Ford Escape vs Honda ZR-V

What's the difference?

The Ford Escape PHEV is a good option for a customer who knows they’ll live within the parameters set by the car. That’s the case with any plug-in hybrid, really, so in that regard, this new model is hardly a standout.

And it isn’t particularly outstanding in any other way either. I personally would have appreciated it if Ford had decided to add the plug-in powertrain to the Vignale flagship model instead - that model is more about luxury than sportiness, and would better fit the character of this powertrain in my opinion.

It’s a decent addition to the brand’s SUV range, and a welcome one to the segment, though it won’t be on its own for long.

The Honda ZR-V has always been an engaging and fun car that’s the right size for many people. The frugal hybrid powertrain has always been the pick too.

It’s great that Honda has finally introduced more affordable hybrid trims with this update which addresses one of my biggest criticisms of this car previously.

If you’re willing to forgo some luxury features, this entry-level hybrid trim is a fantastic car that still offers enough creature comforts to be driven daily.

Hopefully Honda has some renewed sales success with this car as I believe it’s a clear benchmark for the segment.

I haven’t really warmed to the “I wish I was a hatchback” styling of the Escape, which has a softer-edged look to it than most of its rivals. I mean, compared to a Hyundai Tucson or Toyota RAV4, the Escape looks like a blob.

That mightn’t be an issue for you, and it’s hardly a reason not to buy the car, but I was also a bit disappointed that there’s no real specific highlights to make you realise you’re buying the PHEV model, which - at $15,000 more than the equivalent petrol version - should have something to differentiate it other than the addition of a small badge and the additional filler cap on the front quarter panel for the plug.

Even a different set of wheels would have sufficed. Alas, it’s an identical looking Escape to the petrol. That means the ST-Line trimmings, such as black highlights on the grille and bumper, side skirts, a rear spoiler, and those 18-inch wheels and lowered sports suspension.

The interior, as mentioned in the pricing section, does have a few changes over the petrol version, but they’re hardly game-changing additions.

The exterior of the ZR-V has always left me feeling quite… meh. It’s a mundane and generic look that doesn’t stand out from the crowd, but that's no bad thing because not everyone wants a flashy car.

That said, I’m still not a fan of the front grille, which makes it look like this car has a moustache.

The dark red paint looks nice, though when it’s paired with these generic-looking grey alloy wheels and black wheel arch cladding, it cheapens the look. The top-spec e:HEV LX looks more attractive.

Inside, it’s similarly standard and doesn’t break the mould. Everything is where you’d expect it to be, which is great for functionality.

The wildest part of the interior is the centre tunnel which features a push-button gear selector and a split console section including a small storage area underneath that’s big enough for a phone.

Looking around, it’s a sea of black finishes, which is a bit boring. However, I do like the mesh panel that spans the dashboard and houses the air vents. It’s a premium touch.

The Ford Escape looks like it has all the bits to make a midsize SUV buyer happy. And while a fair few of the boxes are ticked, there are some elements that could be better. 

The big party trick is that the second row is on rails, so you can slide it forwards or backwards to improve the space for receipt occupants or improve your boot space. The maximised cargo area is 556 litres to the ceiling, while if prioritise second-row occupant space there is easily enough room for a 182cm / 6’0” adult to fit behind someone of a similar size.

In the boot there are remote levers for the second row seats to fold down, a 12 V outlet, and a soft parcel shelf which is easy to remove, too.

During my time with the car I had the seats slid back as far as they go to maximise cabin space, though I did test out whether it was worth having them forward and the boot space was appreciably better especially for a pram and some baby stuff.

The second-row is a 60:40 split for the backrest, with the smaller portion on the driver’s side. That may sound trivial, but we had our baby seat set up behind the passenger, and had to move it to the driver’s side when we picked up a large parcel as it wouldn’t fit with the smaller portion folded down. There are dual ISOFIX child seat anchor points for the outboard positions, and three top-tether hooks.

The boot space is good too, considering it has some extra hardware to contend with under the body, there is also a space-saver spare wheel under there which is nice. However, there is no dedicated hidey hole for the charge cable, and it doesn’t come in a nice stowable bag either - just a plastic ziplock thing. 

Perhaps the biggest letdown of the interior is the fact that you still get the tiny little tablet-style 8.0-inch touchscreen media display, despite there being a big 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster. The two screens almost look at odds with one another, and what’s even more frustrating is that the driver information screen cannot be configured to include the energy flow screen that you see on the smaller tablet style unit. 

That means you can’t watch what’s happening between engine, electric motor and battery, or a combination where you might expect to see that - instead it can only be seen in illustrative form on the smaller central screen. Big issue? Maybe not, but if you’re an eco-conscious customer who wants to know what their car’s high-tech powertrain is doing, while also wanting to use sat nav, or Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, or change the radio station… Well, you’re out of luck.

There is a much more basic and rudimentary display on the driver info screen that shows a small icon of an engine and battery and illuminates them when each part is in use, but really, Ford should have used the real-estate of the big driver info screen better. Toyota, Kia and Hyundai know how to do it better.

The material quality is okay, but it certainly doesn’t feel like a very special environment.There are rubberised liners on the doors which don’t look terrific or feel fantastic, and why there are soft plastic elbow pads, and up high on the dashboard, it is not of the most pristine quality. 

Storage is pretty good. There are bottle holders in the doors and two cupholders in the centre console, and the storage nook in front of the shift dial houses a wireless phone charger and two USB ports, plus a 12-volt plug. There is a strange little shelf section in front of the centre console bin, which is not fantastic in terms of size. There are rear bottle holders in the doors, map pockets and a flip-down arm-rest with cup holders.

That rotary dial shifter which does take a little bit of getting used to. Unlike some others, there is no ‘P’ for park button - instead you have to dial it all the way left. 

In base-model form, it’s expected the ZR-V will have fabric upholstery. However, the seats still feel premium and are deliciously padded. They’re manually adjusted but I was still able to find a good driving position with ease.

One feature I was looking for was heated seats, especially on these brisk Melbourne mornings. It’s rare for a car with fabric seats to get heated seats, though. If you want them that badly, they’re available on higher trims.

Ahead of the driver is a leather-wrapped steering wheel which feels lovely. I particularly like the tactile feel of the buttons and switches.

The digital instrument cluster is clear and crisp. It offers multiple views to customise it, as well as a range of infographic pages to cycle through. I wish you could see the fuel consumption and hybrid system graphics at the same time, but thankfully they’re just a single scroll away from each other.

Moving across, the central touchscreen multimedia system is looking a small in 2026, measuring only 9.0 inches, although it’s still high-resolution and the colours are vibrant.

It appears computing power has been given a boost along with the integration of Google Built-in, as jumping from menu to menu has never been snappier.

Speaking of Google Built-in, it’s great to have the flexibility of using the integrated Google Maps and apps like Spotify and Apple Music, without needing your phone.

However, it’s still nice having Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, though the latter is strangely only offered in wired form. With my iPhone 15 Pro Max, the wireless connection was rock solid, though known interference points did cause CarPlay to stutter.

It’s great to see Honda retaining a physical climate control cluster as it’s intuitive to use. The dials in particular have a satisfying click when twirled.

In terms of storage there are two cupholders, two USB-C ports, a big centre console box, as well as an adequately sized glove box. It’s worth noting this trim level forgoes a wireless charger, meaning you’ll need to plug in to charge your phone.

Moving to the second row, there’s a surprising amount of space, even for adults. At a leggy 182cm, I have plenty of legroom and headroom.

You would easily be able to get two adults in the second row, though you’d be pushing it to fit three as the middle seat is narrow and raised. Kids will be fine, though.

Adding to the annoyance of the middle rear seat, the seat belt is mounted from the roof, which can obstruct rear visibility.

In terms of amenities there are air vents on the back of the front centre console, two USB-C ports, map pockets on the back of each front seat, as well as a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders.

There are also ISOFIX points on the two outboard seats, as well as top-tether child seat anchorages on all three rear seats.

Around the back it’s expected the entry-level hybrid will feature a manually operated tailgate. It’s light to open and close.

With the rear seats upright there’s 380L of boot space available, which is decent for this size of car. This figure includes a small underfloor section.

If you fold the rear seats the boot space expands to 1312L, which is cavernous for this type of car. The rear seats cleverly fold forwards and down at the same time, creating a seamless flat floor.

Boot-related amenities include a number of hooks, a 12V socket plus some lights. As is the case with many hybrids, the ZR-V e:HEV doesn’t come with any spare wheel. You need to make do with a tyre repair kit, which is nowhere near as handy if you have a proper puncture away from a tyre repair shop.

Honda has shuffled the ZR-V line-up for 2026, decreasing the petrol variants to a single, entry-level trim, while increasing the hybrid grades from one to three.

On test here is the ZR-V e:HEV X, which is the cheapest hybrid. It’s priced from $43,400, drive-away, which is $3500 more than the base petrol trim and $8500 less than the top-spec hybrid option.

This is priced keenly against entry-level versions of the Hyundai Kona Hybrid and Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid, while undercutting the Nissan Qashqai e-Power hybrid.

For the price you get standard 18-inch alloy wheels, adaptive LED headlights, a 10.2-inch digital instrument cluster, a 9.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system with wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto, dual-zone climate control and cloth upholstery.

Now standard across the ZR-V line-up is Google Built-in which allows for Google Maps integration, the Google Assistant, plus you can download a number of apps, including Spotify, from the Google Play Store.

If you’re after features like a power tailgate, premium sound system, wireless charger, leather upholstery, plus heated seats with electric adjustment, you’ll need to look higher in the line-up. These are largely all nice-to-haves than musts, anyway.

The Escape PHEV is the only model in the range to get a 2.5-litre petrol engine, which runs on the more efficient Atkinson cycle, and has a continuously variable transmission feeding power to the front wheels - that’s right, this Escape is 2WD/FWD.

The tricky bit is that it also houses a clever electric motor and generator, which is teamed to a 14.4kWh battery pack - which is big for a plug-in hybrid car. 

The electric motor is capable of 96kW of power, while the petrol engine can produce up to 112kW. All told, the combined system output is pegged at 167kW, though there is no peak torque output figure. Even so, that amount of power is a sizeable number for any midsize SUV, even if this particular one weighs in at more than 1800kg.

Speaking of weight, the PHEV is the least capable towing vehicle in the Escape range. It has a maximum braked towing capacity of 1200kg, where all the others can tow up to 1800kg. Unbraked capacity is unchanged, at 750kg.

Power in the ZR-V hybrid continues to come from a 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with two electric motors. Total system outputs are 135kW and 315Nm.

This is sent to the front wheels only via an electronic continuously variable transmission (eCVT).

The Honda hybrid system positions the engine primarily as a generator for the battery pack at lower speeds, however once you reach 60-70km/h it can couple with the front axle and directly power the wheels.

It’s a smart system that allows for an electric zippy feel at lower speeds with the backing of a petrol engine at higher speeds.

Beware the PHEV fuel consumption figure. That’s a great thing to keep in mind if you’re shopping for one of these cars.

That’s because the combined cycle official figure only takes into account a mix of conditions across 100km of driving. That’s right - only the first 100km. So the best case scenario, for a car that is designed to use its battery to run emissions free until it runs out, before sparingly using the petrol engine to keep going.

As such, it is no surprise that the official combined cycle fuel consumption is just 1.5 litres per 100 kilometres, with CO2 emissions claimed at just 33g/km. That takes into account the WLTP battery range of 56 kilometres stated on Ford’s website.

For reference, I completed my test of the car with a total of 462.7 kilometres travelled, of which, the trip computer stated 292.3km was fully electric. Meaning the remaining 170.4km was driving using petrol.

The indicated energy efficiency was 20.0kWh/100km, which isn’t great against a claimed EV driving efficiency figure supplied by Ford, of 14.8kWh/100km to 15.6kWh/100km. 

While the indicated fuel consumption average was 3.1L/100km, so more than double the windscreen sticker’s indicated economy. 

However, when I did the maths, I used a real-world average of 3.9L/100km of petrol ($36.15 worth of petrol) and 43.2kWh of electricity (meaning a cost of $9.82 based on the NSW average energy price of $0.2274c/kWh).

So, to do 462.7km I paid $45.97. I think that’s okay, but bear in mind I included several longer trips (Sydney to Glenbrook, Glenbrook to the Southern Highlands and back, and Glenbrook to Sydney and back). 

As is always the case, if your intended operation for a PHEV is to use it primarily for urban running within its EV range capabilities, you will be better off than if you push it beyond and use the petrol engine excessively.

For reference, the fuel tank size is 45 litres, which is 12L less than the petrol-only versions. It can run on E10, but only if you can find E10 that is also 95RON premium unleaded.

If you wish, there’s also an app called Ford Pass Connect, which allows you to monitor your car’s state of charge, adjust its start and finish times for recharging and even works as a key for the car to allow remote access, too.

Worth noting the maximum charge rate on a 10-amp plug at home is 2.3kW, while on public charging (which typically runs a higher amperage rate) the max rate is 3.7kW.

Honda claims the ZR-V hybrid consumes an average of 5.0L/100km on the combined cycle, according to ADR testing.

In practice, I’ve seen way less than this, which is fantastic. On one particular drive around the city I achieved a mind-boggling average of 3.7L/100km, but my overall average hovered around 4.5L/100km.

There is a 57L fuel tank and a minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol is required.

You should easily be able to travel more than 1000km per refill, so don’t expect to be visiting servos very often.

Being the ST-Line grade, you - like it or not - have to deal with the lowered ride and sportier suspension, which makes this car ride a bit more firmly than you might want.

I found the suspension to be the biggest detracting element in terms of the drive experience – the suspension picked up a lot of the small inconsistencies in the road surface and transmitted them into the cabin. It was fidgety a lot of the time, and on road surfaces with very poor quality, it could be a bit uncomfortable.

The steering was also bit too tuned for sportiness for a car that doesn’t really need to be quite so aggressively angled that way. It took a bit of getting used to – it was somehow both twitchy on centre but not quite as responsive across the radius of lock to lock as I’d thought it might be, given the initial steering response.

Having said all that, I threw it through a couple of twisty corners and there was a nice handling balance from the chassis and decent grip from the tyres, but I did notice that - being front-wheel drive, with all that power going through the front tyres, there were some instances of it scrabbling for traction, notably on wet roads and looser surfaces but also out of offset driveways.

Other gripes included brake pedal response that was quite abrupt and very sensitive to stopping inputs.

Now, let’s consider the driving modes.

There are different drivetrain setups depending on what you plan to do. EV Auto does the thinking for you, dipping between EV, hybrid and petrol modes. EV Now prioritises electric driving. EV Later saves your battery charge for when you think you’ll need it. And EV Charge means you’ll use petrol power to drive, and also to replenish the battery pack.

The throttle response was decent in EV mode, and in hybrid mode it is nice and quiet, and it drives in a very smooth way unless you really plant your foot hard, then it can be a bit vocal - but less raucous than a RAV4 under full throttle. 

The transition between the different drive modes was relatively seamless, as it will readily go between petrol or electric as required, and the four-cylinder is mostly hushed enough so that you won’t hear it too much, especially if you’re driving at higher speeds when it does.

Indeed it was relatively quiet for the most part, though the tyre noise was quite excessive at higher speeds on very coarse-chip surfaces. And in those instances I noticed I could feel the road surface through the steering wheel and the suspension, as it was quite jittery at times.

There is a low speed warning sound that is omitted below about 25km/h and it was quite handy while driving in enclosed car parks - no more accusations of creeping around silently at the shops.

Further, there are multiple drive modes, including Normal, Eco, Sport, Slippery, and Snow/Sand Assist, all of which are designed to make different situations easier to deal with. They will adjust engine transmission and steering response as well as stability and traction control limitations. I kept it in Normal, though a dabble in Sport showed that you’re allowed a bit more aggression from the powertrain in terms of acceleration.

The ZR-V’s hybrid powertrain has oodles of zip, thanks to there being two electric motors which handle a lot of the low-speed grunt.

It’s surprising how much of the driving can be done on electric power alone, provided there’s enough battery charge. Even at highway and freeway speeds the engine will switch off and coast on electric power alone.

When the petrol engine kicks on, you can barely feel it in the cabin or through the accelerator pedal. Instead you’ll only hear a familiar CVT-like drone as the engine charges the battery.

The petrol engine drone is noticeable but the note it makes more pleasant than a Toyota hybrid. Plus when you push the accelerator that bit harder it pretends to shift through gears, making the driving experience more engaging.

At higher speeds there’s plenty of oomph as the petrol engine and electric motors work in tandem. It feels like the powertrain is never stressed, making for an effortless touring feel.

There are a number of different regenerative braking modes accessed via the paddle shifters. The default is the weakest which allows you to coast more like a regular, pure-combustion car.

You can ramp up the intensity of the regenerative braking but there is no 'one-pedal' driving mode and you’re required to use the brake pedal to come to a complete stop.

From the driver’s seat you have a commanding view of the road ahead thanks to the elevated driving position. There are also large side mirrors and a big rear envelope, giving good all-around visibility.

Around town the ZR-V has a nimble feel thanks to its light-ish steering. This translates to a dynamic feel with a touch more weight out on the open road.

It’s surprising how engaging and fun this car is to drive, especially because it’s a regular SUV with no obvious sporty characteristics.

The suspension errs towards soft, but this helps soak up sharper bumps. This car never feels uncomfortable from behind the wheel which is at least partially down to the 18-inch alloy wheels being the right diameter for a car of this size.

The Honda ZR-V received a four- out of five-star ANCAP safety rating based on testing conducted by Euro NCAP in 2023.

Despite this, the entire line-up is stacked with standard safety equipment. Highlights include 11 airbags, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, front and rear parking sensors as well as a reversing camera.

It’s worth noting a surround-view camera is reserved for the top-spec hybrid trim only, which is a little annoying.

However, the ZR-V doesn’t have any annoying beeps and bongs that play while you’re driving. All the safety systems are well calibrated and only interact or engage when required.

As with the rest of the Ford range, you get a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty on the car, while the battery pack has its own eight-year/160,000km warranty plan.

And just like most other models in Ford’s range, there is a lifetime capped-price servicing plan, with the first four maintenance visits (due every 12 months/15,000km, whichever occurs first) incurring a $299 fee, which is cheap for the class.

You also get up to seven years of roadside assist if you service your car with Ford’s dealers.

ZR-V owners receive a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty as standard, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered for eight years.

If you service at Honda dealers when required, however, the standard warranty coverage is extended to eight years. This is more on par with many mainstream brands.

Speaking of servicing, it’s required every 12 months or 10,000km. The latter may be troublesome if you do a lot of kilometres.

The first five services are capped at $199. This is very affordable and on par with Toyota.

There are close to 90 'Honda Centres' across the country covering state and territory capitals as well as key rural and regional centres.