Mercedes-Benz Eqb250 vs Ferrari 812

What's the difference?

The EQB is a likeable yet complicated machine.

On one hand, the high pricing is a real hurdle, even in the base 250, while the 350 4Matic costing the wrong side of $110K driveaway can’t even be had with seven seats. What is the point of it? 

On the other, though, the EQB is roomier than its appearance suggests, way lovelier inside than anticipated, and – especially after allowed to really be driven hard and fast – a whole lot more Mercedes-Benz in the way the 350 4Matic moves, steers, grips, rides and stops.

As a result, we’d skip the capable but bland 250 and try to haggle hard on the price of the altogether too-expensive yet compelling 350 4Matic instead. It’s the EQB to be in.

Clearly, this is not a car for everyone, and you’d have to question whether it’s a car for anyone, really, but people who like spending $610,000 on Ferraris, and waiting in a queue to do so, will be delighted, because it delivers the kind of exclusivity, and bragging rights, that you’d have to hope a car called Superfast would.

Personally, it’s a little too much, a little too over the top and definitely too mad, but if rockets are your thing, you won’t be disappointed.

The EQB does not employ a dedicated EV architecture – sometimes referred to as a ‘skateboard’ platform – like the Tesla Model Y, or for that matter the brilliant Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6 and Genesis GV60 at around the Benz’s price points.

By this, we mean that it was originally designed as an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. In this case, what lies beneath is the MFA2 platform, first seen in the redesigned A-Class hatch back in 2018, and applied to all transverse-engined Mercedes models since.

The upshot here is that there are some compromises as a result compared to the aforementioned EV-only alternatives, namely concerning packaging as well as weight distribution in some cases.   

Like we said earlier, the EQB’s design is eye-catching and quite handsome. It is clear that the success of the GLB that spawned it is partly attributed to the chunky, almost function-over-form tall-boy utilitarian styling. That ‘W’ shaped window-line kink is an interesting visual feature too.

The changes from GLB to EQB do give the EV definite points of difference, from the front-end’s black flat panel and fibre optic light that connects the (blue-highlight) headlights, to the curved strip LED tail-lights and bumper-sited numberplate mount.

We reckon the 20-inch AMG turbine wheels really do enhance the EQB aesthetically as well, but of course they’re an option on the 250. Though probably not in Gold Rose.

It’s very… big, isn’t it? And it looks even bigger in the flesh with a bonnet you could use to put a roof over your tennis court. In all, the Superfast is 4.6m long, almost 2.0m wide and weighs 1.5 tonnes, so it certainly has presence.

Making something this big look good is a challenge even for those as talented as Ferrari’s design team, but they have nailed it. The front has what appears to be a mouth, poised to swallow lesser cars whole like some whale shark Terminator. 

The bonnet appears to be flaring its nostrils, and looks fabulous from the driver’s seat, and the swooping side and taut rear complete things nicely.

Personally, it still just looks too big to be a Ferrari, but then this is not a mid-engined super car, it’s a grand touring rocket ship, and the ultimate expression of unnecessary excess, and it pulls off that aura perfectly.

As with the popular GLB that spawned it, there’s more to the EQB than meets the eye.

Photos mask the German electric vehicle’s considerable length and height as well as the substantial space offered inside, giving the Mercedes a handy advantage compared to premium alternatives like the Volvo XC40 Recharge, the Genesis GV60 and BMW’s recently announced (and quite handsome in the flesh) iX1 due early next year.

In fact, the EQB’s lengthy 2829mm wheelbase accommodates the batteries as well as impressive cabin packaging flexibility. Its 4684mm body is actually 26mm longer and 37mm higher than the larger, current-shape (X253) GLC, though width is identical to the EQA, making this a long, tall but quite narrow SUV proportionally speaking.

That expansive feeling is boosted by deep side windows offering reassuring all-round vision, boosted by an excellent driving position. All launch vehicles had the AMG sports seats (optional on the EQB 250, so we can’t speak for the base model), but as tested, they provided hours and hours of comfort and support. Loads of adjustability also help.

The EQB’s dash design is attractive and contemporary, though it can also seem daunting at first, requiring time to learn and understand where all the switchgear and controls are. The ‘Hey, Mercedes’ voice command mostly works well, too, and can provide additional tuition. The multimedia screen can be swiped like a tablet/iPad, or controlled via a fiddly touchpad on one of the steering wheel spokes.

Once mastered, the layout is logical and operation clear… with the exception of the drive selector on the right-hand side, which can be confused for an indicator and so knocked out of ‘gear’ and into Neutral on a regular basis. This has been a two-decade-long criticism of Mercedes models.

As with most MFA2 vehicles, the interior design and quality are a big step forward compared to earlier efforts. Multi-configurable digital instrumentation (including an elegant uncluttered mode), gorgeous turbine-look vents, a row of classy toggle switches for the main buttons and a great steering wheel are highlights to behold. Storage seems endless, reinforcing the practical nature of this cabin.

Speaking of which, stepping into the rear (second row) seats further underlines the EQB’s spaciousness. Entry/egress is easy due to wide-opening doors, taller folk should find ample room for knees, legs and (especially) heads, and the (slightly reclinable) backrest does its job. Comfy if firm cushions also slide forward (by up to 140mm) when required.

That’s to aid third-row access (where applicable). To that end, the second-row seats also tilt to allow people to squeeze past. Note, though that this is really a kids-only area, rated for occupants no taller than 1.65 metres. Surprisingly cosy, both chairs are OK for short trips, but longer ones would be a stretch too far except for the smallest passengers. 

Keep in mind that all outboard middle and rear seats where fitted have ISOFIX latches for child seats.

Luggage space is another EQB bonus, offering 130 litres with all seven seats up, or 495L with the third-row folded. Drop the middle row and there’s 1710L (or 1620L in seven-seater versions). These figures are between 20L to 60L down compared to the GLB.

Note, too, there is no spare wheel fitted. Just a tyre-repair kit.

Practicality isn’t really your concern when you buy a two-seat mega car like this, so let’s just say it’s about as practical as you would expect it to be. Not very, then.

Is it possible that any car - save one made from gold, dusted with diamonds and stuffed with truffles - would represent good value at a price of $610,000? It seems unlikely, but then people who can spend that much assay value differently, and would probably say that something as profound as the 812 Superfast is worth buying at any price.

Another way to look at it is price-per-litre, which is less than $100,000, considering you do get 6.5 litres of V12 Ferrari donk. Or you could go by kilowatt, which works out at nearly $1000 each for your 588kW.

Other than that you do get a lot of leather, a high-quality interior, superior exterior styling, badge-snob value that’s hard to put a price on and vast swathes of F1-derived technology. And a free car cover.

As with the related EQA, the EQB uses an asynchronous motor and a single-speed reduction gear transmission under the bonnet to drive the front axle. In the 250, it makes 140kW of power and 385Nm of torque.

Moving on to the 350 4Matic, it delivers 215kW and 520Nm, since a second permanently excited synchronous motor is fitted on the rear axle. This slashes the 0-100km/h acceleration time from 8.9 seconds to 6.2s, though both offer a 160km/h top speed.

This is despite a heavier kerb weight (2153kg, up from 2059kg). Power to weight ratio for the 250 is 68kW per tonne, compared to the 350 4Matic’s 99.9kW/tonne. That second motor sure makes a difference!

Both models use a 66.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack fitted between the axles, with a maximum 11kW AC and 100kW DC charging capability.

As with most electrified MFA2 models, front suspension is via MacPherson-style struts while the rear brings a multi-link arrangement. Steering is by electrically assisted rack-and-pinion.

I did want to give the epic, enormous 6.5-litre naturally aspirated V12 engine a perfect 10 here, but when I paused to think about it I had to admit that it is, quite possibly, a little too powerful.

Yes, it is amazing to think Ferrari can build a car that has 588kW (800 horsepower - hence the 812 nomenclature; 800 horses and 12 cylinders) and doesn’t just dig itself a hole in the road as soon as you put your foot down.

And yes, it does provide the kind of performance that makes all other cars seems a bit piss poor and pathetic, even the really good ones. 

But honestly, who could ever use it all, or need it all? They might seem like irrelevant questions, I guess, because it’s all about conspicuous over-excess, a car like this, so really the question is, would anyone want to live with 588kW and 718Nm of torque, or is it just too scary in reality?

Well, a little bit, yes, but Ferrari’s engineers have been wise enough not to actually give you all of that power, all the time. Torque is limited in the first three gears, and maximum mental power is actually only available, in theory, at 8500rpm in seventh gear, at which point you’d be approaching its top speed of 340km/h.

The fact that you can rev an engine this big, and this lusciously loud, all the way to 8500rpm is, however, a joy that would never tire.

In more practical terms, you can run 0-100km/h in 2.9 seconds (although cheaper, less crazy cars can do that, too) or 200km/h in 7.9 (which is a tiny bit slower than the far lighter McLaren 720S).

What you can’t do, of course, is achieve any of those numbers on winter tyres, or roads with snow on them.

Using WLTP figures, the EQB 250 has a combined consumption rating of 20.4kWh per 100km, down from the EQB 350 4Matic’s 21kWh/100km.

Maximum range is rated at 371km and 360km respectively. Note that due to challenging flood-water and torrential rain weather conditions, on-road real-world figures were not available during the launch drive.

The EQB offers varying levels of energy recuperation to help recharge the battery pack. In ‘D Auto’ it figures out the level of resistance automatically, but drivers can also choose to do this manually via ‘D+’ that provides coasting, ‘D’ that brings mild regeneration off-throttle, and ‘D—’ that activates maximising regen for close to single-pedal driving. These are paddle activated.

Cables for home charging with three-prong outlets are included – an eight metre long one plus a five metre public charging cable.

Mercedes says that using a 100kW DC charger will take an EQB from 10-80 per cent charged in 30 minutes, while an 11kW AC public outlet needs 4.1 hours and at home using a regular 3kW 10-amp socket requires at least 25 hours.

Much as you can’t have a good volcano without some serious lava, you can’t have 800 horsepower without burning a lot of dead dinosaur goo. The Superfast has a claimed fuel-economy figure of 14.9L/100km, but on our drive the screen just said "Ha!" and we burned through a whole tank of fuel in less than 300km. 
Theoretical emissions are 340g/km of CO2.

The most remarkable thing about driving the EQB is how similar the 250 and 350 4Matic seem initially, until when push comes to shove.

Around town, both rise up to meet brand expectations. Easy and smooth off the line, acceleration is sufficiently brisk in the 250 and noticeably stronger driving the 350, as you’d expect in a two-motor EV. Progress is spirited, smooth and refined.

We're also grateful that the engineers seem to have cheekily dialled in connected and agile steering, imbuing the EQB with a likeable athletic attitude that’s just right for weaving in and out of tight traffic spots. Which is quite a feat really, given this car’s substantial size and mass.

Perhaps more surprising is how settled the ride is, no doubt aided by the sheer weight of these two-tonne-plus SUVs, as well as the standard-fitment adaptive dampers. Most bumps are quietly and effectively absorbed.

Out on the open road, the 250 remains sufficiently powerful, offering decent throttle response and quite a relaxed cruising gate. However, if you’re expecting Tesla-matching neck-snapping mid-range thrust, look elsewhere. Same applies to the other model. Though undeniably stronger throughout, not even the twin-motor 350 4Matic can be classed as especially quick.

However, while both EQBs display beautifully balanced steering that go exactly where you need them to be, only the 350 4Matic has the muscle to really explore the lofty dynamic capabilities available at higher speeds.

Across water-logged and desolate rural Victoria, the EQB behaved with exceptional athleticism given its role in life, providing outstanding steering precision, matched by brilliantly reassuring control. We’re talking planted confidence, as the 350 4Matic has the ability to really come together and move with the ebb and flow of a fast country road with outstanding aplomb. Despite teeming rain at times, the Mercedes behaved like you’d hope a swift, safe and sound grand tourer would. Who'd have figured?

Back on the highway, there was plenty of road noise intrusion coming up through the tyres, but otherwise, it seems obvious to us that though you pay more, you do get more with the twin-motor AWD version.

Insane. It’s a word that people often lift from their lexicon when describing a supercar experience, because clearly, as forms of transport, things like Ferraris and Lamborghinis are not sane options.

But the Superfast really deserves the word, because it feels not only the opposite of sane, but truly bonkers. As if someone built it for a dare, realised it was a bad and possibly dangerous idea, and then put it on sale anyway.

Picture some tiny-handed child with his greasy, post-cheeseburger fingers poised over a big red button on his desk that could wipe out humanity, and that’s basically the situation your right leg finds itself in when driving the Superfast.

There is so much power on tap here - even the limited amount of it that the engineers allow you to access in lower gears - that it truly seems possible you’ll have a Road Runner moment, and simply dig a hole in the ground, if you push the throttle too hard.

Yes, on the one hand, the noises this extreme V12 makes above 5000rpm are memorable and moving, like Satan himself singing Nessun Dorma in a shower of sparks. At one stage we found a long tunnel, perhaps the only dry road within 500km that day, and my colleague forgot all about his licence and let rip.

The numbers on my 'Passenger Screen' spun like poker-machine wheels, then turned red and then implausible. I was shoved back into my seat as if by Thor himself, and I squealed like a small pig, but my co-driver heard nothing over the Monaco tunnel during F1 sound.

Even on dry road, of course, the winter tyres we were forced (by law) to run in the foul snowy conditions could not maintain grip, and we constantly felt the rear skipping sideways. Fortunately we were in Italy, so people simply cheered us on.

The likelihood that you will lose traction in this car is so high that the boffins have included a special feature in its new 'Electronic Power Steering' system called 'Ferrari Power Oversteer'. When you inevitably start going sideways, the steering wheel will apply subtle torque to your hands, 'suggesting' the best way to get the car back in a straight line.

A proud engineer told me that this is basically like having a Ferrari test driver in the car with you, telling you what to do, and that they used their skills to calibrate the system. You can override it, of course, but it sounds scarily like an autonomous-driving precursor to me.

What’s disappointing about this car having EPS at all, rather than a traditional hydraulic system, is that it just doesn’t feel muscular enough for a hairy-handed monster of a car like this.

It is accurate and precise and pointy, of course, and makes driving the Superfast, even in stupidly slippery conditions, almost easy. Almost.

It’s actually surprising how hard you can push a car like this along a windy and wet mountain road without careering off into a muddy field.

More time, and more traction, would have been appreciated, but you can tell it’s the sort of car you’d grow into, and perhaps even feel in control of, after a decade or so together.

So it’s good, yes, and very fast, obviously, but I can’t get past the idea that it’s all a bit unnecessary, and that a 488 GTB is simply, in every single way, a better car.

But as a statement, or a collector’s item, the Ferrari 812 Superfast certainly is one for the history books.

It might not surprise you to hear that, unlike every other company’s press kits, the Ferrari ones don’t generally include a section on 'safety'. Perhaps because driving something this powerful is inherently unsafe, or possibly because they believe their 'E-Diff 3', 'SCM -E' (magnetorheological suspension control with dual-coil system), 'F1-Traction Control', ESC and so forth will keep you on the road no matter what. 

If you do fly off, you’ll have four airbags, and a nose as big as a house forming a crumple zone, to protect you.

Mercedes-Benz offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty. The battery pack warranty is also industry-standard, valid for the usual eight years/160,000km.

Service intervals are every year or 25,000km. The EQB Service Plan starts at $1625 for the first three years, $2225 for four years and $2650 for five years.

Once you’ve paid the vast cost of entry, it’s nice to know you will get some stuff for free, like your first seven years of servicing, including all parts and labour, carried out by trained Ferrari technicians, who even dress like pit crew. It’s called 'Genuine Maintenance', and is genuinely Kia-challenging in its scope.