Lexus UX250H vs Suzuki Fronx

What's the difference?

Most cars get worse as they age as their makers try and save pennies by scrimping on quality and features. But the reverse seems to be true for the Lexus UX.

The 250h Luxury 2WD we tested is the car that the brand should have launched with back in 2018, with an appealing balance of performance and economy, comfort and sporty handling, as well as refinement and features. The UX has finally come of age.

If you’re considering a small car, particularly if an SUV is the goal, a Suzuki should in most cases be on the shopping list. Back-to-basics motoring is key to the brand’s identity. Its most popular model is a tiny ladder-frame 4X4, for example. Hi Jimny.

The Fronx doesn’t break new ground in any practical sense, but it does come in with a decent price and list of features that should sway plenty of small-car fans in the showroom.

It’s decent to look at, comfortable for the segment, and easy to get used to and drive. The numerical rating on this review betrays just how likeable the car is.

It’s not extremely refined and it starts to lose its dynamic shine on rough roads, but in an urban setting the Fronx should excel.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

A hefty portion of the UX’s engineering underneath is shared with the popular Toyota C-HR. Not that you would necessarily know that by glancing at it.

Even five years on from launch, the current model looks slick and contemporary, and it seems to have informed the styling of newer, larger Lexus SUVs like the latest NX.

Not that you’d call the UX an SUV – it’s very much a higher-riding hatchback, with a ho-hum 160mm of ground clearance.

To put that in perspective, other crossovers are taller: the GLA has 213mm, while Subaru’s new Crosstrek boasts 220mm. At least the UX’s is loftier than the C-HR and its pitiful 137mm.

That said, the angular wheel arches and wide-track stance serves the Lexus well.

‘Fronx’ as a name doesn’t exactly scream ‘cute’, but the little SUV has a pretty classically Suzuki design. This is not a complaint at all.

The Fronx is 3995mm long, 1765mm wide and 1550mm tall, but despite its diminutive dimensions the brand has opted to lean into a ‘coupe’ style with a sloping roofline that creates a relatively sporty look, especially for something with a two-digit power figure.

So while some of Suzuki’s designs have been divisive in Australia (Ignis, anyone?) the Fronx takes a slightly more conservative approach by leaning into more design trends than just the coupe-back SUV shape. 

For example, its tail-lights span the width of the tailgate rather than simply flanking the boot as was standard for decades.

The LED daytime running lights at the front are also arranged in a slim, high-up position with a set of headlights below.

Inside is arguably more conservative than out, as the Fronx goes with a fairly standard formula in terms of its layout, with few premium materials (the synthetic leather on the seats feels cheap for example) or adventurous design elements to be found.

But that’s not such a bad thing.

The UX’s compact crossover-esque hatchback proportions have implications inside. Inevitably, this is no larger than the (related) Toyota Corolla, despite having the higher seating position.

Beyond that, though, the 2023 model highlights how Lexus has made its so-called ‘gateway’ model better than before.

For starters, despite being the base grade, this UX has a properly premium ambience, backed up by exceptional fit and finish.

From a sensory perspective, the UX looks, smells, feels and sounds like a Lexus should. And by the latter, we mean the cabin is pleasingly isolated from the outside world.

The overhauled touchscreen and multimedia system is a huge step forward for the series. The larger new display looks great and works well – what a monumental improvement over the infuriatingly fiddly old set-up. It’s difficult to see how they’ll improve it. Dependable and glitch-free. Are you listening, all European manufacturers?

Meanwhile, the carryover parts that worked well enough before continue to impress.

The UX’s front seats are sumptuous in their cushy softness and comfort, yet provide sufficient support over longer driving distances.

There’s also the excellent driving position, with most switchgear within grasp. There’s just enough space for taller people to settle in nicely up front. And the basics like ventilation and storage are thoughtfully executed. The climate in the UX is always fine.

Negatives? Don’t worry, we’ve identified several.

As mentioned earlier, the now-better-equipped Luxury does have all the essentials. But for a car that’s approaching $60K-drive-away, we’d expect kerb-side mirrors that dip down when reversing to avoid damaging alloys against gutters; we couldn’t get ours to auto-fold when locking up, either.

Driver vision out isn’t great. Thick pillars and that rising shoulder line make changing lanes and reversing a technology-reliant affair, as it’s difficult to see objects that are too-easily obscured. For the same reasons, a front camera would be useful in this grade.

Others might expect a sunroof, or cooled seats that massage, or a head-up display for the instrumentation, but we’d argue that they’re hardly necessities. Lexus has to upsell buyers to something.

Moving on to the back-seat area betrays the UX’s compactness most.

The back doors have small apertures. Entry/egress is challenging for folk with long legs. Legroom is tight, and three adults abreast would be a struggle, so it’s best to treat the littlest Lexus crossover as a four-seater.

Yet headroom is fine, the appearance and finish remain first class as it is up front, and the basics are all present – air vents, grab handles, coat hooks, overhead lighting, one map pocket, centre armrest with cupholders, two USB outlets, and windows that wind all the way down. Narrow front seats aid with light, vision and ambience, too.

Further back, the luggage area is pretty petite for an SUV, though the boot is (slightly) larger than the Corolla and Mazda3’s. That powered tailgate is useful if your arms are full, but the loading lip is high.

Normal boot floor depth is shallow but most of that flooring can be removed to reveal a hidden compartment underneath.

Small side pockets are also useful. You’ll find a 240V outlet. Bag hooks and floor tie-down hooks are fitted.

And – being a hybrid – there’s no spare wheel, just a tyre inflation kit. And the flimsy cargo cover is there only to keep prying eyes out.

Not big on utility, then, but the UX is true to its role as a Lexus in concentrate form.

Because for all the conservative, even outdated, styling in the cabin, the fact is it’ll be refreshingly familiar to someone who’s getting out of a car from perhaps even before the year 2000.

Suzuki’s place at the budget end of the new-car market means its customers are likely either quite young and buying their first new car, or relatively old and looking for a cheap, rarely used runabout as the ‘last car’.

For the former, a lack of techy distractions is paramount. For the latter, ease of use wins over cutting-edge tech in most cases. Which is why it’s probably okay that the Fronx’s multimedia touchscreen and software wouldn’t feel out of place almost a decade ago.

It can be a tad fiddly to use at speed, but it’s still more straightforward than the ‘iPad-like’ systems Tesla has made popular, and there are physical controls for important functions like climate control.

There’s also a row of ever-present haptic buttons for volume controls and navigation shortcuts.

The ergonomics of the interior are quite basic, but there are no red flags in terms of visibility, reach, or placement. 

The head-up display is a bonus, but the physical dials on the dash rather than a digital driver display are clear enough, despite again feeling nabbed from a time before head-up displays even existed. 

Space for the front passengers is decent, it’s not cavernous but it’s far from cramped. Elbow rests and seating positions allow for a relaxed ride.

The back seat is a slightly less comfortable place, but at 178cm I can sit behind my own seating position without my knees touching the seat in front, and my head has just enough space above to accommodate the top of a mullet.

Behind that, luggage capacity in the boot is 304 litres, or 605 litres with the rear 60/40 split seats folded.

There’s also no space-saver spare tyre, just a repair kit as standard.

There’s only one variant of the Fronx, and it lands at $28,990 before on-road costs. It’s also relatively stacked when it comes to features, and Suzuki is even working on a sub-$30K drive-away offer for its on-sale date in September this year. We’d expect that means about $29,990 DA, though that’s to be confirmed down the track.

For something at that price point, features aren’t lacking. While things like wireless phone charging and wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay have become almost expected for even entry-level cars in Australia, the Fronx also features heated synthetic leather seats and a leather steering wheel.

It’s the first Suzuki in Australia to feature a head-up display, and there’s also a standard surround-view parking display thanks to a set of cameras.

The Fronx’s 9.0-inch multimedia touchscreen is joined by a small 4.2-inch driver display nestled between physical dials for the speedometer and tachometer. Exterior lighting is LED front and rear, with auto headlights and manual levelling.

The only extra-cost option for the Fronx is a choice of ‘premium’ single- or two-tone paint - Arctic White Pearl is the standard no-cost colour. Single-tone paint is $745 extra, while two-tone options are $1345, which is a lot pricier than many premium paint options in the market.

The Fronx comes in at the same price as a mid-to-high spec Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic or Chery Tiggo 4, but some rivals like the Mazda CX-3 or Toyota Yaris Cross (with its Hybrid drivetrain) are more expensive even in their lower variants.

The UX’s Corolla/C-HR connection continues with its 2.0-litre (1987cc) twin-cam four-cylinder petrol engine, delivering 107kW of power at 6000rpm and 188Nm of torque between 4400 and 5200rpm.

The 250h Luxury pairs that with an 80kW/202Nm permanent magnet motor and 1.4kWh Ni-MH battery, for a combined power output of 135kW. A second, rear-mounted motor is available in higher grades, providing all-wheel drive. But not in this Luxury guise.

As with most Toyota and Lexus hybrids, charging is only via the petrol engine and recuperated energy from braking. Electric-only drive is only offered during brief spells of low-speed light-throttle driving, or off-throttle coasting where conditions allow.

Drive is sent to the front wheels via an electronically-controlled continuously variable transmission (CVT). Three modes are offered – 'Eco', 'Normal' and 'Sport'.

Tipping the scales at 1625kg (kerb), the 250h Luxury offers a power-to-weight ratio of nearly 83.1kW per tonne. That’s a hefty output for a hybrid. Top speed is 177km/h, with 0-100km/h needing 8.5 seconds.

Underpinning that performance is a MacPherson-style strut-front and a multi-link rear suspension set-up.

The Fronx is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine with mild-hybrid assistance, driving the front wheels via a six-speed automatic transmission. 

Its outputs are quoted at 76kW and 137Nm, not exactly high-grade stuff and part of the reason the Fronx feels like it takes more than 10 seconds to hit 100km/h.

Officially, the 250h averages an impressive 4.5 litres per 100km on the combined cycle, which is just 103 grams per kilometre of carbon-dioxide emissions.

Now, out in the real world, with plenty of inner-city and urban driving as well as a spell of fast highway runs punctuated by some very heavy-footed acceleration, we managed just under 7.4L/100km pump-to-pump.

That’s not too bad given how hard our UX was caned. The trip meter showed 5.6L/100km over the same distance (nearly 400km).

This is one Lexus hybrid that will happily sip from the standard 91 RON unleaded petrol pump. With a fuel tank capacity of a smallish 43 litres, expect a range of between 930km and 1000km.

For a luxury small crossover, these are economical figures.

Suzuki claims fuel consumption at 4.9L/100km. With its 37-litre fuel tank, the Fronx should be able to manage more than 600km on a single tank, though theoretically its maximum range given its claimed fuel efficiency is 755km.

Before driving the 2023 UX250h hybrid, there was some trepidation.

All versions of the original series from 2018 were tested previously, and in every one bar the base 200 on small wheels and tyres, none lived up to the promise of a premium Lexus crossover. A harsh ride, excessive noise intrusion and dull handling made this model a disappointment.

That’s all in the past, thankfully, thanks to a sustained program to save the UX from mediocrity. The company really got the basics wrong the first time around with the horrid CT200h predecessor back in 2011, so we imagine that it would be damned if this was going down the same sorry path again.

In the 250h Luxury, as reviewed here, it is difficult to objectively fault the way everything works and drives.

Let’s start with performance. Even in Normal or Eco mode, the UX steps off the line briskly, and initially at least, it’s the electric motor and battery that silently whooshes the car forward.

If you’re gentle, you can reach speeds of up to about 40km/h before the petrol engine chimes in unobtrusively.

Beyond that, there’s a stream of electric power you can feel, keeping the acceleration coming on strong, even as speeds rise above 100km/h.

This is also true for Sport mode, except that it all happens a bit quicker and earlier, and with extra urge.

And the welcome news here is that the CVT doesn’t really make the engine sound too droney, unless the driver is mashing the pedal to the metal.

Travelling along at normal urban speeds, there’s a seamless transition from electric-enhanced petrol propulsion back to electric-only if the conditions are right – such as when coasting off-throttle.

This is most common in heavier traffic, and the resulting smoothness and quietness adds to a refined and relaxed experience.

About our only objection is when you apply the brakes. In our test car, they felt a little on/off, like a switch. At times, they seemed too grabby for smooth stopping.

That said, the driver can downshift using the gear lever to provide powertrain braking, to help minimise snatchiness.

Road noise seems to be more muted than before, supporting Lexus’ claims that retuning the suspension and beefing up the structure/chassis has helped with refinement.

We wouldn’t say the UX is at the top of the class for quietness, especially on Australia’s coarse-bitumen highways, but now things have hushed sufficiently enough for a crossover purporting to be a premium.

Where the suspension changes really transform the UX, at least on the 215/60R17 tyres the Luxury wears, is how much softer and comfier the ride is.

Where before there was suddenness there’s now suppleness, substantially improving the experience. We wonder whether the bigger-wheeled rubber the richer grades receive are as well-resolved.

As the 250h Luxury is not trying to be a hot hatch, the resulting body lean through fast corners is a happy trade-off, though it’s not so roly-poly that handling composure is adversely affected.

Plus, the steering – while light and easy at parking speeds – still offers enough response and feedback for most drivers to enjoy taking the UX for a cross-country blast once in a while.

To that end, the steering’s weighting does increase in Sport mode… though you won’t be selling your Peugeot 205 GTi for one just yet, but that previous dullness is history. In fact, whether behind the wheel or ensconced in one of the inviting outboard seats, the UX250h as a whole is a much sunnier experience all-round than before.

How you plan to use the Fronx will make a big difference in whether what you’re about to read is a good thing or not. 

The Fronx is a light SUV for a start, so expecting brilliant handling, effortless acceleration and a dead-quiet cabin is going to mean you’re disappointed.

But if you want something easy, engaging and fun, the Fronx might work for you.

Our brief test loop wasn’t entirely indicative of what the Fronx is likely to face day-to-day. With limited time and no preset drive program, the roads within a 20-or-so minute drive of Nagambie, Victoria had to suffice.

The Fronx fared well on the average road, it turned out, with the 1064kg Suzuki managing to feel planted enough to hurl along 100km/h back-roads without complaints. It rides on the same platform used recently by the Suzuki Baleno, something I’ll admit to not having driven.

The rougher roads didn’t faze the light SUV too much, though consistently uneven surfaces made it feel unsettled in some cornering.

Its steering and suspension give enough feedback to make the right inputs easily, though the nature of its light weight and minimal accoutrement in terms of driver assistance make the Fronx feel very rudimentary from the driver’s seat.

At low speeds around the centre of town, the Fronx manages the state’s terrible roads well, though taking off from intersections can be laborious. Much like overtaking, the drivetrain will complain.

And don’t expect its mild hybrid system to do a lot in the way of hard work - or any work at all, really. You could take the hybrid badge off the car, let someone have a drive, and they’d be none the wiser.

From the limited observations on the launch, the Fronx would feel best at home in suburbia or a metropolitan centre more so than on the Hume Highway or the towns dotted alongside it.

Essentially, this is not a refined road trip car for the highway, but its no-fuss approach to getting around means you shouldn’t be surprised if you start seeing them in the car parks at universities or bowls clubs.

A big part of many buyers’ decisions about a new car is safety, and the Fronx is pretty basic on this front.

Six airbags cover front and sides for the front passengers, and there are curtains down the sides of the car, but there’s no front centre airbag and no ANCAP rating has been applied to the Fronx as yet.

In terms of active safety, the Fronx has listed among its standard features auto emergency braking (AEB), ABS and brake assist, lane departure warning, hill hold control, weaving alert, blind spot monitoring, traffic sign recognition, rear cross traffic alert and a surround-view parking camera with front and rear sensors.

There are also outboard ISOFIX seat fastenings in the second row.

The only safety system that activated during the test was a lane departure warning, but only when (under normal conditions) it would have been necessary as the car approached the road’s centre line.

Lexus offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.

Service intervals are at 12 months or 15,000km.

The first three scheduled services are capped at $495 each, with the work carried out detailed online.

Suzuki has a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty for its new cars, which is a little behind the curve compared to many budget-friendly brands these days. 

Suzuki does have a five-year servicing schedule, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. Total cost is $2005 over the five years, with services averaging $401, which is not particularly cheap.