Mitsubishi Reviews

The phrase ‘best of both worlds’, depending on how old you are, might be associated in your mind with one of two things: hybrid cars, or Miley’s Hannah Montana alter ego.But I haven’t spent the last month watching old Disney shows, so you’re here to read about a hybrid car. Specifically, the 2023 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ES PHEV.The entry-level variant to Mitsubishi’s plug-in hybrid EV line-up is spending a few months in the CarsGuide garage so we can decide if it’s worth the rather hefty price increase over a standard petrol Eclipse Cross.The ES grade in the Eclipse Cross range signifies the base model, and the car we’re testing is pretty sparse in terms of features - and not in a ‘simple is best’ kind of way.The purely petrol-powered version starts from $31,490, before on-road costs. Our plug-in hybrid version... $47,290.Yep, the hybrid drivetrain effectively adds $15,800 to the price of the small SUV, so the PHEV cost about one and a half times as much. That's a big ‘oof’.Rather than the non-hybrid’s turbocharged 1.5-litre petrol four-cylinder engine making 110kW/250Nm to power the front wheels, the PHEV boasts a 2.4-litre naturally aspirated unit that, while making only 94kW and 199Nm on its own, is joined by two electric motors (one for each axle) that help drive all four wheels.Mitsubishi doesn’t quote a total system output for the engine and motors together, but the front motor makes 60kW and the rear 70kW. Even though it’s not a simple case of adding all the numbers up, the Eclipse Cross isn’t a slouch.But is it worth almost $50,000? Despite its lack of a proper hybrid system, a top-spec Mazda CX-30 Astina can be had for less than $49,000, as can an all-wheel drive Toyota RAV4 GXL hybrid, which is a category size up from those. They don’t come with Mitsubishi’s 10-year/200,000 kilometre warranty, though.The ES comes with, as mentioned, pretty slim features, too. Aside from lacking some safety features like rear cross-traffic alert or blind-spot warning available in the Aspire and Exceed, the ES misses out on sat-nav, heated or power-adjustable seats, and LED headlights. It also makes do with a four-speaker sound system, which is noticeably short of the audio quality available even in entry-level hatchbacks these days. Stepping up to the Aspire means twice as many speakers, and in a ‘premium audio’ set-up.Boot space is also slightly compromised, 359L compared to the petrol version’s 405L. It also kills the spare tyre, coming instead with a tyre repair kit, which is far less useful for those inevitable trips away from the city.Its 8.0-inch touchscreen, however, is standard across the range, and its wired Android Auto and Apple CarPlay functionality means being able to get around the fact its feeling quite outdated.There’s more to the Eclipse Cross’s interior that feels a little harsh for a small(ish) SUV at almost $50,000, like cloth seats and even just a lack of sunroof. But people aren’t opting for the PHEV for those specifically.The key reason you’d pick the Eclipse Cross over the likes of the CX-30, of course, is the ‘P’ in PHEV. While traditional hybrids run under electric power for short distances, the Mitsubishi’s larger battery and ability to be charged from an external source means, theoretically, the Eclipse Cross could be run using no fuel.For those who want an electric car for the city but might sometimes need a couple of hundred kilometres of extra range for an out of town trip, it’s probably an ideal - if expensive - alternative to either a full petrol model or waiting around at charging stations.It also requires, of course, somewhere to park that’s within a reasonable distance of a way to charge the car. During my custodianship of the Eclipse Cross, I’m planning to test it with varying levels of charge discipline - there are sure to be some out there who rarely charge their PHEV - to see how good or poor the consumption is.This month, for example, I’ve been fairly 50/50 about the charging frequency, treating it as my own life allows. I live in a share house, and I’m not always home first to park in the driveway.Next month, I’ll run its tank down once with a single charge, then I’ll keep it charged as much as possible.Its battery is a 13.8kWh unit, so it’s not tiny, though it takes a while to charge. At a DC fast charger, 80 per cent comes along in a claimed 25 minutes, while a cable at home using AC charging is a seven-hour job.First impressions are that commuting under electric power is quite pleasant, though a day that requires a bit of running around is a good way to empty the battery quite quickly. It also seemingly becomes relatively inefficient without any charge saved up - which makes sense given its 1895kg kerb weight is over 420kg heavier than the non-PHEV ES.Mitsubishi claims I should be able to get a rate of 1.9L/100km out of the PHEV, which is pretty impressive.That, of course, is only tested on a 100km journey, and the electric driving range of 55km covers most of that. In the first relatively charging-relaxed run through the petrol tank, I managed 6.4L/100km.Admittedly, that's with a lot of mixed driving, and a couple of longer journeys that weren’t conducive to charging beforehand.If not for the efficiency, anyone with an Eclipse Cross PHEV is going to want to keep the battery topped-up for the simple fact that its EV driving mode is its best.I’ll cover off its driving in more detail in a future update, after more time behind the wheel.Acquired: August 2023Distance travelled this month: 570kmOdometer: 1789kmFuel consumption this month: 6.4L/100km

News of a 'special' or 'limited' edition vehicle should be received with a healthy degree of cynicism because the special vehicle may merely be wearing a sticker pack.But sometimes it's a bit more, or a lot more substantial than that.The Mitsubishi Triton Sport limited edition is a GLS-spec variant of the ute with some cosmetic changes - but not a lot else - applied to the vehicle.

Mitsubishi hasn't had a halo Triton model to chase the likes of the Ranger Raptor, HiLux Rogue and Navara Warrior. It does now, but it took Walkinshaw Engineering to point out the gap in the line-up.

Don't fall into the trap of assuming all hybrids are the same, you may end up with a car which is impractical to use or offers barely benefit. That's why we've conducted this comparison of the Mitsubishi Outlander Plug-in Hybrid, Nissan X-Trail e-Power and Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. Three similar mid-sized SUVs with very different hybrid systems.

The ability to whistle up an extra pair of seats in what is 99 per cent of the time a five-seat SUV, complete with big boot, is a neat trick. And it's one the Mitsubishi Outlander LS Black Edition performs while adding the visual pizzazz of black-out design elements and some extra kit. Is it the right fit for your (growing) family?

A lot of carmakers have launched hybrid and plug-in hybrid versions of family friendly SUVs in the past couple of years as they play catch up to two pioneers.One of those pioneers is Toyota and its RAV4 hybrid, and the other is Mitsubishi's Outlander PHEV. Now in its second generation, the PHEV has a loyal following. But is the new version a step up or a step backwards?

It's the ultimate bush-track test: three ute-based 4WD wagons, all great off-roaders in their own right, face off in a bush showdown. The new V6-powered Ford Everest in Sport grade, the Isuzu MU-X in top-spec LS-T guise, and the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in top GSR spec.A low-range 4WD test made up of hard-core challenges at the outer limits of reasonable use for a standard 4WD.

Australia loves a fuel-sipping hybrid but we also love going off-road. Mitsubishi says its new Outlander PHEV can do both...

It's an underestimated ute and while its sales performances have never been HiLux high, the Mitsubishi Triton has consistently been a quiet achiever in a tough market and it has a legion of loyal fans to prove it.Adventure lovers appreciate the Triton's low-key, no-nonsense, value-for-money appeal and its renowned for being robust and reliable hasn't hurt its long-term reputation either.

Could Mitsubishi's tiny EV work for Australia's urban motorists, or is it simply too small for the task?