Chery C5 vs Ssangyong Musso

What's the difference?

Can a new name, fresh face and suspension update save Chery’s sleek SUV coupe from the ignominy of being one of the least pleasant options in its ultra-competitive class?

Sadly, not enough has been done for us to recommend the new C5.

As an affordable, stylish, roomy and zoomy SUV, the Chery definitely provides showroom appeal, especially given the decent warranty.

But, with lots of little niggles still present to distract and frustrate, the C5 is far from A1. Plus, with prices now creeping up, it doesn’t even have the cheap pricing of the old Omoda 5 to get it over the line.

Heading into 2026, Chery still needs to do better than this.

The SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate is an affordable workhorse that has good comfort, features and drives well. It suited my little family and our gear just fine this week with its space. If you need the practicality of a ute and are on a budget, you get a lot for your money here.

The new and narrower nose treatment is better, banishing the Omoda 5’s insectoid face straight into the bin. As an example of coupe-SUV design, the unaltered silhouette remains contemporary and is a defining signature for the series.

But, as before, the C5’s styling is hobbled by its narrow-gutted track width and highish (at 184mm) ground clearance, that give it a muffin-top and tippy-toed appearance respectively from most angles. Flashbacks to a Holden VN Commodore. Stance be damned.

Let’s look at the newcomer’s dimensions, compared to the Tiggo 4 for perspective: length is 4351mm (plus 44mm), width is 1831mm (+6mm), height is 1662mm (+2mm) and wheelbase is identical at 2610mm.

Still, there’s a positively Pollyanna-esque perspective to be gained here as well, since the C5’s extra size translates to a biggish small SUV inside a cabin that seems stylishly minimalistic. Or fairly basic. It all depends on your point of view.

Let’s take a closer look.

The Musso looks the part of a 4x4 dual cab ute. It’s big even without the XLV pack at 5095mm in length. And with it, that jumps up to 5395mm. Enough to well and truly fill out a car space.

To put it in perspective, it's longer than the Kia Carnival, so I'd check to see if it will fit in your garage!

The finish isn’t the best, with wide spaces between door jams and the tray (I can fit my hand in that one) and a painted foam-like joinery in the tailgate which is already showing a lot of wear and tear for a brand-new workhorse. Stuff like this could make it look worn quickly.

Once you move into the cabin, it becomes obvious where a lot of the facelift has been focused.

The black leather upholstery, headliner and accents all make it feel premium in the cabin.

The dashboard has been redesigned to be more horizontally-themed and to sit lower than the previous dash. It showcases the new upgraded tech screens, large integrated air vents and digital climate control panel.

The cabin looks way more expensive than the price tag might suggest and it's most welcome.

Three things struck me the moment I stepped inside the C5.

Firstly, though the silhouette suggests a low-slung car, the tall stance means getting in and out isn’t a drama at all, with the seats being up high enough for this to deserve its SUV/crossover status.

Secondly, the Chery emits a somewhat repellent plastic off-gas odour, a bit like a cheap toy. The smell never goes away. Perhaps it was just our test car? Unlikely though, as it reminds me of pre-2000s Kias and Hyundais.

And in stark contrast, thirdly, there’s an arresting elegance to the dashboard’s minimalist layout and presentation. Nothing’s changed visually and nothing needed to.

Let’s concentrate on the many positive points first.

There’s plenty of space around you for a comparatively small and narrow SUV, including ample legroom and head room for your 178cm tester front and back. It doesn't feel cramped at all.

Finding the ideal driving position is easy, with most of the (available) switches and controls where you’d need them to be without having to stretch to reach. Helping things out here is an adjustable steering wheel for rake as well as reach. Unlike in an MG ZS.

The dash layout looks great, given that this car is of a 2022 vintage, with the large, twin 10.25-inch integrated displays for both the electronic instrumentation and the multimedia system seamlessly presented. Both are fairly clear and easy to work out and operate. And, despite being an older-generation vehicle (it’s now well into year four of production), the instruments still look fresh.

And though the C5 runs a software-based operating system for vehicle functions, climate, audio, multimedia and other settings, the few buttons provided are well integrated and mostly work logically.

Below the touchscreen is a row of haptic switches for the main heating and cooling elements, meaning just one touch is necessary and with no complicated and time-consuming sub-menus to navigate. That's good.

You do need to dive into sub-menus for some drive settings and modes, though, and that's disappointing, but at least the C5’s is not as complicated as some others we’ve experienced of late.

Other plus points include excellent ventilation and loads of storage, including a big old glovebox, a cavernous centre console bin, a vast lower area to hide things on, deep cupholders and a ‘wall’ to lean two phones or a tablet while still being visible for the driver to glance at, with one side providing wireless charging on the Ultimate grade.

Along with pleasant cloth seats that are surprisingly comfortable, all show a reassuring degree of thoughtfulness.

Additionally, the poor side and rear vision is at least aided by large side mirrors and a crisp reverse-camera views.

However, there are some serious downsides too, starting with the C5’s aforementioned phone/tablet wall. The rubber backing in our test car was misshapen and dog-eared, undermining the otherwise exemplary build quality.

Until you learn its weird ways, the gear shifter can be unfathomable. It looks like it would operate as per a regular T-bar, but pressing the side button to engage Drive or Reverse instead locks them out, meaning the uninitiated will inevitably find themselves panicking manoeuvring in traffic with impatient drivers wondering why a Chery is blocking the road during a cheeky three-point turn. Embarrassing and, yes, super frustrating.

In the Ultra at least, the lofty front passenger seat has no height adjustment. The digital radio did not work for the entire week we had the C5. Maybe it was just our car, but even in inner Melbourne, reception proved elusive.

And the touchscreen-based secondary climate settings that aren’t supported by physical buttons are a stretch away, including temperature adjustment, meaning these and other items are arranged for left-hand-drive access.

This means it is fiddly to operate, as concentration is not on the road ahead, resulting in the driver monitor sounding off, leading to more frustration. An unvirtuous circle of distraction ensues, highlighting the folly of software-based vehicle systems that have not been tailored to Australian road conditions. Fail.

But nothing is as aggravating as the Chery’s voice control system. Like we said earlier, when turned on, it mishears or misunderstands words to almost a comical degree… if it wasn’t so constantly intrusive. As with paranoid and/or trigger-happy ADAS warnings, you end up switching off such irritating tech. Which beggars the question: what is their point?

Moving to the back seat, things look up again, with sufficient space for most smaller families to settle into.

The bench is fine, offering adequate comfort for shorter journeys. Legroom is generous, helped out by room for boots to tuck underneath the front cushion. And most amenities are present for a base model car, including a folding armrest with two cupholders (again, unlike in an MG ZS), as well as one-touch electric windows, overhead grab handles, coat hooks, decent size door bins, a USB port and face level ventilation.

All those go towards making the C5 well-packaged, small family transport.

Further back, Chery has managed to liberate an extra 10 litres of cargo capacity compared to the old Omoda 5, so 360 litres is available – which is not bad for a small SUV. That rises to 1075L in two-seater mode.

It’s also a practical and easy boot to use, with a space saver spare wheel.

The cabin of the XLV Ultimate is big on space and all occupants enjoy fantastic head- and legroom.

Individual storage is good for a ute with the front enjoying two cupholders, a good-sized middle console and glove box plus a drink bottle holder in each door.

Rear occupants get map pockets, a fold-down armrest with two cupholders and storage bins in each door.

Amenities on the whole are good with the heated and ventilated front seats that feature lumbar support. But the upgrade to electric control for the fronts and heat function for the rear outboard positions clinch the luxury factor Both rows are well-cushioned and comfortable for long journeys.

Charging options are limited to the front with two USB-C ports, which is an upgrade from the old USB-A ports, and two 12-volt sockets.

But one of them is an old-school cigarette lighter which I haven’t seen in years! Now that was a teachable moment when I was a kid.

It's a shame there are no charging options in the rear as it could be inconvenient if you travel a lot and your kidlets have devices.

Fitting a child seat in the rear row is a little awkward due to the backrest folding down in one piece and it misses out on any clever hacks like some other utes have, like the zippered accessed points to the top-tether anchor points found on the HiLux and D-Max or the 60/40 split-fold on the Cannon.

Because of this, you'll want to fit your child seats at the same time and probably want it to be a 'set and forget' scenario.

On to the upgraded technology – the touchscreen of the multimedia system is responsive but the info is limited to the radio and a small settings menu.

Think of it as more of a mirror-screening device for the wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. It’s easy to connect to the CarPlay and the graphics are nice and bright. 

The instrument cluster is semi-customisable but it’s here you can access/customise more information like the safety features, which I appreciate.

Our test vehicle has that XLV Pack fitted which adds 300mm to the tray length and boosts the overall capacity by 251L.

The max payload is 880kg, which should be sufficient for a lot of weekend pursuits.

You get a full-sized spare wheel and with our optioned tonneau accessory, you don’t have to worry about your gear getting wet, either. 

The tailgate is large and feels very light to operate, thanks to the assist function but this ute lacks any sort of step to access the tray, which won’t be an issue for you giants out there but for me it was a bit of comedy to climb in to the back to retrieve stuff.

The facelift sees the Musso gain a mid-spec variant in the form of the Adventure which creates a line-up of three grades overall.

Our test vehicle is the flagship Ultimate, which is priced from $45,000, drive-away, making it one of the most affordable 4x4 dual-cab utes on the market at the moment.

In comparison, the GWM Ute Cannon Vanta is the closest competitor at $46,490, before on-road costs, with the LDV T60 Max Luxe coming in at $47,884, before on-roads.

The Ultimate grade gets some great premium features, like heated and ventilated front seats, a heated leather steering wheel, as well as, updated technology with the 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia screen (up from the previous 8.0-inch system), and the new 12.3-inch instrument cluster, up from the previous 10.25-inch unit. The climate controls have been integrated into a new touchscreen panel, which is easy to use.

Other standard features include an assisted tailgate function, full-size spare wheel,18-inch alloy wheels, LED DRLs and fog lights, HID headlights, a 360-degree camera system and wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

Off-roading enthusiasts will be pleased with the part-time 4x4 drivetrain that includes low- and high- range and the auto-locking rear differential feature.

For its price point, the Ultimate is well-specified but our test vehicle has a couple of option packs and a few accessories that boost the overall costs.  

The test vehicle features the 'Luxury Pack' for $3000, which adds dual-zone air-conditioning, a sunroof, leather upholstery, electric front seats and heated rear outboard seats.

It’s also fitted with the 'XLV Pack' for $1500 which adds 300mm to the tray length and an extra 20Nm of torque. 

But we’re not done. With the red metallic paintwork and accessories like a tow bar, rubber mat set, tonneau cover and electronic brake controller our test vehicle actually slides in at $53,598.

Which is still great given the market but not as jaw-dropping as the first price might suggest because most of those added extras would be needs rather than wants for some buyers. Especially the extra torque and tow bar if you plan on using the 3.5-tonne braked towing capacity. 

The C5 is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine, delivering 108kW of power at 5500rpm and 210Nm of torque from 1750-4000rpm.

As part of the MY25 facelift, the Chery swaps out the old Omoda 5’s CVT for a six-speed dual-clutch transmission, complete with a handy manual mode. It drives the front wheels only.

Tipping the scales at 1462kg (kerb), the C5 Ultra offers a power-to-weight ratio of 73.9kW/tonne – which is slightly less than, say, a Haval Jolion, but quite a bit behind a Mazda CX-3.

With a slight helping hand from a strong northerly wind, we managed to record a 0-100km/h sprint time of 9.9 seconds. This figure suggests the Chery feels faster than it is.

The upgrade hasn’t seen any changes to the Musso's powertrain and it is still powered by a 2.2-litre, four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine with a maximum power output of 133kW and 420Nm of torque (400Nm without the XLV Pack).

It’s got plenty of grunt and despite having only a six-speed auto transmission, the gear changes are mostly smooth.

Adventure enthusiasts should be happy because the Musso is a proper part-time 4x4 with low- and high-range, which is easy as pie to change over to when the need arises.

The C5’s combined average fuel consumption figure is 6.9L/100km, for a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 160 grams/km. And that’s on regular 91 RON standard unleaded. Topping the 51-litre petrol tank should result in nearly 740km of range between refills.

During our week with the Chery, we managed 9.0L/100km, which is very disappointing, though that did include highway and performance driving.

Despite its size, the Musso's official combined cycle fuel economy figure is only 9.0L/100km.

My real-world average came in at 10.2L/100km after a good mix of open-road and urban driving. Not too surprising, but that's without any loads. Expect it to be thirstier if you plan on towing.

Based on the combined fuel figure and 75L fuel tank, you should be able to get a driving range in excess of 800km.

Chery has made some pretty fundamental changes underneath, so we had higher hopes of the C5 compared to the preceding Omoda 5. However, expectations ought to be tempered here.

Let’s begin with the Chinese SUV’s performance.

After a moment’s hesitation, the C5 feels punchy from the get-go, with a decent amount of muscle as the revs rise. Throttle response is brisk, even at higher speeds. And the brakes do a great job. This is quite the rapid little runabout.

Some of that initial lag is down to the dual-clutch transmission, since it needs time for the turbo to spool up. Once sorted, it shifts swiftly and smoothly, and without delay. Only the aforementioned gear selector complication will catch out new drivers, as the operation is needlessly complicated.

But the engine is never really quiet, and can even feel coarse when extended under hard acceleration, betraying this Chery’s station as a cheap SUV. And the stop/start tech is especially jerky.

The steering, meanwhile, is a mix of disgruntle and delight.

When driving on the motorway, it can feel lumpy, with the driver-assist system tugging away endlessly at the wheel. The sudden jolts make it feel like a pinball as the vehicle feels like it is ricocheting off the white lines. Such constant correction is both tiring and irritating, leading to fatigue and, if your fuse is really short, aggravation.

For steering smoothness or linearity, you need to dive into a sub menu and opt out of several ADAS modes. Or otherwise pull over and wonder why Chinese car companies especially seem to have such disdain for Australian drivers. If this sounds like a nightmare, the C5 is not for you.

Furthermore, there’s no point choosing a steering setting. Comfort is light enough for easy driving and weighty enough for the driver to feel in control, but feedback and feel are absent. And selecting Sport just adds needless heft and makes it all feel way too heavy.

Now, that said, the C5 offers some dynamic compensation, and likely courtesy of its multi-link suspension upgrade.

At higher speeds, the steering, for instance, is pleasingly direct and precise, meaning it turns exactly where you choose it to. The handling feels controlled and the tyres grip well, for some unintentional scrappy fun through really tight corners, to a certain extent anyway. It’s a side to the Chery the Omoda 5 never seemed capable of delivering.

But, inevitably, this comes at a price, and that is a busy and at times agitated ride, with the suspension failing to soak up bumps and irregularities on anything other than smooth roads, despite its new-found independence, adding to further fatigue. For the record, our test car rode on 215/60R17 Giti tyres.

Would higher-quality rubber help fix this? If you’re buying a sub-$30K Chery SUV, would you even care? Basically, unless you enjoy the occasional hoon, the C5 lacks dynamic sophistication as well as sufficient Australian road tuning. Much like its predecessor. Such a letdown.

The Musso has won me over with how it drives. The update has seen the suspension retuned and it’s well-cushioned without feeling spongy.

The ride comfort is very good but you occasionally get some shudders through the frame when gear changes happen on a steep hill. The cabin sounds refined with how quiet it is, even at higher speeds and you’ll enjoy that on longer trips. 

Hitting the open-road isn’t an issue with power being delivered smoothly when you accelerate. Despite being a tall car, the Musso handles cornering much better than I thought it would without heaps of roll. 

You don’t feel any of the weight of the car when you steer, though, and that’s a bit too light for my liking. But it gives the Musso more of a car-like feel rather than a ute/truck feel which some people might enjoy.

Massive windows mean the Musso has crazy-good visibility for a ute and I feel confident about checking the blind-spot because of it. That's great for such a big vehicle.

Despite being almost 5.5m long, the Musso isn't too difficult to park because of the 360-degree view camera system, and front and rear parking sensors, a must have on large cars like this. The camera system is a smidge low quality for the image, though.

On the top-grade model, you get most of the important safety features you expect to see on new cars but only at this level. The lower grades miss out on some big-ticket items and it annoys me when you have to pay extra for safety.

Standard features include biggies like rear cross-traffic alert, blind-spot monitoring, as well as AEB with forward collision warning and lane-change collision warning.

Other features include lane departure alert, safe exit assist, driver attention warning, tyre pressure monitoring, hill descent control, hill start assist, a 360-degree camera system, plus front and rear parking sensors.

It features six airbags, which is good for this class, but is currently unrated with ANCAP while its rivals all sport a maximum five-star rating. 

There are ISOFIX child seat mounts on the outboard rear seats and three top-tethers but you can’t legally fit a child-seat in the middle seat as it only features a lap belt. Not having the sash does lower the safety aspect for any middle rowers and I’d think of the middle seat as an emergency spot for an adult only.

Very competitive if not quite as class leading as the conditional Nissan, Mitsubishi and MG 10-year warranty, the C5 comes with a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

Chery also offers seven years/105,000km of capped-price servicing and a year’s free roadside assistance, though up to seven years is available should owners choose to have their vehicle maintained at an authorised dealer during that period.

Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km, and cost $280 per visit for the first five, extending to nearly $370 and $290 for the final two.

The on-going costs are great on the Musso, with it coming with a seven-year/unlimited km warranty, which is above average for this class. 

It also comes with a seven year/105,000km servicing program where services average $375, which is competitive for the class. 

Servicing intervals are average at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first.