Suzuki Reviews

The enduring family workhorse of the small SUV segment, the ageing Suzuki Vitara finally goes hybrid for its second facelift, adopting a mild-hybrid 48V ISG (Integrated Starter-Generator) set-up similar to the one proven on the smaller Swift supermini, to bring consumption down whilst keeping prices reasonable. But, has the Japanese engineered and European-built small SUV changed enough?

Suzuki’s first electric vehicle (EV) is more than it seems.Badged e Vitara, it will be aimed directly at the BYD Atto 2 and Kia EV3 small SUV set when sales commence mid this year.And, despite the familiar name, this is like no other Suzuki that’s come before, as our preview test drive demonstrates.But let’s get one thing straight first.The existing, fourth-generation Vitara, released way back in 2015, continues with a facelift, upgraded mild-hybrid turbo-petrol engine and updated multimedia. That starts from a hefty $40K drive-away, raising the question: how much will the e Vitara cost?Suzuki’s not saying just yet, but we’re thinking from mid-to-high 30s for the e Vitara Motion 2WD, placing it in between the BYD Atto 2 and evergreen Atto 3.That base grade comes with a slightly smaller battery than most rivals. It's a 49kWh LFP item courtesy of BYD and capable of 344km WLTP range, yet is well specified, with a heat pump for greater thermal efficiency, climate control, 10.1-inch touchscreen, 360-degree camera, fabric seats, ambient lighting, a slide/recline rear bench and 18-inch alloys as standard.There’s also a decent level of advanced driver-assist systems (ADAS), including auto emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert and lane-keep tech.Then there’s the e Vitara Ultra that’s expected to start from under $50K, adding AWD, a 61kWh battery for 395km of WLTP range, as well as adaptive LED headlights, a glass roof with sun shade, wireless charger, Infinity audio upgrade, heated front seats and artificial leather upholstery.Helping keep this electric Suzuki cost competitive is down to economics – the petrol Vitara comes expensively from Hungary while the e Vitara arrives from India, where it is built, in big volume, alongside its Toyota Urban Cruiser clone.Yep, there’s a Toyota version. There’s also a lot of Toyota underneath Suzuki’s freshman EV.Dubbed 'Heartect e', this box-fresh skateboard architecture was co-developed with Toyota, and features a Suzuki SUV-first multi-link suspension.Larger than the old one, the e Vitara measures in at 4275mm long, 1800mm wide and 1635mm high, while its 2700mm wheelbase represents a sizeable 300mm stretch. For an EV, a kerb weight between 1700kg and 1860kg is commendable.Yet the chunky design reflects Suzuki’s heritage with its exaggerated cladding extending up and over the wheel arches, broad stance and handy 180mm ground clearance.That sizeable wheelbase benefits interior packaging too.Two things stand out the second one steps (easily and effortlessly) into an e Vitara.Firstly, the cabin is longer and broader than the diminutive exterior proportions suggest, with decent space front and rear, including for headroom. Nice.And, secondly, this is a junior Toyota bZ4X/Subaru Solterra in its dashboard shape, style and character.We’re talking about the long, rectangular screen, the graphics within the 10.25-inch electronic driver display, the central touchscreen layout, the row of (thankfully) physical buttons and volume knob below for the climate control, as well as the entire ‘two storey’ centre console set-up, down to the gear selector, armrest and lower-level storage.Even the squarish steering wheel and related switchgear seem Toyota.These, along with the comfy seats, excellent driving position, strong ventilation, general practicality and high-quality presentation, really elevate the brand’s interior presentation. The e Vitara feels solid and expensive inside.The same applies with the rear seat, that also benefits from a slide and recline function for the split-fold bench. USB ports, ventilation and cupholders speak to family-friendly functionality.Except… out back. The floor is high and the aperture smallish. With the rear bench slid all the way back, VDA capacity is just 238 litres, rising to 306L pushed forward. With backrests down, that rises to 562L. And there’s no spare wheel, just an infernal tyre-repair kit. Not happy, Suzi.At the other end, the e Vitara offers a choice of two powertrains – a single, AC synchronous electric motor driving the front wheels, as well as second electric motor on the rear axle for AWD.The 2WD models make 106kW of power and 193kW of torque, compared to the AWD’s combined 135kW and 307Nm, as a result of the rear e-Axle, made up of an electric motor, inverter and reduction gears working simultaneously, contributing 48kW and 114Nm.Are these outputs enough for a 1.8-tonne electric SUV?A brief spin on mostly suburban and rural back roads around outer Sydney in the base FWD model revealed a quiet, smooth and competent EV.Designed to be as benign as possible, a squeeze of the throttle resulted in brisk acceleration, with plenty of power in reserve once speed quickly increased.Suzuki says the AWD can scoot to 100km/h from standstill in a lively 7.4 seconds, some 2.2s faster than the 2WD, yet the latter certainly seems rapid enough.Like the related Toyota bZ4X, a push of a button provides some single-pedal slowing-down braking ability.As with the regular Vitara, the electric version brings light yet responsive steering, so it’s quite enjoyable to dart around busy traffic.And even on bad roads, the suspension seemed to do a good job isolating us from bumps and noise intrusion. You’d never call the chassis sporty, but there’s an underlying solidness keeping things under control.In fact, and not surprisingly, the e Vitara seemed very Toyota-like in its dynamic abilities during our brief drive.Toyota, with Subaru’s support, also helped develop the electric Suzuki’s AWD system, which includes variable torque distribution between the axles according to traction needs, as well as a limited-slip diff in Trail Mode for extra-slippery conditions.A very short stint around a controlled 4WD course provided evidence of some decent off-road prowess.A promising start, then, but what will the electric Suzuki really be like on Australia’s roads? You’ll need to check back in with us when our full testing commences mid-year.That’s when we’ll also find out if the e Vitara’s efficiency claims come anywhere near the stated combined average WLTP figures of 14.9kWh/100km for the 2WD and 16.6kWh/100km for the AWD.It’s also worth noting that, while there is room for improvement with a 2025 European NCAP rating of four stars, the e Vitara is better than Suzuki’s recent form with the three-star Swift supermini.We’re also hoping the newcomer improves on the brand’s existing, mediocre five-year/unlimited km warranty, which is below many rivals’ seven-year schemes nowadays. More info, including service intervals and pricing, will be revealed closer to the e Vitara’s mid-year launch.

With small SUVs becoming more and more prominent, Suzuki is bringing a new sub-$30K hybrid light SUV to the market - the Fronx. We’ve jumped in for a quick spin at its Australian launch to find out.

After three months living with the Suzuki Swift GLX Hybrid, is this the pick of the light hatch segment, or should you look at the Toyota Yaris or MG3 instead?

Our Swift engages in a circa-1000km road trip with us in its second month - exactly the kind of territory where small, city-focused cars like this can fall downSo, how did our GLX Hybrid fare, and what else has cropped up in our extended time behind the wheel?There are some good and bad things as well as a few surprises along the way. Read on to find out what's been happening.We travelled north of our Sydney home to the NSW mid-north coast for a week, allowing plenty of time to explore the local area. The result was a trip of nearly 1000km, which revealed a few things about the car.For example, it’s not just the cabin up front which is tight on storage. It’s the boot, too. Measuring in at 265 litres, it’s not terrible for the class, but if you’re away for a week or more you’ll definitely use the space available.With just two large duffel bags, an Eski (for the beach, of course) and some chairs, we had no room left.Everything else, groceries, bedding, the works, had to be left in the footwell of the back seat, or worse still, on the back seat itself. If you have kids or a pram, I can’t imagine it would be fun to try and pack for a similar trip.We'll often spruik the benefits of a small car for use inside city limits, but it’s unlikely to be a road-trip hero.On the other hand, this little car surprised me with just enough refinement to not get on your nerves on a long trip.Yes, it’s not as quiet as many mid-sized SUVs or more expensive size-up hatchbacks, but it’s also not bad considering its size.The ride is comfortable over a long journey and so are the seats, which are plush enough to have you hopping out after a few hours in a decent state.Still, cabin storage continues to be a sore point. With a frozen Coke and water in the front cupholder, a phone on the charger, and another cabled up to the system in the third rear cupholder, it left only the doors for storage, neither of which could fit our additional 1.25-litre water bottle, which was consigned to the floor. At the end of the day, it’s a city-focused hatch, and not really designed with inter-city running as a primary consideration. But then again, I’ve seen more clever designs in this class, like Honda’s sorely-missed Jazz, which offered a masterclass in city car floor planning.This was a big surprise, because when it comes to hybrids their fuel efficiency benefits can taper off at freeway speeds.This is generally because the way they are geared means the combustion engine gets more use, and the electric motors can do little to help at such velocities, let alone benefit from the recycled energy from regenerative braking which makes them such fuel-sippers in stop-start traffic.Yet, it's here the Swift’s 'not-a-real-hybrid system' comes into its own. Without a hybrid transaxle with tricky variable ratios to work with, and just a lean and efficient pairing of a three-cylinder engine and continuously variable automatic, the freeway portion of our journey had little to no impact on overall fuel consumption.In fact, the sustained higher speeds had the consumption drop by 0.1L/100km to 4.8L/100km.Real hybrid or not, this Suzuki continues to prove you don’t have to overthink the solution.As good as its fuel consumption may be, I find myself refilling this car a little too often. The computer says I get about 650km from a tank, which I have discovered is because the Swift hybrid’s fuel tank is only 37 litres.Sure, it’s less bill shock when you pull up at the pump and only need to put 25 litres in, but there are now electric cars which can travel as far on a single charge.Oh, and the kicker? This hybrid’s new 1.2-litre three-cylinder engine requires mid-shelf 95RON unleaded which undoes some of your efficiency gains when it comes time to pay.Part of our adventures included some curvy hilly roads, which let the Swift put some of its best traits on display. Specifically, its ride and handling.While Chinese automakers focus on packing in features while offering a clean-sheet design aesthetic, Suzuki’s engineers clearly still have their heart on the art of the drive.The Swift isn’t a masterpiece to drive by any stretch of the imagination. This is, after all, an affordable light hatchback with a small efficiency-focused engine. However, considering its price and class, this is a fun little car to steer.   The steering is weighted just right while the ride is tight enough to keep it from leaning too hard in the corners, but forgiving enough to not make you cringe every time you see a bump.Grip is middling from the stock Yokohama eco tyres, and sound levels are only okay. But the whole package feels more sophisticated and refined than the previous-gen car.The biggest detractor from the drive experience is, as usual, the continuously variable automatic transmission, which pairs with the mild engine outputs to make for disappointment when powering out of a corner.The little three-cylinder engine might have an agreeably gruff tone, but when you’re foot to the floor it’s happy to make a lot of noise while not much is happening in terms of road speed.It’s easy to imagine how much more fun this car could be with more poke, which makes the death of the GLX Turbo a shame. We can only hope the brand follows this hybrid up with a new Swift Sport, which is always a gem of a car.Overall, I came away from our trip impressed with the Swift. I didn’t have high hopes for the city hatch spending extended time on the open road, but every time I got out of it I didn’t come away feeling fatigued or frustrated.Tune in next month for some final thoughts on the Swift Hybrid, and our farewell video.Acquired: February 2025Distance travelled this month: 1291kmOdometer: 6313kmAverage fuel consumption this month: 4.8L/100km

Suzuki's new 'hybrid' swift looks good on paper, but what is it like to live with?

You've set a new-car budget ceiling of $30,000. Your preference is for a small five-door hatch rather than the ubiquitous 'compact SUV' and with fuel price surges now a painfully regular part of life you like the idea of a hybrid.

A true original amongst affordable and quality city cars and superminis, the first Swift arrived in 1983, and the latest version launched in mid-2024 is version number six.

The sixth-generation Swift supermini since 1983, the latest version is the first to introduce mild-hybrid electrification across the range.

The Suzuki Swift Hybrid is the company’s first electrified passenger vehicle sold in Australia, and coincides with the sixth-generation of the long-lived supermini series since 1983.