Ford Problems

Are you having problems with your Ford? Let our team of motoring experts keep you up to date with all of the latest Ford issues & faults. We have gathered all of the most frequently asked questions and problems relating to the Ford in one spot to help you decide if it's a smart buy.

Browse by

Show all

User Ford Laser Review: 1994-1996
By Graham Smith · 17 Jul 2004
The Mazda-based small car was popular from the first model in 1981 right through to the last, which was replaced by the Focus in 2002.  The Lasers that preceded the KJ were pretty much rebadged Mazda 323s. The KJ, however, was an attempt to move a little further away from the Mazda.For the first time there was even a unique body style.  It was also unique in that it was imported from Japan. The preceding models were built at Ford's Homebush plant in Sydney.MODEL WATCHFORD pulled the covers off the KJ Laser in late '94 with an expanded range of three models encompassing three quite different body styles.  There was a four-door sedan, which made use of the Mazda 323 body with Ford-styled sheet metal front and rear.A new name, Liata, appeared on the five-door hatch, while the racy three-door Lynx hatch was aimed squarely at the youth market.  But it was the Liata, regarded by Ford as the main model in the range, that really started the move away from the Laser's 323 roots.Apart from a sportier grille, the Liata was the same as the sedan forward of the windscreen. But from there back, it was all new.  It cut a stylish profile with a steeply raked roof line, spoiler mounted on the rear window and large, roundish tail lamps.The three-door Lynx, with its large headlamps, sharply bobbed tail with a spoiler mounted on the rear glass and egg-shaped rear lamps, made a bold statement.  The Lynx sat on a 100mm shorter wheelbase, with a rear overhang shorter than both the Liata and LXi.Power was supplied by either a 1.6-litre economy engine or a larger 1.8-litre performance unit.  Both were double overhead camshaft engines with sequential fuel-injection and variable intake.  The LXi and Liata came with a 1.6-litre engine. They also had the option of the 1.8-litre engine, which was standard in the Lynx.Drive was delivered to the front wheels through an upgraded five-speed manual, which featured synchromesh on reverse for smoother selection of reverse gear, or a four-speed electronic auto.Underneath the metal lay MacPherson Strut suspension, front and rear, with slightly higher spring and shock rates for a sportier feel when the 1.8-litre engine was selected.  All models had power steering, retuned for reduced effort and improved on-centre feel.Brakes were disc all round, with a larger master cylinder for a more solid pedal feel, and ABS was optional on the LXi and Liata, but standard on the Lynx.  Dual airbags, which were standard on the Lynx, became available with the 1.6-litre engine from early '95.The LXi was the entry-level model for the sedan and Liata. The Ghia luxury upgrade offered 1.8-litre engine, alloy wheels, central locking, power mirrors, power windows and four-speaker sound.ON THE LOTLXi manual sedans sell for $9000 to $12,500. Add $500 for auto, another $600 for a 1.8-litre engine, $1200 for the luxury Ghia.  For the Liata, expect to pay $9000 to $12,700 for the LXi, add $500 for auto, $600 for a 1.8-litre engine and $1200 for the Ghia.  The sporty Lynx can be yours for $10,500 to $15,000.IN THE SHOPTHE KJ was imported from Japan, which meant better build quality.  Add to that a stiffer body than those of the preceding models and you have a car that stands up well to the rigours of city life.Check for tell-tale signs of crash repairs, such as colour mismatches between adjacent panels, poorly fitting doors and hatches, and irregular panel gaps.  Mechanically, the KJ is sound. The engines are reliable, but look for a service record to ensure your potential buy has regularly seen the inside of a reputable service shop.OWNERS' VIEWSWally Turner bought his new 1.8-litre auto Liata hatch in '94.  It has now done 115,000km and all he has had to replace are the tyres and water pump.Wally says he gets 8-litres/100km on the highway and 10 round town.  David McClean says his '94 1.6-litre Liata LXi five-door hatch has 100,000km on the odometer, but runs like a dream.  The only negative is the visibility out the back window.LOOK FORSTYLISH small car, apart from wild LynxGOOD, reliable Mazda mechanical packageROOMY interior that will handle four adults and their luggageWELL-BALANCED and responsive handlingRIVALSMazda 323 (1994-96) $9000-$13,000Nissan Pulsar (1995-98) $10,000-$15,500Holden Astra (1996-98) $9000-$14,000THE BOTTOM LINEATTRACTIVE styling, with Mazda build quality, safety and reliability, make the KJ a good second car or first car for beginners.RATING13/20
Read the article
Used Ford Explorer review: 1996-2002
By Graham Smith · 12 Jun 2004
It looks tough but it's really a softie.  Rightly or wrongly the Ford Explorer is much maligned, tarnished by being the vehicle that brought the mighty Ford Motor Company to its knees and hastened the end of Aussie Jac Nasser's time as head honcho.The Explorer was America's third-best-selling passenger vehicle and its top-selling four-wheel drive. But it started popping tyres and several people died in the resulting accidents.Ford blamed the Firestone tyres fitted to it; Firestone blamed the Explorer. It was a mess of monumental proportions, not helped when the Explorer became known as the Exploder.  But when it arrived here, it entered a quite different market.Model WatchThere were three models at launch: the entry-level XL, the XLT mid-range and the Limited, which came with everything.  Power was provided by one of two V6 engines, depending on your choice of transmissions.The five-speed manual had a 4.0-litre overhead valve unit that supplied 119kW at its peak.  If you chose the five-speed auto trans, you'd get a much more modern alloy-headed single overhead camshaft engine that offered 153kW at 5250 revs and 339Nm of torque at 3000 revs.The big news with the Explorer was its Control Trac full-time four-wheel-drive system.  It's not so new now, but the Explorer was the first model sold here to offer an intelligent electronically controlled on-demand 4WD system that apportioned drive to the front and rear wheels as needed to maintain traction.The suspension on the first Explorers was a combination of independent front with a solid axle slung on leaf springs at the rear. Brakes were discs at all corners, with the assistance of ABS, and additional safety from dual airbags.The range-starting XL came with cloth trim, aircon, power steering, limited-slip diff and four-speaker sound.  The XLT also got central locking, leather steering wheel, power driver's seat and power mirrors, windows, and sunroof.The Limited got alloys, auto aircon, CD, leather trim, roof racks and traction control.  The US-coded model arrived in 2000 and with it came many equipment updates before it was replaced in 2002 by the all-new UT.In the shopGenerally the Explorer is sound, though its driveline is suspect under heavy load, as when towing.  The thing to remember is that the Explorer was built as an SUV for the US market, and while its size suggests brawn, it's really a bit of a soft-roader at heart.Owners' viewsJohn Thompson has had two Explorers, and both have been used for heavy towing around the country as he's gone about his work on the V8 Supercar trail.  The first was a manual which he says wasn't up to the job of towing and he had to replace the clutch, which was the weak link.His latest, a 2001 XLT, is an auto which until recently has been faultless, but at 128,000km the auto trans had a meltdown, requiring an expensive rebuild.  In his view, the auto isn't strong enough to do the heavy towing he needs it to do. He'd never own another one.Lawrie Dughetti owns a 2000 US Explorer Limited which had 6500 km on it when he bought it.  Overall he says it has plenty of grunt and every luxury he could ever need, but he rates the finish and feel of the plastic as ordinary, and the interior is too tight for three adults in the rear.Problems have been fairly minor and overall he's happy with it.  Bob Lorich bought a new XLT Explorer auto in 1999. He has since travelled 140,000 km and had no problems worse than a faulty thermostat at 95,000km.He often uses his Explorer for towing and rates it highly. It gets about 12 litres/100km on the highway at 110km/h. Even when fully laden and towing, it still manages about 18 litres/100km.  Julianne Gould and her husband bought their Explorer to visit family living a long way away.She says they have had a few hiccups, but Ford's service has been tremendous.  They say it has plenty of get up and go and there are no problems towing a trailer. They chose a manual for fuel consumption, which is heavy around town but good on the open road.The bottom lineWell-equipped and solid around-town soft-roader that can handle a bit of bush bashing but doesn't like heavy towing.Look forSmooth, comfortable ride around townCapable off road, with smart electronics for assistanceAvoid if you do heavy towingTroublesome clutch on manualUndersized automatic trans can mean troubleWwell equipped with standard features
Read the article
Used Ford Fairlane review: 1995-1997
By Graham Smith · 20 Jun 2004
In the mid-1960s the Ford Fairlane was unrivalled for luxury motoring.  Holden tried to match the big Ford, first with the Brougham, then with the Statesman, but neither threatened the Fairlane's domination. But by the mid-1990s, when the NF Fairlane came on the scene, the Statesman had clawed its way into the lead, and the Fairlane was battling back.Model watchThe 1995 NF followed the traditional Fairlane formula in that it was based on the current Falcon, in this case the EF.  Ford invested $220million in the EF in an effort to make up some ground lost to Commodore as Holden sales recovered from the disastrous '80s, and spent a further $30million on the long-wheelbase models once the Falcon was up and running.The NF used the same front-end sheet metal as the EF Fairmont. The result was that the NF was shorter in the nose than most previous Fairlanes, but it still had the roomy rear seat, and large boot, which were seen as the key features of a local luxury model.  All up the NF Fairlane was 98mm shorter than the car it replaced.For the first time Ford adopted what it called a "High Jewel" effect, which meant more chrome and stainless-steel trim, and clear turn-signal lamp lenses. Central to the theme was the bright chrome grille, which combined with bright window mouldings and numerous chrome strips for sparkling highlights.Inside there were new trim fabrics and make-believe woodgrain panels. There was a long list of features, from improved audio systems and a CD stacker to climate-controlled airconditioning, cup holders and a driver's airbag.Based on the Falcon as it was, the NF Fairlane got the same mechanical improvements as the EF Falcon, which meant more responsive handling. The suspension was the same combination of wishbones at the front and live axle with Watts Linkage at the rear, but in the Fairlane it was tuned more towards a refined ride than sporty handling.When you bought a Fairlane you expected a smooth ride and didn't necessarily worry about handling precision, but despite its obvious bulk the big Ford still handled quite well. It was quite well balanced and went where it was pointed. Bigger brakes, in the form of thicker front and larger-diameter discs, with ABS, resulted in a firmer pedal feel and boosted braking performance.Buyers could choose between Ford's fuel-injected single overhead camshaft 4.0-litre six, which gave 157kW at 5900rpm, and 357Nm at 3000rpm, or the optional 5.0-litre V8 which boasted 165kW and 388Nm. Both engines were coupled to four-speed auto transmissions to ensure smooth progress.  Ford released the NFII in 1995 and with it came an airbag for the front-seat passenger, along with a number of other detail improvements.In the shopWith the same mechanical package the Fairlane suffers the same maladies as the Falcon. Both engines are reliable and the 4.0-litre six works well on gas, but they can suffer head-gasket problems.Fairlane drive lines are also reliable – the auto hangs on well into the high 100,000km and the diff is tough. Listen for diff noise on high-kilometre cars.  Problems with electrical components can be frustrating and the Fairlane can suffer similar electrical gremlins to the Falcon.Fairlanes, particularly if privately owned from new, are usually well cared for by fussy owners and these are the ones to seek out.  Others, which might have come from the hire-car business, will be showing high mileage and should be treated with caution.Check the history of ownership to determine if the car has been in the hire business, and the service record to ensure that the car has been serviced according to Ford's recommendations.RivalHolden VS Statesman Price 1995-1998 $14,000-$24,000
Read the article
Slightly more punch
Answered by Graham Smith · 08 Jul 2004

THE NL, an update on the NF series, was introduced in October 1996. The most obvious change was a new grille with a badge in the middle, but your Concorde had a slightly more powerful six-cylinder engine, 162kW compared with 157kW, 16-inch alloy wheels, Momo steering wheel, leather trim, pin striping, floor mats, and was available in green, red and blue only.

Long-lasting laser
Answered by CarsGuide team · 01 Jul 2004

I CAN'T predict when your engine might expire, but you could get a guide by having a mechanic check some of its vitals. You say it drives well and isn't using oil, which is a good sign. But check to see if it's blowing smoke under any conditions and have a mechanic run a compression test to check the state of each cylinder. If all that comes out positive, I wouldn't be concerned about the engine giving up in the near future. As for the Astra, I have no problems recommending it.

The `bomb' dilemma
Answered by Graham Smith · 17 Jun 2004

GETTING it to a mechanic is easy. You can either get it towed there by tow truck, or you can get a permit from VicRoads that will allow you to drive it to and from your mechanic's premises. Buying a car unregistered and without a roadworthy certificate is always a gamble, unless you can have it checked by a mechanic or a body such as the RACV before you hand over the cash. Without a thorough check, one can't possibly know what you might have to do to make it roadworthy. In your case, with more than 200,000km on it, there is probably going to be lots, which could make your bargain buy look very expensive.

Noisy fairlane
Answered by Graham Smith · 01 Jul 2004

FORD made some major changes in the AU II to reduce interior noise, but they were changes that couldn't be made easily to your car. The main one was the inclusion of a laminated firewall which had a significant affect on interior noise and they also fitted hydraulic engine mounts for further reduction. The engine mounts could be fitted, but the firewall is clearly out of the question. Check where the noise is coming from and that might give you a guide as to what to do to reduce it. If it's coming from the rear, it's probably tyre noise, in which case I would consult a tyre expert -- like Russell Stuckey at Stuckey Tyre Service -- who should be able to recommend a tyre that would be quieter than those you're now running. The BA Fairlane is quite different to yours. It has a stiffer body and control blade independent rear suspension, so the noise transmission path is quite different and that makes it difficult to compare to your car.

Chains that bind
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 08 Jul 2004

MY FIRST reaction is that there must be something amiss, either with your car, or the chains you have used. I can't believe Ford has made such a basic error, given that the Focus is designed in Europe where chains are regularly used in snow areas.

My ghia is so thirsty
Answered by Graham Smith · 08 Jul 2004

THE BA is a nice, smooth-driving car, but the Ford engines are renowned for being thirstier than those of its main rival. My testing has shown that the Ford engines -- sixes and V8s -- use 10 to 20 per cent more fuel than the equivalent Holden engines. Ford's official fuel consumption figures for the BA with the Barra 182 six-cylinder engine are 12.0 litres/100km city and 7.4 litres/100km on the highway, but those are test figures, best used to compare between makes and models. Real-life numbers are generally higher than test ones, so I would expect fuel consumption more in line with that you quote. It's difficult to suggest anything that will make a dramatic difference, other than to suggest you keep your tyre pressures up to the mark, and drive conservatively, maintaining a steady throttle as much as possible.

Guzzle puzzle
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 29 Jul 2004

ON THE face of it, you should be getting about 5 per cent better fuel consumption with the Optimax. That is provided everything else is the same. The higher density of the Optimax means you are putting greater energy into the engine, and that should mean you are getting greater energy out. You should be able to drive with a lighter throttle for the same performance. I would suggest you recheck the engine tune, and perhaps go back to regular unleaded for a tank or two before trying the Optimax again.

Disclaimer: You acknowledge and agree that all answers are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied upon as bespoke advice. Carsguide is not liable for the accuracy of any information provided in the answers.
Have a new question for the CarsGuide team?
More than 9,000 questions asked and answered.
Complete guide to Ford
Complete guide to Ford CarsGuide Logo
Reviews, price, specs and more