Isuzu D-Max vs Volkswagen Caddy

What's the difference?

There’s a lot to like about the regular D-Max in terms of standard features, driver-assist tech, and all-round driveability – it’s an impressive 4WD with plenty of appeal as a daily driver.

And the Blade is even better – but not by a lot.

Walkinshaw’s work on the Blade has bolstered that appeal with conversion work, engineering upgrades and fitment of accessories and all of those elements are the kind of sensible changes an experienced 4WDer would usually make to their own stock-standard vehicle via the aftermarket.

And that’s a crucial point with these type of factory-modded vehicles: some people prefer to do the research, sourcing, purchasing and even the fitment of mods and accessories themselves rather than buy a ready-made adventure machine.

However, there’s no denying the convenience of a factory-backed and -accessorised 4WD ute or wagon, and Isuzu and Walkinshaw have proven, in the same way that Nissan and Premcar have, that these kinds of collaborations can yield positive results.

Do you need a Blade? No, and an LS-U+ might better suit your lifestyle. But do you want a Blade? Many a D-Max fan would say “Yes!” without hesitation.

It’s not hard to see why the Caddy Cargo maintains its enduring favouritism in the small van class. It has outstanding workhorse capabilities, unmatched five-star safety and drivetrain choice, combined with a spirited car-like driving experience, be it unladen or with a heavy payload. It’s not perfect, but it's also hard to fault in a workhorse role.

The Blade’s distinctive look builds on the D-Max’s most recent refresh treatment, in which the ute received new headlights, a bigger grille, redesigned wheels, and three-tier LED tail-lights.

In terms of dimensions, the Blade is 5308mm long (with a 3125mm wheelbase), 1810mm high and 1910mm wide (excluding wing mirrors).

In comparison, the LS-U+ is 5285mm long (with a 3125mm wheelbase), 1790mm high and 1870mm wide (excluding wing mirrors).

So, the Blade is longer, taller, wider (with wider wheels and wheel tracks, and 23mm-wider wheel-arch flares), beefier and more imposing than its standard stablemates.

Also, at a listed kerb weight of 2204kg, this ute is 89kg heavier than the LS-U+.

Exterior Blade extras (all of these are satin black) include front grille with ‘ISUZU’ lettering (and integrated, tinted 112-watt lightbar), front bumper cladding, fender flares with integrated air curtains, ‘BLADE’ lettering across the tailgate, tailgate badging, decals on the front bar, bonnet, doors and tailgate, tubular sidesteps, and a one-piece extended sports bar with integrated stop lamp.

It also gets widened mud flaps, an individually numbered 'BLADE' identification plaque in engine bay, 'Basalt Black' tailgate and door handles and door mirrors.

Inside there are ‘BLADE’ embroidered head rests, 'BLADE’ embroidered floor mats, 'BLADE’ embossed scuff plates, and an individually numbered 'BLADE' identification plaque on the transmission selector surround.

Everything looks good, except...

This vehicle would be a whole lot more appealing without the cheesy katana-style stickers everywhere and the huge ‘BLADE’ emblazoned on its rear end. The ‘Blade’ mentions on the scuff plates and on the front-seats head-rests are about all the decoration it should have.

The decals are shaped to bring to mind the blades of samurai swords I guess, but they look more like ice hockey sticks to me – and they shouldn’t be there.

This ute would benefit from more of a subtle look – it’s chunkier-than-thou appearance speaks for itself, so there’s no need for garish tarting up of any sort.

Our test vehicle rides on a 2755mm wheelbase with 4500mm overall length, yet its 11.4-metre turning circle is slightly larger than a Toyota HiAce mid-sized van, which highlights the restrictions in steering lock shared by front-wheel-drive vehicles like the Caddy and its French rivals.

Underneath you’ll find robust MacPherson strut front suspension, a coil-spring beam rear axle with Panhard rod, four-wheel disc brakes and electric power-assisted steering.

It comes well armoured for work duties with unpainted dark grey plastic used in areas where bumps, scrapes and wear usually occur like the front/rear bumpers (including the rear pillars from top to bottom), door-handles and door mirror-shells. The bright silver alloy-look plastic wheel-covers can also be easily replaced if damaged by kerbs to keep this van looking sharp on the job.

Its purposeful external appearance is matched by a neat and practical cabin design with wipe-clean rubber flooring and fabric-trimmed bucket seats for driver and passenger. Hard surfaces abound in contrasting shades of grey with splashes of satin chrome.

The minimalist dash design is achieved by corralling most functions into the comparatively small (by today's standards) central touchscreen including often-used climate control, engine auto start-stop etc., which can be fiddly and distracting when driving. Thankfully, at least physical dials for audio volume and tuning remain.

Isuzu could never be accused of ever sacrificing substance for style in the D-Max and that remains true in the Blade. 

Not a lot separates the LS-U+ and Blade in terms of functionality or comfort because they share essentially the same interior with only a few differences.

The interior here is at heart a workhorse’s cabin with no fancy-schmancy elements that might spoil this ute’s primary purpose: work … and a fair dose of play, of course.

The latest round of D-Max upgrades brought with it enhanced interior materials, a new 9.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system as well as upgraded functionality across all dash tech, and more charging spots for smart devices.

And the Blade treatment doesn’t add anything other than the aforementioned style tweaks to that – which is fine.

The cabin has a pleasantly familiar feel about it and it’s an easy space in which to swiftly become comfortable and to figure out where all controls are (on-screen and real switches, buttons and dials) and how to use them. 

The interior is adequately spacious with nicely supportive seats upfront and a reasonably comfortable bench-style pew for the three people at the rear. 

The Blade has leather-accented upholstery, but there are expanses of durable plastic surfaces to cope with real-life mess.

Charging options are numerous – a mix of USB-A, USB-C and 12V upfront, and USB-A for the second row – and storage places include recesses for your everyday carry gear, a suitably deep centre console, as well as dual cupholders upfront and cupholders in the fold-down armrest, and bottle holders in the doors.

Back-row passengers get USB ports, directional air-con vents and shallow under-seat storage.

The tub is 1570mm long (at floor level), 1530mm wide (1122mm between the wheel-arches) and 490mm deep. It is a double-walled tub, with an under-rail tub liner, two cargo tie-down points, and it has tailgate assist.

Tub options for D-Max owners include a tonneau or roller cover (which offers at least some degree of security from thieves, and protection from rain, mud, snow etc), or an Isuzu or aftermarket canopy, although a canopy impacts the versatility of the load space because once it’s an enclosed area it makes it more difficult to carry long, awkward and/or large loads in the tub.

The Caddy’s 1508kg tare weight and 2250kg GVM results in a 742kg payload rating, of which up to 100kg can be legally carried on the roof where external anchorage points are provided for roof racks or rails.

It’s also rated to tow up to 1500kg of braked trailer, although its relatively low 75kg tow-ball download (TBD) limit could present a challenge, given that TBD is typically about 10 per cent of trailer weight. So, a 150kg TBD rating would be better.

Volkswagen also does not publish a GCM (Gross Combination Mass) rating, so we don’t know how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time.

The cargo bay, which offers up to 3.1 cubic metres of load volume, is accessed through a kerbside sliding door or asymmetric rear barn-doors.

Its 1797mm length and 1614mm width with 1230mm between the rear wheel-housings provides good versatility, given it can carry an 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or 1000 x 1200mm Euro 3 pallet, two 800mm x 1200mm Euro pallets, or two 720 x 830mm bread-roll containers.

However, with the sliding side-door’s 695mm opening, all of these would need to be loaded through the rear barn-doors which offer 180-degree opening for easy forklift or loading dock access. The load floor is protected by a thick moulded-rubber liner and there are six load-anchorage points.

The cargo bay walls and doors are lined to mid-height and there are two bright LED roof lights and a handy 12-volt socket.

Driver and passenger have ample cabin storage with large-bottle holders and bins in each front door, a handy pull-out compartment to the right of the steering column, numerous bins embedded in the dash-pad, full-width overhead shelf, a large glovebox and a centre console with dual small-bottle/cup holders and numerous storage nooks.

Our test vehicle in standard Candy White is the Cargo SWB, which at entry-level is available with a 1.5-litre turbo petrol engine with six-speed manual or seven-speed auto. Or you can step-up to a 2.0-litre turbo-diesel with either a six-speed manual or (like our example) a seven-speed auto for a price of $45,990 plus on-road costs.

That’s higher than its two small van competitors, given the Renault Kangoo SWB petrol auto lists at $42,990 and Peugeot’s Partner Pro Short petrol auto is $39,990, but the Cargo is unique in offering five-star safety and its drivetrain choices.

The work-focused standard equipment list includes 16-inch steel wheels with plastic covers, 205/60R16 tyres and a full-size spare. There’s also an electronic handbrake, separate cargo bay locking system, a reversing camera, rear parking sensors, heated door mirrors, daytime running lights, two USB-C ports and two 12-volt sockets.

A moulded composite bulkhead with window separates the cabin from the cargo bay. The driver also gets a leather-trimmed flat-bottom steering wheel with multi-function controls, plus adjustable lumbar support for both driver and passenger seats.

The four-speaker multimedia system is controlled by an 8.25-inch colour touchscreen with Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and MirrorLink connectivity and FM radio, but no DAB or (sorry, talkback fans) AM band.

Volkswagen also offers numerous paint colour options and four option packs, plus there’s a genuine accessories range containing useful workhorse items like all-weather floor mats, roof racks, cargo barriers, dashcams and more.

The D-Max Blade has the D-Max line-up’s 3.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine – producing 140kW at 3600rpm and 450Nm from 1600 to 2600rpm – and it’s matched to a six-speed auto. 

Just to be clear: the Blade does not have any power or torque advantages over the standard D-Max.

This engine and auto combination form part of a proven powertrain and while this ute is sluggish when accelerating and it’s not the most dynamic vehicle to drive, the D-Max has a real tractability about it that negates most other flaws. 

It has part-time 4WD, with high- and low-range. Driver-assist tech, such as rough terrain mode, has been tweaked with the aim of making Isuzu 4WDs perform off-road even better than before.

Our test vehicle’s premium 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, dubbed TDI320, meets Euro6 emission standards using AdBlue, and produces 90kW at 4250rpm and 320Nm between 1500-2500rpm.

The seven-speed dual-clutch automatic offers three drive modes comprising (default) Drive, Sport or sequential manual-shifting using steering wheel-mounted paddles. There’s also an electronically-controlled automatic locking diff.

Official fuel consumption for this D-Max is 8.0L/100km on a combined cycle. 

Actual fuel consumption on this test, from pump to pump, was 10.6L/100km for the D-Max. 

The D-Max has a 76-litre fuel tank so, going by those fuel consumption figures, you should be able to get a driving range of about 717km from a full tank.

The official combined average fuel consumption is a hybrid-like 4.9L/100km and the dash display was showing 5.6L after our 355km test, of which about one third of that distance was hauling a near-maximum payload.

That wasn’t far south of our own fuel-sipping figure of 6.5L/100km, based on actual tripmeter and fuel bowser readings. Therefore, you could expect an excellent real-world driving range of up to 770km from its 50-litre tank.

The D-Max has never been a stand-out performer on-road in the ute segment, but it’s never been atrocious either.

The engine and auto combination yield a solid drivability rather than any liveliness, which works fine in this ute package.

Suffice to say, the D-Max is consistently middle of the pack when it comes to ride and handling or refinement comparisons, but again that suits this ute package. 

Besides, the D-Max is a body-on-frame ute with leaf spring rear suspension, so it can’t be expected to produce sportscar-like driving qualities, though the most recent upgrades to the D-Max did improve the steering and driver-assist tech.

But then came the Blade project, which wasn’t about improving the ute’s around-town driveability: Isuzu brought in the Walkinshaw Automotive Group, one of Australia’s leading automotive engineering firms, to make a version of the D-Max that was even better at off-roading than the standard unmodified D-Max.

Boiling down thousands of kilometres and man-hours of Walkinshaw’s work on the Blade into the most salient points for this yarn does not accurately reflect the effort of those involved in the years-long process … but here goes anyway: Walkinshaw has designed, engineered and remanufactured some of Australia’s most iconic nameplates, and, while the Blade reworking doesn’t introduce any new mechanical or driver-assist tech set-ups to the D-Max package, the introduction of new all-terrain tyres, wider wheel track and Aussie-tuned suspension (including Monroe 35mm MTV twin-tube dampers with lifted spring seats) has added a welcome measure of composure to this ute’s on-road behaviour.

And Isuzu big wigs must be feeling a bit chuffed at this point in time because Walkinshaw’s off-road mods have produced real results where they count most: off-road.

The standard D-Max in LS-U+ guise is an impressive 4WD ute, but the Blade version is a touch better on a variety of terrain for a number of reasons.

For starters, the Blade’s Walkinshaw-developed suspension set-up, with those 35mm twin-tube dampers in the mix, yields a more agreeable drive, with more comfort and better chassis control than a regular D-Max on fast dirt tracks and corrugated gravel roads. It manages to subdue most of the lumps and bumps you’re bound to drive over on your way to a beach- or bush-camping destination.

The Blade’s wheel track – at 1602mm, 32mm wider than the LS-U+’s 1570mm – gives this ute a slightly more planted posture than its standard stablemate for improved stability and handling.

And while the Blade’s tyres aren’t gung-ho mud-terrains or something similar, its 275/65R17 Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT all-terrain tyres do work sufficiently well on-road and off.

For low-range 4WDing, the Blade has all of the D-Max good stuff – including a tractable engine with plenty of low-down torque and a recalibrated off-road traction control (part of the most recent D-Max upgrades) – but its ground clearance (244mm vs the LS-U+’s 240mm) and off-road angles (29.2° approach, 19.2° departure and 25.2° breakover vs the LS-U+’s 30.5°, 19.0°, and 23.8°) don’t represent as much of an improvement over its stablemate as you’d expect in a vehicle touted by Isuzu as “an off-road ute without compromise” and “an unparalleled combination of off-road performance and rugged reliability”.

The Blade feels vulnerable to underbody knocks from rocks and the like, but it has 3mm-thick steel bash plate protection so there’s no need to lose any sleep over a few ‘rubbing dirt’ moments.

Its tubular sidesteps at least seem hardier than the standard D-Max’s sidesteps and seem able to cop knocks from rocks without crumpling.

If there’s any need for a vehicle recovery, the Blade has eight-tonne load-rated recovery points (with bracing between chassis rails for torsional rigidity) to work with.

Also, if you’re thinking about using your Blade as a touring platform, at a listed kerb weight of 2204kg, it is 89kg heavier than the LS-U+, and its payload is 896kg (down form the LS-U+’s 990kg). GVM is 3100kg, GCM is 6000kg.

Towing capacities remain at 750kg (unbraked) and 3500kg (braked).

Its compact external dimensions are deceptive, as the cabin has ample headroom and it’s not hard for even tallish drivers (I’m 186cm) to find a comfortable position, even though the close-fitting bulkhead restricts backrest recline adjustment and the base cushion rake is fixed.

Small vans are the closest you’ll get to a car-like driving experience in light commercials and, given the Cargo’s unique turbo-diesel powertrain, it has unmatched torque output that provides energetic performance.

The shift calibrations of its seven-speed dual-clutch automatic ensure vigorous response in city and suburban driving, given that for most of the time they keep the engine operating between 1500-2500rpm, where its 320Nm of torque is served at full strength.

Combined with nicely weighted steering and four-coil suspension that provides an ideal balance of responsive handling and supple bump absorption, it’s an enjoyable and engaging vehicle to drive. The Sport drive mode and sequential manual-shifting options raise the fun level.

The gearing also ensures low-stressed highway driving with only 1600rpm required to maintain 110km/h, at which speeds the solid bulkhead minimises cargo bay noise that mostly emanates from the rear tyres. However, tyre noise can still be intrusive on certain grades of coarse bitumen.

To test its payload rating, we forklifted 650kg into the cargo bay through the rear barn-doors, which with driver equalled a total payload just shy of its 742kg payload limit. The rear suspension compressed almost 60mm under this weight, with long jounce rubbers positioned inside the rear coil springs providing additional load support and, in effect, a second stage of springing.

The Caddy took this heavy load haul in its stride on city and suburban roads, gliding over bumps without a hint of bottoming-out. The payload’s effect on engine, steering and braking performance was minimal and its handling composure was maintained regardless of speed or road conditions.

It also made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h, and although engine braking on the way down required some assistance from the quartet of disc brakes to keep speeds in check, they handled this task with ease.

Our only criticism of the driving experience is that, given the substantial blind-spot over the driver’s left shoulder caused by the cargo bay’s solid walls, a Cargo buyer must pay extra to get blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert as part of an options pack. We reckon these active features are crucial to safe van operation (any solid-walled van that is) and should be standard.

Unmatched by its small van rivals is a five-star ANCAP rating (tested 2021, expires 2027) which applies to all Cargo variants built from July 2022.

It’s equipped with seven airbags, AEB with pedestrian and cyclist monitoring, a reversing camera, rear parking sensors, daytime running lights, non-adaptive cruise control, driver fatigue alert system and more, but you must pay extra for extra safety.

The D-Max has a six-year/150,000km warranty and seven years of roadside assistance when you have your D-Max always serviced at a participating Isuzu ute dealer. That warranty is okay in terms of years, but unlimited kilometres would be a welcome sweetener.

Service intervals are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs soonest.

Capped-price servicing covers the first five scheduled services for 24MY and later vehicle models (up to five years/75,000km - whichever occurs first) – at a flat price of $449 for each service.

The Caddy comes with a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty and 12 months roadside assist.

Scheduled servicing is every 15,000km or 12 months, whichever occurs first.

An optional five-year pre-paid service package is available for the price of a three-year package ($2000), so that’s two free services and savings of up to $1439 compared to pay-as-you-go capped-price servicing. In other words, an average annual servicing cost of $400.