Honda CR-V 2008 Problems

Only a fraction of the 1.2 million cars on Australia roads with airbags that can spray shrapnel have been fixed, new figures show.

Honda was already on a winner with the CR-V, but the new RE model that arrived in 2007 was a clear and welcome improvement over earlier models.

Graham Smith reviews the 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 Honda CR-V as a used buy.

Most people who ventured beyond the black top in a CR-V returned with a scathing assessment of its ability to handle the rough and tough going. They missed the point, the CR-V isn't an off-roader, it's a high-riding townie, which is why Australians have taken to it the way they have. The CR-V became one of our top-selling SUVs because it won over city dwellers, not bushies.If you want a car that will eat up the bush stop reading now; if you're looking for a car that will serve the family well round town read on. The RE model launched in 2007 was larger, smoother and fresher than the outgoing model it replaced. It was an attractive car, although the front with its gaping intake took some getting used to.The spare wheel was moved from the rear to a position under the car, which said more about the CR-V's intended use than anything else. Anyone heading bush would appreciate the easy access to a spare mounted on the rear, but anyone stuck in town traffic would prefer the easier loading with the spare underneath.The new body was more rigid, which was a boost for its safety and handling, it also made the cabin quieter. As a result of the increased rigidity the on-road feel, never one of the CR-V's strengths was a little sharper making the driver feel more connected than in previous models.The 2.4-litre engine had more power, 7kW by Honda's measure, which boosted its performance slightly. It was never a fireball, and the performance was only marginally increased, but at the same time it was perfectly adequate for its role in the marketplace.A new six-speed manual gearbox was an option alongside the five-speed auto, and the final drive was through the front wheels, but with drive sent to the rear wheels as and when needed for traction. Overall the CR-V was a competent family wagon that did everything well without being particularly outstanding in anything.IN THE SHOPHonda has always enjoyed a solid reputation for building quality cars, and the lack of complaints CarsGuide has received about the CR-V is testimony to the company's continuing commitment to quality. Regular oil changes are a must with Hondas, so check for a verifiable maintenance record.IN A CRASHNew to the CR-V in 2007 was electronic stability control, a worthwhile safety feature by any measure. Already with front and side airbags, and ABS brakes, the addition of stability control completed an impressive safety package.UNDER THE PUMPWith a claim of an average of 10.0 L/100 km - which was backed up in real life tests - it couldn't be said the CR-V was a fuel miser. Fuel required was a minimum of 91-octane unleaded and Honda approved the use of E10. LPG experts recommend against running the multi-valve CR-V engine on LPG, advising that premature valve recession is a real possibility.AT A GLANCEPrice new: $31,990 to $41,990Engine: 2.4-litre 4-cylinder; 125 kW/218 NmTransmission: 6-speed manual, 5-speed auto, on-demand 4WDEconomy: 10.0 L/100 kmBody: WagonVariants: Base, Sport, luxurySafety: 4-star ANCAPGreen: 3.5 stars.VERDICTBigger, roomier, smoother and more powerful than before, the CR-V makes a great family choice.

When the Honda CR-V was first sold in Australia in October 1997 it was a considered to be a genuine 4WD, albeit one intended only for mild conditions. That was almost 20 years ago and the SUV situation has changed markedly in the meantime. Today so-called small SUVs are really station wagons, are frequently driven by