MG HS +EV vs Suzuki Fronx

What's the difference?

The MG HS +EV Essence is a nicely specified medium SUV that should suit a lot of people. It looks really nice and I love that it's fairly practical with its features and size but would like some of the tech to improve. It’s not always seamless to use and in this market, tech is very important. The price tag and the on-going costs are hard to beat and if you’re looking for a greener option that will happily cruise in the city or on the open-road, this isn’t a bad option.

If you’re considering a small car, particularly if an SUV is the goal, a Suzuki should in most cases be on the shopping list. Back-to-basics motoring is key to the brand’s identity. Its most popular model is a tiny ladder-frame 4X4, for example. Hi Jimny.

The Fronx doesn’t break new ground in any practical sense, but it does come in with a decent price and list of features that should sway plenty of small-car fans in the showroom.

It’s decent to look at, comfortable for the segment, and easy to get used to and drive. The numerical rating on this review betrays just how likeable the car is.

It’s not extremely refined and it starts to lose its dynamic shine on rough roads, but in an urban setting the Fronx should excel.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

It has an inoffensive exterior design that you won’t be embarrassed to be seen in. Curvy in all of the right places, it still manages to look sharp with its tapered LEDs and chrome accents.

It sits firmly within the medium SUV specs at 4574mm long, 1876mm wide and 1685mm high, so navigating your local shopping centre car park will be manageable.

The interior looks polished with the Bader leather sports seats and their suede-like inserts. The air vents are cute and add some personality to the robust dashboard.

There’s a plethora of soft touchpoints throughout that enhance the overall comfort and refinement, too.

‘Fronx’ as a name doesn’t exactly scream ‘cute’, but the little SUV has a pretty classically Suzuki design. This is not a complaint at all.

The Fronx is 3995mm long, 1765mm wide and 1550mm tall, but despite its diminutive dimensions the brand has opted to lean into a ‘coupe’ style with a sloping roofline that creates a relatively sporty look, especially for something with a two-digit power figure.

So while some of Suzuki’s designs have been divisive in Australia (Ignis, anyone?) the Fronx takes a slightly more conservative approach by leaning into more design trends than just the coupe-back SUV shape. 

For example, its tail-lights span the width of the tailgate rather than simply flanking the boot as was standard for decades.

The LED daytime running lights at the front are also arranged in a slim, high-up position with a set of headlights below.

Inside is arguably more conservative than out, as the Fronx goes with a fairly standard formula in terms of its layout, with few premium materials (the synthetic leather on the seats feels cheap for example) or adventurous design elements to be found.

But that’s not such a bad thing.

The cabin space is very practical with its size. Each row has a decent amount of head and legroom. The big sunroof also makes the cabin feel airy and light-filled, which adds to that roomy feeling.

The leather-accented sports seats are quite comfortable and both are electric but the passenger side misses out on additional lumbar support.

I did have a few comments this week about the front seats, though, mainly that it feels like you’re perched forward in them. It would have been nice to be able to dip the bottom of the seats back.

The individual storage options are solid for this sized SUV with a glove box, two cupholders, drink bottle holders in the doors for front occupants and an air-cooled middle console box.

I missed having a utility tray next to the two USB-A ports and 12-volt outlet, as the Essence features wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but there is a dedicated phone holder next to the cupholders.

Back seat passengers enjoy two cupholders in the fold-down armrest, map pockets and drink bottle holders in the doors.

The seats in the back are well padded but you feel like your knees are propped up a bit because of the shallow footwell. Taller passengers may feel like they’re folding in on themselves.

The technology looks good but isn’t always easy to use. The 10.1-inch touchscreen multimedia system is simple to understand but regularly feels laggy.

It has built-in satellite navigation but a lot of the controls are found via accessing the touchscreen – like the climate control and heating function for the front seats.

The 12.3-inch digital instrument panel is very easy to read but not really customisable.

Charging options are okay and I like the two USB-A ports in both rows but there’s no wireless charging pad or USB-C port which would provide faster charging speed.

The boot is a decent size for the class at 451L and you can bump that up to 1275L if you fold the back seats down. The rear seats have a 60/40 split for added practicality.

There’s a cargo blind and some underfloor storage for the charger and a tyre puncture repair kit. I liked using the powered tailgate but found it a bit glitchy, it sometimes stopping mid-action.

Because for all the conservative, even outdated, styling in the cabin, the fact is it’ll be refreshingly familiar to someone who’s getting out of a car from perhaps even before the year 2000.

Suzuki’s place at the budget end of the new-car market means its customers are likely either quite young and buying their first new car, or relatively old and looking for a cheap, rarely used runabout as the ‘last car’.

For the former, a lack of techy distractions is paramount. For the latter, ease of use wins over cutting-edge tech in most cases. Which is why it’s probably okay that the Fronx’s multimedia touchscreen and software wouldn’t feel out of place almost a decade ago.

It can be a tad fiddly to use at speed, but it’s still more straightforward than the ‘iPad-like’ systems Tesla has made popular, and there are physical controls for important functions like climate control.

There’s also a row of ever-present haptic buttons for volume controls and navigation shortcuts.

The ergonomics of the interior are quite basic, but there are no red flags in terms of visibility, reach, or placement. 

The head-up display is a bonus, but the physical dials on the dash rather than a digital driver display are clear enough, despite again feeling nabbed from a time before head-up displays even existed. 

Space for the front passengers is decent, it’s not cavernous but it’s far from cramped. Elbow rests and seating positions allow for a relaxed ride.

The back seat is a slightly less comfortable place, but at 178cm I can sit behind my own seating position without my knees touching the seat in front, and my head has just enough space above to accommodate the top of a mullet.

Behind that, luggage capacity in the boot is 304 litres, or 605 litres with the rear 60/40 split seats folded.

There’s also no space-saver spare tyre, just a repair kit as standard.

There’s only one variant of the Fronx, and it lands at $28,990 before on-road costs. It’s also relatively stacked when it comes to features, and Suzuki is even working on a sub-$30K drive-away offer for its on-sale date in September this year. We’d expect that means about $29,990 DA, though that’s to be confirmed down the track.

For something at that price point, features aren’t lacking. While things like wireless phone charging and wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay have become almost expected for even entry-level cars in Australia, the Fronx also features heated synthetic leather seats and a leather steering wheel.

It’s the first Suzuki in Australia to feature a head-up display, and there’s also a standard surround-view parking display thanks to a set of cameras.

The Fronx’s 9.0-inch multimedia touchscreen is joined by a small 4.2-inch driver display nestled between physical dials for the speedometer and tachometer. Exterior lighting is LED front and rear, with auto headlights and manual levelling.

The only extra-cost option for the Fronx is a choice of ‘premium’ single- or two-tone paint - Arctic White Pearl is the standard no-cost colour. Single-tone paint is $745 extra, while two-tone options are $1345, which is a lot pricier than many premium paint options in the market.

The Fronx comes in at the same price as a mid-to-high spec Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic or Chery Tiggo 4, but some rivals like the Mazda CX-3 or Toyota Yaris Cross (with its Hybrid drivetrain) are more expensive even in their lower variants.

Both HS +EV models share a 1.5-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine and electric motor hybrid combination. Maximum outputs are 189kW of power and 370Nm of torque.

It’s very responsive with its power output and you definitely will be surprised by how much grunt this thing has.

Drive goes to the front wheels via a 10-speed auto transmission but it’s clunky and a bit too slow to shift out of the lower gears. This can make it feel like the engine is pulling back even when you’re accelerating, which I didn’t like.

On the electric motor side of things – the lithium-ion battery has a 16.6kW capacity and 63km (NEDC) driving range.

It has a Type 2 AC charging port but it can’t be hooked onto a fast charger as it lacks the CCS enhanced port. On a 7.0kW system you should see a full charge be completed in around five hours.

The Fronx is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine with mild-hybrid assistance, driving the front wheels via a six-speed automatic transmission. 

Its outputs are quoted at 76kW and 137Nm, not exactly high-grade stuff and part of the reason the Fronx feels like it takes more than 10 seconds to hit 100km/h.

With the electric motor being used, the official combined cycle fuel figure is 1.7L/100km and the urban figure comes out at 5.8L/100km.

My real-world usage came to 6.6L. That’s not bad at all, but I have done a lot of open-road driving this week. 

Based on the urban figure and the 55L fuel tank, you should see an approximate driving range of 948km.

MG recommends a minimum 95RON petrol be used. 

Suzuki claims fuel consumption at 4.9L/100km. With its 37-litre fuel tank, the Fronx should be able to manage more than 600km on a single tank, though theoretically its maximum range given its claimed fuel efficiency is 755km.

I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the overall driving experience. Besides the slower gear shifting, it’s generally smooth to handle. The power is there and makes it easy to keep up with traffic or overtake if you need to.

The suspension handles bumps very well and the steering is responsive. You can tackle corners or a winding road with confidence and without too much roll!

The cabin is quiet, even at higher speeds but you will note the whining of the engine at lower speeds as those gears shift.

On a windy day at higher speeds, the car moves about in the lane more than I like but otherwise, is firmly placed.

The regen braking isn’t customisable but it’s firm enough that you’ll feel it when you pull off the accelerator.

Going down a mountain let me gain five per cent charge on the battery and despite driving over 500km this week I only popped it on charge once (with 15 per cent left) - just to give you an indication of its performance.

I kept the EV mode on default but you can switch it over to a full EV if you want to wring out the most from the electric range.

This is not a difficult car to park and you’ll love its size in a small car park. However, the 360-degree camera view, while pretty clear, is jumpy.

At first, I thought it was laggy but the image just shudders, like a bad connection. I's prefer to see front parking sensors, too, as this MG only has them at the rear.

How you plan to use the Fronx will make a big difference in whether what you’re about to read is a good thing or not. 

The Fronx is a light SUV for a start, so expecting brilliant handling, effortless acceleration and a dead-quiet cabin is going to mean you’re disappointed.

But if you want something easy, engaging and fun, the Fronx might work for you.

Our brief test loop wasn’t entirely indicative of what the Fronx is likely to face day-to-day. With limited time and no preset drive program, the roads within a 20-or-so minute drive of Nagambie, Victoria had to suffice.

The Fronx fared well on the average road, it turned out, with the 1064kg Suzuki managing to feel planted enough to hurl along 100km/h back-roads without complaints. It rides on the same platform used recently by the Suzuki Baleno, something I’ll admit to not having driven.

The rougher roads didn’t faze the light SUV too much, though consistently uneven surfaces made it feel unsettled in some cornering.

Its steering and suspension give enough feedback to make the right inputs easily, though the nature of its light weight and minimal accoutrement in terms of driver assistance make the Fronx feel very rudimentary from the driver’s seat.

At low speeds around the centre of town, the Fronx manages the state’s terrible roads well, though taking off from intersections can be laborious. Much like overtaking, the drivetrain will complain.

And don’t expect its mild hybrid system to do a lot in the way of hard work - or any work at all, really. You could take the hybrid badge off the car, let someone have a drive, and they’d be none the wiser.

From the limited observations on the launch, the Fronx would feel best at home in suburbia or a metropolitan centre more so than on the Hume Highway or the towns dotted alongside it.

Essentially, this is not a refined road trip car for the highway, but its no-fuss approach to getting around means you shouldn’t be surprised if you start seeing them in the car parks at universities or bowls clubs.

A big part of many buyers’ decisions about a new car is safety, and the Fronx is pretty basic on this front.

Six airbags cover front and sides for the front passengers, and there are curtains down the sides of the car, but there’s no front centre airbag and no ANCAP rating has been applied to the Fronx as yet.

In terms of active safety, the Fronx has listed among its standard features auto emergency braking (AEB), ABS and brake assist, lane departure warning, hill hold control, weaving alert, blind spot monitoring, traffic sign recognition, rear cross traffic alert and a surround-view parking camera with front and rear sensors.

There are also outboard ISOFIX seat fastenings in the second row.

The only safety system that activated during the test was a lane departure warning, but only when (under normal conditions) it would have been necessary as the car approached the road’s centre line.

The ongoing costs are great on this! It comes with a seven-year/unlimited km warranty, which includes the hybrid battery.

It also has a seven-year capped-price servicing plan, which is above average for the class, and services average $426 which is competitive.

Servicing intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever occurs first, which is fine if you don’t clock a lot of kays every year.

Suzuki has a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty for its new cars, which is a little behind the curve compared to many budget-friendly brands these days. 

Suzuki does have a five-year servicing schedule, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. Total cost is $2005 over the five years, with services averaging $401, which is not particularly cheap.