Mercedes-Benz EQB250 vs Tesla Model 3

What's the difference?

The EQB is a likeable yet complicated machine.

On one hand, the high pricing is a real hurdle, even in the base 250, while the 350 4Matic costing the wrong side of $110K driveaway can’t even be had with seven seats. What is the point of it? 

On the other, though, the EQB is roomier than its appearance suggests, way lovelier inside than anticipated, and – especially after allowed to really be driven hard and fast – a whole lot more Mercedes-Benz in the way the 350 4Matic moves, steers, grips, rides and stops.

As a result, we’d skip the capable but bland 250 and try to haggle hard on the price of the altogether too-expensive yet compelling 350 4Matic instead. It’s the EQB to be in.

The Model 3 Performance is one of those cars that’s undeniably impressive in almost every way, and hugely fast in absolutely every way, and yet can somehow still leave you feeling slightly cold. Or at least damp with fear sweat.

It’s not my kind of sports car, but if you love speed, and EVs, and Tesla, you’re gong to think it’s the Queen Bee’s knees.

Publishers: Please place the following in BOLD after the verdict:

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The EQB does not employ a dedicated EV architecture – sometimes referred to as a ‘skateboard’ platform – like the Tesla Model Y, or for that matter the brilliant Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6 and Genesis GV60 at around the Benz’s price points.

By this, we mean that it was originally designed as an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. In this case, what lies beneath is the MFA2 platform, first seen in the redesigned A-Class hatch back in 2018, and applied to all transverse-engined Mercedes models since.

The upshot here is that there are some compromises as a result compared to the aforementioned EV-only alternatives, namely concerning packaging as well as weight distribution in some cases.   

Like we said earlier, the EQB’s design is eye-catching and quite handsome. It is clear that the success of the GLB that spawned it is partly attributed to the chunky, almost function-over-form tall-boy utilitarian styling. That ‘W’ shaped window-line kink is an interesting visual feature too.

The changes from GLB to EQB do give the EV definite points of difference, from the front-end’s black flat panel and fibre optic light that connects the (blue-highlight) headlights, to the curved strip LED tail-lights and bumper-sited numberplate mount.

We reckon the 20-inch AMG turbine wheels really do enhance the EQB aesthetically as well, but of course they’re an option on the 250. Though probably not in Gold Rose.

Tesla’s design folks waxed long and loud about how they’d finally been able to visually lift and separate this Performance Model 3 from the basic one and they point to the new front and rear fascias, more aggressive styling, aerodynamic flicks, integrated cooling ducts, rear diffuser and carbon-fibre spoiler, which are there not only to look good, but to to “optimise lift balance and high-speed stability”.

Now, I’ll grant you it’s better than a normal Model 3, and that we were regularly approached by excited Tesla fans asking “is this the NEW PERFORMANCE OH MY GOD I WANT ONE NOW?!?"

But honestly, I still think it’s a bit subtle, and that includes the strange little 'Performance' sticker/badge on the rear, which does look a lot like the Ludicrous symbol that Elon loves, from the awful movie Spaceballs, but Tesla staff insist it’s not, nor is it Plaid. 

Clearly, the design tweaks are there for a reason, and train spotters will note the differences immediately, but it’s still just not the most exciting car to look at, nor is it anywhere near as exciting to behold as it is to drive.

As with the popular GLB that spawned it, there’s more to the EQB than meets the eye.

Photos mask the German electric vehicle’s considerable length and height as well as the substantial space offered inside, giving the Mercedes a handy advantage compared to premium alternatives like the Volvo XC40 Recharge, the Genesis GV60 and BMW’s recently announced (and quite handsome in the flesh) iX1 due early next year.

In fact, the EQB’s lengthy 2829mm wheelbase accommodates the batteries as well as impressive cabin packaging flexibility. Its 4684mm body is actually 26mm longer and 37mm higher than the larger, current-shape (X253) GLC, though width is identical to the EQA, making this a long, tall but quite narrow SUV proportionally speaking.

That expansive feeling is boosted by deep side windows offering reassuring all-round vision, boosted by an excellent driving position. All launch vehicles had the AMG sports seats (optional on the EQB 250, so we can’t speak for the base model), but as tested, they provided hours and hours of comfort and support. Loads of adjustability also help.

The EQB’s dash design is attractive and contemporary, though it can also seem daunting at first, requiring time to learn and understand where all the switchgear and controls are. The ‘Hey, Mercedes’ voice command mostly works well, too, and can provide additional tuition. The multimedia screen can be swiped like a tablet/iPad, or controlled via a fiddly touchpad on one of the steering wheel spokes.

Once mastered, the layout is logical and operation clear… with the exception of the drive selector on the right-hand side, which can be confused for an indicator and so knocked out of ‘gear’ and into Neutral on a regular basis. This has been a two-decade-long criticism of Mercedes models.

As with most MFA2 vehicles, the interior design and quality are a big step forward compared to earlier efforts. Multi-configurable digital instrumentation (including an elegant uncluttered mode), gorgeous turbine-look vents, a row of classy toggle switches for the main buttons and a great steering wheel are highlights to behold. Storage seems endless, reinforcing the practical nature of this cabin.

Speaking of which, stepping into the rear (second row) seats further underlines the EQB’s spaciousness. Entry/egress is easy due to wide-opening doors, taller folk should find ample room for knees, legs and (especially) heads, and the (slightly reclinable) backrest does its job. Comfy if firm cushions also slide forward (by up to 140mm) when required.

That’s to aid third-row access (where applicable). To that end, the second-row seats also tilt to allow people to squeeze past. Note, though that this is really a kids-only area, rated for occupants no taller than 1.65 metres. Surprisingly cosy, both chairs are OK for short trips, but longer ones would be a stretch too far except for the smallest passengers. 

Keep in mind that all outboard middle and rear seats where fitted have ISOFIX latches for child seats.

Luggage space is another EQB bonus, offering 130 litres with all seven seats up, or 495L with the third-row folded. Drop the middle row and there’s 1710L (or 1620L in seven-seater versions). These figures are between 20L to 60L down compared to the GLB.

Note, too, there is no spare wheel fitted. Just a tyre-repair kit.

Inside, the big news is the new seats. Tesla was happy to admit the pews fitted to the previous Performance just weren’t up to the job of holding humans in place when applying so much G force. 

The new 'Sport Seats' feature enhanced side cushioning and side bolsters for better lateral support during dynamic driving. And they can also be heated and ventilated. 

Elsewhere, there’s some carbon-fibre trim on top of the dash, with a Tesla-first weave pattern to further help the Performance stand out within the Model 3 line-up.

Other than that, it’s pretty standard Tesla sedan, which will be familiar if you’ve ever caught an Uber in Los Angeles. Spartan, minimalist, slightly cheap-feeling.

As for the practicality of the tech, I'm still against the giant 15-inch tablet-style touchscreen, for everything, the replacement of an indicator stalk with buttons and not having a speedo right in front of your eyes, where you need it.

Tesla says the price for the Model 3 Performance will be "starting at" $80,900, plus on-road costs. There's no word on whether there will be different spec levels and the company does not like answering questions or providing information.

What we also know about Tesla is that the price quoted could move down, or up, at any time, quite randomly, so if phrases like "residual value" or "depreciation" are of interest to you, it can be a challenging brand.

That side swipe aside, this sounds like astonishingly good value for this much performance from your Model 3 Performance. A Hyundai Ioniq 5 N would give it run for fun and involvement, if not brand fans, but it's $111,000, while a Porsche Taycan kicks off at $164,000 (it is a lot more car for the money, but it might struggle to keep up with this Tesla, at least in base model form).

In terms of equipment, it's pretty much standard Model 3 fare, other than the fast bits and a spot of carbon here and there.

You get 'Autopilot' included, of course, but you can't use all of its 'Full Self Driving functionality' on Australian roads. Not yet, anyway.

As with the related EQA, the EQB uses an asynchronous motor and a single-speed reduction gear transmission under the bonnet to drive the front axle. In the 250, it makes 140kW of power and 385Nm of torque.

Moving on to the 350 4Matic, it delivers 215kW and 520Nm, since a second permanently excited synchronous motor is fitted on the rear axle. This slashes the 0-100km/h acceleration time from 8.9 seconds to 6.2s, though both offer a 160km/h top speed.

This is despite a heavier kerb weight (2153kg, up from 2059kg). Power to weight ratio for the 250 is 68kW per tonne, compared to the 350 4Matic’s 99.9kW/tonne. That second motor sure makes a difference!

Both models use a 66.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack fitted between the axles, with a maximum 11kW AC and 100kW DC charging capability.

As with most electrified MFA2 models, front suspension is via MacPherson-style struts while the rear brings a multi-link arrangement. Steering is by electrically assisted rack-and-pinion.

If you’ve ever driven the previous Model 3 Performance you’ll know that it could well have come with Space X badging (arguably Elon’s more impressive engineering achievement), because it really did thrust rather than accelerate.

But this time the engineers wanted to go all out. Customers appreciated the incremental performance they got from the last Model 3 Performance version, but they told Tesla they wanted more.

With many enthusiasts among Tesla's engineering and development team, they looked to unlock the performance potential of the platform.

So, that meant a whole lot more madness and torque thump. It comes from a new Performance 4DU, an all-new drive unit - featuring an entirely new rear motor that uses bar-winding technology - unlocking 22 per cent more continuous power, 32 per cent more peak power and 16 per cent higher peak torque delivery. 

Overall figures are 380kW and 740Nm, but looking at them written down, they seem big, yet not as big as they feel in this car, as it’s shoving you from a standing start to 100km/h in three seconds flat. 

It feels faster. Sick-making fast, even.

Using WLTP figures, the EQB 250 has a combined consumption rating of 20.4kWh per 100km, down from the EQB 350 4Matic’s 21kWh/100km.

Maximum range is rated at 371km and 360km respectively. Note that due to challenging flood-water and torrential rain weather conditions, on-road real-world figures were not available during the launch drive.

The EQB offers varying levels of energy recuperation to help recharge the battery pack. In ‘D Auto’ it figures out the level of resistance automatically, but drivers can also choose to do this manually via ‘D+’ that provides coasting, ‘D’ that brings mild regeneration off-throttle, and ‘D—’ that activates maximising regen for close to single-pedal driving. These are paddle activated.

Cables for home charging with three-prong outlets are included – an eight metre long one plus a five metre public charging cable.

Mercedes says that using a 100kW DC charger will take an EQB from 10-80 per cent charged in 30 minutes, while an 11kW AC public outlet needs 4.1 hours and at home using a regular 3kW 10-amp socket requires at least 25 hours.

Despite being heavier and gruntier, Tesla claims the new Performance Model 3 manages to be more efficient than the one it replaces, albeit delivering just a two per cent reduction in energy consumption. Claimed energy usage is 16.7 kWh/100km.

Tesla claims a total range of 528km on the WLTP, which is obviously going to drop if you drive it the way its makers clearly intended.

Using a Tesla Supercharger, you can add 228km in 15 minutes and... that's all Tesla will tell us. There are no official figures available for how long a full charge takes, on either a Tesla charge or a home wallbox of your own.

The most remarkable thing about driving the EQB is how similar the 250 and 350 4Matic seem initially, until when push comes to shove.

Around town, both rise up to meet brand expectations. Easy and smooth off the line, acceleration is sufficiently brisk in the 250 and noticeably stronger driving the 350, as you’d expect in a two-motor EV. Progress is spirited, smooth and refined.

We're also grateful that the engineers seem to have cheekily dialled in connected and agile steering, imbuing the EQB with a likeable athletic attitude that’s just right for weaving in and out of tight traffic spots. Which is quite a feat really, given this car’s substantial size and mass.

Perhaps more surprising is how settled the ride is, no doubt aided by the sheer weight of these two-tonne-plus SUVs, as well as the standard-fitment adaptive dampers. Most bumps are quietly and effectively absorbed.

Out on the open road, the 250 remains sufficiently powerful, offering decent throttle response and quite a relaxed cruising gate. However, if you’re expecting Tesla-matching neck-snapping mid-range thrust, look elsewhere. Same applies to the other model. Though undeniably stronger throughout, not even the twin-motor 350 4Matic can be classed as especially quick.

However, while both EQBs display beautifully balanced steering that go exactly where you need them to be, only the 350 4Matic has the muscle to really explore the lofty dynamic capabilities available at higher speeds.

Across water-logged and desolate rural Victoria, the EQB behaved with exceptional athleticism given its role in life, providing outstanding steering precision, matched by brilliantly reassuring control. We’re talking planted confidence, as the 350 4Matic has the ability to really come together and move with the ebb and flow of a fast country road with outstanding aplomb. Despite teeming rain at times, the Mercedes behaved like you’d hope a swift, safe and sound grand tourer would. Who'd have figured?

Back on the highway, there was plenty of road noise intrusion coming up through the tyres, but otherwise, it seems obvious to us that though you pay more, you do get more with the twin-motor AWD version.

Very occasionally, one drives a car that makes the human body feel inadequate to the task. I would have worried that I’m getting old, that my body is simply too flubby and my brain too broken, to cope with the kind of wild acceleration and brutal g-forces the Model 3 Performance delivers.

But, fortunately, I had a videographer in the passenger seat, a much younger man who loves fast cars, and he kept threatening to vomit when I drove it hard, too. 

I’ve driven quite a few cars that you can use make your passenger sick, or hurt their necks - one obvious competitor in the shape of a Porsche Taycan Turbo S comes to mind - but it’s very rare that a vehicle is so intense it can make you, the driver, feel bilious.

Yes, you do bring this on yourself, by choosing to push this Performance anywhere near its limits through particularly sharp and intestine-shaped roads like the canyons outside Malibu Tesla chose to launch it on. 

On longer, sweeping bends it was far more of a joy, and less physically punishing, but in the tight stuff it often felt like corners were being thrown at you, as if you were driving behind the Millennium Falcon and being pulled along in its wake.

The brakes, special new sporting ones with track-ready pads, were up to the task, even though it often felt like they couldn’t possibly pull you up from the speeds you were doing.

And yes, it was entirely my fault that the very first time I even gently prodded the throttle and it launched me ahead past a California Highway Patrol officer, that was my fault too. Three minutes into the drive, holding an American fine, I had already deduced that perhaps this car was too fast for my own good.

But lots of EVs are fast in a straight line, you’re really comparing the length and depth of your “oooophhh” sounds at this point, but where this one succeeds is by being a lot better in the handling and ride and cornering departments than most.

Tesla’s stated goal with this car was to move beyond straight-line speed, to become more than a one-trick pony, and to do that it’s given the Performance a stiffer structure overall and updated the springs and stabiliser bars. 

Aerodynamic changes have reduced drag by five per cent, delivered a 36 per cent lift reduction, and a 55 per cent improvement in front-to-rear lift balance.

Tesla’s own, in-house version of adaptive dampers, not an option but included in every Performance, work with the car’s 'Vehicle Dynamics Controller' through its various modes - 'Insane' and 'Track' being the most… ludicrous - to immediately respond to driver inputs. 

The Performance rides well on LA’s awful concrete freeways but feels absolutely nailed down when you attack even a bumpy driver’s road.

This version also has a lot more power going to the rear wheels, to help it feel more sports-car playful and to fire out of bends the way an enthusiast’s car should. And make no mistake, I met them, the people behind this car are serious driving enthusiasts (although they demur, slightly, on whether their boss is one).

Track mode will allow some serious adjustability, drifting ability and fun, so the kind of people who want to hurl around a racing circuit in silence will love it.

Perhaps the only let downs are that it still feels a bit austere inside, just not very special, and that the steering is just a bit digital, soft and uninvolving, compared to the cars they clearly benchmarked against - BMWs and Porsches. 

Tesla provided no information about safety for the Performance Model but it is assumed it will be unchanged from a standard Model 3.

Aside from Autopilot that means auto emergency braking, lane keep aids, and instead of blind-spot monitoring, it gets the surround radar view and blind-spot cameras when you indicate.

The latest Model 3 has an additional centre airbag for a total of seven, as well as additional bolstering where the doors meet the body in response to requirements in its American home market.

It should be able to carry its maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating, which the original version achieved in 2019.

Mercedes-Benz offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty. The battery pack warranty is also industry-standard, valid for the usual eight years/160,000km.

Service intervals are every year or 25,000km. The EQB Service Plan starts at $1625 for the first three years, $2225 for four years and $2650 for five years.

Again, we've been asked to assume the Performance will come with Tesla's standard four-year/80,000km warranty and roadside assistance. And that the battery and drive unit will fall under an eight-year/192,000km warranty, whichever comes first.

Tesla says it monitors its cars to ascertain when they need servicing, and so it is based on a case-by-case situation. Every 12 months/20,000km is recommended for a general check-up, and includes tyre rotation.

Wiper blades, brake fluid and cabin air filters need replacement every two years while the air-con service is every six years.

Of course, there are no oil changes, filters or spark plugs to replace, and even brake pad wear is less than on an ICE vehicle because of the regenerative braking system. Although it will likely be higher in the Performance variant.