Kia Rio vs Toyota GR Corolla

What's the difference?

The Rio S Manual is a fun-to-drive little car with a big practicality and multimedia offering in a segment rapidly heading towards extinction.

While some elements of the drive experience are reminiscent of budget cars from 10-20 years ago, Kia makes up for it by wrapping the Rio in a contemporary looking and feeling package, ready for the buyer who needs no frills and demands no nonsense. Until the manual transmission goes the way of the dodo, there is almost no better option.

The GR Corolla had a lot to live up to before, given the likes of the GR Yaris and GR86 fit their briefs so well.

Now, with a little more daily useability and a little more performance, the GR Corolla is even better at both sides of its Jekyl and Hyde personality.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

While notable equipment is missing, the Rio reclaims lost ground with the way it looks, and to a degree, the way it feels.

Ever since this new generation hatch launched, I’ve thought it brings a slick modern design to the city-car space, and even in its most rudimentary form as-tested (our car even came in the most basic ‘Clear White’ paint) it’s a great looking little hatch.

Sure, it doesn’t have the romance factor of the Fiat 500, nor the more delicate curvature of the much more expensive new-generation Toyota Yaris, but it certainly has a more refined visage than, say, the MG3 whilst feeling a bit more grown-up than the Suzuki Swift.

Solid, squared-off lines give this car a sporty pose, and its frowny-face and blocky rear round out a stout city-car persona, and I especially like the way even this most basic trim is adorned with contrast pieces, a spoiler above the boot lid, and body-coloured door handles and mirrors.

Sure, the 15-inch steelies dress it down a bit, but on the Rio these leave the impression of financial prudence rather than cost-cutting.

Inside is basic but tidy. The overall look maintains a hint of sportiness, with an appealing symmetrical finish to the dash.

There’s no question the Rio is a budget model when it comes to the touch though, with everything either a soft polyurethane or a nasty hard plastic, so while it all might look neat it’s far from the most comfortable place to be for long periods of time.

The basic dot-matrix multifunction display, chunky plastic air-conditioning controls, and polyurethane items from the wheel to the handbrake and shifter are reminders of a bygone era, but the overall aesthetic of the driver’s space is pleasing.

The Corolla already looks more sporting than most hatchbacks even before the GR treatment, but a few tweaks up front, some wider wheel arches and a third exhaust exit at the back have this thing looking almost ready for a rallycross.

The only downside to that is the changes are relatively minor from some angles. If you weren’t aware of the GR version, you'd need to see the GR Corolla from the front or spot that exhaust to know something was up.

The update has, however, ushered in a change at the front bumper, where the air intakes have been adjusted for improved airflow “to the radiator, intercooler, brake ducts, sub radiator and automatic transmission fluid cooler”

In part, this was necessary to help cool the new automatic gearbox, though it does generally help with overall cooling.

While the GR Corolla looks the part, there’s more function to it. The air that passes in through the side intakes at the front is vented to a duct in the wheel arch that also cools the brakes.

It’s the same as the GR Yaris sibling in terms of the philosophy behind aerodynamics and cooling in many ways, though much of the Yaris is bespoke, where on the Corolla, parts have been attached to the standard body.

Like the outside, the inside of the GR Corolla is mostly the same bones as its non-hot-hatch relatives, but the aforementioned sports seats, leather trim and aluminium pedals are all fairly strong hints this isn’t quite ‘hire car spec’.

I'd argue the key reason to buy the Rio at this end of the market is that it has the most space and largest cabin relative to its rivals, bar maybe the Suzuki Baleno.

All-round practicality is great, with front passengers scoring a low, sporty seating position with a high roof, and so much width in the cabin it almost feels like the Rio belongs in the next segment up.

Storage options up front include a large bottle holder and bin in each of the doors, dual cupholders next to the handbrake up front, and a large storage tray underneath the climate unit. Unlike the Yaris or Mazda2, the Rio features a small armrest console box, which gives a small lift to the ambiance of the cabin.

Back seat passengers are treated to great space for this segment, which feels nice and open courtesy of the large rear windows. At 182cm tall, I have airspace for my knees behind my own driving position, as well as relatively healthy headroom and ample width, which is again more like a car in the next segment up.

Rear passengers don’t get adjustable air vents, but there is a single USB port, a single pocket on the back of the passenger seat, and small bottle holders in each of the doors.

Perhaps the Rio’s biggest drawcard is its boot capacity, which at 325 litres is one of the largest in the city car class. Unlike the Yaris, Mazda2, or Suzuki Swift, the Rio will actually accept the CarsGuide three-piece luggage set with the rear seats up, although the rear view was obscured by the medium case.

Thanks to the boxy roofline, the Rio offers a cavernous 980L with the rear seats folded down, and despite its abundance of room, maintains a space saver spare wheel under the floor.

As far as hatchbacks to build a daily-useable hot hatch upon go, the Corolla is a relatively solid starting point in terms of ergonomics.

Physical buttons and controls for things like climate are within reach for most functions of the car, though the multimedia touchscreen itself isn’t the most up-to-date.

The seats are comfortable but hold you firmly in place, and the steering wheel, pedals, and shifter are all in the correct positions for engaging driving - particularly important in the manual version.

The storage space is where the GR Corolla disappoints a little. There’s door card space for a water bottle, cupholders, the wireless device charger, but not really anywhere for larger items.

Behind the front row, adults will find themselves a little cramped in terms of kneeroom, while dark interior materials make the second row feel poorly lit.

Further back in the Corolla is the 213-litre boot, which is pretty small even for a hatchback, although Toyota lists a maximum 503 litres with the seats folded down.

Under the boot floor is a tyre repair kit, rather than a spare tyre. Keep that in mind if undertaking a road trip.

The 2025 Toyota GR Corolla comes in just one grade now, the highly-speced GTS, which starts from $67,990 plus on-road costs for the six-speed manual, but it's now available with an eight-speed automatic for $70,490.

Sounds like a lot for a Corolla, and it’s a little more than the $64,190 asking price the GTS manual wore before, but compare it to the highly-regarded Honda Civic Type R ($74,100) or the do-it-all VW Golf R ($70,590) and it lines up.

While the GTS has plenty of features for the price, they’re not all focused on the comfort of the interior.

For example, the synthetic leather and suede sports seats are manually adjustable, even though they are heated.

The 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen is similar to that in the standard Corolla, too, plus dual-zone climate, USB-C ports, the wireless phone charger and JBL Audio system are all expected features of a hatchback at more than $60,000.

The GR Corolla does however gain heating for the leather-wrapped sports steering wheel, plus leather trim for the parking brake and shifter too. It also scores aluminium pedals.

There’s a lot more under the skin when it comes to the GR, some of which is visible via controls in the cabin, but we’ll come to that.

The Rio is beginning to fall behind here with an antiquated 1.4-litre four-cylinder non-turbo petrol engine. Peak outputs aren’t far off where they should be for this segment, with 74kW of power and 133Nm of torque, although they arrive at the most distant end of the rpm range (6000rpm and 4000rpm respectively) so you need to rev it.

It can be clumsy to extract this power, too, with the engine paired in this circumstance to a six-speed manual which leaves a lot to be desired in terms of action and clutch feel.

While the abundance of ratios can be beneficial for fuel consumption, it’s clear this car was designed to be paired with the more modern three-cylinder turbocharged engine only available on the top GT-Line trim.

The GR Corolla’s 1.6-litre three-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine is now a little torquier than before, with outputs now 221kW (at 6500rpm) and 400Nm (between 3250 and 4600rpm) thanks to an extra 30Nm.

The G16E-GTS engine can now drive the Corolla’s four wheels through a choice of gearboxes, either the existing six-speed manual or an eight-speed torque converter automatic.

As well as the usual drive modes, Eco, Normal and Sport, the Corolla’s GR-Four all-wheel-drive system can split the torque to the front or rear wheels via its limited-slip diffs.

Normal, Track and Gravel modes can distribute drive either 60:40 front/rear in Normal, 53:47 in Gravel, or variably depending on conditions and need for acceleration in Track.

Toyota hasn't provided a 0-100km/h time for the 2025 GR Corolla in either variant, but the auto should knock it over in under five seconds, with the manual taking a little longer.

The Rio S manual has an official combined cycle fuel consumption rating of 5.6L/100km, which is about right for a light car with a small engine.

On test, covering largely urban kilometres, I saw a higher but not unreasonable 7.4L/100km. Still, this number isn’t too far off what some larger cars with 2.0-litre engines are capable of.

Rios with this engine accept entry-level 91RON unleaded fuel, and have 45-litre fuel tanks. They are only compliant with Euro 5 emissions regulations.

Toyota’s claimed fuel consumption for the GR Corolla with a manual gearbox hasn't changed from the previous 8.4L/100km, which isn’t bad for a sports car.

With the auto, Toyota says it burns through the fuel faster at a rate of 9.5L/100km.

In either case, the Corolla’s 50-litre fuel tank needs to be filled with premium 98 RON petrol, and theoretically could provide more than 500km of driving if conditions and your driving style are both perfect for efficiency.

Chances are, however, you’ll feel the need to put your right foot down a little harder than they did during WLTP testing, if for no other reason than to hear the turbo flutter when you lift off.

A six-speed manual with a tiny non-turbo engine is an absolute oddity in today’s new car market, but as a result of its rudimentary approach, there’s something refreshingly honest about the Rio S.

The engine requires a wringing to extract the desired result, and a lot of action on the gears, as six speeds proves to be quite a few to work your way through before you achieve cruising speed.

As so much interaction is required with the transmission, I wish it was tighter when it comes to the clutch which feels a bit doughy at the best of times.

The Rio is very organic, though, with next to no electrical assistance for any of its interaction points offering the driver a high level of control.

The steering is direct, but as a result of a cheaper rack (with less teeth compared to this car’s Stonic relation), it feels simple and brittle when it comes to feedback.

The same criticism can be levelled at the suspension, which errs on the side of firm. This attribute combines with the low seating position to make even this most basic Rio an absolute hoot in the corners.

But it can be a little crashy over every-day potholes and corrugations, despite the abundant amount of rubber cladding the 15-inch steel wheels.

Visibility is superb out of this little car’s big windows, making you feel in control of your surroundings (necessary in the multi-lane confines and tight parking conditions of a city), and ergonomics in the cabin are absolutely on-point with the large touchscreen elements easy to reach and the instruments taking a basic no-nonsense form.

While noise levels are okay at urban speeds, they pick up above 80km/h, making the Rio more unpleasant to drive over long distances than, say, the more upmarket-feeling Yaris.

The Rio does find its place in this price bracket as a fun-to-drive, but predictably rudimentary experience, for the niche audience of drivers seeking an entry-level car who are still able to shift gears themselves.

The GR Corolla isn’t as engaging to drive as the GR Yaris, it’s not as honed as one particular rival, the Honda Civic Type R, and it’s not as ‘nice’ as the Golf R.

But the GR Corolla is still an excellent car to drive, and it’s better for its update. In fact, the two major gripes I had with the pre-facelift car have been addressed.

I was in a unique position to be able to compare the old and new versions of the GR Corolla as I drove a MY 2024 version a week prior to the media launch for the 2025 model.

The first and probably biggest issue I had was that the Corolla’s suspension seemed like it must have been rather stiff and the body bracing quite rigid for a car riding on 19-inch wheels to let that much road noise and that many harsh bumps into the cabin.

Though it wasn’t mentioned before the on-road drive loop, the car felt more compliant without sacrificing ability and seemed much more suited to daily duties.

Toyota’s product team confirmed there had been tweaks made to the rear suspension geometry and that I wasn’t just imagining it.

The second issue is more for the sake of passengers who may be less agreeable to the three-pot thrum resonating along the exhaust underfloor.

Toyota has solved this by putting a slight mute on the pipes in the Eco drive mode, so the car is now just ‘a bit’ lairy rather than full boy racer.

Generally, it’s hard not to compare the GR Corolla to the smaller (but original) GR hatch, the Yaris. Especially having driven them back-to-back at the media launch.

Without leaning too much on that, I will say that while the Yaris feels like a rally car that's been modified to be road-legal, the Corolla feels more like a road car that was tweaked for rallying.

The Corolla stops just short of being too ‘raw’ for everyday use in most aspects, but it’s still very capable when it comes to driving fast. 

Like its suspension, the steering feel is dialled in for feedback without being too rough, and allows you to corner accurately without feeling like you need to second-guess or adjust inputs.

When it comes to handling, it doesn’t feel like the Corolla is entirely leaning on the Yokohama Advan tyres for grip, as it feels tied-down and doesn’t pitch and roll through corners.

The duality of the GR Corolla is helped by its drive mode and differential settings and even on track can help you lean into your own driving style.

While the rear-biased 30:70 setting previously made for a slightly tail-happy hot hatch, the new variable Track setting does a fabulous job of keeping the drive where it needs to be, though it turns out it’s also rather handy for sliding the Corolla around a wet skid pan.

Another neat trick is the GR’s handbrake, same as the Yaris, which can disconnect the rear diff when engaged so you don’t need to dip the clutch pedal in the manual version when indulging in handbrake turns.

It will set you back to 2WD mode when the drivetrain overheats, however, or at least when its sensors suspect the drivetrain has overheated - something that only happened after a lot of handbrake turning and spinning wheels as the hatchback slid sideways.

The Corolla’s brakes are ventilated 356mm front and 297mm rear discs, and doesn't lose stopping power even after plenty of tight, twisting road driving where the brakes and the sticky Yokohama Advan tyres copped a workout.

The new auto transmission is also a delight. It's calm during normal driving but snappy with shifts in Sport mode and set to manual gear selection. It won’t really cooperate on a rapid drive of its own accord.

The only criticism of the auto gearbox (aside from being less engaging than the manual, but that’s your own choice) is that the shift paddles behind the wheel feel a little plasticky, but I’m nitpicking at this point.

The Corolla’s not lacking in safety kit, with a healthy list of passive and active features as well as a series of seven airbags and three ISOFIX points along the rear seats.

ANCAP tested the non-GR Corolla in 2018 and awarded it five stars, though that score is now outdated. It’s not clear if the car’s updated tech would manage five stars again, though the car is clearly structurally sound.

Aside from the usual expectations like auto emergency braking (AEB), a blind spot monitor, parking sensors front and rear plus a decent reversing camera, the GR Corolla also has rear cross-traffic alert and Toyota’s ‘Safety Sense’ suite of active kit.

That includes a pre-collision safety system with pedestrian detection and cyclist detection in daylight, active cruise, intersection assist, emergency steering assist, lane departure and lane-trace assist, road sign detection for speed limits and auto high beam.

The Rio again gets the edge on its budget competition with a lengthy seven-year, unlimited kilometre warranty. In this space it only butts heads with the MG3, which offers a matching promise.

Roadside assist is included for up to eight years if you continue to service with Kia, and there's also a capped price service program for the duration of the warranty, covering up to 105,000km.

The Rio needs to be serviced once every 12 months or 15,000km, and prices range from $269 and $608 per visit, for an annual average of $409.40.

Not the cheapest servicing schedule we’ve seen, particularly when compared with the likes of Toyota.

Toyota offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty plus an extra two-year warranty on the GR Corolla’s engine and driveline.

There’s also a capped price on the first three years of servicing for the GR Corolla at $310 per service.

The downside to the servicing arrangement is that intervals are six months or 10,000km, whichever comes first. That's more regular than a usual schedule and it means potentially pricier servicing for the seventh visit onwards.