Ford F150 vs Tesla Model X

What's the difference?

This update to the F-150 is long overdue and while it does a lot to address previous faults, Ford is going to have a hard time winning back the public’s trust on this vehicle.

Given the pre-update car was subject to so many recalls and stop-sales, it’s hard to shake that somewhat tarnished reputation.

In saying that, the F-150 is arguably the pick out of its rivals. It’s bold with lots of nifty features, has acres of space, plenty of towing capabilities and is surprisingly efficient.

Just be prepared for your hip pocket nerve to ache when you see the price tag, especially if you opt for the flagship Platinum trim.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

After nearly 700km of testing with both cars, it’s fair to say that the Tesla is indeed a capable tow vehicle, provided you keep the distances relatively short and plan around charge station locations.

Overall average - Penrith to Bathurst to Penrith

Fuel and energy consumption will always depend on the driving conditions, which is why we chose different routes for each leg of our testing.

Averaged across the two legs, towing the caravan with the Model X used 101 per cent more energy than without, or halved its driving range, which sounds a bit scary.

The LandCruiser by comparison added 63 per cent on average, which is still a big difference, but matters less in the real world when its big fuel tanks would still give you about 760km of driving range, which can be refilled quickly at any diesel-stocked servo.

So you could do a weekend trip with the caravan from Penrith with one supercharge in Bathurst, but it would’ve been highly unlikely to manage the extra 55km if you were leaving from Sydney CBD.

The bottom line is that there’s plenty of things - like smaller camper trailers - lighter than our caravan that will help the Tesla to do the towing job better right now.

Compared to the ‘Cruiser, the Tesla is a lesson in the benefits of a lower centre of gravity and road-focused handling.

As always, bigger batteries and more recharge points will go a long way to rectifying the Tesla’s towing shortcomings, and I'm sure we'll get there eventually.

But no matter what, its acceleration performance under load is simply excellent.

Thanks to our friends at Avida for making this test possible with the use of the 17-foot Avida Wave Tourer Electric Pop-Top single-axle caravan. They can also be reached on 1300 428 432.

Although the F-150 retains the same 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 engine as the pre-update model, this is no bad thing as it’s a sweet and perky unit with plenty of rolling acceleration.

It gets this large, lumbering pick-up moving with no problems and makes you wonder why you wanted a V8 engine in the first place.

In the Lariat and Platinum some fake engine noise is pumped into the cabin through the speakers. I don’t hate it as it adds an almost V8-like gargle to the note.

Like before there’s a 10-speed automatic transmission which has a lot of ratios to choose from and sometimes can take a beat to kick down if you punch the accelerator harder.

It also feels like the transmission is constantly changing gears when you’re accelerating and as a result it almost sounds like a vehicle equipped with a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

In saying this though, the transmission is just keeping the engine within its torque band so acceleration is punchier.

With this update Ford was required to change the steering rack fitted to the locally converted F-150. Previously it was a Ranger unit and while Ford hasn’t detailed what the new steering rack is, it said it’s an amalgamation of existing Ford parts.

It’s hard to say definitively how different the steering feels from the pre-update model without driving them back to back, however, it does feel just a touch heavier than before. This isn’t bad as the F-150 is a big unit and it makes steering feel more substantial.

While you may be lulled at times into thinking this is just an overgrown Ranger on the open road, if you start driving with more intent and on twisty roads, this is far from a dynamic car. It also fills the lane quite generously, leaving minimal space between the painted lines.

The suspension, especially at the front end, is rather American and feels floaty, taking multiple movements to settle over bumps or undulations.

Thankfully this is where the flagship F-150 Platinum’s adaptive dampers come to save the day. In the Tow/Haul and Sport drive modes, the dampers are stiffened to create a more compliant ride and in reality they do iron out road imperfections better.

I particularly like how the ride in the Sport drive mode feels from behind the wheel, however there’s no way to split out the Sport suspension from the Sport engine calibration. This means you’re always driving around with the revs flared.

I wish there was a custom drive mode where you could pick and choose the engine, transmission and suspension calibrations. This would be a game changer for F-150 Platinum buyers.

In terms of towing, it’s the F-150’s bread and butter. With a 4500kg braked towing capacity, you can tow virtually anything without the pick-up breaking a sweat.

The Tow/Haul drive mode makes it feel even easier, plus having the Pro Trailer back-up assist takes the hard work out of reversing with a trailer.

Around town and even out on the highway, the F-150 is an incredibly quiet and serene car to drive, despite its heft. The transmission usually opts for the highest gear possible and you can barely hear it whirring away under the bonnet.

Surprisingly there’s barely any wind or tyre noise present in the cabin. Ford seems to have done an excellent job at insulating the F-150.

The only note I’ll make is the lack of noise makes you pick up on minor interior creaks and rattles more obviously. This isn’t ideal in a brand-new car.

Energy consumption is just one element of a tow vehicle though, with stability, braking and acceleration performance being the most important details.

The big ‘Cruiser is always a safe bet for towing heavy loads, but it's fair to say its off-road ability, tall body and short wheelbase mean it could be better on the road, and the Tesla goes some way to proving that.

With all those batteries mounted nice and low, the Tesla is significantly more stable with 1.7 tonnes on the back than the LandCruiser, in all conditions. It’s also helped by that longer wheelbase.

The Tesla’s airbag suspension is another surprise advantage, and while it can be a bit choppy around town over minor bumps, bigger bumps on the highway are soaked up really nicely and it all settles quicker than with the LandCruiser - even with the caravan on the back.

Tesla is famous for instant acceleration at any speed, and this effect remains when towing. The LandCruiser’s twin-turbo V8 (with max torque available from 1600-2600rpm) has long been a benchmark for tow vehicles, but the Model X makes it feel sluggish by comparison.

You know how caravan vehicles are usually the slow ones up hills? This time, we were the ones doing the overtaking, even up the steep bends heading out of Lithgow. To overtake, it just takes the slightest flex of your right foot.

Clearly there’s a big caveat though when it comes to how much energy it’s consuming while you’re enjoying that performance, and it’s deceptive because it doesn’t make any more noise like a conventional engine when you’re pushing it. 

You’d also think the weight of the van would overcome the engine-braking effect of the regenerative brakes, but they are still very effective at conserving your brakes downhill and preventing the car from running away from you, and no doubt giving the batteries a bigger boost at the same time.

On that note, the LandCruiser’s cruise control also does a great job of witholding speed on downhill runs, proactively dropping gears to engine brake enough to keep the Avida Wave in check.