Holden Commodore vs Ford Transit Custom

What's the difference?

So will the new Commodore become Australia's favourite car? I strongly doubt it, but it's not the car's fault, and it wouldn't be any different if it was a rear-wheel drive, V8, Australian-built sedan. Australian buying habits have just moved on, and diversified into a range of SUVs, small hatches and dual-cab utes. 

Taken as an all-new entry in Holden's revitalised line-up though, the new Commodore ticks all the important boxes required of a mid-size to large passenger car these days. It may not be anywhere near as exciting as a 6.2-litre Redline sedan, ute or wagon, but it’s objectively a far better car overall, and you should definitely give it a drive before dismissing it. 

The pick of the bunch in my eyes is the $39,490 RS Sportwagon with the 2.0-litre petrol engine. Yep, the best new Commodore is now a four-cylinder station wagon.   

Be sure to check out what James Cleary thought of the new Commodore in prototype guise here:

Does the world need a pair of electrified Transit Custom vans? It’s not as simple a question when it comes to commercial vehicles like these, because there’s a fair chance the last-mile delivery sector is going to absolutely love the EV variant of the Ford van. Charged overnight at a depot, the EV Custom has the potential to massively reduce running costs for large and small fleets, as well as reduce downtime in terms of maintenance. It could be a big win.

But for our money, the PHEV Transit Custom is the one that offers the most promise. The usual EV compromises and range anxiety are shown the door and the plug-in driveline not only trumps the traditional turbo-diesel for running costs, refinement and actual performance, it also promises day-to-day efficiency that even the otherwise handy Ford diesel just can’t match. Win, win, we believe it’s called.

The question now is what Ford does with this driveline. Surely, as an option for the Tourneo people-mover (itself Transit Custom based, so all the hard work is done) the PHEV driveline seems like a foregone conclusion. And that’s the Transit van we’d most like to see, to be honest.

So, take these vehicles as a taste of what might be to come. The first shot in a market segment that stands to gain more than most from electrification.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

Aside from the move to a front-drive basis, the other key difference between the new Commodore and those of the past is its shift from a classic three-box sedan shape to a sleek, five-door Liftback. Even the Sportwagon has an elegant arc to its roofline, which is arguably their most appealing design element. There are no Ute or Caprice bodystyles, and there never will be. 

The European-designed look is less macho than the bulging wheelarches of the VE and VF, but more in line with its European rivals like the Ford Mondeo, Volkswagen Passat and Skoda Superb. 

The best way to identify specific models is by their wheels, with the trim levels split between a more elegant body trim on the entry, Calais, Calais-V and Tourer variants, and sportier body kits with side skirts and a rear spoiler on the RS, RS-V and VXR flagship.

The interior look is also best described as elegant, with fresh shapes that flow cohesively into the door trims and centre console. There’s a general air of quality about it, but it’s let down by some cheap-feeling controls and switches, particularly the climate control knobs. 

The ZB’s overall size is bigger than you might think, with most dimensions fitting neatly between the VE/VF and the VT-VZ generation that preceded it. 

You might be surprised to learn it’s no lightweight either, with the heaviest Calais-V Tourer actually outweighing the portliest VF by 31kg. 

Interior dimensions are comparable with its predecessor, with the most significant differences being a narrower back seat thanks to its 36mm thinner body and 13mm less rear headroom in the Liftback (but 3mm more in the wagon).  

Before the decision was made to source the new car from Germany, Holden was planning a longer wheelbase for Australia. One specific requirement that did reach fruition is the availability of a V6 engine, which isn’t fitted to European versions.

Under the skin it rides on GM’s E2XX platform, which is a significant evolution of the chassis that underpinned the previous Insignia and the now-defunct Holden Malibu. 

Aside from having a say in every step of its design process, Holden engineers covered more than 200,000 kilometres of testing on Australian roads and at the Lang Lang proving ground.

This has been to fine tune the drivetrain calibrations, the steering, suspension, and even details like the sat nav and radio reception to suit our tastes and unique demands. 

Specific suspension tunes have been developed for four cylinder models, the V6 Calais, V6 RS-V and the Tourer, with unique setups between Liftback and Sportwagon bodies. 

The only version not to score an Australian suspension tune is the VXR, which was treated to a performance-focused setup at the Nürburgring in Germany. 

Functionality trumps all else in commercial vehicles, but even so, the Transit Custom is a pretty cool looking thing, particularly in Sport trim with its stripes and alloy wheels. It’s easy to see how the van might appeal to private buyers as well, both as family transport with optional rear seats and windows or decked out as a camper. Keeping the roofline below 2.1 metres also means the Custom will work in an underground car-park environment.

Inside, it’s all about function and while there are plenty of hard plastics in evidence, the sheer attention to detail regarding storage and convenience features is what you’ll remember. Maximising interior space is part of that and the Transit Custom cleverly uses front airbags mounted in the roof lining, clearing up dash-top space that has subsequently been used to locate a second glovebox.

Another traditional Commodore trait to have taken a step backwards is its ability to carry three adults across the back seat. Admittedly only really an issue for taxi use, the ZB will certainly still swallow three, and likely three child seats, but less comfortably and more like the similarly sized Camry.

The Liftback’s reduced headroom didn’t matter for this 172cm tester, but if you were marginal in a VF you’d probably want to avoid spiking your hair.  

The cabin ticks all the other important boxes for a modern family car, including twin cupholders front and rear, bottleholders in each door and two ISOFIX child seat mounts in the rear. 

All get a good cluster of USB and 12V charge points, while the RS-V models upwards get a big bonus with wireless phone charging. 

The Liftback's boot space is only slightly down on before at 490 litres, but the huge opening created by the five-door design is so much more useful in the real world. It also brings a split-fold back seat for the first time in a non-wagon Commodore. 

The Sportwagon has lost around 100 litres in capacity though, but is still a very useful 560 litres to seat height or 793 litres to the roof. 

Holden’s local team has also developed a range of optional accessories for the Commodore, which includes a bonnet protector, weather shield, towbar, boot liner, floor mats, headlight protectors, sill guards, locking wheel nuts, roof racks and a cargo net, but there’s no sign of a cargo barrier, nudge bar or bullbar at this stage.

Here’s the meat and potatoes of a vehicle like the Transit Custom. If it can’t cut it as a workhorse, then there’s not much point in having it take up showroom space, and Ford knows that. But Ford also has loads of experience in making one and two-box vans work for their living. The fact is, these vehicles have been best-sellers in Europe for decades, so there’s plenty of back-catalogue to draw from.

Knowing that some drivers will spend a full shift in the cabin of the Transit Custom, Ford has gone to a lot of trouble finding little nooks and cubbies for things like clipboards, pens and phones to live. There’s also a fold-down centre seat that forms a small desk, two gloveboxes, and no less than four cupholders across the cabin. A large storage area lives under the flip-up passengers’ seat.

There’s a single USB-A charging port in the cabin and no less than five USB-C ports, as well as a 12-volt socket in the dashboard. Bottles can be stored in either door pocket and the front cabin steps are illuminated. A flat-bottomed steering wheel makes sliding across the cabin easier.

In the cargo bay, the walls feature protective panels and there’s a hose-out plastic mat on the floor. You’ll also find LED cargo lights, eight tie-down points in the long-wheelbase Trend and two fewer in the shorter Sport. Integrated roof racks are standard and while only one sliding side door is standard, there’s the option of a second one on the other side. The standard rear doors are the barn-door type, but open wide and back on to the vehicle’s sides to allow for fork-lift loading. A tailgate version of the rear door is optional.

There’s a load-through hatch giving a total length of 3.45m in the long-wheelbase version and, depending on what variant you choose, the payload is anything up to 1339kg. Cleverly, the top-hinged hatch cover for the load-through is held up by a magnet when in use so it doesn’t rattle against the load over bumps.

Towing capacity for either electrified Transit Custom is down from the turbo-diesel's 2800kg to 2300kg.

Keeping passengers safe in a nose-to-tail crash is a metal bulkhead with a window, but the window can be deleted as part of a security pack on the long-wheelbase variant, at which point the interior rear-view mirror becomes a camera screen. That mirror also incorporates a forward-looking dash cam.

It won’t matter to everybody, but it’s worth mentioning that the PHEV Transit has a space-saver spare wheel, while the EV variety has no spare at all.

All Fords are now connected via modem, allowing managers back at head office to receive alerts for low fuel or tyre pressure and even track their vehicles when they’re on the move. For fleet managers, this will doubtless be welcomed. For the drivers, perhaps not so much.

Let’s start at the start. The E-Transit Custom Trend is the pure EV entry-level version. With battery-only operation, it’s the more radical of the two drivelines. The next step up in the EV line-up is the E-Transit Custom Sport with the same driveline and a few standard equipment additions.

The same goes for the PHEV Transit; the Trend kicks things off and the Sport adds the same trinkets.

The biggest difference, of course, is in terms of the wheelbase. The Trend grade (in either EV or PHEV) uses the long-wheelbase version of the Transit platform, while the Sport trim level is based on the short-wheelbase Transit.

All versions get a central 13-inch infotainment screen, LED lighting, full Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, wireless connectivity, embedded sat-nav, a 12-inch dashboard screen, keyless entry and start, and wireless phone charging.

Beyond that (and, again, the differences in trim remain identical across EV and PHEV variants) you get 16-inch steel wheels for the Trend and 17-inch alloys for the Sport, and the Sport comes with a body-kit including a rear spoiler and a set of racy looking exterior stripes. Inside the Sport also gets striped seat trim (still fabric and not leather) dual-zone climate control (single-zone for the Trend) and a 10-way powered driver’s seat (manual in the Trend).

The biggest interior difference is in the seating layout. The basic set-up is a three-position front seat, while the more utilitarian Trend, oddly, is the one with the option of individual buckets and an arm-rest for both occupants.

Prices start at $67,590 before on-road costs for the PHEV Trend (LWB), while the PHEV Sport (SWB) lands at $69,990. The parity is maintained in the EV version with the Trend starting at $77,590 and the EV Sport at $79,990. Those EV prices are a bit more than some of the competition (LDV eDeliver 7 and Peugeot Partner) but are line-ball with the Volkswagen ID. Buzz Cargo. The PHEV Transit Custom variant at ten grand less seems pretty competitive, then.

No, there’s no more V8, manual transmission or rear wheel drive, but the ZB’s options are more in sync with its newer rivals. 

For the first time since the VH, or 1984, the base engine is a four-cylinder petrol unit, but uses modern tech like direct injection and a turbo to boost power statistics to more than triple that of the infamous Starfire engine. Also seen in the Equinox, the new turbo motor’s 191kW is also notably 6kW more than the 5.0-litre V8 in the VL Group A SS (Walkinshaw), and 1kW more than the 3.6-litre V6 was making in top-spec VZ Commodores – so pretty good horsepower for its engine size.

MORE: If any Commodore engine problems or automatic transmission problems crop up, you’ll likely find them here.

The real story is its healthy 350Nm of torque, which is also more than what the same VZs were making, but on tap from a useful 3000-4000rpm.

The latest version of the 3.6-litre Alloytec V6 that’s seen duty in VZ, VE and VF models makes a reappearance as the new performance leader, but mounted sideways and turning all four wheels this time. In ZB trim, it produces 235kW and 381Nm, the latter from 5200rpm.

MORE: Find all ZB Commodore specifications here.

For the first time, you can also choose a diesel option with LT and Calais trims, which is a version of the engine used in the previous Opel Insignia. You’ll also find it under the bonnet of the Jeep Cherokee and Compass, and its applications spread as wide as the Alfa Romeo 159 that ended production in 2011. In Commodore guise, the turbo 2.0-litre engine specs are 125kW and 400Nm (available from 1750-2500rpm), and therefore taking out the torque trophy for the ZB range. 

Both petrol engines are paired with a nine-speed torque converter automatic transmission, while the diesel has an eight-speed gearbox. Both four-cylinder engines are front-wheel drive, while all V6 variants are all-wheel drive. 

MORE: What’s the difference between 4X4, 4WD and AWD

The all-wheel drive system is actually quite clever, using what’s called a Twinster twin-clutch rear differential for finite torque vectoring, or sending the just the right amount of power to each wheel. The system varies torque distribution between 100 per cent front and a 50/50 split. 

If you think the Commodore has gone soft, its towing capacity ratings also suggest otherwise, with a 2100kg maximum braked rating for V6 models matching the best offered previously. The four cylinder models are rated at 1800kg, which is 200kg better than what the previous 3.0-litre V6 and LPG models carried.

Although they might both subscribe to the concept of electrification, under the skin the Transit PHEV and EV are quite different animals. That’s starts with the fundamentals, with the front-engined PHEV Transit Custom using front-wheel drive, and the pure EV variant placing the single electric motor between the rear wheels for a compact rear-drive layout. As per usual practice, the EV’s batteries are positioned under the floor.

That single electric motor, when fed by the standard 64kWh battery, gives the EV Transit Custom a sensible power output of 160kW and a meaningful 415Nm of torque. Thanks to the way an electric motor makes its power (and torque, more importantly) there’s no need for a conventional gearbox, so a single-speed transmission is all that’s required.

The PHEV, meanwhile, uses the combination of a 2.5-litre petrol engine, teamed with a single electric motor. Interestingly, the electric motor is more powerful than the non-turbocharged petrol engine, but when both are delivering, there’s a total of 171kW of power and 400Nm of torque. A continuously variable transmission (CVT) is fitted for maximum efficiency.

Four-wheel disc brakes are fitted on all electrified Transit Customs in deference to their greater kerb weight (just shy of 2200kg for the LWB). Independent rear suspension is also a feature on all Transit Custom variants, and has been engineered to be compatible with the one-tonne payload standard.

Ford has also fitted the PHEV Transit Custom with selectable drive modes, four in the Trend (Tow, Normal, Eco and Slippery) and five in the Sport with the addition of a, you guessed it, Sport mode. The PHEV builds on that with modes to force electric operation, store the battery power for later or use a combination of both at the car’s discretion.

As you’d hope, the ZB sets a new Commodore benchmark for fuel consumption, with the diesel models managing a best official combined figure of 5.6L/100km. The petrol four-cylinder models also pip the VF’s best combined fuel economy figure of 8.3L/100km with 7.4 and 7.6L/100km for the LT, RS and Calais Liftbacks respectively. The Sportwagon versions wear 7.7 and 7.9L/100km figures, while V6 versions span 8.9-9.3L/100km combined ratings. 

It’s worth noting that the petrol four-cylinder engine needs premium 95RON unleaded to do its best, while the V6 is happy to run on regular 91RON unleaded. All versions have a 61.7-litre fuel tank. 

Typically, for a hybrid vehicle, Ford quotes a staggering combined fuel economy figure for the Transit PHEV. In this case, that’s a marvellous, yet often unattainable 1.7 litres per 100km with tailpipe CO2 emissions of just 38 grams per kilometre.

No, you probably won’t achieve this in the real world, and our testing suggests closer to 4.2 litres per 100km in urban running which is where the PHEV shines most brightly thanks to the opportunity to harvest energy in stop-start traffic.

And even though that’s a long way from 1.7 litres per 100km, it’s still a pretty impressive number for a big, heavy vehicle with garden-shed aerodynamics. Combined with the Transit’s 63-litre fuel tank, there’s a real chance of stretching fill-ups beyond the 1000km mark.

The plug-in element provides for an electric range of 54km which is off the pace for most PHEVs and means any delivery driver in a Transit Custom PHEV will be making use of the petrol engine pretty much daily.

Unlike the Transit Custom EV with its 64kWh battery, the PHEV’s smaller 11.8kW battery doesn’t allow for commercial fast chargers. Instead, you can take the battery from fully discharged to 100 per cent capacity in seven hours on a household 10-amp socket, or in four hours, 15 minutes on a 15-amp outlet, which equates to a maximum AC charge rate of 3.5kW.

The Transit Custom in EV form, meanwhile, can be charged from zero to 100 per cent capacity in 6.7 hours on an 11kW outlet, but can also make use of fast DC charging. At that point, it’ll charge from 15 to 80 per cent in 32 minutes at its maximum charge rate of 125kW.

Ford claims a range of 301km for the Transit EV Trend and 307km for the slightly lighter Sport. Both those figures are likely to be a little optimistic in the real world, but we reckon, based on our on-test power usage figure of 17kW per 100km, they might be a lot closer to the mark than many other makes claim. So, that should, theoretically, work for most delivery vans in major cities where daily distances are generally below 200km.

The Commodore we know and most of us love is just as famous for its quality driving experience as its local production and motorsport successes. So, the ZB has some big shoes to fill in this area. 

At the ZB’s media launch, we drove everything aside from the base LT or any diesel variant, over several hundred kilometres of pretty much every road condition. 

I’ll cut to the chase. There’s a genuine quality to the way they handle Australian road conditions. We drove them back to back with a UK-spec model at Lang Lang, and while you’d expect the local car to excel at its own test facility, the rear and front suspension work in harmony to handle mid-corner bumps with far greater stability than the alternative. The electric power steering weighting was also lighter, but it didn’t seem to lose any precision. 

You probably wouldn’t notice it driving to the shops every day or cruising on the highway, but this on-limit controllability could easily be the difference between life and death in an emergency. 

The turbo four is a surprisingly capable and refined package, and would honestly be my pick if I were in the market. It’s smoother and more tractable than the V6, so feels like it would deliver speed more readily than the bigger engine unless you were going flat out. 

Holden isn’t quoting official 0-100km/h acceleration figures, but we hear the petrol four is good for a 7.0 second-ish time, and the V6 will manage just over 6.0sec. So there’s really not much in it outright. 

Therefore it’s a shame you can’t get the Tourer with the petrol four, but because the combination is available in Europe, Holden could shift the line-up if there’s enough demand. 

The nine-speed auto does a pretty good job with either engine, and its electronic brain does a slick job of seamlessly adjusting its shift behaviour to your driving style. 

Holden isn’t quoting ground clearance figures, but all have enough to handle dirt roads, and while the 17-inch wheel equipped models match the VF II’s 11.4m turning circle, be aware that the 18-inch wheel variants blow out to 11.7m, the 19s are 12.7m, and Holden doesn’t quote a figure for the 20-inch equipped Calais-V Liftback and VXR.   

The only other surprise among the group we drove is the Calais-V Liftback, which is likely to be a bit too sharp in its ride for some luxury buyers on its big 20-inch alloy wheels. The Calais or one of the Tourers would be your best bet for comfort.  

The VXR performance flagship is a completely different personality to the SS models of the past. It’s nowhere near as fast, but is more of a grownup package that’s easier to get the best out of. 

Its more demure than the brash final VF IIs, and the V6 does make a pretty sweet note, even if half of it is coming from the speakers.

Nothing was ever going to replicate the romance and pride of the last SS, but all is not lost for fans of fast Holdens.

We’ve said it plenty of times before, but delivery vans really have come a long way. What were once bucking, sliding, pitching, screeching monsters are now almost as comfortable as a car and vastly more stable and predictable to drive even at freeway speeds.

The EV variant almost sounds and feels like a modern Melbourne tram in the way it accelerates with authority but also in near silence with only the suspension and a bit of tyre slap over sharp edges to spoil the serenity. Even then, the noises barely intrude. Tyre noise is the worst of it.

Performance is strong and effortless and this is a parcel van that accelerates like a decent car right up until about 100km/h when things start to tail off a little. The overall driving position is a bit sit-up-and-beg, but that’s actually comfy over longer distances and the seats themselves are good with plenty of padding, but not too much bolster that you need to climb over it to enter or leave the cabin.

The column-mounted gear selector is smart, but does mean the indicator stalk moves to the `wrong’ side, and confusing them can leave you in Neutral. And even though it’s a clearer, sharper result than many cars offer, the camera-screen interior rear-view mirror (if you choose the solid cargo-barrier version) is never as good as a conventional mirror. For some reason, the camera screen lacks the depth of field of a mirror and is more difficult to focus on. Those who wear reading glasses might struggle with it.

On the plus side, the EV variant’s one-pedal-driving setting is brilliantly set up and allows for bringing the Transit Custom to a complete stop without touching the brake pedal. Also better than average is the calibration for the driver aids including the lane-keeping assistance which is there to help, but never call the shots.

The PHEV version is, logically, more of the same, although the ride quality seems a little better with an extra layer of plush particularly on smaller, sharper bumps. The slightly lower kerb mass that allows for the one-tonne payload without the same spring firmness is probably the reason.

What the front-drive PHEV can’t achieve, however, is the EV’s level of power-down and grip. Floor the throttle and the PHEV will easily make its front tyres chirp and introduce a small amount of tugging at the wheel. Over bumps with lots of throttle, the PHEV will also momentarily lose traction, but meantime, it’s just as quick as the EV version, even if the CVT is evident in the way the engine revs up and the rest of the van eventually catches up with it.

All four versions of the electrified Transit Custom feature the same safety gear, reflecting the increasing importance of OH&S concerns regardless of the vehicle’s purchase price. On that basis, you’ll get six airbags including side and side-curtain bags. There are also a pair of front airbags regardless of whether you have the standard cabin (three-seater) or optional two-seater layout.

Driver assistance packages include stability control with traffic sign recognition, adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic monitoring, exit warning, forward collision warning, lane keeping assistance, parking sensors front and rear and a 180-degree rear camera system. There’s also autonomous emergency braking that incorporates pedestrian recognition.

It’s also good to see a standard tyre pressure monitoring system, too.

The Transit Custom has been rated by ANCAP according to its light-commercial vehicle Medallion system which assesses active safety systems rather than actual crash data. In this case, the vehicle achieved the highest, Platinum, rating with a 96 per cent score.