Mercedes-Benz E220 vs Chery C5

What's the difference?

Given Mercedes-Benz's rich heritage with station wagons, it is a bit of a shame Australia’s preference for SUVs has reduced the line-up to just one variant this time around.

I'm glad they've picked the All-Terrain to fly the flag though, and Merc wagon loyalists should appreciate the extra versatility of its dirt road ability - if they're not mourning the loss of the extra two seats in the rear. Like the rest of the current E-Class range, the E 220 d All-Terrain is an excellent product overall.

Can a new name, fresh face and suspension update save Chery’s sleek SUV coupe from the ignominy of being one of the least pleasant options in its ultra-competitive class?

Sadly, not enough has been done for us to recommend the new C5.

As an affordable, stylish, roomy and zoomy SUV, the Chery definitely provides showroom appeal, especially given the decent warranty.

But, with lots of little niggles still present to distract and frustrate, the C5 is far from A1. Plus, with prices now creeping up, it doesn’t even have the cheap pricing of the old Omoda 5 to get it over the line.

Heading into 2026, Chery still needs to do better than this.

The All-Terrain styling pack is comprised of tough-looking front and rear bumpers, with unpainted plastic side skirts and wheelarch flares on all corners. This will all be welcomed by anyone who travels regularly on dirt roads, but the All-Terrain bits will also provide a handy disguise from urban parking scrapes.

The double-blade grille, wheels and roof rails are also bespoke to the All-Terrain, and the net result is a distinct personality that should satisfy the majority of previous E-Class Estate buyers previously opting for the AMG styling pack.

Interior trim is based on the regular E-Class Avantgarde package, but with specific rubber studded pedals and All-Terrain branded floor mats to align with the exterior treatment.

In the default suspension setting, the All-Terrain sits 29mm higher than a regular E-Class. Taller tyres make up 14mm of this, while the remaining 15mm is thanks to an elevated 'Air Body Control' air suspension. A further 20mm of lift is available with the All-Terrain drive mode selected, but only at speeds up to 35km/h.
 
The All-Terrain’s 20-inch alloys are a staggered fitment with 245/40 tyres up front and 275/35 at the rear, while taller-sidewalled 245/45R19 at each corner are a no-cost option, and essential if you wish to use snow chains.

Like the Estate available internationally, the All-Terrain rides on the same 2939mm wheelbase as the E-Class sedan but gains an extra 24mm in rear overhang to measure 4947mm overall.

The wagon body, extra kit and all-wheel drivetrain also add an extra 240kg to the kerb weight over the E 220 d sedan, with the All-Terrain tipping the scales at 1920kg.

The new and narrower nose treatment is better, banishing the Omoda 5’s insectoid face straight into the bin. As an example of coupe-SUV design, the unaltered silhouette remains contemporary and is a defining signature for the series.

But, as before, the C5’s styling is hobbled by its narrow-gutted track width and highish (at 184mm) ground clearance, that give it a muffin-top and tippy-toed appearance respectively from most angles. Flashbacks to a Holden VN Commodore. Stance be damned.

Let’s look at the newcomer’s dimensions, compared to the Tiggo 4 for perspective: length is 4351mm (plus 44mm), width is 1831mm (+6mm), height is 1662mm (+2mm) and wheelbase is identical at 2610mm.

Still, there’s a positively Pollyanna-esque perspective to be gained here as well, since the C5’s extra size translates to a biggish small SUV inside a cabin that seems stylishly minimalistic. Or fairly basic. It all depends on your point of view.

Let’s take a closer look.

Aside from the All-Terrain’s rugged looks, the greatest departure from E-Class Estate tradition is the omission of the third row of seats, which makes this one a strict five-seater.

One could argue that the Estate’s traditional rearward-facing third row is a bit old school next to the forward-facing setup used by seven-seat SUVs like the GLS, but it's a shame given the third row is still available in other markets.

The All-Terrain does offer a vast cargo area however, with an extra 130 litres (VDA) over the sedan with the seats up to total 670 litres (VDA). Seats down, this extends to 1820 litres (VDA), but it’s worth noting that both wagon figures are marginally smaller than the previous Estate’s 695/1950 measurements.

Facilitating full use of this space is the classic Merc Estate retractable cargo net, and a 670kg payload promises good scope for loading beyond a full passenger count. The air suspension will also automatically maintain a level ride height regardless of load.

As with all current E-Classes, there are bottle holders in each door plus two cupholders front and back and ISOFIX child seat mounts in the outward rear positions.

As per the non-AMG Mercedes passenger car norm, run flat tyres take the place of a spare tyre, but a space saver can be optioned to sit above the boot floor.

Three things struck me the moment I stepped inside the C5.

Firstly, though the silhouette suggests a low-slung car, the tall stance means getting in and out isn’t a drama at all, with the seats being up high enough for this to deserve its SUV/crossover status.

Secondly, the Chery emits a somewhat repellent plastic off-gas odour, a bit like a cheap toy. The smell never goes away. Perhaps it was just our test car? Unlikely though, as it reminds me of pre-2000s Kias and Hyundais.

And in stark contrast, thirdly, there’s an arresting elegance to the dashboard’s minimalist layout and presentation. Nothing’s changed visually and nothing needed to.

Let’s concentrate on the many positive points first.

There’s plenty of space around you for a comparatively small and narrow SUV, including ample legroom and head room for your 178cm tester front and back. It doesn't feel cramped at all.

Finding the ideal driving position is easy, with most of the (available) switches and controls where you’d need them to be without having to stretch to reach. Helping things out here is an adjustable steering wheel for rake as well as reach. Unlike in an MG ZS.

The dash layout looks great, given that this car is of a 2022 vintage, with the large, twin 10.25-inch integrated displays for both the electronic instrumentation and the multimedia system seamlessly presented. Both are fairly clear and easy to work out and operate. And, despite being an older-generation vehicle (it’s now well into year four of production), the instruments still look fresh.

And though the C5 runs a software-based operating system for vehicle functions, climate, audio, multimedia and other settings, the few buttons provided are well integrated and mostly work logically.

Below the touchscreen is a row of haptic switches for the main heating and cooling elements, meaning just one touch is necessary and with no complicated and time-consuming sub-menus to navigate. That's good.

You do need to dive into sub-menus for some drive settings and modes, though, and that's disappointing, but at least the C5’s is not as complicated as some others we’ve experienced of late.

Other plus points include excellent ventilation and loads of storage, including a big old glovebox, a cavernous centre console bin, a vast lower area to hide things on, deep cupholders and a ‘wall’ to lean two phones or a tablet while still being visible for the driver to glance at, with one side providing wireless charging on the Ultimate grade.

Along with pleasant cloth seats that are surprisingly comfortable, all show a reassuring degree of thoughtfulness.

Additionally, the poor side and rear vision is at least aided by large side mirrors and a crisp reverse-camera views.

However, there are some serious downsides too, starting with the C5’s aforementioned phone/tablet wall. The rubber backing in our test car was misshapen and dog-eared, undermining the otherwise exemplary build quality.

Until you learn its weird ways, the gear shifter can be unfathomable. It looks like it would operate as per a regular T-bar, but pressing the side button to engage Drive or Reverse instead locks them out, meaning the uninitiated will inevitably find themselves panicking manoeuvring in traffic with impatient drivers wondering why a Chery is blocking the road during a cheeky three-point turn. Embarrassing and, yes, super frustrating.

In the Ultra at least, the lofty front passenger seat has no height adjustment. The digital radio did not work for the entire week we had the C5. Maybe it was just our car, but even in inner Melbourne, reception proved elusive.

And the touchscreen-based secondary climate settings that aren’t supported by physical buttons are a stretch away, including temperature adjustment, meaning these and other items are arranged for left-hand-drive access.

This means it is fiddly to operate, as concentration is not on the road ahead, resulting in the driver monitor sounding off, leading to more frustration. An unvirtuous circle of distraction ensues, highlighting the folly of software-based vehicle systems that have not been tailored to Australian road conditions. Fail.

But nothing is as aggravating as the Chery’s voice control system. Like we said earlier, when turned on, it mishears or misunderstands words to almost a comical degree… if it wasn’t so constantly intrusive. As with paranoid and/or trigger-happy ADAS warnings, you end up switching off such irritating tech. Which beggars the question: what is their point?

Moving to the back seat, things look up again, with sufficient space for most smaller families to settle into.

The bench is fine, offering adequate comfort for shorter journeys. Legroom is generous, helped out by room for boots to tuck underneath the front cushion. And most amenities are present for a base model car, including a folding armrest with two cupholders (again, unlike in an MG ZS), as well as one-touch electric windows, overhead grab handles, coat hooks, decent size door bins, a USB port and face level ventilation.

All those go towards making the C5 well-packaged, small family transport.

Further back, Chery has managed to liberate an extra 10 litres of cargo capacity compared to the old Omoda 5, so 360 litres is available – which is not bad for a small SUV. That rises to 1075L in two-seater mode.

It’s also a practical and easy boot to use, with a space saver spare wheel.

In its latest guise, Chery’s small SUV coupe range has been reduced to just two grades, Urban and Ultimate.

This one’s the Urban. At $29,990 drive-away at the time of publishing, it undercuts the Ultimate by $5000, but does cost $2000 more than the old base Omoda 5 FX. And the competition is becoming fiercer by the month.

Consider, for example, the redesigned and vastly-improved MG ZS, facelifted Jolion and all-new Suzuki Fronx, as well the less expensive if smaller rivals such as the Mahindra 3XO, Kia Stonic, Hyundai Venue, Mazda CX-3, Nissan Juke and Chery’s own Tiggo 4.

Frankly, the Omoda 5 needed to improve.

To that end, the C5 ditches the old torsion beam rear suspension for a multi-link independent set-up that promises better comfort and control. That’s a big step in the right direction.

And while long-term durability and reliability remain unknowns with such gearboxes, a switch from a continuously variable transmission (CVT) to a six-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT) may be a nod to driving enthusiasts. Let’s see about that.

The entry-level Ultra includes a nicely integrated electronic display and central touchscreen at 10.25 inches apiece, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, DAB+ digital radio, rear air vents, powered folding mirrors, noise-cutting acoustic front door glass and 17-inch alloys.

There’s also “Hello, Chery” voice control, that can thankfully be silenced as our example’s inability to differentiate 'Chery' from 'Cher', 'chair' and 'care' fast became a pain in you-know-where, since it insisted on constantly butting in.

Seven airbags and a decent level of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are also standard – more on those in the safety section below.

For the record, the $35K-drive-away Ultimate adds better audio, a powered tailgate, heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, a 360-degree monitor, sunroof with sunshade, wireless charger, imitation leather, bigger wheels and more.

However, they are also necessary sweeteners against sophisticated rivals like the Toyota Yaris Cross Hybrid, Mazda CX-30, Subaru Crosstrek, Hyundai Kona, Nissan Qashqai and Renault Duster.

More importantly for some, the closely related and virtually identically sized Chery Tiggo 4 costs several thousand dollars less, and mostly matches the C5’s spec at each corresponding grade, undermining the newcomer's value. A strange own-goal, Chery.

Oh well. For some buyers, this swoopy crossover is all about image. At least the facelift addresses the old Omoda 5’s odd appearance from some angles.

The All-Terrain’s excellent 2.0-litre turbo-diesel engine and nine-speed torque converter auto are carried across from the E 220 d sedan, which produces a decent 143kW/400Nm. Max torque is available from 1600-2800rpm.

The All-Terrain is the only Australian E-Class to pair this engine with the '4Matic' all-wheel drivetrain though, which uses a slightly rear-biased (45/55) torque split in this application.

The C5 is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine, delivering 108kW of power at 5500rpm and 210Nm of torque from 1750-4000rpm.

As part of the MY25 facelift, the Chery swaps out the old Omoda 5’s CVT for a six-speed dual-clutch transmission, complete with a handy manual mode. It drives the front wheels only.

Tipping the scales at 1462kg (kerb), the C5 Ultra offers a power-to-weight ratio of 73.9kW/tonne – which is slightly less than, say, a Haval Jolion, but quite a bit behind a Mazda CX-3.

With a slight helping hand from a strong northerly wind, we managed to record a 0-100km/h sprint time of 9.9 seconds. This figure suggests the Chery feels faster than it is.

The All-Terrain’s extra 240kg and no doubt less slippery body add 1.6L/100km to the E 220 d sedan official combined fuel consumption figure, but the wagon’s 5.7L/100km claim is still very impressive for a taller body nudging two tonnes. 

At this rate, the E-Class All-Terrain has a theoretical range of 1157km from its 66-litre fuel tank.

The C5’s combined average fuel consumption figure is 6.9L/100km, for a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 160 grams/km. And that’s on regular 91 RON standard unleaded. Topping the 51-litre petrol tank should result in nearly 740km of range between refills.

During our week with the Chery, we managed 9.0L/100km, which is very disappointing, though that did include highway and performance driving.

Climbing aboard the All-Terrain, there’s a sense you're seated higher than its 29mm static ride height lift suggests. It's probably mostly psychological, and borne from the All-Terrain styling treatment, but something SUV fans will probably appreciate.

Otherwise it's mainly W213-generation E-Class from the driver's seat, which is a very good thing.

However, the extra 240kg of Estate body and All-Terrain spec over a regular E 220 d sedan is just enough to put a dent in the 2.0-litre diesel's performance. Mercedes claims an 8.0sec 0-100km/h figure, which is still more than enough to keep up with traffic, but just not as spritely as the sedan’s 7.3sec figure.

The combination of airbag suspension and the All-Terrain’s slightly taller tyre sidewalls help the wagon ride commendably well. There's no disguising the large-diameter 20-inch wheels over sharp potholes, but the experience is generally even better than we recall from any other existing E-Class.

The steering also feels slightly heavier, as though the level of assistance has been tuned for a touch more weight to add to the All-Terrain’s semi-SUV aura. If our perception is correct, it only adds to the sense of substance from the driver’s seat.

Its overall composure is maintained on dirt too, with the All-Terrain’s Victorian launch route offering a good dose of gravel and muddy unsealed roads. The all-wheel drive system keeps you pointing where you want and enables clean acceleration from the greasiest of corners. All of this highlights the All-Terrain’s potential as a ski field chaser.

We also detoured via some moderate fire trails, which gave us the chance to try the All-Terrain driving mode that lifts the suspension an extra 20mm and slackens the stability control and ABS to better suit low grip scenarios.

At speeds above 35km/h it reverts to Comfort mode, but will return to All-Terrain settings if you slow down again. In Sport mode or above 125km/h, the suspension lowers 15mm below normal to reduce aerodynamic drag. Even at full height it won’t challenge a GLE for clearance, but it’s significantly more capable than regular E-Class models.

Chery has made some pretty fundamental changes underneath, so we had higher hopes of the C5 compared to the preceding Omoda 5. However, expectations ought to be tempered here.

Let’s begin with the Chinese SUV’s performance.

After a moment’s hesitation, the C5 feels punchy from the get-go, with a decent amount of muscle as the revs rise. Throttle response is brisk, even at higher speeds. And the brakes do a great job. This is quite the rapid little runabout.

Some of that initial lag is down to the dual-clutch transmission, since it needs time for the turbo to spool up. Once sorted, it shifts swiftly and smoothly, and without delay. Only the aforementioned gear selector complication will catch out new drivers, as the operation is needlessly complicated.

But the engine is never really quiet, and can even feel coarse when extended under hard acceleration, betraying this Chery’s station as a cheap SUV. And the stop/start tech is especially jerky.

The steering, meanwhile, is a mix of disgruntle and delight.

When driving on the motorway, it can feel lumpy, with the driver-assist system tugging away endlessly at the wheel. The sudden jolts make it feel like a pinball as the vehicle feels like it is ricocheting off the white lines. Such constant correction is both tiring and irritating, leading to fatigue and, if your fuse is really short, aggravation.

For steering smoothness or linearity, you need to dive into a sub menu and opt out of several ADAS modes. Or otherwise pull over and wonder why Chinese car companies especially seem to have such disdain for Australian drivers. If this sounds like a nightmare, the C5 is not for you.

Furthermore, there’s no point choosing a steering setting. Comfort is light enough for easy driving and weighty enough for the driver to feel in control, but feedback and feel are absent. And selecting Sport just adds needless heft and makes it all feel way too heavy.

Now, that said, the C5 offers some dynamic compensation, and likely courtesy of its multi-link suspension upgrade.

At higher speeds, the steering, for instance, is pleasingly direct and precise, meaning it turns exactly where you choose it to. The handling feels controlled and the tyres grip well, for some unintentional scrappy fun through really tight corners, to a certain extent anyway. It’s a side to the Chery the Omoda 5 never seemed capable of delivering.

But, inevitably, this comes at a price, and that is a busy and at times agitated ride, with the suspension failing to soak up bumps and irregularities on anything other than smooth roads, despite its new-found independence, adding to further fatigue. For the record, our test car rode on 215/60R17 Giti tyres.

Would higher-quality rubber help fix this? If you’re buying a sub-$30K Chery SUV, would you even care? Basically, unless you enjoy the occasional hoon, the C5 lacks dynamic sophistication as well as sufficient Australian road tuning. Much like its predecessor. Such a letdown.

Considering that it is merely a facelift with a new badge, the Chery C5 conveniently adopts the preceding Omoda 5’s five-star ANCAP crash-test rating.

Note that was conducted in 2022 using earlier performance parameters compared to today.

Anyway, there is little doubt that Chery has done its homework here, with a host of advanced driver-assist systems (ADAS) being fitted.

These include autonomous emergency braking (AEB), forward collision warning, emergency lane keeping, lane departure warning and prevention, blind spot detection, lane change assist, rear cross-traffic alert and braking, adaptive cruise control with traffic jam assist, traffic sign recognition, speed control assist, a driver monitor and auto high beams.

This cannot be understated: most of this ADAS tech requires Australian road tuning, because they interfere and distract to the point of being a nuisance.

Note that the AEB (encompassing pedestrian, cyclist and back-over braking) operates from 4km/h to 65km/h, whilst the car-to-car braking is between 4km/h and 150km/h. The lane-support systems work between 60km/h and 150km/h.

Seven airbags are present (including a front-centre and full head/curtain coverage but no rear side airbags), as are anti-lock brakes, stability control and traction control systems.

Finally, a pair of ISOFIX child-seat latch points and a trio of hooks for tether straps across the rear seat are also part of the C5 package.

The E220 d All-Terrain is covered by Mercedes’ three-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, with service intervals pegged at either 12 months or a generous 25,000km.

Mercedes is yet to confirm capped service pricing for Australia, but we don’t expect the All-Terrain to stray too far from the $556, $1112 and $1112 figures applied to the E220 d sedan’s first three services.

Very competitive if not quite as class leading as the conditional Nissan, Mitsubishi and MG 10-year warranty, the C5 comes with a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

Chery also offers seven years/105,000km of capped-price servicing and a year’s free roadside assistance, though up to seven years is available should owners choose to have their vehicle maintained at an authorised dealer during that period.

Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km, and cost $280 per visit for the first five, extending to nearly $370 and $290 for the final two.