo reminds us of the lower-line Mercedes-Benz A180 and BMW 118i in the way it blends premium European presentation with a sporty flavour. Seen in this context, the $15K or so you save going the Skoda instead makes it a winner.

However, the Monte Carlo’s stiff suspension is one trait shared with the above luxury brands’ offerings at base level that we can live without, so if you’re enamoured with the Scala’s looks and packaging, we suggest checking out the regular 110TSI with a couple of the option packs added, and enjoy a smoother and softer experience.

Or check out one of the latest VW Golf alternatives instead.

It’s tough to be kind to the Abarth 595. Based on a platform that’s more than a decade old, the car has been left behind by its rivals in many ways, including basic ergonomics and its value equation.

The larger engine does work well in this smaller package, and its road-holding ability belies its size. However, only die-hard fans of the Abarth brand will be able to cope with the uncomfortable seating position and a complete lack of even the most perfunctory features that cars costing $10,000 less are able to offer.

The Rapid was only sold in boxy Spaceback shape in Australia, and the wagon-oid look established by that elongated five-door two-box hatch silhouette has migrated to the Scala too.

It's not unique to this brand of course, with Mazda’s BJ 323 Astina and (maybe more stylishly) the original Impreza wagon of the ‘90s espousing similar themes.

The differences between old and new Skoda are in the latter's more contemporary body surfacing and modernised nose and tail treatments that are all, frankly, a little fussy and too confusingly similar to other Skodas of today, especially the Octavia and Kamiq. We’re talking cookie-cutter clones of each other from some vantage points. Not unattractive, just samey.

Germans love this sort of Matryoshka doll thinking when it comes to car design.

Still, the upshot is plenty of space inside.

Despite being based on a design that’s a decade old, the Abarths still stand out. Based on the classic Fiat 500 shape of the 1950 and '60s, it’s more cute than cut-throat, with a narrow track and tall roof giving it a toy-like presence.

The Abarth attempts to beef things up with deep front and rear bumper splitters, go-fast stripes, new headlights and alternate-colour wing mirrors.

The 595 rides on 16-inch rims, while the Competizione runs 17s.

Inside, it’s definitely different to most mainstream cars, with colour-coded plastic panels on the dash and a very upright seating position, along with a dual-tone steering wheel.

It’s a love-it-or-hate-it proposition. There’s no middle ground here.

The Scala might be built on a stretched Polo platform, but there is nothing short or skinny about this roomy little runabout. Long doors, wide apertures and a sense of space as a result of the six-window glass area means the Skoda squares up as a solid small hatch proposition.

Apart from the badges, umbrella holder in the driver’s door side, cruise control stalk seemingly stolen from a ‘90s Audi 80, brand-specific graphics and there being no flocked door pockets, there’s very little that isn’t VW inside. German heft, precision quality, squidgy upper plastics and a premium ambience are present in abundance.

Take the driving position. It offers a pleasing amount of adjustment so taller or larger drivers can fit inside. The same goes for the steering rack adjustment (tilt and telescopic), firm and always supportive sports-style front seats, while the weight of the switchgear and the feel of the textures are all kin to the Golf.

Drilling into them a little further, the Monte Carlo's front pews look wild. Tombstone-shaped, with outlandish shoulder flares and side bolsters, thick red striping and deep contours, they promise – and deliver – exceptional comfort and support. They're designed this way for improved body location during g-force-inducing hard cornering, speaking to this grade's athletic nature.

Both front seats offer multitude of adjustability, with lumbar support and height movement, as well as the obvious front-to-rear sliding functionality, for both front passengers. These are great chairs to travel in.

Being a Monte Carlo with Travel Pack, the (1.2-inch larger) 9.2-inch touchscreen is another expensive-looking addition, with its (fiddly and unreliable) gesture control, wide fascia, colourful look and elegant layout. It feels slick and smooth on the fingertips.

Five instrumentation panel designs are offered in the digital instrumentation, including a two-dial (speedo and tacho) approximation of an analogue dial and a full-screen map view, as well as a load of other-data related info displays. There’s bound to be one to suit everybody.

But the climate control is needlessly complicated and confusing (it takes a prod of a button in the multimedia system to access air-flow, fan speed and other controls; and what is the point of a glass roof if it doesn’t open? The fabric covering is OK but not strong enough to block out the hot sun. And how can a $40K Euro not offer digital radio nowadays?

Take away the flashy add-ons, though, and you’re still left with a basically sound cabin layout. Large door bins make up for the small-ish centre console storage (with sliding fabric-covered armrest); there’s a sizeable glovebox, two too-small cupholders (it wouldn’t hold our standard-sized Keep Cup), while vision out is very respectable – even without the big camera view.

Some surprise-and-delight details abound, but perhaps not as many as you might expect from the off-beat brand. There’s the aforementioned umbrella that lives in the driver’s door, as well as a waste-bin that sits in the driver’s door card storage area. Generous rear legroom. You’ll discover four USB-C outlets (two under the back of the centre console) and rear face-level air vents. And the Monte Carlo’s racing-car style tombstone front seats, that afford excellent forward visibility for rear-sited passengers. Our Travel Pack-derived rear (as well as front) seat warmers are also nice to behold on a cold journey.

The rear bench is pretty comfortable, though a bit more thigh support from the cushion would be appreciated. There’s no level of sliding or reclining adjustability, however, while the lack of armrest (and subsequently any form of cupholders) is a disappointing omission in any 2021 car.

Further back, behind the long and wide electrically operated tailgate is a big, deep cargo area, which stretches from 467 litres in five-seater mode to 1410 litres with the rear seatbacks dropped. Among other things, you’ll find a double-sided mat with fabric or rubber as required, sturdy bag hooks, a 12-volt boot socket, ‘Trunk Package’ with a net under the rear shelf and two hooks in the top tether), and a space-saver spare wheel beneath that low, low floor.

All-in-all, then, the Scala’s as spacious and practical as you’d expect from a Skoda.

This is another area where the Abarth falls down. First and foremost, the seating position for the driver in both cars is utterly compromised.

The seat itself is mounted far, far, too high, and has little adjustment in any direction, and there is no reach adjustment in the steering wheel column to allow a taller (or even an average height) driver to get comfortable.

The more expensive Competizione we tested was fitted with a set of optional sports bucket seats from racing company Sabelt, but even they are mounted literally 10cm too high. They are also ultra firm, and even though they look supportive, lack decent side bolster support.

The tiny multimedia screen is okay to use, but the buttons are miniscule, while there’s a complete lack of storage places in the front. 

There are two cupholders under the centre console, with two more in between the front seats for rear seat passengers. There are no bottle holders in the doors and no storage for rear seaters.

Speaking of the rear seats, they are the very definition of cramped, with little headroom for moderately sized adults and precious little knee or toe room. There are two sets of ISOFIX baby seat mounting points, though, should you fancy wrestling your wriggling toddlers through the narrow aperture.

The seats flip forward to reveal more cargo space (185 litres with the seats up, and 550 litres when the seats are down), but the seat backs don’t fold flat into the floor. Under the boot floor is a can of sealant and a pump, but no space saver spare.

In truth, it was a long day testing this car… at 187cm, I simply could not get comfortable in it at all.

The range has been stripped back to just two cars, and costs has come down slightly, with the 595 now starting at $26,990, plus on-road costs. 

A new 5.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system (with digital radio), a leather wrapped steering wheel, TFT dash display, rear parking sensors, alloy pedals, 16-inch alloy rims, and (front-only) adaptive dampers are standard on the base 595.

A convertible, or more accurately, a rag-top (cabriolet) version of the 595 is also available for $29,990.

The 595 Competizione is now a whopping $8010 cheaper at $31,990 with a manual gearbox, leather seats (Sabelt-branded sports buckets are optional), 17-inch alloys, a louder Monza exhaust, as well as front and rear adaptive Koni shocks, and Eibach springs.

Unfortunately, what stands out more on the Abarths is what they don’t come with. Auto lights and wipers, cruise control of any sort, driver aids including AEB and adaptive cruise… even a rear view camera is missing.

What’s more puzzling is that the Abarth’s architecture, though a decade old, has provision to accept at least a rear view camera.

Abarth’s explanation that the car’s home market doesn’t see these inclusions as important doesn’t really hold water, either.

In terms of value, the lack of basic content sends the Abarth to the bottom of a competitive pile that includes both the Ford Fiesta ST and the Volkswagen Polo GTI.

At the other end of the Scala is VW’s evergreen EA211 four-cylinder direct-injection petrol engine. Turbo-charged and intercooled, this 1498cc 1.5-litre twin-cam unit with variable-valve timing and a Euro-6 emissions rating develops 110kW of power at 6000rpm and 250Nm of torque from a low 1500rpm to 3500rpm.

It drives the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT) VW calls DSG. Tipping the scales at 1215kg (tare), this gives the Scala a power-to-weight ratio of a healthy 90.5kW/tonne.

VW says it can hit 100km/h in 8.3 seconds, on the way to a 219km/h top speed, so it’s no slug.

The Abarth 595 pair use the same 1.4-litre 'MultiJet' four-cylinder turbo engine in differing states of tune. The base car makes 107kW/206Nm, while the Competizione makes 132kW/250Nm, thanks to a freer-flowing exhaust, a larger Garrett-branded turbocharger and an ECU re-tune.

The base car can do 0-100km/h in 7.8 seconds, while the Competizione is 1.2 seconds quicker; the optional 'Dualogic' automatic is 0.2sec slower to the mark in both cars.

A five-speed manual gearbox is standard, and neither car is fitted with a limited slip diff.

Tuned to operate on a minimum of 95 RON premium unleaded petrol and aided by stop/start technology, the Scala’s official combined average fuel consumption figure is just 5.5 litres per 100km, which translates to a carbon-dioxide emissions rating of 127 grams per kilometre.

That’s impressive stuff for a non-hybrid small car of this amount of space and practicality. Fitted with a 50L fuel tank, over 900km between refills is possible.

What did we manage at the pump though? An OK 7.9L/100km, some 0.4L/100km more than what the on-board computer displayed.

Not a bad outcome, given the at-times hard-revving and racy nature of this powertrain prompting us to put the pedal to the metal. In fact, we didn’t give two thoughts about saving petrol, driving our Skoda one or two-up with the air-con constantly on, and mostly in inner-city or urban areas.

Over 150km of testing, the Competizione consumed a dash-indicated 8.7 litres per 100km, against a claimed combined fuel economy figure of 6.0L/100km. Our brief test of the 595 revealed a similar number, against the same claimed figure.

The Abarth will only accept 95 octane fuel or better, and its small 35-litre tank is good for a theoretical 583km between fills.

From the moment you step inside and press the starter button, you’ll be taken by the spirit and effervescence of the Scala 110TSI’s powertrain.

Slick and speedy off the line, with a minimum of lag despite the inclusion of a turbo and DCT, the Skoda is a strong and consistent performer, with an eagerness to rev right up to the red line without fuss and plenty left in reserve when you need to overtake quickly.

Even in normal mode, throttle response is lively, but for extra snappy acceleration, there’s sport mode, as well as a handy set of paddle shifters for manual transmission manipulation. This is a naturally rapid little commuter... hang on, where have we heard that name before?

The engineers have also done a great job balancing steering effort and reaction, meaning tipping the Scala into corners, zipping through gaps in traffic or parking in tight spaces is no chore at all. You just need to get used to the turbo's thrust if you're coming from a naturally-aspirated car. The 110TSI's fiery nature can catch you by surprise.

There’s much to really admire here, and it is clearly designed for round-town commuting in terms of size, ease and manoeuvrability.

However, we wonder whether the Monte Carlo – with its sports chassis set-up and 15mm-lower suspension – is the right grade for you if you travel regularly over rough or uneven roads.

This is because the ride can feel stiff and unyielding, as well as loud in certain conditions. A set of adaptive dampers would help, as the Drive Selector Mode does not alter the suspension settings at all. Speaking of which, fitted with MacPherson struts up front and a torsion beam rear end, it’s clear that this Scala grade is tuned for the type of rippleless roads you find in more affluent areas of Europe. In Oz, it can get tiresome.

Out on the open highway, it’s a similar story. And you might also find the amount of road noise coming through the Goodyear Eagle 205/45R18 tyres might be wearing over coarse bitumen.

On the other hand, find a set of snaking turns, and the Monte Carlo really comes to life, drawing upon its muscular throttle responses, fast-shifting DCT and taut chassis set-up to gel together beautifully; precise steering brings involving handling and excellent body control, for fast yet secure point-to-point transportation.

This Scala isn’t quite up to GTI standards, but at least it has the dynamic capability to please the keen driver, as compensation for the terse and at times vocal suspension arrangement. Think of it as a warmed-over hatch, rather than a hot one.  

Note that while most of the driver-assist safety tech is right up to class standards, the adaptive cruise control will bring the Scala to a full stop but will not hold on to the automatic braking, meaning that after a few seconds, it will release and roll forward again. Unlike the best systems around nowadays, you need to consciously apply the brakes straight away, and it won’t resume afterwards. This is disappointing for a model that was all-new on the world market less than two years ago.

Over all, then, we rate the Scala 110TSI’s punchy performance, handling agility and smooth-road refinement, but reckon the Monte Carlo’s sub-standard suspension comfort is enough to have us gravitate towards one of the less sporty grades, given that they ride on a less-firm chassis tune.

Ergonomics aside, the combination of torquey engine and lightweight car is always a good one, and the 1.4-litre turbocharged four is a good match with the front-drive Abarth.

There’s always enough mid-range urge to give the Abarth the hurry-up, and the longer-legged five-speed gearbox is a good match for the engine.

It also grips and turns surprisingly well, despite the Sport button adding too much artificial weight to the Abarth’s steering feel. 

That same button also firms up the front dampers on the 595 and all four on the Competizione, which works well on smoother terrain, but stiffens it too much over more undulating surfaces.

Around town it can be hard to strike a good balance between ride and comfort. The difference between soft and firm is much more pronounced in the Competizione, but it will still get tiring if your commute is a bumpy one. 

The turning circle, by the by, is ridiculously large for such a small car, making u-turns - already compromised by the lower front bumper - unnecessarily fraught.

The Monza exhaust on the Competizione gives it a bit more presence, but it could easily be louder (or at least more crackly) again; you’re not buying this car to be a wallflower, after all.

Despite a lack of electronic safety aids – and, somewhat amazingly in the current age, a rear-view camera – the Fiat 500 that forms the Abarth's basis still carries the maximum five-star rating from ANCAP it was awarded in 2008, by dint of its seven airbags and bodyshell strength. 

It wouldn’t have the same luck if it were judged under new ANCAP regs coming into force in 2018, though.

Skoda has switched to an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, while roadside assistance is free for the first year only.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, while published basic capped-price servicing is available. Prices start at $307 in year one, then change to $467, $452, $769, $452 and $542 in the subsequent years. This adds up to $2989 over five years and averages out to $598 annually. Prices are valid until December 31, 2021.

Scala owners can also subscribe to a pre-paid three-year/45,000km or five-year/75,000km pre-paid service regime, which works out to be a little cheaper again.

A three-year/150,000km warranty is offered as standard on the Abarth 595 range, with a suggested service interval of 12 months or 15,000km.

Abarth importer Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Australia offers three fixed-priced services for the 595 range at 15,000, 30,000 and 45,000km, with the first costing $275.06, the second $721.03 and the third $275.06.