Kia K4 vs Mazda CX-3

What's the difference?

The new Kia K4 GT-Line has a lot to offer - an interesting design, lots of features and a pleasant driving experience. It’s not without its quirks and there are times when a more powerful engine may have improved it for me as a long-term prospect as I do some big kays every year but it ticks the boxes as a friendly urban dweller.

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

Have to admit I wasn’t convinced on the design of this new sedan at first as it can look a little out of sorts from certain angles. But the more time I spend with it, the more I appreciate its sharp lines and sporty rear shaping.

The small sedan market doesn't have a lot of options now because SUVs are so popular but it's nice to see a design that stands out and the fang-like LED light design at the front and rear, as well as the 18-inch alloy wheels make the K4 look very cool.

The rear doors look sleek because the handle has been hidden in the C-pillar and the K4 is particularly striking in our test model's 'Wave Blue' ($600 RRP) paint colour.

Head inside and you'll find a cabin that looks slick with a two-tone synthetic leather upholstery that feels supple underhand and a plethora of soft touchpoints under all the bits that touch.

The black headliner creates a posh space but the sunroof helps the cabin to feel airy when you need it to.

The dashboard isn't too wide, preferring a sharply linear shape and is headlined by a massive display panel that houses dual 12.3-inch screens and a 5.0-inch climate panel.

There is still a strong presence of plastics inside but you don’t tend to focus on them.

Unlike some other new cars hitting our market, the K4 hasn’t done away with its buttons and dials - and there’s enough to satisfy those who don’t like to rely on a screen for everything. The extra traditional element of the physical gear selector adds to its charm as well. 

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

The K4 feels big for the class, especially compared to its nearest rivals and that translates to a cabin that feels adult-friendly in both rows. An impressive feat for a small sedan.

Access is the only time you will have moments of 'I should have opted for an SUV'. That's because you will get in your daily squats sliding in and out of the K4 due to its 140mm ground clearance.

The rear doors also feature a wide wing that juts out from the door handle and it catches your hip almost every time you go to close the door.

The wide front seats offer lots of comfort with thick padding and long under-thigh-support. The driver's side is powered with adjustable lumbar support but the passenger seat only offers manual adjustments, which is surprising for a top-grade model. However, both front seats enjoy heat and ventilation functions.

The back bench seat offers similar comfort to the front with seat padding and length but it's not terribly wide and two adults (or child car seats) will fit best.

Amenities and storage is decent for the class with each row enjoying four drink holders and two USB-C ports. Front rowers also get a wireless charging pad and 12-volt socket.

In the front there is a large glove box that fits more than just an owner's manual, a mid-size middle console and a centre console that features retractable cupholders to open up the space if you need to. A dedicated phone cradle with small spaces on each side rounds up individual storage for the front.

In the rear there are two map pockets, a small item cubby next to the USB-C ports and a pair of directional air vents, reading lights and a fold-down armrest.

The boot space is massive for the class at 508L (that's nearing mid-size SUV territory) but the aperture is narrow and I couldn't fit my big booster seat through the opening.

The boot is quite deep as well and you may find yourself climbing into it to retrieve items that roll into the back.

The rear bench seat has a 60/40 split which can help with storage and there is a temporary spare tyre underneath the floor.

While you don't get a powered tailgate in this model, the lid isn't heavy to operate and has a proximity opening function that keeps it practical when you have your hands full.

This just means when you approach and stay near the boot with the key fob on your person the boot lid will pop open for you.

The 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia system looks great with crisp graphics and a responsive touchscreen. The menus are in an easy-to-understand layout which you'll get accustomed to in no time. The 5.0-inch climate display sits to the right of this system and it's nice to have it on display all the time.

The 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster isn't all that customisable but it's easy to read with large text and a small menu screen that shows nav directions, trip info or a compass.

The built-in satellite navigation system is easy to get going and to cancel a route guidance, it's a one button affair which is great for when you're on the go.

The system features wired and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The CarPlay is simple to connect to and retained a steady connection this week with feedback from my callers that my voice was clear on calls.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

Upon updating the Mazda CX-3, the Evolve variant is now a $32,100 ask before on-road costs, which is $900 more than before. It’s a little step up from the $30,370 entry price of the Pure, but falls well short of the top-spec Akari’s $38,890 sticker price.

The CX-3 range now comes with updated autonomous emergency braking and adaptive cruise control, with the Evolve specifically scoring new fog lights and keyless entry.

The Evolve also comes with black machined 18-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim and front parking sensors.

This is all on top of the CX-3’s standard kit which includes a leather-wrapped gear shift knob, handbrake handle and steering wheel, keyless start, an 8.0-inch multimedia display, wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto plus LED headlights, daytime running lights and tail-lights.

For its segment, the CX-3 isn’t cheap. The Evolve grade is more expensive than pretty much the entire line-ups of rivals like the Kia Stonic or Hyundai Venue, and its price somewhat lines up with the newer, hybrid-powered Toyota Yaris Cross.

But there’s more to the CX-3 than just a list of features.

The flagship grade is front-wheel drive and has a 1.6-litre four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine that produces up to 142kW of power and 265Nm of torque giving this a more powerful presence than its non-turbo siblings (which only produce up to 112kW/192Nm).

However, while the power is adequate for the GT-Line there are times when the engine sounds like it's working a bit too hard.

The eight-speed torque-converter automatic transmission can also become flustered as it moves through the lower gears, especially when you’re accelerating quickly.

On the whole, the power delivery and outputs are more than enough for a city environment and the odd road trip.

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

With an official combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle fuel usage figure of 6.7L/100km and a fuel tank size of 47L, this model has a theoretical driving range of 701km. That does sit around 80 kays less than some of its rivals but it’s still sufficient for those wanting to do the odd road trip!

My on-test fuel usage has popped out at 9.2L/100km, which is based on figures achieved at the pump (32.05L) and my km travelled (348km).

I’ve done mostly urban trips this week with one longer open-road drive and overall I’m not too surprised by that figure because I’ve been pushing it hard but it could be better.

The K4 is a simple gal because Kia recommends a minimum 91 RON unleaded petrol to be used for all models.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

As mentioned earlier, the power is adequate to move this car around on the open-road but you have to be a little aggressive on hills to keep your speed consistent.

It’s not always quick off the mark, though, and you’ll notice that when you have to cross traffic or enter a roundabout - so allow for extra car lengths. Once you get going, it’s responsive in the city.

The steering is sports-stiff and so is the suspension. This makes the handling feel nimble in turns and sure-footed when doing quick lane changes but you hear and feel every bump in the road. 

On-road comfort is okay around the city but the road noise is very loud inside the cabin and is particularly noticeable at higher speeds. You’ll have to raise your voice to chat to passengers in the back when you're on the highway.

The K4 has a small turning circle of just 10.7m and you can easily do a U-turn in spaces that others might have to do a three-pointer. This made the K4 feel friendly in small car parks and on ramps.

The direct steering makes it easy-enough to park, as does the reversing camera and front/rear parking sensors but I’m pretty disappointed that at the top grade-level, you miss out on a 360-degree camera system (tsk, tsk, Kia).

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The Mazda CX-3 is technically unrated by ANCAP, though only because its original maximum five-star rating expired after seven years. While this means it easily passes many of ANCAP’s main criteria for safety (and strict Australian Design Rules - ADRs - to be able to be sold here), the CX-3 is missing some recent, more complex safety features.

Not everything is standard across the line-up, either. The Evolve misses out on adaptive headlights, a surround-view parking camera and traffic sign recognition. The base Pure variant also misses out on a front parking sensor.

Fortunately, there are plenty of other key features like seven airbags, dual-front and front-side plus curtain airbags spanning the sides. The CX-3 also has ABS and emergency braking with forward pedestrian detection and rear cross-traffic alert.

There’s lane departure warning, forward obstruction warning, blind-spot monitoring and a driver attention alert for those times you might miss something or - hopefully not often - are distracted.

All these systems are programmed well to minimise interference while driving, making the CX-3 refreshingly trusting of the driver to actually do the job of driving.

The K4 GT-Line is offered with Kia’s seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty. That’s a pretty good term for the class and there is a seven-year capped price servicing program for a flat $3877 (averaging $554 per service), which is slightly more expensive than others in the class.

Servicing intervals could get annoying if you do big kays every year as they're spaced at every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever occurs first.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.