Chery Tiggo 4 PRO vs Ford Transit Custom

What's the difference?

Is the Tiggo 4 Pro the best light SUV on the market? No, it falls short in some key areas, but there’s also a lot to like about it.

The driving dynamics needs more tuning to put it on par with its class rivals. I believe the Chinese brand that invests in a local ride and handling program in the same way Hyundai and Kia have done in the past decade will have a big advantage with customers. The Tiggo 4 feels too vague and unresolved at times, especially in the wet, and that could be rectified with some minor tweaks.

The safety systems also need some major work to make them smoother and less intrusive so you don’t go searching for the button to switch them off - which defeats the purpose of having them in the first place.

But if you can look past (or accept) the driving and active safety issues, there are some big plus points for Chery’s latest model. It looks great inside and out, offers up plenty of value and is as practical as a compact SUV can be.

Chery has come a long way in a short space of time and with some more improvements it’s easy to see it continuing its sales growth with models like the Tiggo 4 Pro.

There’s a lot to like here as it provides spacious and comfortable seating for up to five tall adults combined with a huge load volume, one-tonne-plus payload rating, 2500kg towing capacity, peerless safety and an appealing price. It sets a high benchmark for buyers wanting work-and-play practicality and with its sporty good looks and energetic performance is worthy of consideration as a genuine alternative to a conventional van, ute or US pick-up.

This is the area where Chery has made immense progress in such a short period of time, which underlines the rapid rate of change the Chinese car industry has been able to manage.

Whereas the J11 I drove all those years ago was a mess, seemingly designed by a team of people not allowed to talk to each other, the Tiggo 4 Pro looks smart and stylish on the outside and in the cabin.

While there are some elements of rival models to the look, there’s also a clear family design to all the Chery Tiggo models that helps create a cohesive look across the range.

It took the South Korean brands nearly two decades to achieve this level of design evolution, so it’s impressive (and worrying for rivals) that the Chinese brands have managed to do it so much quicker.

Inside, the cabin design is not only a major step forward and looks very nice for an SUV at this price point in terms of the presentation and technology.

The dual 10.2-inch screens look more premium than the car's price suggests, as does the lower digital screen for the climate control settings as well as the soft-touch finishes and gloss black trim.

Our test vehicle rides on the LWB Transit Custom’s 3500mm wheelbase and its external dimensions of 5450mm length, 1999mm width and a height of 1985mm, which means it can comfortably access underground or multi-storey car parks. A 12.1-metre turning circle is more compact than 1500-class US pick-ups and closer to Ranger/HiLux-sized utes.

The front-wheel drive chassis platform has smooth-riding four-coil suspension with MacPherson struts up front and an independent rear. Steering is rack and pinion and there’s a quartet of powerful disc brakes.

It’s arguably the best-looking mid-sized van on the market with aggressive frontal styling, wedge-shaped side contours and protruding wheel arches that shroud its alloy wheels.

The interior has a spacious and airy feel, with a stylish mix of contrasting two-tone grey surfaces throughout. This is enhanced with bright blue highlights courtesy of the dual ‘racing’ stripe pattern on the fabric seat facings, which provides visual cohesion with the external stripes.

Starting with the question of space, the Tiggo 4 Pro actually offers up good room, for what is ultimately a compact SUV. No, it’s not ideal for a family of five, but for anyone looking for an urban-friendly runabout for singles or couples, it plays that role nicely.

The fronts seats are quite nice, comfortable and offer good support. There’s adequate space in the back to take children, or even adults, with some compromise to the front seat position, but that’s in line with expectations for any model this size externally.

The boot holds a claimed 380 litres, which is quite generous when you compare it to the likes of the CX-3 (264L) and Venue (355L), but can’t match the likes of the Yaris Cross (397L) and Nissan Juke (422L).

The technology in the car is impressive for an SUV this size, especially given the price. The dual 10.2-inch displays look slick, as does the lower screen for climate control, which gives a hint of Audi or Range Rover vibe to the cabin.

The multimedia system is straightforward to use, thanks in large part to the wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, but I did find the ‘Hello Chery’ voice command system hit and miss - although, to be fair to Chery, I find all these voice command systems hit and miss.

One minor amusement is the ‘welcome theme’ that plays when you get in the car. Many brands do this trick, a short musical jingle when you open the door to welcome you inside. The team at Chery went a little overboard, though, and wrote a whopping 15-second theme (yes, I timed it with a stopwatch), which feels like major overkill. Thankfully it can be turned off in the set-up menu.

With its 2167kg kerb weight and 3225kg GVM, our test vehicle has a big 1058kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine ‘one tonner’ designed to carry a full crew and heaps of cargo. Up to 155kg of that can be carried on the cleverly-designed trio of roof racks, which lie flat when not in use but in seconds can be rotated to an upright position and locked in place.

It’s also rated to tow up to 2500kg of braked trailer and with its sizeable 5725kg GCM (or how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can legally carry its maximum payload while towing its maximum trailer weight, which is impressive for a 2.0-litre powertrain.

Standard cargo bay access is through rear barn-doors, but an optional swing-up tailgate is available. These doors open to 180 degrees to optimise loading access and the hinges have enough resistance to keep them open in light winds.

The cargo bay, which is separated from the cabin by a moulded composite bulkhead, has a huge load volume of 4.3 cubic metres which is about 70 per cent of that available in conventional two-seater vans.

Its 2004mm of load-floor length and 1392mm between the wheel-housings also allows it to carry either a standard Aussie pallet or Euro pallet if required, secured by a choice of six load-anchorage points.

The load floor is protected by a composite liner, the walls and doors are neatly lined to mid-height and bright LEDs on the roof provide ample illumination.

There’s generous room not only for the driver and front passenger but also those seated behind. The large sliding doors and assist handles on each side provide easy access to the rear bench seat where even tall people are treated to ample kneeroom, given I’m 186cm and have more than 100mm of knee clearance from the driver’s seat set in my position.

There’s also ample shoulder and headroom, combined with a carpeted and flat floor which with no transmission tunnel provides welcome floor space for those seated in the centre. It feels much like the rear seat of a US pick-up.

Front cabin storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each front door, plus bottle/cupholders on each side of the dash, a large open storage area in the dash-pad, upper and lower lidded glove boxes and two more bottle/cupholders in the centre console.

Rear passengers also get a bottle-holder and bin in each sliding door, plus there’s considerable storage space under the bench seat with a removable frame at the front to retain items.

The only missing item that could make this well-designed cabin even better would be an assist-handle on the left-side A-pillar to help front passengers of shorter stature to climb aboard. Yes, we did have complaints.

The Transit Custom Sport Double Cab comes standard with the same 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel and eight-speed automatic as all other (non-electric) Transit Customs, for a list price of $62,990. Our example is finished in 'Magnetic', which is a metallic 'Prestige Paint' option that adds $700 to this price.

For that spend, the standard equipment list includes 17-inch matt black alloy wheels with 215/60R17 tyres and a steel spare, LED headlights with DRL signatures, LED tail-lights, a unique Sports grille, dual ‘racing’ body-stripes and side decals, a unique Sports body kit (including a rear spoiler) plus soft-close sliding side-doors.

Step inside using the smart keyless entry/start and you’ll find a carpeted floor, 'Sports' seating with blue accent stripes, dual fold-down armrests on the driver and front passenger bucket seats, dual-zone climate control, a lidded upper glove box, six front and two rear USB ports, a centre console with 12V socket and wireless phone-charging, a moulded composite bulkhead with internal window, pop-out latch-style windows in the sliding side-doors and more.

The driver also gets a 12-inch colour digital instrument cluster with configurable display plus there’s a 13-inch colour touchscreen display for the multimedia system which includes four-speaker audio, digital radio, Apple CarPlay/Android Auto/Bluetooth connectivity and 'SYNC' voice-activated commands.

As mentioned earlier, both Tiggo 4 variants are motivated by the same powertrain. Specifically, it’s a 1.5-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT) driving the front wheels.

It makes 108kW/210Nm, which is quite competitive against its rivals, which adds another layer of appeal. The CVT does a decent job and the engine pulls strongly and smoothly in most situations. It’s one of the more impressive elements of the dynamic package.

The 'EcoBlue' 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine produces 125kW of power at 3500rpm with peak torque of 390Nm tapped between 1750-2500rpm. It uses AdBlue to minimise emissions.

The eight-speed torque converter automatic provides the option of sequential manual-shifting using the column-mounted stalk, which can be preferable in some situations when hauling heavy loads. It also offers five drive modes comprising 'Normal' (default), 'Eco', 'Sport', 'Slippery' and 'Tow/Haul'.

The official fuel economy figure for the combined cycle is 7.3L/100km, which is well off class-leading for a compact SUV.

The Kia Stonic has claimed ratings between 5.4-6.7L/100km (depending on the model) and the Mazda CX-3 has a 6.3L/100km claim, but Hyundai’s Venue manages 7.0-7.2L/100km to make Chery’s figure stand out less.

We saw a 9.2L/100km on the trip computer on test, but that was almost exclusively urban driving. The claimed urban cycle figure is 8.9L/100km, so the real-world economy isn’t too far off Chery's claim.

However, it’s clear that the punchy engine performance comes at a cost of efficiency, so that should be factored into your consideration of the Tiggo 4.

It does have a fairly large 51-litre fuel tank, which means it has a theoretical driving range of nearly 700km.

Ford claims official combined average consumption of 8.0L/100km and the dash display was showing 8.7 when we stopped to refuel at the completion of our 274km test, which comprised the usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a heavy payload.

Our own numbers calculated from actual fuel bowser and tripmeter readings were close to these figures at 9.1, which is still excellent sub-10L/100km economy for a vehicle weighing more than two tonnes dealing with a variety of loads and roads.

Therefore, based on our consumption figure, it should deliver a real-world driving range of around 770km from its 70-litre tank.

The Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate made a strong first impression… until the moment I started driving it. As impressive as the brand’s design evolution has been, there is still work to be done on the dynamic side. 

While the engine performance is good, the ride needs some fine-tuning as it’s quite soft, which is good for soaking up bumps but also means less chassis control.

The bigger issues are the steering and the brakes, both of which are below the level of Chery’s rivals in this segment.

The steering is too light, which normally wouldn’t be a deal-breaker as it makes parking and navigating traffic easy, but combined with it being unevenly weighted it becomes problematic.

It leads to a disconnected feeling between the driver and the road, and while I understand that a compact SUV doesn’t have to have sports car-like ‘steering feel’, it feels disconnected and that leads to it feeling vague to drive at times.

It doesn’t help that the Giti tyres fitted to our test car don’t provide very good grip, especially in the wet. During a summer rain shower the front end of the Tiggo 4 felt like it was going to understeer at times, with very little grip when turning, even at low speeds.

This problem is compounded by a long brake pedal, with very little initial bite when you press it. Instead, you need to bury your foot in order to get the Chery to slow with any sense of urgency and that led to some uneasy moments during our test drive.

Then there’s the adaptive cruise control, which I’ll dive into later in ‘Safety’, but has a major impact on the driving experience. Put simply, it has very poorly calibrated lane keeping assistance when the cruise control is activated, which seemingly cannot be turned off, despite turning off lane keeping assistance separately.

This leads to the car drifting in the lane until it finds the lane marking and then rather aggressively tugging the steering wheel to push you into the centre - and then begin the process again. This leads to near-constant tugging of the wheel in your hand which is as unnerving as it is annoying.

It’s spacious and comfortable with a car-like driving position, large left footrest and plenty of steering wheel/seat adjustability including 10-way power adjustment for the driver's seat including lumbar support.

This van is particularly well suited to long-distance driving, given the fold-down inboard and outboard armrests for the driver and front passenger seats. This ‘captain’s chair’ design provides ideal elbow support to minimise neck and shoulder strain during long days on the road.

The 2.0-litre turbo-diesel’s ample 390Nm of torque ensures spirited response regardless of drive mode, with the well-calibrated auto ensuring most driving occurs within the engine’s peak torque band which is right where you want it.

Ride quality and handling are excellent and remain consistent regardless of payloads. Although the driver’s rear view is minimal through the small bulkhead window, the large truck-style door mirrors combined with a reversing camera and active driver aids like blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and parking sensors make it easy to live with in busy urban settings.

It’s also an effortless highway cruiser, with the engine only needing around 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h which is comfortably within its peak torque band. Most noise at these speeds, which is far from intrusive, comes from the tyres as engine and wind noise are negligible.

To test its GVM rating, we loaded 650kg into the cargo bay which combined with our two-man crew equalled a total payload of 830kg. Although sizeable, that was still more than 200kg shy of its legal limit.

The coil-spring rear suspension compressed 55mm under this loading, with long cone-shaped jounce-rubbers mounted on the chassis rails above being pressed into service to provide a second stage of weight support. This design is very effective in providing a smooth ride free of any jarring thuds over bumps when heavily loaded.

It made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h, easily hauling this heavy payload to the summit. Engine-braking on the way down, in a manually-selected second gear, was equally competent as no pedal-braking was required to stay below the 60km/h posted speed limit during this descent.

Our only driving criticism was an annoying rattle coming from the window in the right-side sliding-door (close to the driver's ear) and another emanating from the cargo bay over larger bumps.

The Transit Custom comes with a maximum five-star ANCAP rating (from testing in 2024) during which it achieved a premium 'Platinum' grading with a near-perfect 96 per cent score in the Commercial Van Safety Comparison for collision avoidance.

It features seven airbags including side-curtains for the rear seat, AEB with intersection assist, roll-over mitigation, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, traffic sign recognition, trailer sway control, tyre pressure monitoring, front/rear parking sensors, a 180-degree reversing camera and lots more. Both outer rear seating positions have ISOFIX anchors and top-tether child seat restraint points.

As a still new-to-Australia brand, Chery has made the smart move and is offering a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty plus capped-price servicing and roadside assistance for the same period on all models. This gives buyers taking a chance on an unfamiliar brand some peace-of-mind should anything go wrong.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km (whichever comes first) and servicing is only $280 for the first five workshop visits, rising to $375.64 for the sixth service and $295.54 for the final one covered by the initial plan.

That means a total of just over $2071 to maintain your Tiggo 4 Pro for the first seven years of ownership.

There are still long-term questions about reliability and residual values Chery needs to answer, but only time can tell what those answers will be. Given that, the seven years of ownership coverage is a strong offer.

The vehicle is covered by a five year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/30,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price servicing for the first four scheduled services up to four years/120,000km totals $1996 or $499 per service.