Polestar 2 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia

What's the difference?

This latest update for the Polestar 2 is lovely, but driving the original is a reminder of how solid this car has always been if you overlook the inherent impracticalities of being an EV on a combustion-engine platform.

The fact you still get steady flow of over-the-air software updates bringing new features, plus you can now upgrade to the new Qualcomm processor chip, saving some coin and getting a second-hand model that’s a couple of years old isn’t a bad option at all.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

The Giulia is a love letter to the increasingly lost art of the sporty executive sedan. As refined as it is beautiful and oh-so elegant to drive, it’s a reminder of why we always love Alfa Romeo, even when the odds are against it.

Emotional cars like this are hard to come by and they will soon be gone, replaced by something new. The future is not necessarily worse, but it will be different, so if a sporty European sedan with a combustion engine is calling out to you don’t miss your opportunity to drive the Giulia while it still exists in this form.

I’ve always been a fan of the Polestar 2’s exterior design and unlike many new cars it has aged like fine wine over the years. You need to remember the Polestar 2 dates back to 2016 when it was first revealed as a Volvo concept.

It still has clean lines, iconic lightning signatures, plus a tough stance that evokes just a touch of muscle car.

While it has taken me a while to come around to the new blanked-out grille insert, it suits the character of this car given it’s an EV. It also aligns with the wider Polestar design language.

For 2026 there haven’t been any major changes to the exterior. There’s a new sandy-like ‘Dune’ exterior paint colour replacing the silver ‘Jupiter’, plus a new 20-inch forged alloy wheel design for the Long range Dual motor Performance.

Inside, the Polestar 2 looks fundamentally the same as it did when it first launched, in the best and worst ways.

I appreciate how traditional car-like the layouts of the steering wheel, digital instrument cluster and touchscreen multimedia system are. Sure it doesn’t scream ultra high-tech anymore like some of its rivals, but there’s still an understated premium feel to it.

The same can be said for the rest of the Polestar 2’s interior. Everything feels purposeful in a minimalist way which helps make for a clean design.

Speaking of purposefulness, the optional Bowers and Wilkins sound system features a prominent tweeter on top of the dashboard. It looks stunning and is functional, helping to create an incredibly punchy and full sound stage in the cabin.

One of the few finishes I dislike in the interior is the glossy piano black on the steering wheel buttons. You interact with these frequently and it doesn’t take long for fingerprints to present themselves.

There’s now a new synthetic leather upholstery finish for those who opt for the $4700 Plus package. It’s quilted which helps emulate a premium puffer jacket-like look.

Although it’s expensive, the $4400 ‘Bridge of Weir’ Nappa leather upholstery is beautiful and required if you want ventilated front seats. You can only get black and white finishes, which is fine, but bringing back a tan or caramel option would be delicious.

Like any good Alfa Romeo should be, the Giulia is a work of art. It’s sleek, sharp, and immaculately proportioned.

This most recent update has artfully refined a formula too good-looking to mess with. The increasingly dorky headlamps from the previous car have been swapped out for a more contemporary all-LED set, with a three-bar DRL pattern.

The grille has also been tweaked for this update for a more modern style, and the Veloce is now graced with the iconic and more aggressive sport two-tone alloy wheels in the traditional five-hole 'tele-dial' style.

It’s effortlessly attractive, and instantly recognisable as an Alfa on the road. I can’t think of a better way to stand out in today’s executive sedan landscape.

The interior has received less of an upgrade for the 2024 model year, with the same core parts. The major change is the old-school analogue instrument cluster being swapped out for a slick 12.3-inch digital unit.

The puzzling thing about this is the 8.8-inch central multimedia screen hasn’t been upgraded in-kind, making a strange contrast between the sharp and fast digital instruments, and the laggy and dull multimedia panel.

At least it effortlessly sits behind the curvaceous design of the dash as to not interrupt a good shape.

There are of course plenty of other touches which I love. The leather seats look and feel the part, as do the real metal paddle shifters which float behind the simple yet refined and sporty steering wheel.

The push-to-start button on the wheel is reminiscent of other Italian sports machines, while the tasteful smattering of leather, gloss plastic, and textured surfaces keep the premium feel on-track.

Some areas I’m not so keen about: Some of the interior plastics, particularly for buttons and toggles, feel cheaper than they should, and the door cards are oddly basic considering how much attention has been given to every other part of this car’s look and feel.

This has always been the downfall of Polestar 2 and it remains true.

While it’s pretty and has a cockpit-like design, the cabin can feel compromised in terms of space and storage. This is primarily due to the centre console which angles upwards sharply, aggressively segmenting the driver and front passenger space.

The only storage spots on the centre console include a shallow shelf under the centre console, a wireless phone charger and another uncovered storage nook under the touchscreen.

It doesn’t help that the cupholder situation doesn’t allow for a proper centre armrest. You either have no cupholders and an armrest, one cupholder and your arm barely reaches the armrest, or two cupholders and the centre armrest flops into the backseat space. It’s not ideal.

Gripes aside, there are still positives to the Polestar 2’s front row. The seats are comfortable on longer drives and allow for a large degree of electric adjustment.

Ahead of the driver the steering wheel thankfully has physical buttons, allowing for easy use on the move. I also love how satisfying the indicator stalk thwack is. It’s the little things that count.

The digital instrument cluster has a minimalist look and can be customised with a few layouts. I particularly like the Google Maps layout which shows your navigation when using the in-built app.

Moving across, the Google Built-in software for the multimedia system is still up there as one of the most usable out there currently. It’s easy to navigate, plus if you get lost there’s a convenient home button at the bottom of the screen.

Both screens are now driven by a more powerful Qualcomm processor chip which allows for better responsiveness, smoother performance and higher download speeds for in-car apps.

Although we didn’t get a huge opportunity to stress test this new chip, it’s definitely an improvement on the old one. You can technically upgrade your old Polestar 2’s chip through a Polestar service centre, though it conveniently doesn’t list how much this costs.

While physical switchgear is limited, there’s still enough to get by. Over the years I’ve grown accustomed to using the touchscreen to change the climate control, though some physical dials and buttons would be nice.

Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are available in wired form only, which is surprising as wireless smartphone mirroring is now commonplace. It does mean however that your phone will charge up reliably.

Moving to the second row, it’s arguably where the Polestar 2 is at its worst. At a leggy 182cm I do fit behind my driving position but headroom is tight.

It doesn’t help that there’s a huge transmission tunnel which technically isn’t needed given this car is fully electric. That’s a downside of using a combustion-engine platform.

Second-row amenities include air vents, two USB-C ports, as well as a fold-down armrest with cupholders. Heated outboard seats are optional.

At the back the button to pop the boot is down where the number plate is. It’s not overtly obvious unless you know where to look.

As standard the tailgate is manually operated and you need to get the $4700 Plus pack in order to get it electrically operated. It also gets a hands-free function which is handy if you’ve got your hands full with bags.

Boot space is 407L with the rear seats upright, expanding to 1097L with them folded. This includes a 43L underfloor section which is large enough for some cables. The boot size is fairly standard for a vehicle of this size and type.

There’s also a 41L front boot which can be used for further cable storage or other various storage needs.

The Giulia is an old-school low-slung sports sedan. Many will prefer the SUV sensibilities of the Stelvio, with its bigger hatch-opening boot, and its higher ride height can better accommodate less mobile passengers, and makes it easier to fit child seats and the like.

For those willing to trade those things away for a superior drive experience, the Giulia is still solid to live with every day, but has a few drawbacks.

For example, those strangely basic door cards offer only a tiny map pocket with a nook I’d hardly describe as a bottle holder.

The centre console offers two larger bottle holders with variable edges, but there’s also not much else in the way of storage in the cabin aside from a smaller-than-average glove box and armrest console box.

The big win for me is the physical dial set and shortcut buttons for all the key climate functions, making it easy to operate while you’re concentrating on driving.

At least the seats are well bolstered, and front passengers are treated to plenty of adjustability. Visibility is okay, and it was easy for me to find a comfortable driving position at 182cm tall.

The rear seat is a similar story. It’s tighter, and you have to duck down below the roofline to get into it.

Once inside, I was pleasantly surprised to find enough room for my knees and somewhere for my feet to slide behind my own driving position, although the centre position is all but useless thanks to an enormous raise for the driveshaft.

Headroom is passable, but you wouldn’t want to be much taller than me. 

There are, again, tiny bottle holders in the doors, and a further two in the drop-down armrest. Rear seat passengers get dual adjustable air vents on the back of the centre console, one USB 2.0 outlet, and elastic nets on the backs of the front seats.

The boot measures 480 litres which is up there with a lot of mid-size SUVs, but because it’s a sedan, access is more limited, and it won’t accommodate as many awkwardly-shaped objects.

The Giulia we’re looking at for this review is the mid-spec Veloce, which costs $74,950 before on-road costs, sitting above the base Ti ($68,450) and below the top-spec Quadrifoglio ($153,700).

Natural rivals from Germany include the Audi A4 45 TFSI ($77,869), BMW 320i M Sport ($80,200) and Mercedes-Benz C200 ($89,900) all of which suddenly make the attractive Alfa look like a not-half-bad deal.

But then there’s always the Genesis G70 (from $63,000 in equivalent turbo 2.0L form) to bring the value equation back to reality.

Standard stuff at this grade includes 19-inch alloys, an 8.8-inch multimedia touchscreen and a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster (new for the 2024 model year), dark contrast exterior highlights, leather seat trim with heated front seats and steering wheel, aluminium interior detailing and shift paddles with extended leather trim on the dash, updated LED headlights and DRLs, dual-zone climate, push-start ignition and keyless entry, tinted rear windows, and a 14-speaker Harman Kardon audio system.

Performance-wise, the Veloce also scores a limited-slip rear differential to match its punchy engine.

The tech feels a bit old, and the interior has a dated ambiance to it compared to the more open and digitised spaces of its rivals, but there’s something to be said for how organic the Alfa feels. More on this later.

No changes have been made to the Polestar 2’s electric motor set-up for 2026.

Both the single-motor versions have been rear-wheel drive now for a few years and produce either 200kW or 220kW, depending on the battery pack.

The Long range Dual motor adds a front-mounted electric motor bringing total system outputs to 310kW and 740Nm. It’s capable of doing the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.5 seconds.

The $8980 Performance pack (available only on the Long range Dual motor) bumps the total system power output to 350kW. It also reduces the 0-100km/h sprint to 4.2 seconds.

The Veloce might not pack a Ferrari-derived six-cylinder engine like the Quadrofoglio, but its smaller 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine hardly wants for power.

Packing 206kW/400Nm it outpunches six cylinders of old easily, and is still capable of sprinting to 100km/h in a hot-hatch baiting 5.7 seconds to a Vmax of 240km/h.

It even sounds fantastic, as it flies up the rev-range living up to every bit of the Alfa promise. Peak power arrives at 5250rpm, but peak torque hits at 2250rpm.

Smooth shifts are provided courtesy of an eight-speed traditional torque converter automatic transmission.

Although we didn’t get to drive it at this media launch, the entry-level Polestar 2 Standard range Single motor has arguably received the biggest refresh of the line-up with this MY26 update.

It now has a slightly larger 70kWh lithium-ion battery pack sourced from CATL, replacing the LG Chem-sourced 69kWh lithium-ion battery. As a result there’s 554km of WLTP-claimed range with up to 554km (up from 546km).

Long range versions still have a CATL-sourced 82kWh lithium-ion battery with between 568km and 659km of WLTP-claimed range, depending on the variant. This is good but Tesla has moved the game forward with its Model 3 Long Range RWD which offers up to 750km of range.

We didn’t get a chance to fully test out energy consumption during this media event, but Polestar claims between 14.8kWh/100km and 17.2kWh/100km, depending on the variant. This is much better than when the Polestar 2 first launched.

While the maximum AC charging rate remains at 11kW across the line-up, the Standard range versions can now DC fast-charge at rates up to 180kW (up from 135kW). This means a 10 to 80 per cent charge can now take as little as 26 minutes.

Maximum DC fast-charging for Long range versions is still up to 205kW, allowing a 10 to 80 per cent charge in 28 minutes. Lots of newer rivals offer faster charging now.

The 2.0L turbocharged engine has an official combined cycle fuel consumption figure of just 6.1L/100km, although I saw 9.0L/100km in my time with it.

I’ll admit it was being enthusiastically driven, and treated to lots of urban commuting.

The Giulia has a 58-litre fuel tank and requires mid-shelf 95 RON premium unleaded fuel. Its approximate range on a full tank at the official consumption is 951km.

While outright practicality isn’t the Polestar 2’s strong suit, once you get on the road this melts away almost instantly.

This EV is and has always been a driver’s car that’s engaging and rewarding to steer. It’s a shame that many people’s first experience with it was likely in the second row as a rideshare with a driver that has a bad case of taxi foot.

Surprisingly, during the media launch drive program we had the opportunity to sample the original MY22 Long range Single motor and compare it back-to-back to the MY26 models. It’s rare this kind of thing happen.

This is notable because single-motor versions made the switch from front- to rear-wheel drive back in 2024.

While the MY22 example feels like a bulldog yet still capable of carving up corners, it holds up well if you ignore the odd cabin rattle and creak. You can also feel a marked difference with how the rear guides the latest MY26 Long range Single motor instead of the front when pushed.

This isn’t apparent in calmer, everyday driving situations. If you’re not a car person you likely wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.

The rear-mounted electric motor produces an adequate amount of oomph, allowing you to get up to speed with ease. Like all EVs you get snappy acceleration from a standstill, which is thrilling.

This is dialled up to 11 in the Long range Dual motor Performance. Although the Model 3 Performance is technically faster, it still feels like this Polestar 2 is quick enough.

In the fully loaded all-wheel drive trim you’re able to carve corners enthusiastically. It’s incredibly confidence-inspiring to chuck into corners as there’s grip for days and a bucketload of power to back it up.

Although the regenerative braking system is pretty powerful already, the Performance pack adds chunky Brembo physical brakes for added peace of mind. Perhaps Tesla could take note of this?

The aforementioned Performance pack also adds manually adjustable Öhlins dampers with a ‘Polestar Engineered’ performance chassis. It’s an incredible package with a dialled-in feel, though if you want to adjust the dampers you need to jack up the car.

If you’re not keen on outright performance, the regular Polestar 2’s suspension set-up still holds its own but has an added level of all-around comfort. It’s an improvement from the original which was a little too firm.

Across the line-up the steering is direct and makes this car feel nimble regardless of where or how you’re driving. You’re able to select from different steering feels which increase or decrease the resistance.

Given EVs have no engine noise, they can sometimes have more noticeable road and wind noise out on the open road. Thankfully the Polestar 2’s cabin is quiet enough, that is unless you’re driving on coarse-chip roads.

Put simply: The Giulia is a celebration of Alfa Romeo. Yes. Even with a humble 2.0-litre turbocharged engine and an automatic transmission, this is a deeply emotional car. A riveting experience from behind the wheel.

Fly round corners, your eyes wide, exclaiming ‘magnifico!’ as the Giulia gracefully leans in, the rear LSD, sporty tyres, and wonderfully tight steering working together in harmony as you eke out just a smidge of tyre roar.

Laugh out loud to yourself, as you plant the accelerator, hear the muted rumble of the surprisingly angry little engine, and feel the turbocharger kick in half a second later as you power out.

‘Eccezionale!’ You’ll think, as you feel the click of the immensely satisfying metal paddle-shifters, and the transmission responds in-kind, the engine roaring up the revolutions with enthusiasm.

Sure, the Veloce grade is not as raw, or as wild, or near as fast as the top-grade Quadrofoglio, but all of the exciting spirit of  that car is still here, and at a little over half the price, too. The Veloce is an absolute delight to drive.

It has such poise, makes such a fine sound, and does it all so gracefully. This is how you make a car feel as one with the driver.

Even the ride is deeply impressive. It’s not too harsh or noisy, while gifting the chassis just the right amount of lean in the corners and allowing enough play for it to remain controlled over bumps.

Not only does it work well when you’re driving as it's clearly intended to be driven, but around town it’s quiet and refined inside, living up to the promise of a luxury sedan.

The seats and bolstering are great, the visibility isn’t too bad, and while I’ll complain about the slightly laggy software on the multimedia screen, the digital dash is responsive and the physical climate controls are welcome.

It’s not all perfect. If it were, I think it might cease to be an Alfa Romeo and start sprouting BMW badges.

For example, our test car, with less than 2000km on the odometer, had various inconsistent rattles emanating from the plastic garnish around the digital dash, and somewhere behind the back seat.

Regardless, driving this car has made me a little sad Alfa will be putting this wonderful platform behind it in pursuit of more electrified goals.

I can only hope wherever the Giulia nameplate goes next, it retains the spirit of this version.

The same safety equipment suite is standard on every Giulia variant.

Advanced active gear includes auto emergency braking, lane keep tech, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, driver attention alert, and adaptive cruise control.

It also scores front and rear parking sensors, and a reversing camera with guidelines. 

The Giulia’s maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating expired at the end of last year, as it was originally rated back in 2016. The facelifted model is ‘unrated’ relative to ANCAP’s current standards.

The Polestar 2 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered by an eight-year, 160,000km warranty.

While this battery warranty length is standard, a five-year warranty is getting a little short now in the grand scheme of things as many brands are moving to seven-year warranties.

Owners also get five years' of roadside assistance which can be accessed by pressing the ‘Connect’ button on the overhead console. It’s available 24/7 and includes car recovery and alternative transport, if required.

Logbook servicing is required every 24 months or 30,000km, which is standard for EVs. At the time of writing Polestar Australia was finalising service pricing for the MY26 2 and we'll update this review as soon as we receive the details.

There are a total of 23 Polestar service centres around Australia, a number of them shared with Volvo.

Alfa finally updated its warranty to a more industry-standard five-years and unlimited kilometres in 2022.

Service intervals occur at 12 monthly or 15,000km intervals for the 2.0-litre turbocharged variants. Pricing was not available for the model year 2024 version yet in the brand’s online calculator, but to give you an idea for the pre-facelift version, pricing came in between $345 and $1065 per visit, averaging $573 per year for the first five years of ownership. Not cheap, but not as expensive to run as you might expect.

One thing you might want to keep in mind is depreciation. Boring, I know, but even late model examples of the Giulia and Stelvio have been hit particularly hard by the depreciation stick according to residual values we searched up on Autotrader.

For reference, the Genesis G70 and BMW 3 Series have both fared much better in equivalent 2.0-litre turbo forms.