Lexus NX300H vs Mazda MX-5

What's the difference?

The all-new NX is a massive step forward over its popular predecessor.

In every way, it is an improvement, with better refinement, comfort, performance, efficiency, safety and choice.

Indeed, look out, Audi, BMW, Mercedes and Volvo: the NX has finally come of age. If we were in the market for a luxury medium-sized SUV, we'd definitely have the Lexus on our shortlist, especially the incredibly efficient hybrids.

Europe, you've been warned.

Ultimately, the design and tech changes to the ND MX-5 will be the biggest day-to-day advantages of the updated model, because the mechanical changes don’t make themselves hugely obvious on the road.

If you’re into track days, it’s still a satisfying car to hustle as fast as you can, but it’s at its most accessible on winding roads for weekend drives, where the new differential and track DSC mode won’t come into play as much.

But in a world where accessible sports cars are becoming a rarity, there’s only one rear-drive convertible with a sticker price appropriate for financial mortals, and it’s a pretty damn good thing that it’s the ND MX-5.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

UX, NX, RX, LX, RZ... Lexus' nonsensical naming strategy can be quite flummoxing.

Just remember that the NX sits above the smaller UX but below the larger RX in the brand's burgeoning SUV stable. It's also closely related to the wildly-popular Toyota RAV4 – though you'd never know by looking at them side-by-side.

At first it may look much like the old model, but the new NX has switched to the latest RAV4's advanced Toyota New Global Architecture, known as GA-K in Lexus' lexicon.

Basically, it allows for a vehicle that's between 20 and 30 mm larger than before, to help improve overall proportions. And with this considerably bigger canvas to work on, it also means that Lexus's stylists have had more freedom to evolve the brand's design language. Albeit at a glacial pace from an exterior point of view.

Starting from the front, the controversial 'spindle' grille has been toned down a bit and the headlights have a neat Lexus 'lightning rod' tick motif, while – looking at the side profile – a startlingly cab-backward shape gives it a surprisingly sleek silhouette.

The extra length and stretched wheelbase let the design to breathe more than before, bringing with it a more graceful and elegant aesthetic.

Finally – and this is a brand first – the new NX's rather nondescript rear has 'LEXUS' spelled out in letters, with no sign of the company logo.

Alright, we’ve all seen ND MX-5s, you don’t need me to tell you about its proportions or explain its design elements to you in too much detail, so I’ll give you the headline changes.

At the front and rear are new pairs of LED head- and tail-lights, respectively… obviously, fitting into the spaces the old ones took up.

The DRLS and reverse lights have come off the bumpers for both, and are now part of the main lights at each end - no more DRLs in the front bumper, and the reverse lights have been replaced by reflectors.

There are new 17-inch wheel designs for the base and GT trim levels, too, and there’s a new colour - Aero Grey.

Inside, it’s a shame that the tan Nappa leather interior of the RF Black Roof can’t be had in a manual roadster, because it’s gorgeous, even though the inside still looks refined enough for a simple sports car in its base cloth trim.

For the really big design step-change, you'll need to step inside...

Hallelujah! Lexus has finally forsaken its weird, futuristic dash design elements for a simpler and far-more intuitive look that finally banishes unnecessary complication while still appearing progressive.

Somehow, there are now 33 fewer switches than before, aided by permanent virtual short-cut buttons on both of the touchscreens on offer.

Lexus has clearly been listening!

So, now, what we have here is an attractive, functional and superbly built interior (save for a couple of very-atypical Lexus rattles in these early production cars we drove), boasting quality materials that rate highly on all the important sensory metrics: lush to the touch, easy on the eyes and lovely to breathe in... and breathe out again!

Other plus points include a gorgeous steering wheel, attractive instrument dials, endless storage and climate control that's so effective it pretty much creates a microclimate within your personal space.

Brilliant seats, with ample adjustability, provide comfort and support even after hours ensconced within them, while the driving position is enhanced by thoughtful placement of most major controls - including the natty little gear lever and big old paddle shifters.

It's also worth pointing out a couple of surprise-and-delight features – starting with the 'e-latch' electric door handles, with sensors that delay opening if there are cyclists or pedestrians on approach to prevent striking them, as well as a manual override should the battery go flat.

There's more, like the wireless phone charger tray that also slides to reveal a hidden cubby area; centre-console lid that opens sideways FROM BOTH DIRECTIONS – what sort of sorcery is this?? – and optional digital rear-view mirror that works like X-ray vision in seeing through obstructions... handy for when back-seat passengers' beehives block the back view out.

However, after lavishing such intricate attention to detail, why does the instrument cluster's digital trip computer use the same cheap style and font as found in a lowly Yaris? It takes you completely out of the Lexus state-of-mind.

And, like me, you might lose your mind with the infuriatingly fiddly capacitive touch controls on models with the HUD. While it does provide a broad range of functionality that's displayed on the windscreen view, it's difficult to modulate accurately, and doesn't operate intuitively. Remnants of the fiddly old touchpad from the previous NX. Why can't Lexus just abandon such needless complexity? After a while I worked it out – but it's deeply distracting to use.

Oh well. At least the rear seat area is an improvement over the old NX, with more space, comfort and convenience features. Entry/egress is easy, with wide apertures that ought to make fitting in child seats less of a chore than before.

Most adults should find sufficient leg, knee, shoulder and head room back there, though a trio of adults might result in a very tight fit.

Rear facing air vents (with climate control functionality on higher grades), 12V power outlets, twin USB ports and a wide centre armrest with cupholders are included.

Further back, there's a handy (though not class-leading) 520 litres of luggage space regardless of powertrain, expanding to 1411L when the rear backrests are folded. Access is easy thanks to the wide door and flat floor, where a bit of extra storage and even space for the cargo blind are provided. Thanks, Lexus.

Note, though, that runflat tyres take the place of any spare wheel – a bummer if you're out on deserted country road late at night with no help in sight.

One thing Mazda has significantly changed for the ND is the multimedia screen, now a larger 8.8-inch touchscreen running Mazda’s updated software.

It brings the MX-5 up to date without sacrificing simplicity and makes it a little easier to use. The physical dial and buttons for controlling the screen also remain. The USB-C ports are also new.

Oh, and the MX-5 is the first Mazda model to get Connected Services, which is coming to other Mazda models eventually.

Connected Services allows owners to find, lock, and get alerts for their cars from a phone app, even letting them set curfews to notify them if the car is started during certain hours.

Aside from that, another small tweak is the simplified instrument cluster, which aims to be easier to read even when the roof is open and the sun is bright.

The cabin isn’t built to be plush, it’s built for ‘Jinba Ittai’, Mazda’s philosophy that applies most strongly to the MX-5 which means ‘horse and rider as one’.

And trust me, you feel one with the horse- er, car, when there’s not ample room to move. It’s not restrictive, but it’s cosy. 

Everything’s quite well-placed and it’s not busy with buttons or features in here though, it’s made for focusing on driving. 

One downside is the lack of storage, not even a glovebox, in front of the passenger, and the central storage spot under where your elbow sits is tiny, good for keeping the key fob snug though. Also, the cupholders are able to be removed or swapped between the space behind your elbow, or above the passenger footwell.

There’s also a small storage space between the seats behind where your elbow would sit, though it’s tricky to access while you’re driving.

Then there’s the boot, which is usable for a small amount of luggage at 130 litres in the Roadster and 127L in the RF hardtop.

Finally, as a huge positive, probably the biggest advantage of the ND over any other convertible is how easy it is to open and close the roof in the Roadster. You can do it single-handed, which is great if it starts raining and you’re at a traffic light or able to quickly pull over.

The RF hard-top has a switch that automatically opens and closes the roof section.

Getting into an MX-5 is now a little more expensive, with the base manual Roadster up by $2310 to now start from $41,520 before on-roads.

The top-spec soft-top GT RS is now $51,640, or $2800 more than before.

Pricing for the RF hard top is also similarly bumped up, a base manual costing $46,250, and the most expensive GT RS at $56,140.

There’s also a Black Roof edition which comes with tan Nappa leather inside, but that’s only available in an automatic RF, which is possibly the biggest downside to the 2024 range.

Base models get cloth seats, while GT and GT RS models get heated leather seats. The GT RS also comes with stiffer Bilstein dampers, Brembo front brakes, a bracing strut between the front suspension towers and a DSC-Track mode. The difference there is noticeable, so it's worth the extra spend for the more keen driver.

The higher overall costs bring updated tech, a new 8.8-inch touchscreen and a new limited slip-diff in manual versions, plus tweaked mechanicals like improved acceleration response and lower steering rack friction.

But they do look a tiny bit different too.

Here is where the NX shines, with clear options that provide very obvious benefits according to wants, needs and budgets. And there are even fundamental differences compared to the RAV4 powertrain, further justifying that premium 'L' badge experience.

Let's divide these into petrol and petrol-electric hybrid models, with petrols first.

The NX 250 is powered by a 2487cc 2.5-litre naturally aspirated direct-injection twin-cam four-cylinder engine, producing a healthy 152kW of power at a heady 6600rpm, and 243Nm of torque from 4000rpm to 5000rpm.

Drive is sent to the front wheels only, via an eight-speed torque-converter automatic. Tipping the scales at 1705kg, it's the lightest NX on offer, and thus delivers 89.1kW per tonne.

The NX 350 turbo version, meanwhile, uses a somewhat different four-cylinder engine as well as a variation of the eight-speed auto. A 2393cc 2.4-litre turbo unit, it pumps out 205kW at 6000rpm and 430Nm from a low 1700-3600rpm. It's also AWD only, which adds kilos. That said, coming in at 1860kg, its power-to-weight ratio is a stirring 110.2kW/tonne.

Moving to the series/parallel hybrids, both the expected-bestselling NX 350h and the intriguing new NX 450h+ PHEV are based on that 2487cc 2.5-litre four-cylinder atmo unit, tuned this time to offer 140kW and 136kW (at 6000rpm) and 239Nm/227Nm (from 4300-4500rpm and 3200-3700rpm) in the NX 350h and NX 450h+ respectively.

The NX 350h uses either a single synchronous permanent magnet 134kW/270Nm electric motor in the front-drive version, or two electric motors (adding a 40kW/121Nm generator on the rear, double wishbone axle) to create the AWD alternative. Their combined total power rating is 179kW. The NX 450h+ ups that to 227kW.

None are light, however. While the NX 350h 2WD weighs a reasonable 1810kg, the twin-motor AWD system bumps that up to 1870kg, while the NX 450h+ is a portly 2050kg. Result? The power-to-weight ratio for all three are 98.9kW/tonne, 95.7kW/tonne and 110.7kW/tonne – almost identical to that of the NX 350 turbo.

The hybrids' gearbox in question is an 'e-CVT' electronic continuously variable transmission, working with a lithium-ion high-voltage battery, while the NX 450h+'s EV drive's battery is an 18.1kWh unit.

So, no prizes for guessing which one is the most frugal...

Up front, you get one option: a 2.0-litre naturally aspirated four-pot. It makes 135kW and 205Nm, and it’s a delightful little thing, driving the rear wheels only - as it should.

It used to be that the smaller 1.5-litre engine was the more revvy, keen option, rest its soul, but Mazda updated the 2.0-litre to be more eager (and deliver more power) at high revs and basically made the little 1.5-litre redundant.

Anyway, you can have it with a six-speed manual in any variant, or a six-speed automatic in GT guise if you find manual gearboxes difficult or a hassle.

All NXs require 95 RON premium unleaded petrol, and are emissions rated at Euro6b.

Not surprisingly, on the official combined run, thirstiest of the lot is the NX 350 turbo at 8.1L/100km (for a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 185 grams per kilometre), followed by the NX 250 at 6.9L/100km (158g/km).

The NX 350h cut that down to 5.0L/100km (113g/km for the FWD and 114g/km for AWD), while the NX 450h+, naturally, is the most economical by far, slashing that down to just 1.3L/100km, or 29g/km.

While we can't tell you what the NX 450h+ managed on test, the others didn't quite match their official numbers. Over several hundred kilometres, the NX 350 ranged from 9.3-11.3L/100km, the NX 250 7.5-9.3L/100km and the NX 350h from 5.7-6.8L/100km.

Note that the NX 450h+'s 18.1kW battery can only be charged using an AC outlet, meaning it'll need about 2.5hr to get the job done. Its EV-only range is about 70km on the WLTP score, or 87km using the less-realistic NEDC method.

At 55 litres, the fuel tank will allow the following combined average range between refills: 679km (NX 350 turbo), 797km (NX 250), 1100km (NX 350h) and a barely believable 4231km (NX 450h+, naturally).

Mazda says the MX-5 uses 6.8L/100km as a manual Roadster, or 7.0L/100km with an automatic gearbox. Or, in the heavier RF 6.9L for a manual and 7.2L for auto.

Not great for a tiny car like this, but pretty good for a sports car!

It’s got a 45-litre fuel tank, takes premium 95 RON or higher, and while it should hypothetically be able to travel more than 600km with its on-paper claims, expect fuel use to sit closer to 8.0L/100km if you’re driving it anything like it deserves.

The previous NX looked better than it drove.

Based on the previous-gen RAV4, it failed to rise above such humble underpinnings, despite all the extra design, comfort and equipment features Lexus created to help it do just that.

Sure, there were some very appealing things going on, including attractive styling, an intriguing interior, sumptuous seats and lots of kit to play with, but the Toyota's noisy, fidgety and tiring DNA soon became apparent, especially compared to rival luxury midsizers. And some of the dashboard multimedia controls were just down-right madness.

Building on the latest RAV4's set of modern, competent components, however, has fundamentally changed the NX.

For starters, it's much quieter inside. Whether at idle, travelling at speed, or traversing some pretty rough patches of road, the NX at last rides like something you'd expect a Lexus should. And given how noisy and droney most of its European rivals also are on Aussie bitumen, it gives the Japanese contender a handy head-start.

The same applies to how enveloping the soft yet supportive seats are, how settled the suspension feels and how calm the experience is. No previous Lexus SUV has seemed so... refined. Even the really big, expensive ones.

From the driver's point of view, the steering is beautifully balanced, for precise yet reassuring control at speed. This varies according to which grade you're driving, but as a whole, while not sporty like a BMW's nor as fluid as, say, a Mazda CX-5's helm, the Lexus walks that line between easy and involving quite well.

Ditto the handling and roadholding. The lightest of the bunch – the petrol-powered NX 250 and NX 350 turbo – feel ripe and ready for a hustle along a curvy ribbon of road, coming across as taut enough for tight turns yet supple enough to soak up the many bumps and thumps thrown up at them.

Switching to the NX 350h hybrid, there's a greater sense of mass, whether driving the front-drive 2WD or even heavier AWD version. As such, it's still quite dynamic, but not as athletic as the petrol-only models.

In terms of performance, there are no duds – and that's no surprise, as the previous NX's powertrains were pretty sound as well.

Though simply a front-drive version of the RAV4 Edge's 2.5-litre unit, the NX 250 seems more muted than the Toyota's application, and yet is willing to rev hard to hit the power band necessary for it to feel alive. At higher speeds, sometimes the raspy engine can sound a tad noisy when extended, but it's never harsh or rough.

Moving on to the NX 350h, it feels like, well, a heavier and quieter RAV4, not unexpectedly. Silent at take-off speeds, the engine chimes in fairly unobtrusively, providing plenty of oomph along the way, while the CVT seamlessly slices through each (artificial) ratios. After the petrol versions, the steering does seem a little more remote, and you can feel the extra heft through turns, but – again – the basics underneath seem right.

Accelerating hard on the open road does reveal that typical Toyota hybrid engine roar and CVT flair, but only when the throttle is prodded hard. Driven normally, the NX 350h is as smooth, swift and sweet as you'd expect. And definitely in keeping with brand performance expectations.

Finally, there's the NX 450h+ F Sport. At over two tonnes, Toyota and Lexus' plug-in hybrid debutante is not a flyweight by any means, yet having all that extra low-down mass does result in a slightly different driving experience.

Take acceleration: having access to 227kW of power and torque together at very low revs equals lots of thrust right from the get-go. And while it's not sports-SUV rapid, there's certainly enough punch to justify the F Sport badge. Similarly, the low centre of gravity that the 18.1kWh battery pack provides seems to promote hunkered-down road-holding attitude through tight turns, with minimal body roll.

Regardless of which NX you're looking at, quibbles are few. Occasional road and tyre roar are still a little evident over some surfaces; the adaptive cruise control and lane-keep technologies could benefit from some local fine-tuning so they behave a little more nuanced in Australian conditions (and that applies to most luxury SUVs nowadays); and the optional head-up display's capacitive controls located on the steering wheel spokes are distracting, difficult to modulate and needlessly complicated. They're so annoying we'd even untick the Sport Luxury option box to avoid it.

If we had to choose a favourite among the new NXs, it would probably be the NX 350h F Sport, since its adaptive sports chassis provides the best compromise between agility and suppleness; the NX 350 turbo is probably the most fun to drive hard and fast, while the base NX 250 is thoroughly competent and sufficiently luxurious to scare most rivals.

Could this really be a medium-sized Lexus SUV we're talking about?

We're not saying that the latest NX is perfect, but it now provides a very compelling argument not to buy European.

It feels like every motoring journo under the sun (literally if the roof is off) owns or has owned an MX-5 of some sort.

And the first time you drive one, you might understand why. 

If you spend your days testing and driving a bunch of different cars that aim to be many things at once, it’s refreshing to drive something that aims to be one: fun.

That’s it, the MX-5 feels like it was built to be fun. Not for convenience, not for power, certainly not for the school run.

And fortunately its simplicity remains with this update. All Mazda has done to change the way it drives is attempt to improve the rear limited-slip differential and improve the steering a little by reducing friction in the rack, as well as improve throttle response.

Has any of that changed the way it feels to drive on-road? No, not massively, but the ND was already such a delight that Mazda could have kept this update to purely design and interior tech changes and it would have still been one of the best-value buys around in terms of fun.

The MX-5 still feels relatively softly sprung while still being a dynamic and communicative sports car that’s engaging to drive even at low speeds, and rewarding (or frustrating) to drive fast.

On tight, winding roads, the MX-5 is at home, its soft suspension keeps you humble with its shifting weight and its relatively meagre outputs keep your licence safe.

In fact, despite being slightly compromised as a daily drive, the MX-5 is still plenty of fun even in traffic, there’s something about the satisfying click as the shifter slips into gear, or the little rev matches heading back down through the cogs when approaching a red light.

The 2.0-litre four-pot is a keen unit, and the six-speed manual is light and easy to work with, plus its steering is light without sacrificing road surface feedback - that feedback can quickly turn into cabin noise on a coarse highway which could become a little irritating on a long trip.

But the MX-5 can still be plenty of fun on track, where you’re more likely to get the most out of its new limited-slip differential and Track DSC mode.

It’s equally frustrating and satisfying to hustle the MX-5 around the East Circuit at The Bend in South Australia, where the track is twisty, busy, and unforgiving. Get it wrong, and the MX-5 lurches or slides to let you know you’ve made an error. 

Get it right, however, and the little roadster glides through the corners, camber changes and even over apex kerbs smoothly and carrying impressive speed.

Plus, the electronic assistance won’t usually kick-in until you really need it, a welcome change from cars that are constantly trying to keep you from having fun behind the wheel.

The ND MX-5 actually scored five stars with ANCAP back in 2016, even though its score has now expired. It’s not obvious how well it would fare under newer, stricter tests, given the small car’s lack of advanced driver assistance - not that that’s a bad thing in the case of a sports car.

Still, for a two-seat convertible, the MX-5 has a decent list of kit to keep you safe including front and side airbags, alerts for driver attention, blind spots, lane departure and rear-cross traffic, parking sensors and a reversing camera, belt pretensioners and side-impact door beams and even automatic Smart City Brake Support.

Lexus now offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty with roadside assistance.

Furthermore, NX 350h hybrid and NX 450h+ plug-in hybrid models also feature a 10-year, unlimited kilometre battery warranty.

Service intervals are at 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

The NX also includes three years and 45,000km of capped-price servicing, with each one costing owners just $495 – and that's highly competitive pricing for a luxury brand.

Plus, there's also Lexus' 'Encore' aftersales subscription program offering myriad offers and services.

Mazda’s five-year, unlimited km warranty covers the MX-5, including five years of roadside assist.

Servicing costs are pre-set, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km up to seven years or 105,000km. They cost between $447 and $638, averaging out at about $544 each.