SUV

Subaru has confirmed it will unveil a first-ever hybrid version of one of its Wilderness models at this week’s New York International Auto Show and the brand’s current US line-up suggests it will be based on the Forester Wilderness.That spells big trouble for rivalling family favourites - the Toyota RAV4, Mazda CX-5 and Hyundai Tucson - which can't match the Forester Wilderness' ruggedness.Initially developed for North America, there are currently three Wildnerness varieties - the Outback Wilderness launched in early 2021, the Forester Wilderness that followed later the same year and the Crosstrek Wilderness, which arrived in 2023.Typical upgrades include increased ride height with extra ground clearance, greater roof load capacity, revised transmission gearing and all-terrain tyres to optimise low-speed traction, matt black wheels, retuned ‘X-Mode’ off-highway settings and a transmission oil cooler.All are produced at Subaru’s US manufacturing plant in Lafayette, Indiana. But the US-only factor was side-stepped when the Subaru Outback Wilderness hit Australian off-road tracks in February this year. And Subaru Australia General Manager Scott Lawrence  has previously told CarsGuide to “watch this space” on further Wilderness developments.Subaru currently offers Crosstrek and Forester Hybrid models in the USA, and a Wilderness Hybrid version of the latter is more likely as the Forester Hybrid is built in America while the Crosstrek Hybrid is produced in Japan. If the new Wilderness variant is indeed based on the Forester it’s likely to feature the current Forester Hybrid’s powertrain that combines a (121kW/212Nm) 2.5-litre petrol engine with two electric motors (90kW/276Nm) integrated into the car’s continuously variable transmission (CVT) for total system power of 145kW.You could also expect miserly 6.2L/100km fuel consumption on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle and a 1000km-plus range from every 63-litre tank of fuel.Over and above the upgrades detailed above, the Forester Wilderness features a specific nose treatment including a unique grille, skid plates, fog lights, anodized copper accents, and a glare-reducing matt black bonnet decal.Subaru has also confirmed it will unveil an “all-new, all-electric SUV” in New York, positioned under a theme of “Fast. Family. Fun.” and likely based on the recently released pure-electric Toyota Highlander (Kluger).

The Toyota Prado and LandCruiser have largely been the default choices for family SUVs in rural and remote Australia for decades now but as fuel prices crunch, some alternatives are seeming more desirable than ever.BYD’s premium spin-off brand, Denza, launched in Australia earlier this year with the Prado-sized B5 and LandCruiser 300 Series-rivaling B8 SUVs.Both offer a plug-in hybrid (PHEV) set-up, which combines dual electric motors (one on each axle) with a turbocharged petrol engine that generally acts as a generator to top up the battery pack but is also capable of directly powering the front wheels.Denza claims the B5 and B8 can travel up to 100km and 115km on electric power alone, respectively, according to NEDC testing.If you have the capability to charge at home, whether that be with or without solar, and have a commute of around 100km or less, you can theoretically travel on electric power alone and save massively on fuel costs.Using an electric price of 35c/kWh as a frame of reference, fully charging the B5 and B8’s battery costs $11.13 and $12.88, respectively.For many rural and remote Australians their commutes are considerably longer than 100km and this is where the peace of mind of the petrol engine comes into play.Denza claims the B5 and B8 have a combined range of 975km and 1040km, respectively, both according to the more lenient NEDC testing.The diesel-powered Toyota Prado and LandCruiser 300 Series have theoretical ranges of up to 1392km and 1236km, respectively, when using their ADR 81/02 claimed fuel consumptions.Sure the Denzas offer less overall range on paper, but previous experiences with the Prado and LandCruiser have shown they both consume more fuel than they claim, so expect less overall range between diesel refills.The new Prado also requires AdBlue and, depending on driving style and conditions, consumes around one litre of AdBlue every 500km. This means a full refill could be required every 8500km.Denza claims the B5 and B8 consumes 1.9L/100km and 2.0L/100km, respectively, when the battery pack is between 100 and 25 per cent of charge, according to NEDC testing. These figures are largely arbitrary though as much of the test cycle is driven on EV power.Where the real story is how much fuel is consumed when the battery pack is under 25 per cent charge. Denza claims the B5 and B8 consume 9.5L/100km and 9.9L/100km, respectively.During the media launch for the Denza B5 and B8 where we drove both of these cars on remote highways in the Flinders Ranges locked at 70 per cent battery charge, we saw average fuel consumption figures between 8.0L/100km and 9.0L/100km according to the trip computer read-out.One consideration is that diesel is largely more readily available in remote Australia than petrol. However, both the Denza B5 and B8 only require a minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol.In saying this though, Denza has noted it’s unclear how the B5 and B8 performs on Opal fuel, which is a low-aromatic fuel that doesn’t contain the properties that create a high when sniffed and is more prolific in central Australia.While fuel is a major consideration for budget-conscious car buyers right now, there are a number of other factors that off-road-ready family SUV buyers consider.The Denza B5 has a braked towing capacity of 3000kg, which is slightly under the segment benchmark, however the B8 has a braked towing capacity of 3500kg. The latter matches what the Toyota Prado and LandCruiser offer.Due to the heft of the battery pack, the B5 and B8 are much heavier than the Prado and LandCruiser. Instead of having a kerb weight about 2500kg, the Denzas weigh more than 3000kg.The B8 in particular has a kerb weight of about 3300kg, making it Australia’s heaviest SUV.Payload in the B5 is between 490kg and 600kg, depending on the trim level, which isn’t a great deal as the Prado offers between 580kg and 615kg, depending on the trim level.The B5 only offers a five-seat configuration, whereas the Prado does offer a five- and seven-seat configuration, depending on the trim level.While payload in the B8 is 702kg across the line-up which is more on par with the 650kg-785kg payload the LandCruiser 300 Series offers.The B8 has a six- or seven-seat configuration across three rows, depending on the trim level, whereas the LandCruiser 300 Series has either five or seven seats, depending on the trim level.Both Denzas offer four-wheel drive systems with a low-range mode and, depending on the version, rear and front-locking differentials.Then there’s pricing. The 2026 Denza B5 is priced from $74,990 and $79,990 before on-road costs, whereas the Prado costs between $73,200 and $100,690 before on-road costs.The 2026 Denza B8 is priced between $91,000 and $97,900 before on-road costs, whereas the LandCruiser 300 Series costs between $99,340 and $147,910 before on-road costs.Both Denzas offer a more premium level of specification on par with the likes of Lexus.Where Denza will be fighting an uphill battle against Toyota is with its dealer network. The former is still scaling in Australia and will lean on its connections with BYD to get wide service coverage.Toyota has the largest dealer network out of any carmaker in Australia. It has over 250 locations, whereas Denza is planning to have 25-30 dealers by the end of 2026.While this op-ed has largely focused on the new Denza SUVs, there are a few notable family SUV rivals that also offer PHEV powertrains.Examples include the similarly off-road-ready GWM Tank 300 and Tank 500 PHEVs, as well as more on-road-oriented rivals like the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the Chery Tiggo 8 and Tiggo 9 Super Hybrids.

In month two of ‘owning’ a 2026 Zeekr 7X RWD, it has proven to be very easy to live with, which is something you can’t say about a lot of new cars these days (hello, annoying safety alerts).I introduced the all-electric mid-size SUV last month in part one of this three-part long-term review, covering its pricing, features (including safety), powertrain, efficiency, warranty and servicing.But in this second instalment, I will be deep-diving the 7X’s design inside and out, as well as its all-important practicality.Without further ado, let’s get to it!From certain angles, you could mistake the Zeekr 7X for any number of Chinese electric SUVs.That said, its signature design element is arguably the ‘eyebrow’ that connects its LED headlights together and wraps around the front wheelarches.This black panel is more apparent if your exterior paint isn’t also black, but it helps to break up the otherwise grille-less, concave wall of body colour.A full-width daytime running light (DRL) bisects the eyebrow, providing even more visual punch.Look a little closer and you’ll notice the 7X has a clamshell bonnet, which is seldom seen.Its haunches are muscular, a theme that carries over to the side, which has mostly smooth door panels with the obligatory pop-out door handles.For the RWD, the latter automatically opens the doors slightly when a hand is placed on them, significantly reducing the effort to open them fully.The windows are frameless, adding to the luxury feel, while the arms of the side mirrors are unusually separated and stacked to accommodate some cameras and sensors for the safety systems.Underneath the RWD’s well-defined wheelarches are a nice-looking multi-spoke set of 19-inch alloy wheels.The roofline avoids the headroom-reducing ‘coupe’ trend and remains relatively boxy, although its C-pillars spruce things up with floating elements.At the rear, the 7X is at its most anonymous with its full-width LED tail-lights and large, black bumper insert, although the former sits just below a ducktail spoiler of sorts, which is borne of the rear wheelarches and contributes to the concave theme that carries over there.Inside, the 7X RWD makes a very strong first impression.Instantly, you’ll find yourself searching for the spec sheet to double check its sub-$60K price, such is the high level of its perceived quality.This genuine sense of luxury carries all the way through the cabin, with soft-touch materials used on seemingly every surface.Covering the seats, armrests and door inserts, the RWD’s artificial leather upholstery is so supple that I initially thought I’d accidentally picked up the keys for the flagship Performance, which has high-end Nappa coverings.A textured vinyl is the secondary material, which is applied to the dashboard, centre console and door inserts.The door shoulders and cards are even stitched to make things that little bit fancy.Rubberised bottoms and felted sides elevate the door bins, while layered LED ambient lighting links the dashboard with all four doors, creating a wraparound effect.The general interior design is otherwise full of straight lines and features plenty of layers, resulting in a structured feel.And then there’s the technology, with a 13.0-inch digital instrument cluster ahead of the driver, providing all the key information they need, but without the level of customisation that some may want.Located to the left, the 16.0-inch touchscreen draws eyes with its ‘floating’ style and relatively thin bezels.However, the large display misses the mark with its positioning, as in most driving positions the left side of the steering wheel conceals the far end of its right side, which is where a number of shortcut buttons are displayed, whether you’re using the default multimedia system or wirelessly smartphone mirroring. Whoops.The multimedia system itself is easy enough to use once you’re familiar with it.Specifically, you will find yourself having to learn Zeekr’s names for some common functions, but once you are there you can confidently find what you need.It is great to see Zeekr include a row of physical controls below, but it is a shame that none of them are for operating the dual-zone climate system.Granted the touchscreen’s controls are omnipresent in its bottom row, but nothing beats the ease of something physical, which is a big reason why the increasingly rare steering wheel buttons here work so well.Another climate-related annoyance is the fact that the direction of the front air vents can only be controlled via the touchscreen.There are a multitude of options, but it would be nice to physically move the air to just the right spot – like the good, old days!I would also like it if the indicator stalk clicked into place when in use, as that physical feedback is currently missed.Visibility is also compromised via the wedge-shaped side mirrors and letterbox-shaped rear window, which is further compromised by the protruding second-row headrests.And then there is the square-shaped key fob, which inexplicably lacks an attached point for a key ring or the like, making it easier to lose than it should be.Other than that, the 7X’s interior is a practicality masterclass for a mid-size SUV.Up front, the seats are extremely comfortable. Perhaps Zeekr tapped into some of the expertise of its sister brand, Volvo.Amenities wise, the door bins accommodate up to three regular bottles, while there are two cupholders in the centre console, complete with a sliding lid.Behind them is a very deep central storage bin, which has a lid that opens from either the driver or passenger side.In front are two wireless smartphone chargers, which complete the bridge design, with a large, open storage tray located below, alongside two USB-C ports.The wide but shallow glovebox can only be opened via the touchscreen, which is becoming a bit of a trend these days.There is no overhead sunglasses holder in an otherwise faultless first row.In the second row things are arguably even more impressive, with a ridiculous amount of legroom available behind my 182cm driving position.Headroom is also generous, at more than two inches with the panoramic sunroof’s sunblind in place.Three adults can sit abreast in relative comfort, too, with the almost flat floor affording them plenty of foot space, while the availability of power reclining is a rare win alongside the B-pillar air vents that deliver vastly better upper-body ventilation.Three top-tether and two ISOFIX anchorage points are on hand for fitting child seats, a task that is made easier with the rear doors, which open up to a handy 90 degrees.When it comes to amenities, there are map pockets affixed to the front seat backrests, while the rear of the centre console features a small, pop-out cubby.The door bins can accommodate two regular bottles at a pinch, while the fold-down armrest features two cupholders and USB-A and -C ports.Behind the power tailgate is a generous 539L boot, which can expand to a cavernous 1978L by stowing the 60/40 split-fold rear bench, an action that can be done from behind with the available pull tabs.Either way, the boot floor is flat, with the lack of a load lip making loading bulkier items that little bit easier.Underfloor storage is also present and accounted for, with the front section featuring a deeper bin that happily swallows up EV charging cables, while the rear area is shallower but still useful.Loose loads can also be secured with either the four tie-down points or two bag hooks, while a 12V power outlet is on hand for a vacuum to clean up any messes.And there’s even more storage space in the 7X RWD’s 62L frunk, which can be accessed via the touchscreen inside.There is no additional latch to open, while gas struts mean the bonnet holds itself up. Nice.In my second month with the 7X RWD, my average energy consumption was a slightly higher 15.9kWh/100km, which equates to a real-world driving range of 447km.That is just 33km shy of its WLTP claim, which is seriously impressive considering my 932km of driving for the month included a long, relatively inefficient highway drive from Melbourne to Phillip Island.And with that we’ve reached the end of this second instalment of my long-term review of the 7X RWD.The third and final part will see me deliver my long-awaited driving impressions in full, as well as my overall verdict.See you then!Acquired: January 21, 2025Distance travelled this month: 932kmOdometer: 4760kmAverage energy consumption this month: 15.9kWh/100km

Leapmotor has unveiled its special edition C10 Sports+ all-electric mid-size SUV, which will shake up the performance EV space. It will be priced from $53,888 (before on-road costs), which is $4000 more than the previous top-spec model. Unlike the rest of the C10 range, the car comes with all-wheel drive, while all other C10s have rear-wheel drive. The main change on this special edition C10 is the addition of a serious power upgrade, with its dual motor set-up producing 440kW and 760Nm, shifting the car from 0-100km/h in four seconds. This is substantially more power than the standard C10, which produces 160kW and 320Nm. These figures mean the C10 has a similar power output to the range-topping Tesla Model Y Performance, with a starting price of nearly $90,000. It is also cheaper than the most affordable rear-wheel drive variant of the Model Y .The car has been given a bigger 81.9kWh Lithium-Ferro-Phosphate (LFP) battery, offering a driving range of up to 437km, according to WLTP testing. This is only a slight improvement on the standard car (425km) due to the extra weight and increased power of the dual motor set-up. This version of the C10 is built on a new 800-volt platform, allowing for DC charging at 180kW. It can recharge from 30-80 per cent in 22 minutes. The C10 appears better value on paper compared to pricier key rivals such as the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV5 and Zeekr 7X.On the inside, the car has a 14.6-inch central touchscreen and 10.25-inch digital driver display, along with synthetic leather seats. Other interior features on the special edition C10 include a panoramic glass roof, as well as electrically adjustable, heated and ventilated front seats. It gets some cosmetic changes as well, like ‘Sports+’ branded cabin mats, rear badging and side decals. The C10 Sports+ Special Edition will arrive in showrooms next month. 

Fuel prices are soaring across the board whether it is petrol or diesel. Some drivers are being more affected than others as lower fuel efficiency contributes to higher refuelling costs. Here are the most expensive cars to run currently in Australia based on fuel efficiency. Other contributing factors to the high fuel costs on this list include the fact many of the cars have big fuel tanks and require premium fuel.Fuel prices have been calculated using the average prices for fuel in New South Wales and at an average of 15,000km driven per year. Among the heaviest guzzlers is the Nissan Patrol four-wheel drive, with its 5.6-litre V8 drinking fuel at a rate of 14.4L/100km. Its 140-litre fuel tank and requirement for premium unleaded petrol means it costs $364 per fill-up and a total yearly cost of $5617.28. The Patrol will move to a more efficient 3.5-litre six-cylinder twin-turbo petrol, which is expected to reduce fuel costs. The Ford Mustang sports car is another V8 on this list, with its 5.0-litre unit registering average fuel efficiency at 13.6L/100km and a yearly cost of $5310.27.Ford’s other representative is the Ranger Raptor high-end ute, powered by a twin-turbo six-cylinder petrol engine costing $4482.76 per year. The Ineos Grenadier off-roader is the most expensive model to run and costs $5618.50 a year to run, in part due to it being diesel, which has been the fuel type that has increased the most. The Lexus GX550 has refuelling costs of $208 per fill-up currently, costing $4800 for the year, along with nearly $3000 for the Jeep Gladiator, which unlike many on this list can run off E10 fuel.The 6.2-litre petrol V8 found in the Chevrolet Silverado full-size pick-up has an economy of more than 12 litres per 100km, costing $4,356.30 over the year.  Genesis’ GV70 luxury SUV costs more $4400 per year in fuel, a similar figure to the supercharged 5.0-litre V8 variants of the Land Rover Defender. Highest fuel efficiency new vehicles on sale under $150,000 

Subaru has confirmed it will unveil an “all-new, all-electric SUV” at this year’s New York International Auto Show, which kicks off on (no joke) April 1st.Positioned under a theme of “Fast. Family. Fun.”, the Japanese maker has previewed the upcoming arrival via a dark teaser image with the only hard specifications noted being a power output of 313kW (420hp) and all-wheel drive, both of which point to dual-motor propulsion.Visual clues include narrow six-point headlights similar to the existing Solterra and Trailseeker EV line-up, roof rails and an illuminated star-cluster badge on the nose.The emphasis on ‘Family’ could also point to a three-row configuration, which opens up the possibility of the new model sharing its development with the recently released pure-electric Toyota Highlander (Kluger).A connection makes sense with Subaru and Toyota confirming expansion of their model-share partnership with three electric SUVs in 2026-’27, Subaru on the record noting the Toyota connection will accelerate development of its EV portfolio.The three-row Highlander, Toyota’s first battery-electric vehicle for the US market, rides on the brand’s ‘Toyota Next Generation Architecture-K’ (TNGA-K) platform and is slated for assembly in the southern US state of Kentucky with batteries sourced from Toyota's recently opened battery assembly plant in Liberty, North Carolina.For reference, the Highlander measures 4950mm long, 1989mm wide and 1709mm tall with a 3050mm wheelbase.If Subaru follows the high-standard spec strategy it applies to other Toyota-shared models, it’s likely the new SUV will adopt the top-grade Highlander Limited’s 95.8kWh battery, for a 515km range.Other premium Highlander features like ‘Vehicle-to-Load’ (V2L) are likely to feature and although the flagship Highlander’s overall output is quoted at just over 250kW, it’s not hard to imagine Subaru putting its own, more performance-focused spin on the powertrain.Expect the interior to include a 14-inch multimedia touchscreen, 12.3-inch driver's display, a large-format head-up display and customisable ambient lighting.

After months of price-rise predictions, the redesigned Mazda CX-5 has come in below expectations, at least with the cheaper versions.On sale now, with deliveries scheduled from July, the new CX-5 starts from $39,990 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the new Pure grade, which is $2750 more than the old base Maxx did previously.But that was with the now-discontinued G20 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with front-wheel drive (2WD), while the Pure switches to the G25 2.5-litre, six-speed automatic all-wheel drive (AWD) set-up, which is now standard across the range.In the previous version, the cheapest CX-5 G25 AWD was the $45,600 Touring, meaning that the latest model undercuts many mid-sized SUV AWD rivals – a first for the series in a long time.This includes the Nissan X-Trail ST AWD and Mitsubishi Outlander ES AWD from $42,615 and $43,240 respectively, though both come with seven seats, as well as the Subaru Forester AWD (from $43,490), Kia Sportage SX+ AWD (from $47,580), Toyota RAV4 GX hybrid AWD (from $49,340), Hyundai Tucson Elite hybrid AWD (from $50,850) and Volkswagen Tiguan 150TSI Elegance 4Motion (from $56,850).And while cheaper electrified Chinese alternatives exist, like the BYD Sealion 5 PHEV, Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV, Geely Starray PHEV, GWM Haval H6 hybrid and MG HS hybrid, all are 2WD up to the CX-5 Pure AWD’s $40K price point, underlying the Japanese SUV’s unique competitiveness.Next up is the new Evolve AWD from $42,990, effectively replacing the old Maxx Sport G25 2WD from $40,960 and Touring G25 2WD from $43,100.From there, every grade is more expensive than its corresponding AWD predecessor, as the Touring AWD from $47,990 (up $2390), GT SP AWD from $51,990 (up $1030) and Akera AWD from $54,990 (up $1840) illustrate.Some of the other changes made to the latest CX-5 may not please everybody.The previously-standard head-up display and wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto are no-longer available on the base grades.Now offering 132kW and 242Nm, the G25’s power and torque figures fall by 8kW and 10Nm respectively, to meet stricter Euro-6d emissions requirements. Yet the combined average fuel-consumption figure remains at 7.4 litres per 100km while CO2 emissions edge up to 173 grams/km,The old G25 Touring 2WD, as well as the G35 GT SP Turbo AWD and G35 Akera Turbo AWD models fitted with a 170kW/420Nm 2.5-litre turbo, have been eliminated, dropping the range from eight to five grades.And the long-awaited hybrid engine(s) that Mazda reckons will more than make up for the AWOL turbos as well as the D22 turbo-diesel engines dropped way back in late 2023 may still be up to two years away.As reported earlier, the freshly-streamlined CX-5 range also features a completely redesigned body, sharing no parts with the previous version, despite very similar stylistic themes. Length is up 115mm from before, with a 50mm higher bonnet and 30mm of extra height. The back doors are also longer, and they now open at nearly 90 degrees for easier cabin access.Underneath, the continuing SkyActiv transverse architecture is said to be 50 per cent new, despite fundamentals like the MacPherson strut-front and multi-link rear end remaining.Mazda says it sought to improve ride comfort via lower-rate springs and higher-response dampers compared to the previous CX-5, whilst also increasing steering/handling responses. Key differences include different dampers, spring rates, bump stops, stabiliser bars and tyres, with extensive real-world testing and fine-tuning conducted.A 115mm wheelbase stretch benefits rear-seat kneeroom by 64mm and extends cargo length by 45mm, aided by a lower scuff plate to facilitate loading/unloading.These address consumer resistance to the previous CX-5’s comparative compactness compared to RAV4, X-Trail, Outlander and others.The dashboard has also been completely redesigned, adopting a generic-2020s horizontal-look instrument panel that dispenses with Mazda’s lauded climate-control buttons for simplified, screen-based access and functionality that the company claims minimises disruptions whilst maximising minimalism.As such, and among myriad other changes, the previous lower-console controller gives way to capacitive switches with short/long push selection or swipe action on the new steering wheel’s spokes; there’s added emphasis on voice control; and configurable widgets are now part of this touchscreen-heavy operation.It is anticipated that traditional CX-5 buyers and future ANCAP crash-rating testers may have opinions on such developments.Speaking of safety, a long list of advanced driver-assist systems tech are fitted on all grades, such as autonomous emergency braking (front and rear), lane-departure warning/assist, blind-spot monitoring and adaptive cruise control with full stop/go. An app with connected services allows for remote location, some vehicle functionality/control and auto emergency services notification if required.Standard features on the Pure include a 12.9-inch touchscreen, 10.25-inch instrumentation display, wired-only Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, cloth trim, dual-zone climate control, rain-sensing wipers, front/rear reverse sensors, front/rear parking sensors and 17-inch alloy wheels.The Evolve adds items like keyless entry/start, heated front seats, rear-seat air vents, (reinstated) wireless CarPlay/Auto and smartphone charger and heated/folding mirrors.The $5K jump to the Touring is a result of artificial leather/suede trim, powered driver’s seat with memory, (reinstated) head-up display, heated windscreen, powered tailgate, heated steering wheel, roof rails and more.The GT SP includes adaptive LED headlights, 360-degree monitor with see-through view, a 12-speaker premium (Bose) audio upgrade, ambient lighting, powered front passenger seat, leather upholstery, heated rear outboard seats, glossier trim and 19-inch alloys.Finally, the Akera adds vented front seats, a 15.6-inch touchscreen, panoramic sunroof, remote powered tailgate functionality and personalised driver-settings memory, among other items.Mazda hopes the KG boosts CX-5 sales by 10 per cent over 2025 levels, to around 25,000 units. The sales split is predicted to be 20/30/20/15/15 per cent for Pure/Evolve/Touring/GT/Akera respectively.Since the KE series debuted in Australia in February, 2012, some 325,000 CX-5s have been sold, as part of a worldwide total of five million units. Mazda's local best-seller here over the past seven years, last year it accounted for a quarter of all the brand's volume.

Fuel prices continue to increase in Australia.Hybrid models generally offer better fuel efficiency than a comparative petrol model, but they are also more expensive. Questions remain about how much going hybrid actually saves buyers on fuel and how long it will take to pay off the extra upfront cost. Below is a comparison based on some of the most popular models in Australia offering petrol and hybrid choices and the potential increased savings in the current climate. Figures have been calculated based on the average yearly kilometres driven at 15,000km, and the cost to fill-up based on average NSW pricing data using the official recommended fuel for each model. Small car/sedanHyundai i30 sedanThe Hyundai i30 is one of few passenger car models which are available with petrol and hybrid variants in its lineup. Many of its rivals have become hybrid only, such as the Toyota Corolla and Camry as well as the Honda Civic. The hybrid is cheaper to fill up and goes further on its tank, so it takes around four years to pay off the $4000 hybrid premium - well within the seven-year warranty period for the car. This is also due to the smaller and more efficient hybrid motor compared to the bigger petrol engine.Small SUVChery Tiggo 4 The Chery Tiggo 4 is one of the cheapest SUVs on the market, with a drive-away price under $30,000 for both petrol and hybrid variants. The Hybrid carries a $6000 premium over the petrol, which means it will take roughly seven years to pay off the extra cost. This is part due to the $850 year-on-year saving, which is less than many of the other cars on this list. Unlike the other examples, there is no change in engine capacity between petrol and hybrid variants of the Tiggo 4.  The seven-year break-even point matches the seven-year warranty provided on the car. Medium SUVGWM Haval H6There is a $5000 gap between pricing on the petrol and hybrid versions of the Haval H6, but the smaller and more efficient hybrid engine sees savings of more than $1000 year-on-year. The H6 hybrid offers an average of more than 500km of driving range than the petrol. This means the extra cost of the hybrid can be paid off in just under five years. This falls within the seven-year warranty period for the H6. Large SUVHyundai Santa FeThe Hyundai Santa Fe was CarsGuide’s 2026 Overall Car of the Year, and offers one of the most competitive hybrid/petrol pricing comparisons. This is because the hybrid Sante Fe is less than $4000 more expensive than the petrol and offers more than 400km average driving range. With nearly $1200 of savings each year, it would take around three years to pay off the hybrid premium, and the majority of the car’s seven-year warranty will also still be valid.UteThis comparison uses the cheapest dual-cab variant of the Toyota HiLux Workmate and the single-variant BYD Shark 6. While these utes are obviously not variants within the same lineup, the Shark 6’s petrol status offers savings over the diesel ute. It also has a smaller fuel tank, which makes filling up cheaper. The HiLux is also slightly more expensive to drive-away, costing about $59,500 in NSW.Fuel efficiency on the Shark 6 dramatically decreases when the ute has less than 25 per cent of battery charge, dropping to 7.9L/100km. This still makes it less expensive to run than the diesel HiLux. *Petrol engine only fuel use figure not provided by Ford but calculated over several CarsGuide road tests once battery had been depletedThe plug-in hybrid set-up in the Canon Alpha does make it cheaper to run overall, but the substantial price difference between the plug-in hybrid and the petrol, means it would take eight years to break even on the extra cost. The Ranger PHEV is more of a curve ball, it is harder to hit on exactly how much fuel it will use. It all depends on how ofter you charge the battery. If you don't charge it every night it'll be more expensive to run than the diesel, as it needs to be topped up more often. If you regularly charge it the cost equation flips and it's a wallet saver.You'll need to be vigilant about charging to pay off the $15,000 premium, though.

The Xiaomi YU7 GT electric SUV has just been exposed in China, and it comes with some bonkers performance numbers.

In Audi’s latest round of financial results for 2026, the German luxury brand confirmed “the focus” would be on its latest and largest product, the Q9 flagship SUV.