Deepal E07 vs Gac Aion Ut

What's the difference?

The Deepal E07 is not a truck, so tradies need not apply. However, for couples and families it's a generously equipped and luxurious EV with a unique electronic approach to a reconfigurable interior, albeit with practicality partly compromised by its fastback styling. So, only car buyers will determine if this is a short-lived automotive curiosity, or a bold new direction for SUV design.

The Aion UT is a cleverly-specified little hatchback and a great entry-point into electric motoring. The software needs a bit of work from a usability perspective, plus the spongy ride and cutesy styling might not be for everyone. 

However, with strong points including driving range, cabin space and value, there’s even a pitch for it in some cases to be an only car compared to most of its price rivals, which are more likely to be thought of as a second car runabout in a two-car garage.

The pick of the range is definitely the entry-level Premium. It comes in at a headline-grabbing price with specs to blow rivals out of the water, while only missing out on a few luxuries.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The E07 rides on a 3120mm wheelbase with 5045mm overall length, 1996mm width and 1680mm height, so compared to the segment-leading Ford Everest it’s larger in wheelbase, length and width but not as tall. It also has active air suspension with adjustable ground clearance and ride firmness.

The exterior styling, which can best be described as a fastback SUV, disguises the electronic interior transformations that largely occur behind its privacy glass. Our example’s black paint ensures it looks smaller and less conspicuous than its generous dimensions would suggest.

Its spacious and airy interior is enhanced by the panoramic sunroof. It has a futuristic look and feel, although the optional bright orange nappa leather trim may be too garish for some. It was also showing light staining and scuffmarks, so perhaps not a practical choice for families with young kids.

GAC tells us the UT hatch was designed in Milan, Italy, but it also isn’t ashamed of the Chinese influence on its overall appearance, like the ultra-short bonnet and Chinese city-car style face.

Along the side it has a modern, aerodynamic profile, and the ultra-short overhangs and long wheelbase maximise the amount of room for batteries under the floor and interior space.

The rear feels a lot like a modern Mini, with its bulbous tailgate and protruding light clusters, spiced up with a sporty spoiler piece jutting out.

It’s not a bad looking thing and it’s available in an array of fun colours.

On the inside it seems to follow the established rule-book of Chinese automakers, with plush trims, big screens with minimal physical buttons as well as a contemporary two-spoke steering wheel.

There’s a trendy floating console which hosts the cupholders and wireless charger on the Luxury grade, and an array of interesting patterns and textures through the doors and dash which you wouldn’t have once seen on a car at this price-point.

However, it is worth noting that while the seats are quite nice, and the steering wheel is a stand-out touchpoint, the trims on the doors and across the dash-top are hard plastics, more so than some of this car’s rivals.

Its 2320kg tare weight and 2930kg GVM provides 610kg of internal load capacity. That should comfortably cater for the weight of five large adults, with their belongings shared between the 131-litre front boot (aka frunk) and the rear luggage area which offers 524 litres or just over half a cubic metre of load volume with the glass dome closed and rear bulkhead upright.

This is a modest load volume compared to conventional seven-seat large SUV rivals (with their third rows folded) like the Isuzu MU-X (1119L) or Ford Everest (898L), which is largely due to the E07’s fastback design.

It’s also rated to tow up to 1500kg of braked trailer but Deepal doesn't quote a GCM rating so we don’t know how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time, which is a surprising omission for a vehicle claiming to be a truck.

Push a button and the rear glass dome retracts forward into the roof to expose the rear luggage area to the great outdoors (a nice space for tethered dogs to ride in). Push more buttons and the tailgate opens, the rear bulkhead window slides down and both the bulkhead and rear seat fold forward and flat to create more than 1.6 cubic metres of internal load volume, which again is modest compared to conventional large SUV rivals.

And if you’re a tradie or other service provider needing to carry bulky tools and equipment, the E07 lacks the basic requirements of a truck when the interior is in this flat-floor configuration.

For example, it can theoretically carry up to 500kg or half a tonne of cargo plus driver without exceeding its GVM limit. However, there are no load anchorage points provided on the B pillars and the strongest anchorages in the rear luggage area are only rated at 50kg each. And there’s no cargo barrier provided (or available as an accessory) behind the front seats to protect the driver and front passenger.

We also noted when using the E07 to haul gardening tools and equipment that the trailing edge of the metal roof was low enough to require deflating the tyre on our wheelbarrow to just squeeze under it (see image), so tall loads would be an issue.

And although the E07 can be driven in this fully open configuration, if the cargo is large enough to stop closure of the glass dome and you get caught in the rain, the luxurious nappa leather trim could get wet. So, we don’t expect to see one of these ‘trucks’ replacing a Ranger or HiLux for tradie duties any time soon.

Front of cabin storage includes big bins in each front door but there’s no glove box or overhead glasses holder. The two-tiered or ‘floating’ style of centre console has a large storage tray at floor height while the upper level provides two USB-C ports, wireless phone charging, a pair of cupholders and a large box with padded lids that provide comfy elbow rests.

The large rear doors open wide to access a bench seat which for a fastback body style is surprisingly accommodating, even for tall people. I’m 186cm and when seated behind the driver’s seat set in my position I have ample foot, knee and headroom.

Even those in the middle seat can ride in comfort, enhanced by a spacious flat floor with no transmission tunnel to straddle. The 60/40-split backrests can also recline but with the trade-off being less legroom given the base cushions must slide forward to achieve this.

Rear seat storage includes bins in each door, pockets on both front seat backrests and two cupholders which appear when the centre seat backrest is folded forward to serve as an armrest.

The rear of the centre console also has a USB-C port and small touchscreen that allows rear passengers to adjust various comfort settings.

The rear luggage area has numerous hooks for securing light duty straps or load nets plus a 12V accessory socket and a domestic three-pin plug outlet for the 6.6kW V2L (vehicle to load) inverter to power a variety of devices and appliances.

In terms of interior space, the Aion UT stands out with its spacious cabin. At 182cm tall, I am easily able to find a comfortable seating position, and visibility out the front sides and rear, while not as good as some small SUVs, isn’t bad.

There’s lots of headroom, and while I mentioned the hard plastic door cards before, there’s enough padding everywhere your elbows are going to touch to make it feel a bit nicer than perhaps it is.

The main drawback of this car for me is the lack of tactile buttons and the frustrating software.

The main screen isn’t particularly well utilised, being taken up by either a background or the navigation map, with an array of typically small shortcuts across the bottom for important features like the climate control or settings menus.

You can pre-set a few information panels which sit above the shortcut bar as in many rival cars and there’s also a shortcut tray which can be hosted on the driver’s side and configured with a variety of shortcuts and settings.

It’s just a bit clumsy to use, and the array of poorly-labelled settings menus for things like active safety equipment feel needlessly complicated.

I’d love to see this car with physical controls for climate and multimedia to make it easier to live with.

Up front the storage is decent. There are big pockets in the doors and a large storage tray between the driver and front passenger thanks to a flat floor. There’s also a slightly weird storage box under the touchscreen which has a net inside, good for more delicate objects you don’t want flying around the cabin.

On the floating console there are two cupholders which are a bit too shallow for my liking, and the wireless charger feels almost pointless because its made of a hard plastic, so your phone just slides right off in the corners. The cabled outlets are hidden beneath which allows for tidy cable management and the centre armrest console box is a healthy size.

The rear seat is comparatively basic, although touches on the key points. Its main advantage is how generous the space is. My frame was able to fit behind my own driving position with heaps of room for my knees, and just enough room for my head despite the dip in the roof for the sunroof shade in the Luxury-grade car we tested. There may be even more headroom in the base car.

The flat floor makes the space useful even for three across in a pinch and there’s a drop-down armrest with (again, shallow) cupholders. There are pockets on the back of both front seats and smallish pockets in each door. The array of soft trims continues, too, and the back of the centre console features a partially adjustable air vent. Luxury spec cars get a single USB rear power outlet.

As with many Chinese cars in this segment, the generous rear seat space comes at a cost to the boot. It measures just 321 litres, which is slightly smaller than its main opponents in this category, although larger than some hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla, for example.

It has its advantages, though. The floor is two-tiered, and can offer a flat load area with the rear seats folded down, or a deeper boot in its lower position. Underneath there’s a cutaway good for charging equipment and the tyre repair kit (sorry, no spare wheel in here).

Unlike some EVs, the Aion UT doesn’t get a frunk (front boot) for additional storage.

The GAC Aion UT starts from $31,990, before on-road costs, for the entry-level Premium grade, which makes it the third-most affordable EV you can buy in Australia after the city-sized BYD Atto 1 and the entry-level version of the BYD Dolphin.

It sits closer to price-parity with the GWM Ora, but is significantly more affordable than the rear-drive MG4 and more spec-competitive top-grade BYD Dolphin.

The bigger threat to the Aion UT is that a lot of buyers will be willing to spend slightly more to get into one of the most affordable electric small SUVs, like the BYD Atto 2 or Jaecoo J5.

Still, GAC makes a solid pitch for its hatch, which offers a higher spec level than its most direct price rivals.

For example, the Aion UT is more powerful than the entry-level Dolphin and Ora while offering a higher level of interior equipment. 

Even the just-arrived front-drive MG4 Urban also starts at $31,990, but that’s for a version with significantly less driving range.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say the entry-level version of the Aion UT (the confusingly-named Premium) is probably the pick of the two variant range.

Standard equipment levels on this car include 17-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting all around, synthetic leather interior trim with heated and power adjust front seats, a 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen with online connectivity and built-in nav as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

There’s also an 8.88-inch digital instrument cluster, heated steering wheel and the full array of safety kit.

With the same power and battery size, this leaves only arguably unnecessary luxuries for the Luxury grade, like a wireless phone charger, ventilated driver’s seat, auto dimming rear vision mirror with auto power folding wing mirrors, a powered tailgate and of course, a panoramic sunroof (with shade!).

The single electric motor, which drives the rear wheels through a single-speed transmission, produces 252kW of power and 365Nm of torque.

Deepal claims a zippy 0-100km/h acceleration time of 6.7 seconds, compared to its dual-motor AWD sibling which does the same sprint in less than four seconds.

The Aion UT has a front-mounted electric motor producing 150kW/210Nm. That’s plenty punchy for any hatchback at this price, and I like the way the brand hasn’t messed around with a sub-100kW motor in the base variant to push prospects towards the top-spec car.

It’s more powerful than all of its closest rivals and at the time of writing you’ll have to spend four to six thousand dollars more to get into something equivalent from BYD, Chery, Jaecoo, Leapmotor or MG.

It even has a claimed 0-100km/h sprint time as low as 7.3 seconds.

It has a WLTP estimated driving range of up to 550km (510km for the dual-motor AWD) and like its sibling draws energy from a 90kWh lithium-ion propulsion battery beneath the floor.

Deepal claims a maximum AC (Type 2 plug) charge rate of 7.0kW can fill the battery from 0-100 per cent in 13 hours while DC (CCS2 plug) fast charging at the maximum 240kW can do 30-80 per cent in just 15 minutes.

When we collected the test vehicle, the touchscreen was displaying 95 per cent charge and an estimated range of 524km. We covered 219km during our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving, with 45 per cent charge and 245km remaining.

We did an overnight charge at home using the AC Type 2 cable and after 14 hours at a glacial 1.6kW the battery charge increased from 45 to 63 per cent, adding an extra 100km of range (346km).

We added another 80km to achieve a total distance of exactly 300km, after which the touchscreen was claiming average consumption of 15kWh/100km. So, based on our real-world figure, a range of 500km or more from a single charge is credible.

The Aion UT has a 60kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery pack, which grants it a WLTP-certified 430km of driving range.

That’s more than its closest rivals, like the entry-level Ora Standard Range (310km), BYD Dolphin Essential (410km) or BYD Atto 2 (345km).

Claimed efficiency is 16.4kWh/100km and the car I tested returned a consumption of 14.0kWh/100km over a 130km route of mixed conditions, which isn’t bad at all.

Charging speeds are less impressive, but realistically appropriate for the relatively small battery. The peak DC charging capacity of 87kW means a charge time which the brand quotes at 24 minutes, but this is from 30-80 per cent. Expect closer to 40 minutes for a 10-80 per cent charge.

AC charging is decent, at 11kW. This should have you charging from 10-80 per cent between four and five hours.

The E07 offers plenty of personalisation including four drive modes, a ‘super’ power saving mode and multiple adjustments for acceleration, steering, braking, regenerative braking, suspension height and ride firmness.

It has a spacious and comfortable driving position but the view takes some getting used to given there’s no conventional instrument cluster. You rely only on the head-up display for key info like road speed, traffic sign recognition, indicator direction etc.

Steering column stalks provide some basic functions like gear selection and indicating/headlight flashing but many settings like wipers, lights, climate control, audio etc are controlled by the central touchscreen.

This can be very distracting while driving, given the need to accurately place your fingertip on a virtual button or slider each time you need to change a setting. Yes, it has ‘Hey Deepal’ voice assistance, but physical dials and buttons would be quicker and easier.

The E07 is otherwise nice to drive with its near silent powertrain and low tyre/wind noise combined with good steering feel, strong braking and sure-footed handling with an air-cushioned ride. Its electric air-con was also impressively cold when daytime temperatures reached the mid-30s.

While the single motor and RWD can’t match the performance of its dual-motor AWD sibling, our test vehicle’s smooth and spirited acceleration in the sub-7.0 second 0-100km/h zone is more than ample for family duties with the added benefit of a longer driving range.

The drive experience can be where a lot of Chinese cars fall down but I walked away less frustrated by the Aion UT.

That’s not to say it will behave as you might expect a low-slung hatchback to. The suspension, for example, is extremely soft as it maintains its original Chinese-market state-of-tune.

This makes the car waft over imperfections on city roads. And in that sense it offers supreme ride comfort in the scenarios it was designed for. However, at the extremes, like some speed bumps, or particularly deep pot holes there can be a surprisingly violent re-bound sending a thud through the cabin.

The other trade-off for soft suspension is less body control. I was surprised to find that the Aion UT holds it together mostly well on a flat country B-road, but when undulations and big dips introduce themselves, the soft suspension can be too slow to react, making the car lose confidence in higher-speed open road scenarios we’re more used to in Australia.

The steering, like many electric cars in this category, is relatively heavily electrically assisted. This makes it light and easy to adjust at low speeds for easy park and maneuverability in the confines of a city. It loses a little bit of road-feel at higher speeds but the Aion UT’s steering is far from the least connected I’ve experienced recently.

One thing it can’t be criticised for is a lack of power. With 150kW instantaneously available the Aion UT has some serious poke and while the ChaoYang tyre package is tuned more for efficiency than grip, it’s again not one of the worst I’ve driven with.

One thing which helps the whole experience along is this car’s hatchback layout. With the weight of the battery low and squat and the wheels all the way out to the edges of the frame, the Aion UT inherently handles decently compared to an electric crossover or small SUV.

Like all Chinese cars, the UT has a host of occasionally frustrating driver aids, which you can read about in the Safety section below. While I was inclined to turn some of the features off after testing them, the alerts are relatively quiet and non-invasive.

Is the UT any good to drive? It’s not bad for the segment, I was largely pleased with how it handled and the power on offer, and while it still has its annoyances, they’re not big deal-breakers. 

The MG4 rear-drive is a better allrounder, while the GWM Ora isn’t as good. I’d say it’s on par with the BYD Dolphin, but they excel in different areas. The Dolphin's a bit sharper in terms of handling but the Aion UT is more comfortable.

As with many Chinese cars the list of active safety equipment is long but that doesn’t mean it’s particularly well calibrated.

Standard gear includes the key stuff like auto emergency braking (AEB), lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and adaptive cruise control. There are also rarer features for an affordable car like this including traffic sign recognition, door open warning, auto high beams and front cross-traffic alert.

On the parking front you get a 360-degree parking camera view as well as front and rear proximity sensors.

There's also an annoying driver monitoring system and one I haven’t seen much in the form of an occupant warning system, which seems to imagine you’re not wearing a seatbelt when you are.

It’s not the only safety system I found myself reaching to turn off. The lane keep assist could occasionally be a bit heavy-handed and the traffic sign alert was typically frustrating. This, sadly, is what we’ve come to expect from these types of systems from many Chinese automakers.

It’s not the most annoying system I’ve used, though, and the alerts are quiet enough and far enough apart that they aren't as intrusive as they can be in some rivals. You can also adjust the tolerance of some of the systems in the (needlessly complicated) menus to make them less annoying.

At the launch, the Aion UT was yet to be rated by ANCAP.

The E07 RWD comes standard with a seven-year-/140,000km warranty plus a separate eight years/240,000km warranty covering the propulsion battery. There’s also 12 months of complimentary roadside assistance.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/20,000km whichever occurs first. Capped pricing applies to the first seven scheduled services up to seven years/140,000km totalling $2955, or an average of $422 per service.

Deepal has a small but expanding national dealership network comprising around 14 locations, with each also providing vehicle servicing.

GAC covers this electric hatch with an eight-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the brand’s “magazine battery 2.0” is covered by a separate eight-year and 200,000km warranty. Five years of roadside assistance is included.

The Aion UT needs to be serviced once a year or 15,000km. The service price schedule extends all the way out to 240,000km with yearly visits costing between $199 and $640 but for the life of the warranty the average yearly cost comes in at $352.

There are currently 19 GAC dealers in Australia, confined mainly to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane with a single store in Perth and an outlier in Cairns. No representation yet in Tassie, Canberra, the Northern Territory or SA.