Subaru BRZ vs Suzuki Fronx

What's the difference?

The Subaru BRZ is a classic modern-day sports car that is a driver’s car through and through. This top-spec tS tester with the litany of accessories is a great example of what’s possible straight from the dealer, but it’s definitely not the best bang for your buck.

Thankfully you still get virtually every benefit the BRZ offers in the entry-level model. You’ll save thousands of dollars which you can use to pay for fuel on a road trip or modify your car exactly how you’d like.

If you’re considering a small car, particularly if an SUV is the goal, a Suzuki should in most cases be on the shopping list. Back-to-basics motoring is key to the brand’s identity. Its most popular model is a tiny ladder-frame 4X4, for example. Hi Jimny.

The Fronx doesn’t break new ground in any practical sense, but it does come in with a decent price and list of features that should sway plenty of small-car fans in the showroom.

It’s decent to look at, comfortable for the segment, and easy to get used to and drive. The numerical rating on this review betrays just how likeable the car is.

It’s not extremely refined and it starts to lose its dynamic shine on rough roads, but in an urban setting the Fronx should excel.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

The Subaru BRZ has a timeless exterior design that screams dynamic sports car from every angle.

Even though the second-generation BRZ is around halfway through its lifecycle now, the design is aging like fine wine. It’s also a lovely evolution of the original which dates back to 2011.

The BRZ is low slung, has an aggressive front fascia plus the rear has prominent exhaust pipes. All of this stacks up to make a tough-looking car.

Thankfully this test example is also finished in 'WR Blue' exterior paint, which in my books is still the best colour for a Subaru performance car.

Adding all the genuine accessory goodies onto this car not only amplifies its street appeal, but also harnesses its racing intent. The carbon rear wing in particular has a swan neck design much like the Porsche 911 GT3. Many interested car-spotters craned their necks to get a good look.

Despite this, all the accessories are too flashy for my taste, especially for a car likely to be driven daily. I’d go for the stock look to retain resale, or something subtle like a small rear lip spoiler.

Inside the BRZ has all of the hallmarks of a sports car, as well. These include a steering wheel with minimal buttons, a prominent rev counter and contoured seats.

The manual gear shifter in this car is prominent and nice to hold. It’s great to still see manual options as they’re slowly but surely falling out of favour with buyers.

The manual handbrake is also a nice touch from a design perspective, but it limits overall interior practicality. More on that in a bit.

You can tell the interior is getting a little dated due to the older central multimedia system. But at the end of the day sports cars are more about the driving experience than the flashy tech.

‘Fronx’ as a name doesn’t exactly scream ‘cute’, but the little SUV has a pretty classically Suzuki design. This is not a complaint at all.

The Fronx is 3995mm long, 1765mm wide and 1550mm tall, but despite its diminutive dimensions the brand has opted to lean into a ‘coupe’ style with a sloping roofline that creates a relatively sporty look, especially for something with a two-digit power figure.

So while some of Suzuki’s designs have been divisive in Australia (Ignis, anyone?) the Fronx takes a slightly more conservative approach by leaning into more design trends than just the coupe-back SUV shape. 

For example, its tail-lights span the width of the tailgate rather than simply flanking the boot as was standard for decades.

The LED daytime running lights at the front are also arranged in a slim, high-up position with a set of headlights below.

Inside is arguably more conservative than out, as the Fronx goes with a fairly standard formula in terms of its layout, with few premium materials (the synthetic leather on the seats feels cheap for example) or adventurous design elements to be found.

But that’s not such a bad thing.

Hopping into the BRZ you’re immediately aware you’re getting into a sports car. It’s low-slung and the driving position feels like you’re almost sitting on the road. Perfect for this kind of machine.

The front seats are beautifully contoured and lock you in for when you’re driving through the twisties. Thankfully, the bolstering isn’t too aggressive and it’s still comfortable for everyday driving.

Ahead of the driver, the leather-wrapped steering wheel has a thin rim and is lovely to hold and turn. There aren’t many buttons but the few that remain are purposeful and have a lovely tactile click.

Behind this there is a 7.0-inch digital instrument cluster that permanently displays the rev counter in the middle. It’s a cool set-up that almost has a retro look to it, plus you’re able to configure the content that is displayed on the left-hand side.

Moving across, the central touchscreen multimedia system is classic Subaru. Nothing revolutionary, but I appreciate the physical shortcut buttons and dials on both sides of the screen.

It’s very easy to navigate around the screen, though as the photos show it is prone to glare, especially in bright scenarios.

Disappointingly there is only wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, with no wireless versions offered. You need to plug your phone in with a USB-A cable in a slot under the split-fold centre armrest.

While this means your phone will reliably charge, rather than having your phone overheat on a wireless charger, there’s no nice spot to put your phone given the physical handbrake takes up so much valuable centre armrest space.

You can put your phone in one of the cupholder spots, but when you do you don’t get a centre armrest. It’s too compromised for my liking.

While I’m on the topic of storage, there isn’t a great deal of it. There’s a small glove box and if you want, you can technically use the backseat area as they’re way too compromised for adults to fit into.

The rear seats are so small I didn’t even bother trying to fit as in my default driving position there is zero legroom. Even kids would struggle.

In terms of boot space, there is 201L available with the rear seats upright. It’s a fine space, though it’s impeded by the full-size spare wheel poking above the load floor. As a result you need to pack around the wheel.

Folding the rear seats makes the boot space more usable, though the envelope to slot things into the boot is narrow.

While the full-size spare wheel impedes the boot area, I’m glad it’s there because it’s much more usable than a dinky space-saver spare wheel or nothing at all. It gives you peace of mind in the event you have a puncture in the middle of nowhere.

Because for all the conservative, even outdated, styling in the cabin, the fact is it’ll be refreshingly familiar to someone who’s getting out of a car from perhaps even before the year 2000.

Suzuki’s place at the budget end of the new-car market means its customers are likely either quite young and buying their first new car, or relatively old and looking for a cheap, rarely used runabout as the ‘last car’.

For the former, a lack of techy distractions is paramount. For the latter, ease of use wins over cutting-edge tech in most cases. Which is why it’s probably okay that the Fronx’s multimedia touchscreen and software wouldn’t feel out of place almost a decade ago.

It can be a tad fiddly to use at speed, but it’s still more straightforward than the ‘iPad-like’ systems Tesla has made popular, and there are physical controls for important functions like climate control.

There’s also a row of ever-present haptic buttons for volume controls and navigation shortcuts.

The ergonomics of the interior are quite basic, but there are no red flags in terms of visibility, reach, or placement. 

The head-up display is a bonus, but the physical dials on the dash rather than a digital driver display are clear enough, despite again feeling nabbed from a time before head-up displays even existed. 

Space for the front passengers is decent, it’s not cavernous but it’s far from cramped. Elbow rests and seating positions allow for a relaxed ride.

The back seat is a slightly less comfortable place, but at 178cm I can sit behind my own seating position without my knees touching the seat in front, and my head has just enough space above to accommodate the top of a mullet.

Behind that, luggage capacity in the boot is 304 litres, or 605 litres with the rear 60/40 split seats folded.

There’s also no space-saver spare tyre, just a repair kit as standard.

There’s only one variant of the Fronx, and it lands at $28,990 before on-road costs. It’s also relatively stacked when it comes to features, and Suzuki is even working on a sub-$30K drive-away offer for its on-sale date in September this year. We’d expect that means about $29,990 DA, though that’s to be confirmed down the track.

For something at that price point, features aren’t lacking. While things like wireless phone charging and wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay have become almost expected for even entry-level cars in Australia, the Fronx also features heated synthetic leather seats and a leather steering wheel.

It’s the first Suzuki in Australia to feature a head-up display, and there’s also a standard surround-view parking display thanks to a set of cameras.

The Fronx’s 9.0-inch multimedia touchscreen is joined by a small 4.2-inch driver display nestled between physical dials for the speedometer and tachometer. Exterior lighting is LED front and rear, with auto headlights and manual levelling.

The only extra-cost option for the Fronx is a choice of ‘premium’ single- or two-tone paint - Arctic White Pearl is the standard no-cost colour. Single-tone paint is $745 extra, while two-tone options are $1345, which is a lot pricier than many premium paint options in the market.

The Fronx comes in at the same price as a mid-to-high spec Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic or Chery Tiggo 4, but some rivals like the Mazda CX-3 or Toyota Yaris Cross (with its Hybrid drivetrain) are more expensive even in their lower variants.

Power continues to come from a 2.4-litre naturally aspirated flat-four petrol engine producing 174kW and 250Nm.

This is mated to either a six-speed manual gearbox or a six-speed automatic transmission. Our tester is equipped with the former. Both feature a limited-slip rear differential.

The Fronx is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine with mild-hybrid assistance, driving the front wheels via a six-speed automatic transmission. 

Its outputs are quoted at 76kW and 137Nm, not exactly high-grade stuff and part of the reason the Fronx feels like it takes more than 10 seconds to hit 100km/h.

Subaru claims the BRZ manual consumes an average of 9.5L/100km on the (ADR 81/02) combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle.

We almost matched this during our largely urban-based testing, achieving an average of 9.7L/100km. There’s a 50L fuel tank which means there’s a total theoretical range of 515km using our as-tested fuel consumption.

A minimum of 98 RON premium unleaded petrol is required which isn’t uncommon for sports cars, but it still hurts your hip pocket nerve.

Suzuki claims fuel consumption at 4.9L/100km. With its 37-litre fuel tank, the Fronx should be able to manage more than 600km on a single tank, though theoretically its maximum range given its claimed fuel efficiency is 755km.

This is where the BRZ has always excelled and this kitted-out tS manual is no exception.

Firing up with a cold engine, you’re immediately aware this is powered by a horizontally-opposed 'boxer' engine. It has that classic high idle that eventually simmers down once the engine has warmed up a bit.

Setting off you need to acquaint yourself with how this manual gearbox works. Every manual is a little different, however this BRZ is easy to pick up and understand quickly.

I particularly like the notchy and direct gear throw. It makes changing gears easy, fun and engaging.

If I am to be critical, the clutch bite point is a little high and there is a touch too much rev hang when changing gears, especially in the ‘Sport’ drive mode, but you get used to it eventually.

In everyday driving scenarios there is enough power available. Some more wouldn’t go astray due to the lack of a turbocharger, but this constraint makes the car more fun to drive as you have to work harder with the gears.

Speaking of, the gearing is short, which means you will be shifting gears quickly. At 60km/h, for example, the car can be driven around in sixth gear, which is clearly focused on maximising efficiency.

Once you’ve reached your set speed there’s enough torque to maintain it without having to dive back through the gears. This is nice because you don’t have to shuffle through the gears to keep up with traffic.

Out on the open road is where the BRZ comes into its own. The steering in particular highlights how balanced and poised the car feels. It’s so fun to chuck around on twisty bends and feel the weight transfer.

The STI-tuned suspension in this particular trim also highlights how sporty and dialled-in this car is. It can feel a little rough and taut on pimpled urban roads, though you need to remind yourself this is a sports car, not a comfort-oriented SUV.

In a similar vein, at higher speeds there is a lot of road and tyre noise that transfers into the cabin. This is made worse when the rear seats are folded. While more sound insulation would likely fix this, I like it being left out in the name of lighter weight (kerb weight is only 1.3 tonnes).

How you plan to use the Fronx will make a big difference in whether what you’re about to read is a good thing or not. 

The Fronx is a light SUV for a start, so expecting brilliant handling, effortless acceleration and a dead-quiet cabin is going to mean you’re disappointed.

But if you want something easy, engaging and fun, the Fronx might work for you.

Our brief test loop wasn’t entirely indicative of what the Fronx is likely to face day-to-day. With limited time and no preset drive program, the roads within a 20-or-so minute drive of Nagambie, Victoria had to suffice.

The Fronx fared well on the average road, it turned out, with the 1064kg Suzuki managing to feel planted enough to hurl along 100km/h back-roads without complaints. It rides on the same platform used recently by the Suzuki Baleno, something I’ll admit to not having driven.

The rougher roads didn’t faze the light SUV too much, though consistently uneven surfaces made it feel unsettled in some cornering.

Its steering and suspension give enough feedback to make the right inputs easily, though the nature of its light weight and minimal accoutrement in terms of driver assistance make the Fronx feel very rudimentary from the driver’s seat.

At low speeds around the centre of town, the Fronx manages the state’s terrible roads well, though taking off from intersections can be laborious. Much like overtaking, the drivetrain will complain.

And don’t expect its mild hybrid system to do a lot in the way of hard work - or any work at all, really. You could take the hybrid badge off the car, let someone have a drive, and they’d be none the wiser.

From the limited observations on the launch, the Fronx would feel best at home in suburbia or a metropolitan centre more so than on the Hume Highway or the towns dotted alongside it.

Essentially, this is not a refined road trip car for the highway, but its no-fuss approach to getting around means you shouldn’t be surprised if you start seeing them in the car parks at universities or bowls clubs.

A big part of many buyers’ decisions about a new car is safety, and the Fronx is pretty basic on this front.

Six airbags cover front and sides for the front passengers, and there are curtains down the sides of the car, but there’s no front centre airbag and no ANCAP rating has been applied to the Fronx as yet.

In terms of active safety, the Fronx has listed among its standard features auto emergency braking (AEB), ABS and brake assist, lane departure warning, hill hold control, weaving alert, blind spot monitoring, traffic sign recognition, rear cross traffic alert and a surround-view parking camera with front and rear sensors.

There are also outboard ISOFIX seat fastenings in the second row.

The only safety system that activated during the test was a lane departure warning, but only when (under normal conditions) it would have been necessary as the car approached the road’s centre line.

Subaru BRZ owners are covered by a five-year, 100,000km warranty which is now commonplace in the mainstream segment. Many carmakers are now extending their coverage out to seven years and beyond.

Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. The first five services cost a total of $2595.51, which averages out to around $519 per service. For the performance car space this isn’t cheap but not as exorbitant as more premium offerings.

Subaru has a total of 128 dealers around Australia, with a spread across metro, rural and regional areas.

Suzuki has a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty for its new cars, which is a little behind the curve compared to many budget-friendly brands these days. 

Suzuki does have a five-year servicing schedule, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. Total cost is $2005 over the five years, with services averaging $401, which is not particularly cheap.