Ford Transit Custom vs Ford Ecosport

What's the difference?

There’s a lot to like here as it provides spacious and comfortable seating for up to five tall adults combined with a huge load volume, one-tonne-plus payload rating, 2500kg towing capacity, peerless safety and an appealing price. It sets a high benchmark for buyers wanting work-and-play practicality and with its sporty good looks and energetic performance is worthy of consideration as a genuine alternative to a conventional van, ute or US pick-up.

So, should you buy a base-model Ford EcoSport Ambiente? 

For the money it’s a great little daily commuter with an odd mix of dated trim and a great multimedia, but it’s definitely worth making room in your budget to investigate the Trend or Titanium grades.

Plus, it’s worth keeping in mind that many competitors now offer more comprehensive safety or more powerful drivetrains for not much more money.

Our test vehicle rides on the LWB Transit Custom’s 3500mm wheelbase and its external dimensions of 5450mm length, 1999mm width and a height of 1985mm, which means it can comfortably access underground or multi-storey car parks. A 12.1-metre turning circle is more compact than 1500-class US pick-ups and closer to Ranger/HiLux-sized utes.

The front-wheel drive chassis platform has smooth-riding four-coil suspension with MacPherson struts up front and an independent rear. Steering is rack and pinion and there’s a quartet of powerful disc brakes.

It’s arguably the best-looking mid-sized van on the market with aggressive frontal styling, wedge-shaped side contours and protruding wheel arches that shroud its alloy wheels.

The interior has a spacious and airy feel, with a stylish mix of contrasting two-tone grey surfaces throughout. This is enhanced with bright blue highlights courtesy of the dual ‘racing’ stripe pattern on the fabric seat facings, which provides visual cohesion with the external stripes.

The EcoSport has had a second refresh this year, simply removing the spare wheel from the back. According to Ford, this was due to consumers not liking the extra 12kg it added to the rear hatch. Fair enough. 

Personally though, I think it detracts from the EcoSport’s look, the rear spare was a cheeky stab at small soft-roaders of the ‘90s. 

The lack of a spare also makes the side-swinging door a bit pointless now (it also swings the wrong way, toward the kerb instead of away from it, due to its European design origins) and just gives the rear three-quarter another anonymous SUV look.

Aside from that the EcoSport has come a long way styling-wise. 

It has ditched the weird hatchback grille it used to have, instead employing a tough-looking single plastic grille insert, bringing it stylistically in line with larger Ford SUVs like the Everest and Escape. Plus, the plastic guards on the underside give it a fun off-roader look.

Importantly, it strays far enough from its Fiesta underpinnings to look like something new entirely, unlike the Holden Trax, which simply looks like a Holden Cruze on stilts…

Inside, it maintains a little too much of that last-generation Fiesta look. The dash juts too far into the cabin, feeling as though it reduces space, and there is an abundance of terrible plastics and hardly aesthetic textures across the entire cockpit.

The seat trim is some el-cheapo nylon material, but at least it will be easy to clean.

A saving grace is the slick-looking multimedia interface, but it looks so much newer than its surroundings its obvious Ford has simply tacked this on as part of a facelift. Thankfully, unlike some other current Fords, the volume, fan-speed and temperature controls are all dials instead of buttons.

The touchscreen itself, as with most new Ford products, is a pleasure to use and not difficult to navigate. The Apple CarPlay connectivity didn’t throw me any lag or problems.

In terms of interior trim, the Honda HR-V is still the target to beat in this segment, but the EcoSport shapes up pretty well compared to the Trax and ASX with their tiny media screens and equally average interior materials.

With its 2167kg kerb weight and 3225kg GVM, our test vehicle has a big 1058kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine ‘one tonner’ designed to carry a full crew and heaps of cargo. Up to 155kg of that can be carried on the cleverly-designed trio of roof racks, which lie flat when not in use but in seconds can be rotated to an upright position and locked in place.

It’s also rated to tow up to 2500kg of braked trailer and with its sizeable 5725kg GCM (or how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can legally carry its maximum payload while towing its maximum trailer weight, which is impressive for a 2.0-litre powertrain.

Standard cargo bay access is through rear barn-doors, but an optional swing-up tailgate is available. These doors open to 180 degrees to optimise loading access and the hinges have enough resistance to keep them open in light winds.

The cargo bay, which is separated from the cabin by a moulded composite bulkhead, has a huge load volume of 4.3 cubic metres which is about 70 per cent of that available in conventional two-seater vans.

Its 2004mm of load-floor length and 1392mm between the wheel-housings also allows it to carry either a standard Aussie pallet or Euro pallet if required, secured by a choice of six load-anchorage points.

The load floor is protected by a composite liner, the walls and doors are neatly lined to mid-height and bright LEDs on the roof provide ample illumination.

There’s generous room not only for the driver and front passenger but also those seated behind. The large sliding doors and assist handles on each side provide easy access to the rear bench seat where even tall people are treated to ample kneeroom, given I’m 186cm and have more than 100mm of knee clearance from the driver’s seat set in my position.

There’s also ample shoulder and headroom, combined with a carpeted and flat floor which with no transmission tunnel provides welcome floor space for those seated in the centre. It feels much like the rear seat of a US pick-up.

Front cabin storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each front door, plus bottle/cupholders on each side of the dash, a large open storage area in the dash-pad, upper and lower lidded glove boxes and two more bottle/cupholders in the centre console.

Rear passengers also get a bottle-holder and bin in each sliding door, plus there’s considerable storage space under the bench seat with a removable frame at the front to retain items.

The only missing item that could make this well-designed cabin even better would be an assist-handle on the left-side A-pillar to help front passengers of shorter stature to climb aboard. Yes, we did have complaints.

Despite being based on a car as compact as the Fiesta (complete with aforementioned dash design that feels like it detracts from space), the EcoSport has a good amount of head and legroom in both seating rows.

In terms of storage, there’s a little trench under the air conditioning controls, two decently-sized cupholders in the centre console and what has to be one of the smallest storage boxes I’ve ever used under the armrest.

Rear passengers get… um… not much. There are no storage areas in the doors, no drop-down centre armrest and no air vents in the back of the centre console. They do get two ISOFIX points on the outer seats, though. At least in terms of dimensions, space is decent back there.

The EcoSport’s boot is large. As Ford provides measurements in SAE rather than VDA, it’s hard to compare number for number, but the boot is deep and tall with the seats up, and with them down there’s a nifty variable boot floor so you can level it out or take advantage of the extra depth.

CarsGuide colleague Matt Campbell points out in his latest range review, that one of the EcoSport's main selling points in other markets is that it can fit a whole washing machine in the boot.

The HR-V still aces this segment in terms of flexibility, but the EcoSport possesses one of the most useful boots in its class.

Oh, and the missing full-size spare wheel on the back? That's now gone entirely, replaced with an inflation kit under the boot floor. Don't blame Ford, blame the consumers.

We’ll start with one of the most appealing points of the EcoSport, and that’s price. Our Ambiente is the base-model and comes in at a total of $22,790 before on-roads.

That’s cheap. Especially when lined up against competitors, like the base automatic Holden Trax LS ($26,490), the automatic Mitsubishi ASX ES ($25,490), and the Honda HR-V VTi ($24,990).

It comes closest to the base-model Suzuki Vitara RT-S, which can be had in automatic form from $23,990.

Obviously cheapest doesn’t always mean best, and you’ll notice right off the bat items like the dorky 16-inch steel wheels with plastic hubcaps, cheap black plastic finishes on the door handles and wing-mirrors and bargain halogen headlamp fittings.

Better features for the price are the wing-mirror mounted indicators, new 6.5-inch multimedia touchscreen with DAB+, two USB ports, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as well as a very welcome reversing camera and rear parking sensors.

Frustratingly, auto headlights are missing… a let down in any 2019 car.

The new touchscreen with Ford’s 'Sync 3' software is the most important value add for the base EcoSport, It’s way better than similar offerings in more expensive base-model competitors, although, unlike the Suzuki Vitara, does not offer sat-nav at this price.

One thing I’m not entirely sure of is why you wouldn’t simply stretch the extra $1700 to upgrade the EcoSport to the mid-spec Trend grade, as it scores a better turbocharged engine, alloy wheels, bigger 8.0-inch multimedia screen with sat-nav, ditches the dorky black plastic finish and adds a leather-trimmed steering wheel. Worth the money for sure.

The 'EcoBlue' 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine produces 125kW of power at 3500rpm with peak torque of 390Nm tapped between 1750-2500rpm. It uses AdBlue to minimise emissions.

The eight-speed torque converter automatic provides the option of sequential manual-shifting using the column-mounted stalk, which can be preferable in some situations when hauling heavy loads. It also offers five drive modes comprising 'Normal' (default), 'Eco', 'Sport', 'Slippery' and 'Tow/Haul'.

The EcoSport Ambiente is the only EcoSport in the range powered by a 1.5-litre non-turbo three-cylinder engine.

The Trend and Titanium levels get a more advanced 1.0-litre three-cylinder turbo engine bearing Ford’s 'EcoBoost' branding.

On paper the 1.5-litre in our car is underpowered. It produces just 90kW/150Nm, comparing poorly to four-cylinder competitors like the Holden Trax with its 1.4-litre turbo (103kW/200Nm), the Mitsubishi ASX with its 2.0-litre non-turbo (110kW/197Nm) and Honda HR-V with its 1.8-litre non-turbo (105kW/172Nm).

In practice though, it’s not too bad. Quite a bit of the available torque arrives early, letting the EcoSport zip around city surroundings with ease. It’s only really out on open roads where you’ll feel the power fade away at higher revs.

All EcoSports have a six-speed torque converter automatic transmission and are front-wheel drive only in Australia.

Ford claims official combined average consumption of 8.0L/100km and the dash display was showing 8.7 when we stopped to refuel at the completion of our 274km test, which comprised the usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a heavy payload.

Our own numbers calculated from actual fuel bowser and tripmeter readings were close to these figures at 9.1, which is still excellent sub-10L/100km economy for a vehicle weighing more than two tonnes dealing with a variety of loads and roads.

Therefore, based on our consumption figure, it should deliver a real-world driving range of around 770km from its 70-litre tank.

The bad news for the 1.5-litre three-cylinder is clearly in this department. 

Ford claims a not-great combined figure of 6.9L/100km, and after my mixed drive (freeways on the weekend, traffic during the week) I managed to add another 2.1 litres to that total, bringing my final number to 9.0L/100km.

An average score, considering you can extract better fuel figures from much bigger and more engaging engines. For comparison, I recently scored 8.0L/100km in the 1.4-litre four-cylinder turbo Suzuki Vitara.

All EcoSports have a 52-litre fuel tank, and happily drink base-grade 91 RON petrol.

It’s spacious and comfortable with a car-like driving position, large left footrest and plenty of steering wheel/seat adjustability including 10-way power adjustment for the driver's seat including lumbar support.

This van is particularly well suited to long-distance driving, given the fold-down inboard and outboard armrests for the driver and front passenger seats. This ‘captain’s chair’ design provides ideal elbow support to minimise neck and shoulder strain during long days on the road.

The 2.0-litre turbo-diesel’s ample 390Nm of torque ensures spirited response regardless of drive mode, with the well-calibrated auto ensuring most driving occurs within the engine’s peak torque band which is right where you want it.

Ride quality and handling are excellent and remain consistent regardless of payloads. Although the driver’s rear view is minimal through the small bulkhead window, the large truck-style door mirrors combined with a reversing camera and active driver aids like blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and parking sensors make it easy to live with in busy urban settings.

It’s also an effortless highway cruiser, with the engine only needing around 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h which is comfortably within its peak torque band. Most noise at these speeds, which is far from intrusive, comes from the tyres as engine and wind noise are negligible.

To test its GVM rating, we loaded 650kg into the cargo bay which combined with our two-man crew equalled a total payload of 830kg. Although sizeable, that was still more than 200kg shy of its legal limit.

The coil-spring rear suspension compressed 55mm under this loading, with long cone-shaped jounce-rubbers mounted on the chassis rails above being pressed into service to provide a second stage of weight support. This design is very effective in providing a smooth ride free of any jarring thuds over bumps when heavily loaded.

It made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h, easily hauling this heavy payload to the summit. Engine-braking on the way down, in a manually-selected second gear, was equally competent as no pedal-braking was required to stay below the 60km/h posted speed limit during this descent.

Our only driving criticism was an annoying rattle coming from the window in the right-side sliding-door (close to the driver's ear) and another emanating from the cargo bay over larger bumps.

The EcoSport is a great city companion. With long suspension travel that’s comfortable and compliant, neglected infrastructure didn’t bother the ride much at all, and it was surprisingly quiet during our week.

Prodding the accelerator too far will only lead to disappointment, the engine starts to make a bit more noise, but doesn’t propel the car with an equal amount of gusto. It’s hardly the most entertaining car to drive, even in the small SUV segment.

The steering is great, if a little light and the transmission makes itself largely unknown. Ford’s choice to stick with a torque converter rather than a CVT has probably saved this little engine from being a major let down.

All those features combine with a high seating position and great visibility for a little SUV that’s simply easy to pilot in urban surroundings. 

More can be had from competitors like the HR-V with its excellent ride, and the Suzuki Vitara with its fun-packed engine, but Ford has nailed the experience for daily commuters.

The EcoSport carries a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating as of December 2017, although it has not been rated to the more stringent standards introduced in 2018 that place a higher importance on autonomous systems.

No EcoSport grade has auto emergency braking (AEB), Lane Keep Assist (LKAS) or active cruise, but Blind Spot Monitoring (BSM) does become available on the top Titanium grade.

It’s a letdown given most competitors are now at least offering low-speed AEB.

Our understanding is that Ford doesn’t even plan to add those more recent active safety features to the EcoSport for the foreseeable future, unlike the Suzuki Vitara which is set to get features like AEB soon.

The Ambiente still has seven airbags, the standard suite of stability systems and hill decent control, as well as the aforementioned reversing camera and rear parking sensors.

The vehicle is covered by a five year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/30,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price servicing for the first four scheduled services up to four years/120,000km totals $1996 or $499 per service.

Just like Mazda, Honda and Holden, Ford has updated its warranty recently to five-years/unlimited km coverage. Kia doesn’t operate in the small SUV segment (unless you count the quirky Soul) so five years is the bar to beat.

The 1.5-litre non-turbo three-cylinder engine option was not available in Ford’s service calculator tool at the time of writing but expect it to cost between $230-270 per regular service, jumping to somewhere just under $500 every four years (assuming it keeps a similar pricing structure to the previous engine options).

Ford offers a free loan car while your car is down for servicing, which needs to happen once a year or every 15,000km.