Used Subaru Forester review: 2002-2008
April 6, 2018
- 5 star ANCAP rating
- Strong and reliable engine
- Feels a bit flimsy
- No ISOFIX mounting points
The many fans of Subaru’s four-wheel drive models were rejoicing with the news of the Forester in 1997.
It quickly attracted a legion of followers after its launch, and Subaru was eager to build on that momentum when it released an updated model in 2002.
The new MY03 model was an evolution of the previous one rather than a revolution. It followed the same theme, but complaints levelled against the earlier model were addressed.
A lack of performance from the 2.0-litre engine was the most common grumble about the older model, and Subaru was quick to promote the change to a 2.5-litre engine in the new car.
Another negative sometimes aired was that the Forester felt a little flimsy. It wasn’t, it just felt that way.
In response there was a new, stronger body shell that boosted cabin space, and offered better side impact protection.
For your X money you got more safety features and more equipment.
With that came a new model line-up, starting with the X at the entry-point.
For your X money you got more safety features and more equipment.
Dual front airbags, anti-lock ABS braking, EBD electronic brakeforce distribution, seat belt pretensioners boosted the Forester’s safety, while standard air conditioning, cruise control, remote central locking, power mirrors and windows, an adjustable steering wheel, roof racks, and a radio cassette player with four speakers added to its comfort and convenience.
For more there was the XS, and for the extra spend you got 16-inch alloy wheels, climate control air conditioning, a six-stacker CD player, fog lights, and automatic self-levelling suspension.
But like the steak knife salesman Subaru had even more in the form of the XS Luxury.
On top of all that you got with the XS the Luxury sub-tag got you the added safety of side airbags, leather trim, and a power sunroof.
The sizzling hot GT was discontinued in MY03; at least the GT badge was dropped.
It came back as a MY04 model in 2003, but carrying an XT badge. It still had the performance of a turbo engine, but not the image of the GT.
The XT spec mirrored that of the XS.
Like the XS there was also a Luxury version of the XT, its spec mirrored the XS Luxury.
An update in 2005, dubbed MY06, boosted the engine’s performance, and improved its offroad capability with increased ground clearance.
Towards the end of its model life Subaru added a special model, an X with sat nav.
The new body promised more elbow and legroom for those in the front and rear seats.
It was a rather bland place to find yourself; awash with plastics that felt hard to the touch, but at the same time it was on a par with most other models coming from Japanese carmakers.
Trim on the bulk of the models was durable cloth; those tagged with the Luxury badge had leather.
It was of a time when buyers were expecting, of all things, more cupholders, and Subaru obliged with seven in the MY06 update, and threw in a small picnic table in the rear for good measure.
Lap sash seat belts allow for the fitment of a baby car seat, but there were no ISOFIX mounting points.
Like the first Forester the MY03 was powered by a horizontally-opposed, flat-four petrol engine, but unlike the previous model it was a 2.5-litre engine designed to address the complaints about a lack of performance of the earlier 2.0-litre engine.
Power and torque were both increased, up to 112kW (150 horsepower) and 223Nm respectively.
When required the 2.5-litre models would do the 0-100 km/h sprint in 10.4 seconds, the turbo models in a blistering 6.4 seconds.
Both ran on petrol, the base 2.5-litre engine could use 91-octane regular, but the turbo needed 95-octane premium to run at its best.
The transmission options were a five-speed manual gearbox, or a rather dull four-speed automatic transmission.
When the XT arrived in 2003 it came with a turbocharged version of the 2.5-litre engine putting out 155kW/320Nm.
The MY06 update saw the performance peaks of both engines increased.
The base engine jumped to 121kW/226Nm, while the turbo engine went up to 169kW/320Nm.
A shortage of ground clearance meant it was necessary to stay away from the hard going off-road if you didn’t want to be stranded. Keep that in mind and you won’t go far wrong, it’s quite capable.
On the blacktop it’s a great performer. Sure-footed with all-wheel drive it’s a good thing to drive.
With only a four-speed automatic it lacks the smoothness and driveability that comes from having a fifth ratio.
The good news was that ANCAP gave the Forester a full complement of five stars.
In base form it came with dual front airbags and seat belt pretensioners, and an array of electronic safety features, like ABS anti-lock brakes, electronic brakeforce distribution.
Further crash protection in the form of side front airbags were added in 2005.
Any common issues?
The Forester’s reliability is exemplary; owners report few problems even though some have had them for quite a long time.
The flat-four ‘boxer’ engine is strong and reliable, but it’s important to check for oil leaks and signs of oil burning. It’s quite common to see a puff of smoke from the tailpipe on start-up in the morning; it’s generally oil that has accumulated in the piston rings while the car has been sitting idle overnight.
Like all cars the Forester thrives on regular maintenance and oil changes. Subaru recommended servicing every 12,500km or six months, and it’s important that this routine is maintained.
Use the recommended 5W-40 oil and you won't go wrong.
The engine employs a cam timing belt and this requires changing every five years or 100,000km. Ignoring it is to risk serious internal damage to the engine.
It pre-dated capped price servicing, but service costs aren’t expensive and any mechanic can do it.
The warranty when new was for three years/unlimited kilometres.
Look for evidence of off-road use by checking the underbody for damage, and walk away if you see any. There are lots of other cars on the market that have only been used on sealed roads.
MORE: If anything crops up, you’ll probably find it on our Subaru Forester problems.
Kevin Oakes: My X rides smoothly and handles well. It’s economical and the performance is quite good for my needs.
Karen Hardy: My 2004 XT never fails to excite me; it goes hard and pushes you back in the seat when accelerating. It’s sturdy, handles well, and it’s been reliable.
Terry Harrison: I have an XT Luxury, which has been great for everyday use, but even better when I get away on weekends. It’s fast and so far it has been reliable.
Tanya Thomson: Our 2006 XS is the second Forester we’ve had. I love the performance of the 2.5-litre engine, but I’d like more room in the back.
Colin Adams: I’ve loved my 2007 XT since I bought it new. The performance is great, the economy reasonable, and the cabin is roomy enough for a couple or small family.
Hyundai Santa Fe
Much improved, but still great value-for-money, and there is a diesel.
Much maligned for its suspension troubles, the early Ford SUV is one to avoid.
Grown up SUV was larger, roomier, with good performance and road manners.
Nice blend of everyday practicality and off-road capability for weekends.