Browse over 9,000 car reviews

No need for speed

I READ with interest the debate about speed cameras, limits, tolerances and even kinetic energy, but one thing that doesn't seem to get a mention is the actual scale of calibration on modern speedos. My wife's Mazda 3 is never going to reach the 220km/h at the top of its dial. My new Toyota Kluger is similarly scaled to 220km/h and would have an equally slim chance of reaching that speed, even if I were crazy enough to try it. Even my previous V8 Calais was optimistically scaled to 260km/h. Why do manufacturers devote such a large part of the speedo scale to speeds we never get to, instead of having larger, easier-to-read scales at the speeds we do drive at every day? If the speedos were easier to read we'd be able to judge the speed better and might not get so many speeding tickets.

Good point. In my view the marketing people are driving it. They seem to think it's a way of impressing owners and prospective owners with the performance of their cars. Also, manufacturers should take a long, hard look at the graphics on instruments. Some are very hard to read in daylight.

Disclaimer: You acknowledge and agree that all answers are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied upon as bespoke advice. Carsguide is not liable for the accuracy of any information provided in the answers.

Comments

Have a new question for the CarsGuide team?
More than 9,000 questions asked and answered.
Complete guide to Mazda 3 2009
Complete guide to Mazda 3 2009 CarsGuide Logo
Reviews, price, specs and more