Subaru Problems

Are you having problems with your Subaru? Let our team of motoring experts keep you up to date with all of the latest Subaru issues & faults. We have gathered all of the most frequently asked questions and problems relating to the Subaru in one spot to help you decide if it's a smart buy.

Browse by

Show all

Used Subaru Impreza review: 2007-2008
By Graham Smith · 10 Dec 2010
You only have to mention the Subaru Impreza and images of the hot rod WRX come flooding to mind. The WRX rally rocket has come to define   the small Subaru, but to forget the rest of the range would be unfair.The Impreza has long been a well-built, reliable and popular small car and the new model introduced in 2007 was even better than those cars it replaced.There was a sense of change about the new Impreza, a fresh approach that spelt a change in direction for the Japanese carmaker that had built a solid reputation for quality, drivability and reliability.MODEL WATCHThere was always something off-putting about the way Impreza doors closed, a feeling of flimsiness that suggested a lack of quality.  That was before the new model in 2007, which for the first time had frames around the windows in the doors. Now, with the windows supported by frames, the doors closed with a solid feel that made the Impreza experience much more satisfying.You might think that adding doorframes is a small change, but in terms of the impact it had on the Impreza it was a major revision.  While it was a most welcome change it also seemed to signal a major change in thinking at Subaru.It was as if Subaru had decided to come in from the cold; it was the final step from being a somewhat quirky outsider to being a solid mainstream carmaker.Subaru only offered a five-door hatch at the Impreza's launch, but there were three models, plus the WRX, which we'll hold over for another story. The R provided the entry point to the range, with the RX and RS as you climbed the tree.With a look reminiscent of Europe the new Impreza was more attractive. It was also shorter, taller, wider, and lighter, with more cabin and boot space.Inside the cabin, there was a fresh new dash, upgraded seats and trim, better insulation and isolation, and a height and reach adjustable steering column.Under the bonnet was the familiar 2.0-litre flat-four, but with 20 per cent more power and seven per cent more torque. That meant that at its best it was putting out 110kW at 6400 revs and 196Nm at 3200 revs.On the road that translated into more urge and better drivability, and motor-noters reckoned it was also smoother.  Bolted to the back of the engine was either a five-speed manual gearbox or a four-speed auto, while drive was directed through all four wheels.IN THE SHOPCarsguide has received few complaints about the Impreza, and those that have landed here have been of a minor nature and not to be too concerned about.Check around the engine for oil leaks and make sure the required servicing has been done. There is nothing more damaging to an engine than missing services. Oil can quickly clog an engine's vital internal passages, and blockages quickly wreck an engine. Brake and tyre wear doesn't appear to be an issue for owners, as it can be with some other makes and models.IN A CRASHANCAP handed the Impreza a five-star rating on the back of its array of airbags, which provided front, side and curtain protection, along with its impressive active safety package. In addition to anti-lock brakes the Impreza also boasted electronic stability control.AT THE PUMPSubaru claimed the Impreza would do 8.9-10.7 L/100 km and owners back that claim up, reporting that their cars are quite economical to run.OWNER'S SAYPam Baker loves her 2008 Subaru Impreza RS. She says it handles well on all terrain, particularly on wet dirt roads, it looks good, the fuel economy is good, and the bucket seats are comfortable. On the other hand she says the auto transmission is sluggish on takeoff, the body sheetmetal feels very thin and flimsy, and dents easily, and there's too much plastic on the interior. All in all she says it's about an eight out of 10.LOOK FORFresh Euro lookSolid feelMore powerful engineLarger cabinUncomfortable seatsTHE BOTTOM LINEThe popular small car got even better with new looks, an improved cabin and a more solid feel.
Read the article
Used Subaru Forester review: 2008-2009
By Graham Smith · 03 Dec 2010
Subaru's Forester was at the head of the pack during the SUV stampede 10 years ago and the latest model sought to build upon the huge success of earlier models by pushing for market leadership.  The light SUV has become the go-to car for families looking for flexible transport to haul kids to school or sporting events, handle the regular motoring chores and the occasional weekend away.Along the way the market for light SUVs has become one of the most crowded and competitive segments on the local scene and the new Forester was pitted against other hugely popular models like the Nissan X-Trail, Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4.MODEL WATCHIt's no great secret that the Forester is based on the Subaru Impreza passenger car, so the release of a new Impreza heightened anticipation of a new Forester.When it landed it was larger, fresher and more affordable than those that had gone before.  It looked more like a serious four-wheel drive than ever before and was 110 mm taller, 60 mm wider, 75 mm longer, and rode on wheelbase that was 90 mm longer.The increased size was great news for owners wanting more space inside as it delivered more room for rear passengers and more luggage space out back.Overhangs were shortened and ground clearance increased to improve its manoeuvrability.  Power for the regular X and XS came from a 2.5-litre 'boxer' four that boasted more power and torque, while the XT had a turbocharged version that was unchanged.At its twin peaks the 2.5-litre gave 126kW at 6000 revs and 229Nm at 4400 revs, enough to make it a lively drive. The turbo meanwhile delivered 169 kW at 5200 revs and 320 Nm at 2800 revs, which made the XT even livelier.Buyers could choose between a four-speed automatic transmission and a five-speed manual, which featured low-range gearing.  As with all Subarus the drive went to all four wheels, varying from 95 per cent front and five per cent rear to a 50/50 split depending on throttle, load and speed inputs.Three models were offered in the range, starting with the X and climbing through the XS to the 'Rex-like' XT.  Standard equipment on the X included four-speaker sound with steering wheel controls, 16-inch steel wheels, a full-sized spare, as well as air, and power windows and mirrors.In addition the XS boasted front fog lights, alloy wheels, auto air, a CD stacker and six speakers and MP3 compatibility.  The range-topping XT got a body kit, larger alloys,and auto-levelling headlights with pop-up washers.There was also a Premium Pack, which added leather,a power driver's seat and a sunroof to the XS, but when added to an XT there was also a touchscreen sat-nav system with DVD/CD player and Bluetooth compatibility.IN THE SHOPWell built and fundamentally sound like all Subarus there is little that goes wrong with the Forester, and that's reflected in the very small number of complaints received at CarsGuide headquarters.There has been the odd question from owners regarding the head gaskets on the Forester's boxer engine, but we're assured by a Suby service specialist that the gaskets themselves are quite sound. While they don't blow as such it is not uncommon to find minor oil leaks around the gaskets, but again we're assured that they are not something to be overly concerned about.Otherwise the Forester is a sound and solid car.  Like all used cars it's worth checking for a service record, and consider having an expert check them over.IN A CRASHThe Forester was well equipped to handle a crash situation with standard stability control, anti-skid brakes with brake assist for emergency braking, hill-start assist, and front, side and head airbags.  ANCAP's testing gave the Forester five stars out of five.UNDER THE PUMPThe new Forester packed a little more pork than its predecessor but still delivered a little more fuel economy across the range.  Those with the regular engine and manual gearbox were a little over three per cent more efficient at 9.3 L/100 km, the auto around one per cent better at 9.6 L/100 km.  The turbo improved the most over the previous model, but still guzzled gas at 10.5 L/100 km.LOOK FOR . Fresh look. More cabin space. Improved fuel efficiency. Zippy performance
Read the article
Subaru Forester 2010: Same globe issue as Outback
Answered by CarsGuide team · 28 Oct 2010

We have had a number of reports from owners of Outbacks and other Subaru models and, you would appear correct, it's not confined to the Outback. We have forwarded them on to Subaru for their investigation.

Subaru Forester 2006: What are the recommended service intervals?
Answered by CarsGuide team · 14 Dec 2010

I wouldn’t hold off, the consequences of breaking a belt are too dramatic to risk. Belts do deteriorate over time, that’s why all carmakers that use belts put a time limit on their replacement. It’s to cover owners like yourself so do limited kays. At your current rate the car would be eight years old by the time it reaches 100,000 km, which would be too risky.

Alternator could be cause of globe issue for Outback
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 28 Oct 2010

Anyone having problems with blown globes would be well advised to have the alternator output checked as suggested.

Subaru Forester 2010: Should I use E10?
Answered by Graham Smith · 28 Sep 2010

The biofuels people tell us to expect an increase in fuel usage of about three per cent, but that’s offset by the cheaper price of E10. Run a check on your car to actually measure the difference in consumption. Run it on E10 for a couple of tank fulls and then revert to regular unleaded, again for a couple of tank fulls. That will tell you exactly what your car is doing and if it’s worthwhile using E10. We have had a couple of other reports from owners saying their cars are using a lot more E10 than they were unleaded, but the biofuels people and the carmaker involved reckoned there was something wrong with their cars. Running a higher octane fuel will generally improve fuel economy and performance, but it costs more, so you have to balance the extra costs against the benefits to determine if that’s the best way to go.

Outback headlights an issue
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 14 Oct 2010

We have received a number of reports from Outback owners and all report they have replaced a number of low beam headlamp globes.

Subaru Impreza 2010: Slow speedo
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 23 Dec 2010

The ADR demands that speedos not read slower than the actual speed of the car, but they are allowed to read up to 10 per cent faster.  Your daughter's car falls within that tolerance, which makes it legal. She now knows how far out the speedo is, so she can adjust the speed she drives at accordingly.

Leaky Subaru steering pump
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 09 Dec 2010

Take it to an independent Subaru service specialist who will be able to rebuild it, or have it rebuilt. We were quoted $400-$500 for a full rebuild, including new seals, and that included a two-year warranty.

Ask Smithy Xtra squeaky Subaru Liberty Sport
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 05 Oct 2010

The only thing you can do is put pressure on the dealer and Subaru to sort the problem out. Perhaps other owners can let us know if they have the same issue with their cars, and what they were told by their dealers.

Disclaimer: You acknowledge and agree that all answers are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied upon as bespoke advice. Carsguide is not liable for the accuracy of any information provided in the answers.
Have a new question for the CarsGuide team?
More than 9,000 questions asked and answered.
Complete guide to Subaru
Complete guide to Subaru CarsGuide Logo
Reviews, price, specs and more