Citroen C4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E

What's the difference?

It’s weird, wonderful and fun, in more ways that one. I think every segment could use an oddball alternative like the C4. Citroen has successfully transformed it from a hatch to a small SUV with a difference. It’s not going to be for everyone – few Citroens are – but those who are willing to take a chance will be rewarded with a surprisingly competitive little package that stands apart from the crowd.

The Mustang Mach-E is fantastic to drive and very competitive on the range and equipment front, allowing it to outpace some of its well established rivals in Australia.

In fact, it's almost a shame about the Mustang name, because it will distract from what is, at its core, a compelling first step for Ford into the fully electric space.

So, don’t expect a ‘Mustang’, at least not in the traditional sense. But this is certainly something. A new future for a new Ford.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

It’s really hard to stand out in Australia’s busy marketplace, especially in this small SUV space, where there doesn’t really seem to be as much of a design rulebook as there is in other segments.

Rooflines are wildly different, as are beltines and light profiles. While some may decry the fall of the hatchback to these more high-riding options, at least some of them are bringing fresh design ideas to the car world.

Our C4 is a great example. An SUV perhaps in profile only, it sports a slinky descending roofline, tall, contoured bonnet, a frowny-face LED profile, and characterful plastic claddings, which are a continuation of Citroen’s ‘Airbump’ elements, which gave cars like the previous-generation C4 Cactus such a unique look.

The rear is this car’s most confronting angle, with a post-modern approach to the light profile, and in reference to C4s past, a spoiler integrated into the rear tailgate.

It looks cool, contemporary, and I think is successful in its aim to blend the sporty elements from the hatch world with the sought-after high-riding elements of an SUV.

It certainly caught a few eyeballs in my time with it, and if nothing else, a bit of attention is something the Citroen brand desperately needs.

In the past you could rely on this brand to give you a funky interior, but one that sadly also came with its fair share of sub-par plastics and strange ergonomic. So I’m pleased to report that the new C4 dips into the better looking and feeling Stellantis parts catalogue for a still interesting yet more coherent experience this time around.

The modern look and feel of this car continues with interesting seat designs, a high-riding dash with a higher degree of digitization than before, and improved ergonomic features (even over some notable Peugeots). We’ll talk more about those in the practicality section, but the C4 feels as weird and different from behind the wheel as you’d hope , with an odd dash profile, a fun and minimalist steering yoke, and attention-to-detail elements, like a detail strip that runs through the door trims and across the seats.

These elements are welcome and help separate this Citroen from its Peugeot siblings. It will need this going forward, as it also now shares much of its switchgear and screens with its sister brand.

This is largely a good thing, with the 10-inch screen looking and feeling good and slotting into this car’s design nicely.

The Mach-E looks good, but nothing like the designs you have come to expect from Ford.

Sure, there are plenty of notes, references and hints, to its Mustang namesake, some more hidden than others, but fans will have to accept this is a new interpretation of the badge for a new era, and at the end of the day, it’s an electric mid-size SUV.

The overall visage is a little more sleek than your average RAV4, though, with a long wheelbase, coupe-like rear, and a curvy shape which no doubt helps it cut through the air as efficiently as its shape will allow.

Mustang hints are found, obviously, in the big pony badge on the front, but also the frowny-face headlight profile, and iconic three-bar pattern for the rear lights, too.

There are even hidden things, like pony imprints on the underbody protection, and ‘electric ponies live here’ branded onto the motor unit, where few buyers will likely ever see it. In a move which should keep all Mach-E owners happy, every grade looks great, each having its own character.

The base car looks all aero with its wheel covers and more humble plastic cladding pieces, while the Select adds contrast piano black bits and more traditional alloy wheels.

The GT goes harder still with a 3D-effect grille and much more Mustang-like 20-inch wheels.

I’m not sure what I was expecting when it came to the Mach-E’s interior, but it looks a bit more ordinary in pictures than it does when you’re in the car.

What appears from a distance to be a hodgepodge of bits from Ford America and Ford Europe with the same dull grayscale theme is more nuanced and textured once you’re in the driver’s seat.

I especially like the tiered dash with the speaker-bar look for the Bang & Olufsen system which integrates across the front, and the 15.5-inch screen which looks like it will dominate the space is actually at a perfect distance from the driver.

An appreciated amount of soft-touch surfaces and synthetic leather finishes round out the space. There is even a grade-specific textured detail piece running across the dash. Nice touch.

It’s also a lot to take in, but somehow it works. One thing is for sure though, it’s not traditional ‘Mustang’. This has jumped from the big, brash, old-world (and often maligned for quality issues) interior, to something cleaner, more open and futuristic.

The C4 brings some interesting practicality elements. There are a few areas where it’s even better than the improved layouts of recent Peugeot models.

The cabin feels spacious, with the C4’s relatively long wheelbase providing ample room in both rows. Adjustability is good for the driver, although it is worth noting that the seats have an odd blend of manual adjust for sliding fore and aft, contrasted with electrical adjust for seat height and tilt.

Comfort is superb from the memory-foam stuffed and thick synthetic-leather-clad seats. I don’t know why more cars don’t adopt this approach to seat design. You sink into these seats and are left feeling like you’re floating above the ground rather than sitting on something. The feeling here is unmatched in the small SUV space.

The massage function is a wholly unnecessary addition, and with the thick seat cladding, it didn’t really add much to the experience.

The seat bases aren’t too high either, unlike some cars in the SUV class, but the dash design itself is very tall, so people shorter than my 182cm height might find extra adjustment is required to see over the bonnet.

There are large bottle holders in each door with a very small bin; dual cupholders in the centre console, and a small armrest console box.

There’s also an odd little two-tiered shelf under the climate unit, with a removable base for extra storage underneath. It seems to me that the top shelf is a missed opportunity to place a wireless charger, although connectivity is handy with the choice of USB-C or USB 2.0 to connect to the wired phone mirroring.

A big win is the presence of a full dial set for not just volume but the climate unit too. This is something the Citroen scores over some of the new Peugeots, which have moved the climate functions to the screen.

Somewhat less wonderful are the digital dash cluster and holographic head-up display. These seem to be a bit redundant in the information they display to the driver, and the digital dash has no customisation, leaving me wondering what the point of it is.

The C4 also has some interesting innovations on the front passenger side. It has an unusually large glovebox and a neat little sliding tray, which looks like something from a Bond car.

It also has a slide-out tablet holder. This odd little thing lets you securely mount a tablet to the dash to provide a multimedia solution for the front passenger, which may be good for entertaining larger kids on longer journeys. Or adults who don't want to talk to the driver. It’s a neat inclusion, but I’m not sure how many people will use it in the real world.

The back seat offers a remarkable amount of room. I’m 182cm tall and had heaps of knee room behind my own driving position. The nice seat trims continue, as does the patternwork and detailing, which is the kind of attention to detail you don’t always get from rivals.

Headroom is a little limited, but you also score dual adjustable air vents and a single USB port.

The boot comes in at a hatch-sized 380-litres (VDA). It’s a neat, square shape with no little cutaways at the sides and is just big enough to fit our full CarsGuide demo luggage set, but leaves no room to spare. The C4 features a space-saver spare wheel under the floor.

This is especially true when it comes to the usability of the cabin. I was surprised to be greeted by a high seating position, a wide cabin, and an abundance of storage with plenty of neat features.

For a start, the centre console is a nice piece of design. It features a floating bridge section with a wireless charging bay, rubberised storage tray, dual bottle holders with variable edges, and a floating armrest piece with a large console box below.

In front, and below the wireless chargers, there’s a big cutaway for additional storage, and a decent sized glove box on the passenger side.

The all-dominating touchscreen, as mentioned, is at a nice distance from the driver, isn’t as obstructive as it looks and unlike the Tesla Model Y or Model 3, the Mach-E scores a little digital instrument panel to provide the driver with conveniently-located core information.

I only have two gripes about these systems. Unfortunately, you have to adjust the climate functions through the touchscreen.

There’s a nice central volume dial, but it would be nice to have physical adjustment dials for temperature and fan speed, too.

As it is, the touch areas are quite small, and require a bit of concentration to jab at.

The instrument panel has a nice clean design, but isn’t customisable, the limited information it shows is all you get. Better than not having one, I suppose.

The rear seat is also excellent, offering me, at 182cm tall, plenty of airspace for my knees, and sufficient width for my arms. Headroom is its most limited dimension, although I fit without my head touching the roof.

The seats are brilliant, clad in a decent synthetic leather material and padded with an excellent amount of foam material for a comfortable ride no matter where you’re seated. The centre seat even seems usable for adults, thanks to the Mach-E’s flat floor.

Rear passengers are treated to bottle holders in the doors, two more in the centre drop-down armrest, USB ports on the back of the centre console, pockets on the backs of the front seats, and a pair of adjustable air vents.

Annoyingly, the huge panoramic sunroof doesn’t have a retractable shade, nor is there a flexible shade accessory on the options list.

Sure, it looks great, but it could be a nuisance, baking the interior during hot Australian summers.

For some reason this particular trait is common in more and more EVs with the Tesla Model Y and Polestar 2 sharing the same issue.

Boot space is 402 litres (VDA) which is not particularly large for a mid-size SUV. I would expect 450 litres or more in this category, but the Mach-E is compromised a little by its aggressively-shaped rear.

It also doesn’t get a spare wheel of any kind, making do with a repair kit under the floor.

Ford also throws in a Type 2 to Type 2 public AC charging cable, but if you plan on charging from a wall socket at home you’ll have to delve into the accessories list.

One of my favourite Mach-E features is the 134 litre frunk. I’ve said before I don’t think this particular EV fad is super useful.

It’s often an inconvenience to have to pop the front from the inside, and I’ve found in my long-term loans of EVs I rarely use them, but the Mach-E’s frunk is special because it’s watertight and drainable.

This opens up some neat opportunities, like the ability to throw dirty hiking, diving, or work equipment in there and hosing it out later, or even filling it up with ice and chucking a case of drinks of your choice in there for an old-fashioned American block party. It even has integrated cupholders for this express purpose.

Price is key to any new electric car, and the Mach-E doesn’t do anything unexpected. It’s not here to be a new, more affordable mid-sized electric option in Australia, instead leaning on its performance credentials to slice out its own niche amongst its competitors.

Three Mach-E grades arrive in Australia with prices ranging from $79,990 for the most affordable rear-wheel drive Select version, stepping up to $91,665 for the also rear-drive Premium and stretching to $107,665 for the all-wheel drive GT.

Before you start adding on-road costs or state-based discounts then, the Mach-E competes with mid-grade or higher-end versions of the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Tesla Model Y - and maybe the more sedan-like Polestar 2.

Range is, of course, key to the price equation for any EV, and this is where the main differences lie between the variants, which are remarkably similar when it comes to standard equipment. The base Select gets a smaller, more affordable 71kWh battery pack. It grants the entry-point car a driving range of 470km on a single charge. Not bad at all.

Next up, the Premium grade remains rear-wheel drive, but swaps up to a larger 91kWh battery unit, delivering one of the longest ranges of any EV on the Australian market, at 600km.

Finally, the top-spec GT moves to all-wheel drive, almost doubling its power outputs, but maintains the same 91kWh battery, for a reduced but still respectable range of 490km between charges.

Standard equipment is impressive, too. Even the base Select scores items usually reserved for high-spec cars, like synthetic leather interior trim with heated and power adjust front seats, a panoramic sunroof, and a Bang & Olufsen 10-speaker premium audio system.

Other standard equipment includes the impressive 15.5-inch portrait-oriented multimedia touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a matching wireless phone charging bay, a 10.2-inch digital instrument cluster, 19-inch alloy wheels (with aero panels), a 360-degree parking camera, LED headlights, and the full safety suite.

The Premium grade scores higher-spec LED headlights, contrasting piano black exterior trim, black headliner and red stitching for the interior, as well as metal scuff plates and pedal trims.

The top-spec GT has the most noticeable bump in equipment, with the addition of adaptive suspension, 20-inch alloy wheels, a Brembo brake package, GT styling touches inside and out, ambient interior lighting, and sporty front seats with additional bolstering.

The issue the Mach-E faces, then, is not range or standard equipment. It is simply not offered in a form which is as competitive with price-leading versions of its core rivals.

Of course, most anticipated vehicles like this are picked up primarily in high-grade forms to begin with, Ford telling us nearly 40 per cent of pre-orders have been for the GT, but it’s notable there’s no circa-$70,000 entry-point variant as there is for the EV6, Ioniq 5, and Model Y.

The C4’s single trim level has a single engine, and it’s a good one; a peppy 1.2-litre three-cylinder turbo.

It appears elsewhere in the Stellantis catalogue and has been refreshed for the 2022 model year with a new turbo and other small refinements. In the C4 it produces 114kW/240Nm and drives the front wheels via an Aisin-sourced eight-speed torque converter automatic transmission.

No dual-clutches or CVTs to be found here. This sounds good to me, but is it good to drive? You’ll have to read on to find out.

The Mach-E might not look like a traditional Mustang, but don’t be fooled, it’s no ordinary mid-size SUV on the performance front.

Even in its most basic trim level, the Mach-E puts out 198kW/430Nm, and yes, it’s rear-wheel drive.

The mid-grade version boosts power even further to 216kW/430Nm, while the top-spec GT nearly doubles outputs to 358kW/860Nm thanks to its dual-motor, all-wheel drive system.

Sprint times are a hot-hatch baiting 6.6 seconds for the base Select, 6.2 seconds for the Premium and an impressive 3.7 seconds for the GT.

The GT scores other enhancements, too, like the 'MagneRide' suspension also seen in the internal-combustion Mustang, and upgraded software unlocking the sportiest ‘Untame Plus’ drive mode which Ford says is ‘for track use only’ (and it is, because it basically turns traction control down to a minimum). 

Despite the little turbocharged engine and the abundance of ratios in that transmission, the Citroen C4 disappointed me a little bit when it came to real-world consumption.

The official/combined consumption sounds reasonable at just 6.1L/100km, but after a week of driving in what I would consider realistic combined conditions my car returned 8.4L/100km.

While it’s not terrible in the wider context of small SUVs (a segment that is still packed with naturally aspirated 2.0-litre engines), it could be better.

The C4 also needs at least mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel and has a 50-litre fuel tank.

As mentioned, the three Mach-E variants have distinctly different range offerings. The base Select travels a respectable 470km between charges, the mid-grade Premium covers 600km (one of the longest ranges on offer from any EV currently in the Australian market) and the top-spec GT travels 490km between charges.

Interestingly, the base car is offered with the more affordable LFP (lithium-iron phosphate) battery chemistry for its 71kWh unit which uses less rare materials, sourced from China’s CATL, while the larger 91kWh batteries are sourced from Korea’s LG Chem using the higher output but more expensive NMC (nickel-manganese cobalt) chemistry.

On the efficiency front the Mach-E isn’t bad considering its performance, and size. The base Select is rated at 17.8kWh/100km on the combined cycle, while the number is lower for the Premium at 17.3kWh/100km, but hops up to a less-than-impressive 21.2kWh/100km for the all-wheel drive GT.

For reference, these official consumption figures are about on-par with the Ioniq 5 and a little lower than the EV6. It will be interesting to test this car’s range and efficiency figures at a later date, on a longer test.

Driving the C4 is an interesting experience because it approaches the road a little differently from most of its rivals.

It really leans into Citroen’s newfound comfort-focused niche with the seating and suspension. This results in an overall experience that is a bit unique in the market, and quite pleasant, too.

The ride really is quite good. It’s not a fully hydraulic system but has dual-stage dampers that essentially smooth out corrugations and much of the nasty stuff that comes into contact with the tyres.

It’s odd because you can hear the big alloys crashing about on the road, but ultimately you feel little of it in the cabin. What’s more impressive is Citroen has managed to imbue the C4 with this floating-on-the-road feeling, while maintaining enough of a ‘real’ driving position to make it feel like you’re sitting in the car and not on it.

The overall result is impressive. The comfort extends to the seats, as mentioned, which really do still feel floaty and supportive even after hours on the road. It also extends to the steering, which has a very light tune. This is a bit unsettling at first, as it feels like it has a large dead-zone in the centre, but it is also speed dependent, so once you’re cruising it regains a significant amount of feel. You can also manually bring back a bit of firmness by setting this car to its Sport drive mode, which is unusually good.

This means you can have an ease of operation in tight quarters while maintaining enough feel to make it fun to drive when you need to ask more of it. Clever.

Speaking of fun, the revised 1.2-litre three-pot is a hoot. It has a distant but entertaining gruff tone under pressure, and surges forward with just enough urgency to not leave you really wanting for power.

It’s not what I would call quick, but it has a raucous attitude paired with a well-behaved torque converter auto to make it truly entertaining. When you push it, there’s a moment of turbo lag followed by a lump of torque, which the transmission lets you ride out before decisively snapping into the next gear. I like it.

Again, it's not quick, but it punches just enough above its weight to leave you with a smile when you stick your boot in. To have that in a car otherwise so focused on comfort is an unexpected pleasure.

The dash cluster could use some work, as could visibility out of the cabin. The small aperture out the rear and tall dash line could leave some drivers feeling a bit claustrophobic. While the engine is fun to engage with, the turbo lag could potentially be a source for annoyance at times, too.

Brief negatives aside, I think the C4's drive experience really brings something unique, fun, and comfortable to the small SUV space.

Let’s make one thing clear. The Mach-E does not drive like a Mustang. A Mustang, of course, being characterized primarily by its brash V8 roar, gratuitous cabin and grand touring dynamics.

No, the Mach-E immediately reminds me of a Ford Europe SUV. Sounds like an insult doesn’t it? But it isn’t.

The Escape and Puma are remarkably sharp to drive, and I consider them deeply underrated options in the SUV space, and more suited to drivers than they first appear. 

The Mach-E takes the best elements of these two and dials it up to 11, adding the smoothness of an electric powertrain and inherent rear-wheel drive performance characteristics as it does.

While it saddles you with a tall SUV-like seating position, it’s no simple SUV once you get it on a few curves, the urgent performance from the rear-mounted motor, even in the base car, is excellent, feeling as though it punches above many of its rivals, while the sharp, accurate steering makes it feel surprisingly agile and responsive considering its dimensions and weight.

The regenerative braking is well-calibrated, too, offered in either a one-pedal or more moderate tune, but perhaps the most surprising aspect of this car is its well balanced ride.

Reviews from my colleagues overseas pointed to an overly hard ride, which I was expecting, but I was greeted with a car that deals with bumps, undulations, and corrugations with a remarkable amount of poise.

Ford says what it calls the “Irish tune” was selected as it offered the best ride for our roads, and it seems the Blue Oval engineers weren’t wrong.

It’s a firmer ride than the boaty Hyundai Ioniq 5, but not as firmly sprung as the Polestar 2 or Tesla Model Y.

In other words, it’s firm enough to make it fun to drive, but not hard enough to ruin it in your day-to-day commute.

It was also interesting to find the MangeRide adaptive suspension in the GT grade didn’t make as big a difference as expected, firming things up a little on some surfaces, but offering a slight edge to the amount of chassis control on offer as a result.

The three drive modes also make a significant difference to the experience. The ‘Whisper’ mode dials back accelerator response and artificial noise, serving as a kind of ‘eco’ setting which is said to also be more suited to low-traction scenarios, where the instant torque of the electric motors can easily spin the wheels.

The standard mode is far more balanced, while the 'Untame' mode makes the motors respond in haste, and dials up the artificial rumbling noise, but not to an unpleasant level.

The fourth, ‘Untame Plus’ mode, only available on the top-spec GT, allows the car to, for example, break into a drift when grip is low enough by dialling back the traction control.

It’s designed to allow a little more play and maximise acceleration response for track use. Still, it doesn’t feel as tail-happy as its namesake combustion coupe.

While it appears to be yet another mid-size electric EV, then, there’s something a little more on offer here, and something which sets itself apart from the electric pack by being fun to drive in a way something like a Tesla Model Y isn’t.

The best part is, these unusually engaging dynamics extend beyond the top-spec GT, all the way to the base Select.

The only thing is, it’s still very tidy. It’s organised, the traction control is clever, the chassis is sharp, the steering is brilliant and the electric motors are… inorganic.

In some ways, this car is too good to be a Mustang, certainly missing some of the edge-of-your seat chaos a V8 rear-driven coupe can bring.

So, long as you understand this, there’s a very compelling sporty electric SUV to be found here.

All Mach-E variants get the same set of modern active safety equipment including auto emergency braking at freeway speeds, lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert. It also scores a 360-degree parking camera and reverse auto braking.

Adaptive cruise control features (although not the semi-autonomous ‘BlueCruise’ offered in this car’s American version), alongside a healthy suite of airbags.

Only the Select and Premium grades are rated a maximum five ANCAP stars, with the GT excluded.

Ownership has always been a tough topic for unusual Euros like the C4, and that seems to continue here. While Citroen offers a competitive five-year and unlimited-kilometre warranty for all its new products, it’s the service costs that will hurt the most.

While most Japanese and Korean brands are competing to really keep these numbers down, the C4’s average yearly cost, according to the provided schedule, comes in at an average of $497 for the first five years. That’s nearly double the cost of Toyota’s C-HR!

The C4 Shine will need to see a service centre once a year or every 15,000km, whichever occurs first.

Ford offers a now industry standard five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, as well as the battery manufacturer standard eight-years and 160,000km for the high-voltage components.

Unlike some EVs in this space which push intervals out to two years, the Mach-E needs to see a workshop once every year or 15,000km, whichever occurs first.

Thankfully, servicing is relatively affordable, at just $135 or $180 at alternating years for the first 10 years, and roadside assist is automatically topped up with each service (at an authorised Ford dealer) up to seven years.