Mazda CX-90 vs Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class

What's the difference?

There are many reasons I quite like this CX-90. It sells the plush luxury promise when it comes to its interior and design, it feels big and purposeful, and has a refreshingly minimalist approach to its cabin tech. As a seven-seat SUV it’s particularly impressive, with plenty of amenity and a third row that can genuinely fit an adult in comfort.

However, there are areas where it could use more polish, from the drivetrain to the ride, and it ultimately strikes an odd point for price and ownership which feels lost between the premium segment and the mainstream rivals.

If you’re a long-term Mazda owner, I still think you’ll love it, and this Touring grade is definitely the best value in the range. It offers the lion’s share of equipment at a price more comparable to Mazda’s traditional mainstream rivals.

If you can get past the relatively steep asking price, the design appeals to you, and its slightly last-gen ergonomics work for you, then there’s a lot to like about the GLE. It’s a big, capable and comfortable cruiser, but given there are cheaper and more efficient options around, it would be a decision of the heart rather than the head.

The CX-90 is an impressive car to behold. Moving things onwards and upwards from its CX-9 predecessor, the CX-90 is bigger and even more refined in a lot of ways.

Mazda’s signature design language has evolved into something a bit beefier, trading out the delicate sharp angles and chromes of its front-wheel-drive predecessors for something a bit more upright, with a wide stance and tough proportions.

The long bonnet and expansive body panels stress the long-engined, fluid nature of this car’s design language. It certainly gives it a more premium vibe than the boxy American-influenced style of the Hyundai Palisade, and leans more European than the science-fiction styling of something like the Kia Sorento.

If anything, there’s some clear BMW influence in the shape of the tail and light fittings. Light lashings of chrome keep it in-line with Mazda’s previous design language, and on this base model at least, plastic claddings over the arches toughen it up a bit.

Inside is plush. In fact, it’s treading on Lexus territory when it comes to the design and feel of the seats, dash, doors and there are even padded leather touches down the sides of the centre console for your knees to rest against. Even the standard leather seats are nice (with softer Nappa leather available on higher grades), and I actually find the somewhat monochrome interior treatment on our test car to be the most modest option. It’s off-set by silver trims and a touch of chrome in the steering wheel and doors.

The dash is in a more traditional style (again, it feels influenced by BMW here) with a padded insert across the front, inset vents and a climate control panel leading down to a nice wide console with tasteful patterned trims, and an electronic shifter. The screen in this base car is of modest dimensions compared to most cars today, but those who aren’t sold on giant touchscreens will love it.

Even the digital dash elements are tastefully executed, although they’re not particularly customisable, which is a shame. 

The GLE hasn’t changed massively since 2019, but sleeker lights and some tweaks around the face have helped it age relatively gracefully. As much as a 2.4-tonne SUV can be graceful.

There are still references to the original ML-Class the GLE succeeded, like the ‘coupe’ shape of the C-pillar that betrays the true SUV shape of the GLE.

The reshaped front-end has less black plastic on show, and its grille stays true to the pre-facelift design.

Inside, it’s just the steering wheel that’s new, everything else holds up well in terms of a design that’s also practical, though some would say it looks outdated given the many physical controls.

The CX-90 is enormous, but despite its long bonnet, it feels on the inside like it makes good use of its dimensions.

Up front, it’s easy to find a seating position thanks to an array of adjustability, from the seats to the telescopic adjust for the wheel, and the cabin is wide and tall enough to accommodate pretty much anyone with ease.

Unlike some Mazdas which have a strange zoom-factor on their rear vision mirrors, the CX-90 doesn't have this problem, and visibility generally out the windows is impressive. I can see the long, tall bonnet and cosy dash design creating visibility issues for shorter drivers, however.

Padded materials are everywhere they should be (and more), and when it comes to storage there’s a large bottle holder in each front door, two more cupholders in the centre console (with a flip-out cover), a split-opening centre console box (which hides USB-C connections, great for cable management) and a wireless charging bay up front below the climate unit.

It’s rare these days to see a full array of physical buttons and toggles for a dual-zone climate set-up, but the Mazda has the whole lot. It’s a breeze to adjust on the fly and integrates into the design in a subtle way.

It’s also worth calling out the multimedia screen isn’t a touch unit. Instead, you need to control it through a handful of buttons and a rotary dial on the centre console. It’s nice to have a physicality to it, and it works well for the relatively simple base operating system, but it’s a clumsy way to interact with phone mirroring.

In my experience Apple CarPlay has simply too many icons and menu features to work around with a dial-operated system, to the point where it’s distracting to use on-the-go (thus, defeating the purpose of having physical controls).

The second row is a real highlight. Set to its default position, I have leagues of legroom behind my own driving position (at 182cm tall). Again, heaps of width and headroom here, and even the huge rear doors open nice and wide, which should make loading luggage and fitting child seats easy.

The seat trim is just as good as it is in the front, with decent side bolstering, and top-notch amenities, with shades built into the windows, decent-sized bottle holders in each door, a further two in the drop-down armrest, soft pockets on the backs of each front seat, and a separate climate zone with independent temperature and fan speed controls.

There are two adjustable air vents with a lock-off, as well as two USB-C ports for power. Top marks.

The third row is usually where things get tricky for SUVs like this, but the CX-90 isn’t out of tricks yet.

Access isn’t the easiest. The second row can fold forward, but the left over aperture for clambering in, even though the doors are quite large, isn’t great, which will make it a no-go for anyone with mobility issues.

However, once you’re back there, I was surprised to find a full-sized adult like me can fit in relative comfort. With the second row set as far back as it can go, my knees are hard up against the back, but when rolled forward for more third-row space, there's still plenty of room in the middle. I was left with ample room for my knees and feet in the back seats. The seat trim also offers decent padding and comfortable trims, which is rare for most three-row SUVs, and while you wouldn’t want to be too much taller than me, the roof was just tall enough to have a little airspace above.

The armrests are hard plastic, unfortunately, but offer two large bottle holders on each side, as well as a USB-C port, and vents with decent air flow, which is again, quite rare for a three-row SUV.

I’d go so far as to say this is one of the best SUV third rows I’ve been in when it comes to space, comfort and amenity.

Now for the luggage space. I was pleased to find, even with the third row up, I could fit the largest (124 litre) CarsGuide luggage case with room to spare on either side. Officially, space here is 257L, but it’s rare to fit a case this size in a three-row SUV.

With the third row folded down, space comes in at 608 litres, which is on-par for this segment, and with the second and third row down, it tops out at 2025L.

With such space on offer it’s probably worth keeping in mind the payload, which is 580kg, and for those who want to add a trailer to the mix, the maximum towing capacity is 2500kg braked or 750kg unbraked for the 50e petrol straight-six versions like the one we’re testing here.

The GLE is very easy to use because of those physical controls.

Save for the trackpad in the centre console that can be used like a laptop’s control mat - it’s a little fiddly - everything is easy to locate and adjust and the controls feel nice. The switches along the climate control row all feel nice and clicky, buttons in the centre console are big and obvious, and even the steering wheel’s haptic buttons are laid out sensibly.

The touchscreen’s software has been updated since launch during the facelift and it’s easy to navigate, but wireless Android Auto or Apple CarPlay are a good workaround.

The front seats, as well as being comfortable, are adjustable to an impressive degree for finding your driving position and there’s plenty of room and light to make the cockpit feel airy.

Storage isn’t at a premium, there’s plenty of space in door cards, the central storage bin, and the cupholders and phone charger can be hidden away.

Behind the front row, rear seat space is ample, though if you opt for seven seats the second row can be moved to accommodate a third row of passengers when needed.

In our test car, that isn’t the case, so the GLE’s cavernous 630 litres of boot storage is available. The second row can split 40/20/40, which is convenient for loading long items while four passengers are present.

Oh, but under the boot floor, despite some extra room for bits and pieces, no spare tyre. Big marks down for a car that absolutely has the space for one.

It’s not a strong start for the GLE. Our top-spec (non-AMG) GLE 450d 4Matic variant starts from $154,900, before on-road costs, while our test car has $3800 of option boxes ticked.

So, $158,700 before on-roads as-tested, the GLE is this borderline prohibitively expensive for what it offers.

If the car you’re after must be diesel, the options are still many in terms of rivals… especially if you’d like to save a few dollars.

Moving on from the big Mazdas and VW Touaregs to the proper premium badges, and there’s the $136,815 Audi Q7 50 TDI (if we exclude the $120,530 base Q7 TDI) or the BMW X5 30d for $138,600. Even a Range Rover Sport D300 comes in under the GLE at $159,481.

For a seven-ish year old luxury SUV, the GLE does a decent job of hiding its age in some ways, but there are gaps.

The twin 12.3-inch screens for multimedia and driver display have aged well, plus there’s electrically adjustable leather front seats with heating, though the leather in our new test car needs some softening up. Perhaps over time.

The new steering wheel comes thanks to newer models in Merc’s line-up, though haptic controls can be accidentally bumped (as opposed to buttons).

Wireless phone charging, wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, a head-up display, a huge sunroof, LED interior lighting, adaptive high beam headlights, a power tailgate and surround-view parking cameras are all standard.

Optionally, there’s a set of 21-inch wheels as pictured on our test car. They’re $2400 and you’d probably be better off with standard 20-inch wheels for the extra comfort.

The illuminated running boards are a $1400 option, and they’re also probably not necessary. But I’m not your mum, go for it if you want.

Oh, and you can also have the GLE in seven-seat form, but our test car is a luxuriously spacious five-seater.

The CX-90 gets a bit exciting under the bonnet with its big 3.3-litre in-line six-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine. It produces a whopping 254kW/500Nm, well above par compared to its mainstream rivals.

This engine is mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission. This is no run-of-the-mill transmission though. Instead of the usual smooth hydraulic coupling this style of transmission is known for, the Mazda uses a hybridised single clutch set-up instead.

This is in the name of efficiency. A single-clutch plate has less loss, and is therefore more fuel efficient, with a small electric motor helping to push things along as part of the mix.

The catch is, like the sometimes-derided dual-clutch automatics, it’s not as smooth to operate. More on this in the driving section.

Efficiency – What is its fuel consumption? What is its driving range? 8/10

As a result of this unusual transmission set-up, fuel efficiency isn’t bad for such a big and powerful engine, and for such a large vehicle.

The official combined fuel consumption for the CX-90 G50e is 8.2L/100km, which is already impressive, and in my week with the car over a few hundred (mostly urban) kilometres it landed close, at just 8.9L/100km.

It’s seriously impressive and runs rings around the six-cylinder Hyundai Palisade (10.7L/100km combined) while producing significantly more power than the more efficient Toyota Kluger Hybrid (5.6L/100km). On the flipside, you’ll need to fill its massive 75L fuel tank with mid-shelf 95RON fuel.

The GLE 450d’s 3.0-litre inline six-cylinder diesel engine is turbocharged, with a healthy 270kW and a brawny 750Nm to its name. That torque peaks all the way from 1350rpm to 2800rpm, by the way. Handy.

A nine-speed automatic transmission sends drive to all four wheels ('4Matic' in Merc-talk), while a 48-volt ‘mild-hybrid' system ('EQ Boost' in Merc-talk) means take-offs and shifts are aided by a bit of electric power.

Mercedes says the GLE can dispatch the 0-100km/h sprint in just 5.6 seconds, and that feels about right.

For all its clever, efficient drivetrain, the CX-90 has a bit of a mixed drive experience. Initially, it comes off as impressive. It’s plush and quiet from behind the wheel, and the primarily rear-drive nature of its drivetrain gives it the big premium steering response missing from its mostly front-drive rivals.

The flaws with its tricky transmission quickly become evident, though. The clutch constantly needing to engage in stop-start scenarios makes for a slightly jerky and uneven experience, similar to the feel of a dual-clutch auto, particularly in traffic, while the at-speed gear shifts, which in a dual-clutch tend to be much smoother are telegraphed more physically by this Mazda system.

As evidenced by the actual fuel consumption, it’s clear this system does what it sets out to, and it even feels like it could be significantly better, but Mazda will need to invest some time in calibration. For what it’s worth, it feels better than its original implementation I drove at the launch of the CX-60, which was the first car to get this system.

A subsequent software update has solved some issues, but it still can’t compare to a regular auto when it comes to smoothness.

However, the engine is immensely satisfying. The big six has a low roar when pushed, and motivates the big CX-90 with ease when you step on it. It pairs nicely with the weighty steering to make for a car which feels purposeful and satisfying to steer when it gets going.

In this sense it nails the brief of elevating Mazda out of the regular crop of front-drive seven-seat SUVs, giving it a distinct and more premium edge.

As also noted with the CX-60 though, the CX-90 has the same issue with its ride quality. It’s a little too hard to give it the kind of refined response to road imperfections we’ve come to expect from brands like Lexus and BMW. The firm response to the road helps this big heavy SUV feel controlled in the corners, but it doesn’t deal with suburban bumps how it should.

Larger hits in particular are often communicated to the cabin. The CX-90 is better than its smaller CX-60 sibling, which went so far as to have its rear dampers recalled, but the brand is even considering similar updates to this large SUV, so keep an eye out.

While this version of the CX-90, the base Touring with its smaller alloys and larger tyres, is more comfortable than any other Mazda on this new platform I’ve driven, it still leaves room for improvement.

It’s a shame, because otherwise the CX-90 is a lovely and luxurious SUV to drive, with a quiet, plush interior and a satisfying engine. It’s so close to greatness that it’s frustrating.

A trip in the GLE feels like a welcome step back in time. Sure, coming in close to five metres long and two-and-a-half tonnes means it’s not a nimble steer, but the GLE strikes a nice balance of comfort and tactility that’s getting rarer.

None of it feels particularly sharp in terms of inputs or feedback, but it’s easy and predictable to a point where even winding back-roads are effortless to flow through.

The big diesel engine feels almost lazy, but it’s just so effortless in getting things moving as it strives to sit close to idle whenever possible. Because of that, there’s little noise from the engine bay even under reasonable acceleration, and the powertrain is helped by that 48-volt system which makes stop-starts from the lights super-smooth.

The mild-hybrid also helps smooth out power delivery, to the point where the only time the GLE feels clunky is the occasional lag when shifting from Drive to Reverse or vice versa.

The test car’s suspension isn’t the optional airbag set-up, but the non-adaptive steel does fine in terms of comfort and soaking up harsh surfaces. And even the big 21-inch wheels aren’t too bad over sharp bumps.

With smaller wheels (more tyre cushioning) and the air suspension, it feels like the GLE would ride gorgeously.

Its body control is predictable on smooth roads, and if you’re careful you steer the hefty SUV through tight, winding roads easily, but consistently rough surfaces can make the GLE feel unsettled for a short period of time.

There’s an overall softness to it that means gentle off-roading is possible, and the tyres are thick enough to make it comfortable. You won’t find yourself being tossed around on a flat enough gravel road.

There’s a lot under the skin in the GLE in terms of safety, and it doesn’t always make itself known. This is a compliment.

The GLE scored a maximum five stars in its ANCAP assessment in 2019, and though the criteria has changed significantly since then, it feels like it should still score well.

The GLE doesn’t intervene unless it needs to, but the ability is there for the big Merc to avoid incidents and employ many means to protect passengers and pedestrians alike.

A warning for the driver and a gentle seatbelt tension comes in before the car slams on the brakes, though if no action is taken before an expected collision the GLE will drop its AEB anchors.

There are nine airbags if it all goes pear-shaped, plus some well-tuned adaptive cruise control with lane keep assist and departure alert, there’s traffic sign recognition with that, too.

Blind spot warnings, front- and rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking sensors and driver monitoring are joined by Mercedes’ plethora of other little safety features that minimise impact and damage in a crash.

The usual five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the CX-90 range, with a matching five years of roadside assistance.

Servicing is required once every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first, and a schedule of costs on Mazda’s website extends to seven years. Over the first five years, prices fluctuate between $469 and $1304 annually, with an average yearly cost of $693.30. The price puts this big-engined Mazda up the premium end of mainstream automakers when it comes to service costs.

Servicing isn’t cheap at Mercedes, even in the context of this market segment. A three-year service plan for the GLE costs $4045, while five years is $8055. That’s $1348 or $1611 per service respectively. The later services in those five years will of course be much more expensive and bring the average up.

Intervals are every 12 months or 25,000km, but Mercedes’ five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty means anything major that goes wrong in that time should be covered - always read the fine print.

The brand’s Australian website lists 67 Mercedes-Benz dealers that can service your car.