Kia Ev3 vs Toyota C-HR

What's the difference?

The GT-Line is relatively expensive, yes. The Air Standard Range isn’t groundbreaking even at under $50,000, no. But the sweet spot in the EV3 line-up is being able to pay $53,315 for the Air Long Range and come away with a roomy small SUV that can realistically cover almost 600km in the real world.

And it does everything properly, no big red flags or dealbreakers.

Its steering weight at speed on winding roads being the biggest complaint isn’t the end of the world for how otherwise comfortable the EV3 feels on-road.

Put it this way - I recently spent a few days in a Mini Aceman, a five-door electric SUV not too far from the EV3 in size. It is about as fast, and costs a little more, but it doesn’t have a lot more to offer in terms of features and it’s nowhere near as good on range with about 400km to its longer-ranged versions.

The EV3 might still have a bit of ‘sensible’ about it compared to some other electric small SUVS, but when it looks this cute and can get you an extra round trip out of the city compared to ‘Euro’ brands at the same price, it’s hard not to be impressed.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

There’s not much in terms of practicalities that are going to convince you the C-HR is a better option than Toyota’s other small SUV, the Corolla Cross.

Even other ‘stylish’ small SUVs like the Mazda CX-30, fuel savers like the electric MG ZS EV, or performance small SUVs like the Hyundai Kona N are more affordable than the GR Sport version of the C-HR.

In the case of this car, unlike most of its Toyota stablemates, buyers will likely be making a decision from the heart based on exterior styling and its interior rather than value or practicality.

And who would anyone be to tell you not to buy a car you like for its styling?

Family resemblance is everything for Kia’s electric models, and the baby of the bunch so far definitely has lineage on show.

That’s a very good thing for the EV3, because as good as its specs are on paper, the way it looks is key to showroom (or on-road) appeal when it comes to convincing potential buyers.

At the same time as being seemingly made of sharp, angular elements, the EV3’s overall silhouette is relatively soft. Unfortunately, that means Kia’s ‘design philosophy’ (usually a relatively meaningless marketing line) is actually bang-on: Opposites United.

Inside and out, the EV3 is a direct descendant of the brand’s halo EV9 large SUV, and even in base Air specification looks like a properly premium small SUV.

Its narrow LED headlights and taillights were the stuff of Lamborghini concept cars just a few years ago, and its unique wheel designs and the use of contrasting coloured trim can impose either a modern, techy vibe or a bark-over-bite sporty image.

More marketing terms come out in the EV3’s face: Kia Star Map lighting and Tiger Face, respectively the way its lights seem to link ‘points’ together like a constellation map and the grille somewhat resembling a tiger’s nose.

There’s practicality in the design even from the outside - the gentle roof slope is only very slight to avoid eating into interior space, though it’s not the only way the car shrinks at the rear. The front track between the wheels is actually wider than at the rear, so the car is not only shorter but also narrower at the rear. It’s the first time Kia has ever implemented this ‘teardrop’ effect into a car, with the intention being to improve its aerodynamic efficiency.

Most of the colour schemes are decidedly subtle, the new Matcha Green hue looks better in person than can be captured on camera for example, but a new Teracotta colour is an earthy red that really stands out - I’m not sure it suits the car, personally.

In terms of colours inside, it's fairly muted and greyscale, but the mid-spec Earth comes with optional orange interior contrast trim that we weren’t sure would be available in the Australian market.

To invoke a cliche, the interior layout has the vibe of something you might imagine a spaceship cockpit looks like if you were a kid, but it doesn’t sacrifice any practicality by doing so. There are real buttons and switches visible, but only a few as the big screens dominate the driver’s side of the front row.

The look is helped by a series of recycled and “sustainable materials” including recycled PET and bio-based polyurethane. Kia’s aim is to “phase out the use of leather and continuously increase the use of bio-based materials”, so even the GT-Line doesn’t have real leather in it.

There’s a fair bit going on here compared to most of Toyota’s other products, much like the first generation, but being designed with Europe as the key market and Australia as a secondary means the styling team needed to take on some fairly fashionable brands.

All three variants of the C-HR are relatively close in aesthetics, with major differences being two-tone paint or specific trim elements for the top-spec GR Sport.

It uses new Toyota design elements that have been seen on some models already, the ‘c-shape’ lights have been used on the new Prius, which we no longer get in Australia, for example.

The black roof was also available on the previous generation, where this car has carried over the ‘egg-like’ silhouette from.

The overall relatively aquatic styling and shape must be for aerodynamic advantage - its chief engineer told us the drag coefficient is just 0.318Cd - but the removal of the rear wiper to lower drag might have been unnecessary for a city-focused small SUV.

The cabin isn’t as wild as the outside, which may be a let-down in some ways, though it’s still a little more visually interesting than its more mainstream stablemates.

The 64-colour ambient lighting changes based on settings including time of day or drive mode, but can be set to a specific single colour if you wish.

The centre stack on the dash is gently angled towards the driver with a small separation between it and the passenger, creating a slight ‘cockpit’ feeling.

Seats are made from different materials depending on the grade, though no real leather is used even in the GR Sport, where synthetic suede and leather are the main upholstery.

The cloth textiles are made from entirely recycled materials, while the synthetic suede is made from a little less than half recycled materials.

They don’t look cheap, but they also don’t look particularly luxurious.

Along with its general design, the EV3 also has the same focus on space efficiency as the much larger EV5 medium SUV and EV9 large SUV.

Kia compared the EV3 to the BYD Atto 3 and Volvo EX30 upon its global launch in Korea, and it’s stuck with the same comparison as it launches here.

In many exterior dimensions, the EV3 is smaller than the Atto 3, a medium SUV by sales category, while it’s larger than the EX30 in almost every way. However, interior dimensions are reported by Kia as being bigger than both cars in most aspects aside from the first row legroom, but even there only by about 10mm.

The EV3 is 4300mm long, 1850mm wide and 1560mm tall, and has a 2680mm wheelbase, but inside does feel like it’s a category upwards in terms of space.

Along with the roomy interior dimensions, there are plenty of handy spots to put things - a big central storage area and a higher one under the armrest, the device charger, door bottle holders - these and all the controls are generally within reach. 

The GT-Line loses a little bit of this storage space by turning the spot under the central armrest into a sliding table, which could be useful sometimes, but doesn’t seem to me as helpful as another place to put a drink, a wallet, keys, an avocado or whatever other trinkets you and your passengers may have.

The huge multimedia and driver display setup consists of two 12.3-inch screens and a 5.0-inch climate control screen in the middle. The centre climate screen is a little hidden by the steering wheel, but there are also physical climate controls also in the centre under the screen, so there’s nothing vital you can’t do in the EV3 easily.

There are also shortcuts to the main functions of the menu like navigation and media, Kia says tactile controls like that are important for keeping the car usable for a broad range of people.

In the second row, the EV3 feels pretty well suited to four adults for a reasonable trip - I’m 178cm and can sit behind my own seating position comfortably, though if I was too much taller my knees might rest on the hard plastic seat-back.

There is an armrest, places in the doors to put water bottles, and two USB-C plugs actually fitted into the seats. There’s also a little slot to put a phone that might be charging, though it could easily (and perhaps more usefully) fit other things instead.

Behind the second row is a generous 460L boot which puts other electric small SUVs to shame - the EX30’s is 318L and even the Atto 3’s is 440L. The EV3’s boot space extends to 1250L with the seats folded down.

The EV3’s boot floor can also drop down to accommodate taller items, plus there’s a 25-litre ‘frunk’ or under-bonnet storage space.

There’s no spare space-saver tyre, however, as is becoming disappointingly common.

When it comes to interior layout and ergonomics, there’s never much to criticise in a Toyota, unless playing it safe is a downside for you.

The buttons you’re most likely to use regularly, across the climate control, centre console and steering wheel, are all very obvious and easy to find, if a little uninspiring, as is wheel design itself - form definitely doesn’t sacrifice function here.

Welcome are the two large screens, the multimedia touchscreen a large 12.3-inch unit and the driver display either 7.0-inch or another 12.3-inch version depending on variant.

Toyota’s software is simple and accessible, using a few main menu sections, though many will likely bypass this with wireless phone mirroring.

Everything’s in a sensible place: a tall bottle in the cupholders won’t block access to anything, the phone charging pad is tucked away to minimise distraction, and Toyota has kept things like the gear selector and stalks behind the steering wheel relatively traditional.

While the interior feels a little dated by its many buttons and some of its simple graphics, there’s certainly something to be said for a welcome change from distracting screens and menus - if the aim was to not exclude Toyota’s older market, it seems like mission accomplished.

In terms of comfort and space, the C-HR makes pretty good use of its interior from the front, the seats are relatively comfortable and visibility is fine, though the back seat starts to feel a bit cramped.

While cupholders and door bottle storage is plentiful in the front, there’s no armrest and no bottle storage in the rear, only relatively shallow cupholders on the armrests in the doors.

Visibility is also relatively poor with high windows, a narrow rear window, and not a lot of light unless there’s a sunroof.

Behind that, with the seats up, the C-HR’s boot has a claimed VDA capacity of 388 litres in the GXL and Koba, or 362L in the GR Sport. Total volume with the seats down is 1154L and 1490L respectively.

While a Corolla Cross starts at $33,980 before on-roads, or $36,480 for a hybrid, the C-HR is just under $43K in its lowest spec.

And even though you’re paying more for a new hybrid drivetrain and some fun Euro styling, the Corolla Cross’ drivetrain isn’t far behind, and it still looks good enough to sell quite well.

So what’s the C-HR got going for it that the Cross doesn’t?

The base GXL starts from $42,990 plus on-road costs and comes with a bit more than you might expect from a base variant Toyota.

A 12.3-inch touchscreen, a 7.0-inch driver display and wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay have things covered for multimedia, while dual-zone climate, keyless entry and start, rain-sensing wipers, and USB-C and 12-volt ports and chargers cover off convenience.

The GXL has manually adjustable seats with recycled fabric - which I’ll come back to later - plus a synthetic leather-accented steering wheel.

The Koba, at $49,990, scores heated sports seats with synthetic suede trim, plus power adjustment for the driver seat and a digital rearview mirror as well as cabin ionisation via the climate control.

A wireless smartphone charger, a head-up display above a larger 12.3-inch driver display, plus adaptive high-beam all add to the convenience, while a nine-speaker JBL sound system and 64-colour ambient lighting add to the vibes.

Atop the range is the GR Sport, which starts from $54,990.

As well as being more powerful - we’ll come back to that, too - it gets unique styling outside, plus synthetic leather-accented and suede seats inside, aluminium scuff plates, and a heated GR Sport steering wheel.

All three versions of the EV3 have the same drivetrain, the only difference being the smaller battery in the Air Standard Range.

The EV3 is front-wheel drive only, with a single motor at the front wheels putting out 150kW and 283Nm.

Differing weights between variants result in different 0-100km/h times, the quickest being the entry-grade Air Standard Range at 7.5 seconds, likely thanks to a smaller and lighter battery.

The Air Long Range takes 7.7 seconds, while the Earth and GT-Line both take 7.9 seconds.

The difference in boot space is likely because the hybrid-only C-HR comes with two drivetrain options, depending on which variant you have.

The GXL and Koba both use Toyota’s 1.8-litre four-cylinder engine aided by a front-mounted electric motor to produce a 103kW output at the front wheels via a continuously variable transmission.

The GR Sport, however, gains a rear electric motor (taking up some boot space) and a more powerful front motor, helping a larger 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine make a total 146kW - still via a CVT.

Don’t expect to be getting to 100km/h from a standstill in any less than 8.0 seconds in either variant, but both have a claimed top speed of 170km/h.

There are two battery sizes for the EV3, the 58.3kWh unit for the Air Standard Range and the 81.4kWh battery each of the Long Range variants is equipped with.

Of course, the Air Standard Range has the shortest electric driving range - 436km under WLTP testing. Its power consumption is a claimed 14.9kWh/100km.

The Air Long Range is the variant with the furthest electric driving range of the bunch, at 604km, as well as the same power consumption as the Standard Range at 14.9kWh/100km.

The Earth and GT-Line both wear the same set of figures, albeit lower distances and higher consumption than their more affordable counterparts. With 563km of electric range and 16.2kWh/100km consumption figures, they’re still able to cover very usable distances for real-world use.

Charging is the same across the line-up, with the supplied Type 2 AC charger working at a maximum 6.9kW on single phase or 10.5kW on three-phase power, and taking five hours and 20 minutes for Standard Range variants, or seven hours and 15 minutes for a Long Range from 10 per cent to 100 per cent.

On DC fast charging, with a CCS Type 2 charger, the EV3 charges as quickly as 29 minutes from 10 to 80 per cent in Standard Range, or 31 minutes in Long Range, when using a 350kW fast charger.

While we didn’t get a chance to properly run down the battery and test the EV3’s range, the drive route was relatively demanding with power consumption yet the EV3’s range didn’t plummet like you might expect on fast, steep and winding roads.

Toyota says the C-HR uses just 4.0L/100km on the combined cycle test, which is 0.3L less than the previous generation’s claim, but it should be noted the 2.0-litre in the GR Sport drinks a claimed 4.1L/100km.

During testing on the launch drive, but without being able to measure properly from fill to fill, one quite spirited leg of driving netted a 6.9L/100km reading on the trip computer, while a more sedate drive returned 5.4L/100km.

The EV3’s arrival on Australian roads is not only important because it means we can test it in right-hand drive, but also because it’s had a localised ride and handling tune. Time for the proper judgement.

Kia Australia's local program lead for this is, as it has been for years, Graeme Gambold, and according to the brand he aimed for neutral balance with confidence-inspiring and responsive handling, and a linear, natural steering feel. And it’s pretty close to nailing all of that.

In town and on backroads, its ability to soak up bumps and handle rough surfaces is impressive. Not a lot of noise comes into the cabin in either case, too, a feat given the road surfaces. In fact, even with the radio off, the EV3 feels pretty well insulated from the outside, including wind noise.

It's cornering and handling is nice and predictable. It feels designed to be safe if you misjudge a corner, only gently understeering when you've come in a bit spicy.

The body doesn't roll or pitch dramatically, so the car feels planted and, as intended, flat through the bends.

But there’s one aspect to the tune in which the EV3 feels like it could do with a little more attention - its steering.

At low speeds, the steering is light enough, but at higher speed it feels a little heavy. I’m not sure if Gambold’s been going to the gym or if it’s that I haven’t really, but it feels like there’s some unnecessary resistance, regardless of drive mode or camber on the road, requiring a bit more input on the wheel than you'd like.

It does let the car down in terms of driving out on country roads, but fortunately it's not a dealbreaker on highways or in its intended city or suburban environments.

Otherwise, the EV3 is extremely pleasant, with its outputs and delivery feel about right for a small electric SUV, never feeling too slow or unruly. It doesn’t spin its wheels with too much torque, even on wet roads and when hustling out of a corner.

The paddles which allow you to adjust the intensity of the regenerative braking also mean you barely need to use the left pedal, which is a plus for increasing the available driving range.

Speaking of the left pedal, a sudden stop thanks to a surprise slow car around a blind corner went smoothly thanks to a decent set of brakes.

In all, the car is ergonomically sound from the drivers seat, with the positioning for the seat and steering wheel feeling comfortable and easy to adjust, though slightly better vision out the rear sides would be good.

There’s nothing particularly offensive about the way the new C-HR drives, but there’s nothing riveting either.

If you’ve driven anything on the Toyota TNGA platform, this will feel familiar to you - and that’s not a bad thing, it’s generally pretty stable, comfortable and controlled.

The modified Corolla platform it rides on is a very good thing, but the C-HR doesn’t have anything in the way of sporting tendencies its styling might suggest.

The hybrid drivetrain in the two 1.8-litre versions of the small SUV don’t offer up a whole lot in terms of keen acceleration, but even the GR Sport and its 146kW drivetrain need a push to get things feeling properly quick on a twisty road.

The added stability of the all-wheel drive in the top variant is noticeable, the front-drive variants feeling a little less planted when pushed.

Steering is on the slightly lighter side of still being well-weighted - it doesn’t wow, but Toyota’s engineers know what they’re doing and it does everything it needs to in terms of communicating feeling to the driver.

Some particularly rough roads on the test drive showed the suspension to handle short, sharp bumps well and not feel crashy over larger imperfections.

The suspension has been retuned in this TNGA-C platform to be stiffer for more control but also more compliant in terms of comfort.

But it’s around urban and suburban streets where the C-HR will spend most of its time, and neglected streets, speed bumps, or tram lines won’t shake you too much from in the cabin.

All three variants of the C-HR come with a version of the Toyota Safety Sense suite of tech which includes things like pre-collision, active cruise control, speed limit sign assist, a surround-view parking camera, plus all the expected inclusions like ABS, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.

The rear outboard seats are equipped with ISOFIX tethers, too, while the ADR-necessary top tethers are also present.

It hasn’t been tested by ANCAP, but in the case of a collision the C-HR does have a pretty decent airbag count of 10.

Kia’s seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty applies to the EV3, and though that was once industry-leading, it’s now being matched or overtaken by many rivals.

Roadside assistance is covered for one year but can be extended to up to eight years if serviced with an authorised Kia dealer.

Kia also backs the high-voltage equipment in the car with a more specific seven-year or 150,000km warranty, whichever comes first.

Australian servicing costs are pretty minimal in the EV3, with Kia offering well-priced pre-paid plans of three ($674), five ($1285) or seven years ($1897). Certainly some points for Kia on that one.

Service intervals are on the shorter side for an EV, at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

Toyota has a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty which covers the C-HR, as well as capped-price servicing for the first five years or 75,000km, whichever comes first, with each 12-month/15,000km service costing $250.

The C-HR also comes with a 12-month subscription to Toyota Connected Services, with features accessible through the myToyota Connect smartphone app.