Fuel prices continue to increase in Australia.
Hybrid models generally offer better fuel efficiency than a comparative petrol model, but they are also more expensive.Â
Questions remain about how much going hybrid actually saves buyers on fuel and how long it will take to pay off the extra upfront cost.Â
Below is a comparison based on some of the most popular models in Australia offering petrol and hybrid choices and the potential increased savings in the current climate.Â
Figures have been calculated based on the average yearly kilometres driven at 15,000km, and the cost to fill-up based on average NSW pricing data using the official recommended fuel for each model.Â
Small car/sedan
Hyundai i30 sedan
| Variant | Price (before on-road costs) | Engine | Recommended fuel | Fuel tank size | Fuel efficiency | Average driving range | Fill-up cost @ $2.35/L | Yearly cost @ 15,000km | Yearly saving | Break even point (to the nearest year) |
Petrol | $29,250 | 2.0-litre petrol | Unleaded 91 | 47L | 6.1L/100km | 770km | $110.45 | $2151.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Hybrid | $33,250 | 1.6-litre petrol hybrid | Unleaded 91 | 42L | 3.9L/100km | 1275km | $98.70 | $1161.18 | $990.44 | 4 years |
The Hyundai i30 is one of few passenger car models which are available with petrol and hybrid variants in its lineup. Many of its rivals have become hybrid only, such as the Toyota Corolla and Camry as well as the Honda Civic.Â
The hybrid is cheaper to fill up and goes further on its tank, so it takes around four years to pay off the $4000 hybrid premium - well within the seven-year warranty period for the car. This is also due to the smaller and more efficient hybrid motor compared to the bigger petrol engine.
Small SUV
| Variant | Price (drive-away) | Engine | Recommended fuel | Fuel tank size | Fuel efficiency | Average driving range | Fill-up cost @ $2.35/L | Yearly cost @ 15,000km | Yearly saving | Break even point (to the nearest year) |
Petrol | $23,990 | 1.5-litre turbo-petrol | Unleaded 91 | 51L | 7.4L/100km | 694km | $119.85 | $2590.42 | N/A | N/A |
| Hybrid | $29,990 | 1.5-litre petrol hybrid | Unleaded 91 | 51L | 5.4L/100lkm | 1033km | $119.85 | $1740.32 | $850.10 | 7 years |
The Chery Tiggo 4 is one of the cheapest SUVs on the market, with a drive-away price under $30,000 for both petrol and hybrid variants.Â
The Hybrid carries a $6000 premium over the petrol, which means it will take roughly seven years to pay off the extra cost. This is part due to the $850 year-on-year saving, which is less than many of the other cars on this list.Â
Unlike the other examples, there is no change in engine capacity between petrol and hybrid variants of the Tiggo 4. Â
The seven-year break-even point matches the seven-year warranty provided on the car.Â
Medium SUV
| Variant | Price (drive-away) | Engine | Recommended fuel | Fuel tank size | Fuel efficiency | Average driving range | Fill-up cost @ $2.35/L | Yearly cost @ 15,000km | Yearly saving | Break even point (to the nearest year) |
Petrol | $35,990 | 2.0-litre turbo-petrol | Unleaded 91 | 61L | 7.4L/100km | 824km | $143.35 | $2609.53 | N/A | N/A |
| Hybrid | $40,990 | 1.5-litre turbo-petrol hybrid | Unleaded 91 | 61L | 5.2L/100km | 1363km | $143.35 | $1577.59 | $1031.94 | 5 years |
There is a $5000 gap between pricing on the petrol and hybrid versions of the Haval H6, but the smaller and more efficient hybrid engine sees savings of more than $1000 year-on-year.Â
The H6 hybrid offers an average of more than 500km of driving range than the petrol. This means the extra cost of the hybrid can be paid off in just under five years.Â
This falls within the seven-year warranty period for the H6.Â
Large SUV
| Variant | Price (before on-road costs) | Engine | Recommended fuel | Fuel tank size | Fuel efficiency | Average driving range | Fill-up cost @ $2.35 | Yearly cost @ 15,000km | Yearly saving | Break even point (to the nearest year) |
Petrol | $54,000 | 2.5-litre turbo-petrol | Unleaded 91 | 67L | 9.1L/100km | 736km | $157.45 | $3208.90 | N/A | N/A |
| Hybrid | $57,650 | 1.6-litre turbo-petrol  | Unleaded 91 | 67L | 5.6L/100km | 1172km | $157.45 | $2015.16 | $1193.74 | 3 years |
The Hyundai Santa Fe was CarsGuide’s 2026 Overall Car of the Year, and offers one of the most competitive hybrid/petrol pricing comparisons. This is because the hybrid Sante Fe is less than $4000 more expensive than the petrol and offers more than 400km average driving range.Â
With nearly $1200 of savings each year, it would take around three years to pay off the hybrid premium, and the majority of the car’s seven-year warranty will also still be valid.
Ute
| Dual-cab pick-up variant | Price | Engine | Recommended fuel | Fuel tank size | Fuel efficiency | Average driving range | Fill-up cost | Yearly cost @ 15,000km | Yearly saving | Break even point (to the nearest year) |
| Toyota HiLux | $53,990 (before on-road costs) | 2.8-litre turbo-diesel | Diesel | 80L | 7.4L/100km | 1081km | @ $2.78
| $3086.03 | N/A | N/A |
| BYD Shark 6 | $57,900 (drive-away) | 1.5-litre turbo-petrol plug-in hybrid | Unleaded 91 | 60L | 2.0L/100km | 800km | @ $2.35
| $2643.75 | N/A | N/A |
This comparison uses the cheapest dual-cab variant of the Toyota HiLux Workmate and the single-variant BYD Shark 6.Â
While these utes are obviously not variants within the same lineup, the Shark 6’s petrol status offers savings over the diesel ute. It also has a smaller fuel tank, which makes filling up cheaper. The HiLux is also slightly more expensive to drive-away, costing about $59,500 in NSW.
Fuel efficiency on the Shark 6 dramatically decreases when the ute has less than 25 per cent of battery charge, dropping to 7.9L/100km. This still makes it less expensive to run than the diesel HiLux.
Â
| Variant | Price | Engine | Recommended fuel | Fuel tank size | Fuel efficiency | Average driving range | Fill-up cost | Yearly cost @ 15,000km | Yearly saving | Break even point (to the nearest year) |
| GWM Cannon Alpha | $51,990 (drive-away) | 2.4-litre turbo-diesel | Diesel | 78L | 8.9L/100km | 876km | @ $2.78
| $3713.01 | N/A | N/A |
GWMÂ Cannon Alpha PHEV | $61,490 (drive-away) | 2.0-litre turbo-petrol plug-in hybrid | Unleaded 91 | 75L | 1.7/100km | 1060km (NEDC) | @ $2.35
| $2494.10 | $1218.91 | 8 years |
| Ford Ranger | $56,690 (before on-road costs) | 2.0-litre turbo-diesel | Diesel | 80L | 6.9L/100km | 1159km | @ $2.78
| $2879.34 | N/A | N/A |
| Ford Ranger PHEV | $71,990 (before on-road costs) | 2.3-litre turbo-petrol plug-in hybrid | Unleaded 95 | 70L | 2.9L/100km | 750km (est.)* | @ $2.53
| $3542 | N/A | N/A |
*Petrol engine only fuel use figure not provided by Ford but calculated over several CarsGuide road tests once battery had been depleted
The plug-in hybrid set-up in the Canon Alpha does make it cheaper to run overall, but the substantial price difference between the plug-in hybrid and the petrol, means it would take eight years to break even on the extra cost.Â
The Ranger PHEV is more of a curve ball, it is harder to hit on exactly how much fuel it will use. It all depends on how ofter you charge the battery. If you don't charge it every night it'll be more expensive to run than the diesel, as it needs to be topped up more often. If you regularly charge it the cost equation flips and it's a wallet saver.
You'll need to be vigilant about charging to pay off the $15,000 premium, though.