Volkswagen Amarok vs Isuzu D-Max

What's the difference?

The Amarok W600 is impressive when you get it onto a twisty road, and my hat goes off to Walkinshaw for turning a dual-cab into something that is genuinely fun to drive on twisty roads. I’m not kidding, the W600 is proper fun.

But it’s expensive, and despite the tough looks and on-road ability, it doesn’t have any more on-paper performance than its standard siblings. That and its ride is compromised by its new abilities.

Those who spend the cash on a W600 probably won’t be disappointed if they can handle a slightly stiff ride, but it’s possible VW is expecting people will be more into the idea of a corner-carving dual-cab than is the reality.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The D-Max X-Rider has adequate appeal as a daily driver – it’s functional and comfortable – and it’s also working off a proven 4WD platform.

This mid-spec ute lacks the polish of higher-grade D-Max grades, but it may still entice those ute fans who want a workhorse with a tractable engine and don’t care at all about frippery.

Does that 2.2-litre engine add anything substantial to the package? No, and the potential fuel savings it represents don’t seem so likely as the 3.0-litre doesn’t use a lot more fuel than the 2.2-litre D-Max anyway – and the 3.0-litre version only costs another $2000 or so to buy.

The 3.0-litre D-Max remains the better option because while the 2.2L is effective off-road, it’s only reasonable in general day-to-day driving, as it lacks grunt and has to work that much harder and is that much noisier under load than the 3.0-litre in most driving scenarios, including 4WDing.

The Amarok W600 looks tough. In fact, it might even look a little too tough given the engine under its bonnet is unchanged from the regular V6 Amarok.

Walkinshaw has done an excellent job making the Amarok look like a properly fierce on-road performer, from the bespoke front bumper and new ‘W’ motif in the grille, to the lightbar across the front of the fascia connecting the lights and the aforementioned 20-inch Walkinshaw wheels.

The side-exit twin exhaust up the back of the ute looks excellent, and the fact that the sidesteps retract to tuck in below the doors gives the ute a sleeker vibe.

It’s a bit underwhelming in the cabin by comparison, with the Walkinshaw stitching in the headrests and the stainless steel pedals the biggest additions to the (admittedly already plush) Amarok interior.

It’s just a little more than a jazzed-up Ranger interior, but not by much.

Nothing much – if anything at all really – is different about this D-Max’s exterior compared to others in the stable.

Sure, the X-Rider has a tweaked front grille, 17.0-inch gloss black alloy wheels and black sports bar but those elements are mere frippery on top of what is already a tidy looking package.

The D-Max X-Rider is 5205mm long (with a 3125mm wheelbase), 1870mm wide and 1785mm high.

Inside, it is a clear uncluttered space, which is spot-on for this ute and part of the line-up’s rough charm.

The D-Max retains even an undeniable robust presence when compared to the more stylish Mazda BT-50 and Ford Ranger, or even rivals such as the Toyota HiLux.

The Amarok starts from a solid base in terms of practicality, so the W600 inherits pretty much all of it, including a couple of its downsides.

The positives to start, the W600 uses the same handy multimedia system on a nice, clear vertical touchscreen with always-on climate controls and a few buttons for key shortcuts.

As much as a bespoke steering wheel would feel more special, the standard one from the Amarok has convenient buttons and is nice to hold.

The seats in the W600 are comfortable, and finding a naturally ergonomic position is easy with the 10-way electric adjustment, but as much as everything falls nicely to hand the cupholders are in an awkward position and there’s not a lot of easy storage space.

A little cubby above the glovebox and a small centre storage bin are a little hard to reach or access while driving, and the phone charger isn’t the best place to store items.

There’s decent space in the back, with doorcard bottle storage (as up front) and a centre armrest with cupholders.

Impressively, the Amarok W600 still has a 3500kg braked towing capacity, a 954kg payload, and no intrusion on the 1544mm long and 1224mm wide tray. There’s an optional roller cover for that, too.

The X-Rider is a solidly spartan mid-spec ute.

From its myriad durable plastic surfaces through to its high-grade cloth seats, this ute is booted and suited for the dirt and dust of real day-to-day life.

Sure, it misses out on some of the more appealing aspects of higher-spec D-Max grades – including a bigger 9.0-inch touchscreen, built-in sat-nav, and less-tinny nine-speaker audio system – but it remains steadfastly true to the spirit of Isuzu’s workhorses where substance wins out over style every time.

As in any good ute, the cabin has a comfortably familiar feel about it and it’s an easy space in which to spend lots of drive time.

The interior is adequately spacious with supportive seats upfront and a reasonably comfortable bench-style pew for the three back-seat passengers.

While the touchscreen system is a bit clunky in operation – it takes some time and effort to navigate your way through menus and sub-menus to reach the area you want (usually the driver-assist tech that you want to adjust), the general mix of controls (on-screen and real switches, buttons and dials) are welcome.

There are plenty of charging options – a mix of USB-A, USB-C and 12V upfront, and USB-A for the back row – and storage places include recesses for your wallet, keys etc, a deep-ish centre console, as well as dual cupholders upfront and cupholders in the back seat’s fold-down armrest, and bottle holders in the doors.

Back-row passengers get USB ports, directional air-con vents and shallow under-seat storage.

The tub is 1570mm long (at floor level), 1530mm wide (1122mm between the wheel-arches) and 490mm deep. It has an under-rail tub liner, two cargo tie-down points, and it has tailgate assist.

Our test vehicle had a soft tonneau cover, which is annoyingly fiddly to close at the top edge of the tailgate.

Tub options for D-Max owners include a tonneau or roller cover (which offers at least some degree of security from thieves, and protection from rain, mud, snow etc), or an Isuzu or aftermarket canopy, although a canopy impacts the versatility of the load space because once it’s an enclosed area it makes it more difficult to carry long, awkward and/or large loads in the tub.

The D-Max X-Rider is part of a nine-variant 4x4 line-up; there are five 4x2 variants. Some D-Max variants are not offered with the 2.2L four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, while some are not offered with the 3.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine – check with your dealership for clarification.

The 2.2L D-Max X-Rider crew cab ute (our test vehicle) has an RRP of $59,500 before on-road costs (at time of writing), with special offer drive-away pricing of $56,990, depending on location.

Our test vehicle has some accessories onboard including rubber cabin floor mats ($229.98), tow bar wiring harness – 12-pin flat ($490), tow bar and tongue kit ($1310), and an electric brake controller ($999.75), so, with accessories stamp duty ($151.49) also added to the price, the test vehicle costs about $60,170 drive-away.

Standard features include an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen system (with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), a 4.2-inch driver display, six-speaker audio system, full suite of driver-assist tech, and more.

The X-Rider also has a black sports bar, revised front grille and 17.0-inch gloss black alloy wheels. 

Exterior paint choices include Sunstone Orange mica, Moonstone White pearl, Basalt Black mica, Wolfram Grey metallic (on the test vehicle) or Mineral White. Premium paint costs $695.

Its price-tag may put it up against the likes of Toyota HiLux, Ford Ranger and its mechanical twin, the Mazda BT-50, and it manages to hold its own against those in terms of value for money.

Powering the W600 is the standard 3.0-litre twin-turbo-diesel V6 available in other Amaroks, with 184kW and 600Nm.

It’s mated to a 10-speed torque converted automatic and powers either the rear or all four wheels, depending on how you’ve set the all-wheel-drive system.

The 2.2L D-Max X-Rider has a 2.2L four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine producing 120kW at 3600rpm and 400Nm between 1600-2400rpm and it’s matched to an eight-speed automatic transmission.

While the 3.0-litre D-Max has always been mostly unstressed in the majority of driving scenarios – even low-range 4WDing – the 2.2-litre feels underpowered.

It is noisy, especially under heavy acceleration or load. It has to work harder than the 3.0-litre and, again, it is noisy. Yes, the 3.0-litre D-Max is gruff, but there's a strained edge to the roughness in the 2.2-litre that is very noticeable while driving on sealed surfaces at speed.

Have I mentioned that it’s noisy?

The good news is that the eight-speed auto feels as slick and as smooth in application here as it does in this ute’s stablemate, the MU-X, and, as such, it feels right at home in this ute.

This D-Max has a part-time 4WD system which includes a dual-range transfer case (with high- and low-range 4WD) and a rear diff-lock. The driver is able to shift from 2H (two-wheel drive, high-range) to 4H (4WD high-range) while on the move up to speeds of 100km/h. The diff-lock may only be engaged when the vehicle is in 4L (4WD low-range).

The D-Max also has a switchable terrain mode system which tweaks the engine, transmission and traction control to suit the driving conditions. 'Rough Terrain' mode, like a steroids-enhanced off-road traction control, is king of these modes when you’re off the bitumen.

The Amarok’s diesel V6 engine remains unchanged so the 8.4L/100km fuel consumption rate stands, but if you’re driving the W600 as intended, you’ll see that figure climb.

It’s fitted with an 80-litre fuel tank so theoretically a 950km trip would be possible in WLTP test conditions.

Official fuel consumption for this D-Max is 7.1L/100km.

Real-world fuel consumption on this test was 8.4L/100km.

The D-Max has an 76-litre fuel tank, so, going by that on-test fuel consumption figure, you should be able to get a driving range of about 904km.

But remember, your fuel consumption has the potential to be much higher than our tested figures because chances are you'll have family, friends, pets, camping gear, water craft, the whole kit and caboodle on board. I only carried vehicle recovery gear, MaxTrax, and a first-aid kit, so I didn’t have a huge amount of weight on board.

The first and most impressive thing to mention once you’re on the move in the Amarok W600 is that, once you sling the 2.4-tonne dual cab into a corner, you can tell there’s been some rigorous engineering work undertaken here.

The cornering and handling ability of the W600 belies its dual-cab nature to some extent, as it holds relatively flat and is far more confidence inspiring even on soaked roads than any ladder-frame ute I can recall. 

Of course, the tyres help on the cornering front too, with the PS4 SUV rubber being a fairly big trade-off in terms of sacrificing off-road ruggedness for asphalt grip.

Even the exhaust is a subtle reminder that you’re in something that’s had the once-over (or several times over) from a crew of engineers who know what they’re doing.

Sure, it’s not the same burble that used to roll out of the Walkinshaw sheds back in the Holden days, but it growls gently at certain revs or under the right load.

But the ride is firm, and it’s surprising the roads in the south and east of Tassie showed that given they were the test roads used to turn the W600 into the ‘ultimate driver’s ute’.

It’s noticeable enough that you’d probably get a bit tired of it on a long trip, which is a shame as that’s something VW is pretty sure its W600 customers are looking to use it for. That’s why it can still tow 3500kg and has that near-1000kg payload.

I should note that utes with some weight in the tray often feel a little more settled at the leaf-sprung rear, but we didn't test the W600 with any load onboard.

Its big wheels and low-profile rubber probably don’t help the 2.4-tonne ute on the comfort front, but hey, they look good.

The other main issue is it doesn’t feel as ‘special’ as it could in the power and performance department. 

The engine is great for a dual-cab, plenty torquey and doesn’t feel like it needs to work hard day-to-day, but something with a bit of mongrel about it would have been better.

VW not wanting Walkinshaw to detract from its towing and payload ability might have hindered this a little, but I can’t help but wonder if the Amarok W600 could have been more lively with the four-cylinder petrol engine than the diesel V6.

In the Amarok TSI452 variants, it feels peppy enough to be interesting, and there’s probably more scope for chassis balance than the twin-turbo diesel allows.

It’s also the engine used in Ford’s Mustang EcoBoost and the wicked Focus RS of a few years ago, so not bad pedigree.

The D-Max has for some time been regarded as reasonable on-road - comfortable, composed, and somewhat refined for a 4WD ute.

However, while the 3.0-litre D-Max is gruff and laggy and yet retains a certain rough charm, the 2.2-litre version is simply noisy and sluggish and forgoes the charm.

This D-Max has to work harder than the 3.0-litre does, and it makes that abundantly clear with a caustic edge to the roughness in the 2.2-litre that is very noticeable on road.

It’s slow off the mark, exhibiting a disconcerting lag under heavy throttle from a standing start. And it’s far from the most dynamic vehicle to drive. But its low-key appealing tractability almost manages to negate these flaws – but not quite.

As mentioned earlier, the eight-speed auto is a smooth operator, micro-managing the engine as best it can.

When it comes time to leave the bitumen and hit the dirt, this D-Max – with a kerb weight of approximately 2010kg and a not-insubstantial turning circle of 12.5m – feels nimble on bush tracks and it is still very capable.

Even though the 3.0-litre D-Max is not the ute segment’s torquiest, it offers plenty of pulling power across a broad rev range – with peak torque between 1600rpm and 2400rpm – and it delivers that torque in an even-handed way. It still has a decent amount of low- and mid-range torque, which makes dirt-road cruising and low-speed 4WDing easy.

One of the major differences between the two engines is that the 2.2-litre D-Max has to work that much harder than its stablemate, and, as a result, it’s noisier and harsher.

However, this D-Max has part-time 4WD (with high- and low-range 4WD), a rear diff lock and an effective off-road traction control system (which has been recalibrated over the years), so it still retains all of that off-road capability the D-Max has built its reputation on.

Ground clearance is 235mm and wading depth is 800mm, so there’s an adequate amount of clearance for most reasonable off-road challenges (for standard unmodified vehicles) and its listed off-road angles of 26.9 (approach), 23.9 (departure) and 23.3 (ramp-over) all check out.

This ute’s wheel travel – how far the axle can move up and down relative to the chassis – has more than an adequate amount of flex, stretching its tyres close, if not all the way, to the dirt.

This D-Max’s 255/65 R17 all-terrain tyres (Dunlop Grandtrek AT25s on 17” x 7” alloy rims) are adequate for off-roading but an even more aggressive set of all-terrains would boost this ute’s off-road capability.

The general rule applies here as with any standard unmodified off-road vehicle: drive with care, control and consideration and you shouldn't have any trouble tackling light to moderate 4WDing in this ute.

The 2.2L D-Max has a listed kerb weight of 2010kg. In terms of packability, gross vehicle mass is 3100kg, so theoretically this ute has a payload of 1090kg (GVM - kerb weight = payload), but Isuzu has based that figure on the cab-chassis variant’s weight.

This ute’s payload total – after the weight of onboard accessories and a 200kg total of driver and passengers are subtracted – is 818kg, according to Isuzu’s own payload calculator.

The 2.2L D-Max can legally tow 750kg (unbraked trailer) and 3500kg (braked). It has a listed gross combined mass of 6000kg.

The D-Max has the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing in 2022.

Standard safety features include eight airbags - dual front, dual front side, dual full-length curtain, front knee and centre (far-side) - and a comprehensive suite of driver-assist tech including auto emergency braking (AEB), adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist, lane departure warning, a digital reversing camera and a tyre-pressure monitoring system.

The driver-assist tech, while mostly effective, can be annoying (for example, misreading/misjudging speed limit signs) and over the top in its reactions (with auto emergency braking biting hard out of the blue when it really needn’t), and it takes some time to work your way through the on-screen menus and sub-menus in order to switch off ADAS alerts.

The W600 is backed by VW’s standard five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty.

Given most popular utes are covered by the same, that’s pretty standard, but longer warranties are creeping in.

Volkswagen says a five-year servicing plan covers the Amarok for just $3200, which averages to $640 a year. Service schedule is every 12 months or 15,000km.

The D-Max has a six-year/150,000km warranty and seven years of roadside assistance. Unlimited kilometres in the warranty would be welcome.

A free inspection is pencilled in at the three-month or 3000km mark (whichever occurs soonest), then service intervals are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs soonest.

Capped-price servicing covers the first five scheduled services (up to five years/75,000km – whichever occurs soonest) at a cost of $489 for each service.

Isuzu Ute Australia has a nationwide network of more than 160 dealer sites.