Mercedes-Benz C300 vs Volkswagen Tayron

What's the difference?

Over five decades, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class has pivoted between mastery and mediocrity, and all-too-often relied on that three-pointed star up front to win over buyers.

Thankfully, the W206 is one is one of the better generations. It's easier on the eye, comfier to travel in, more intuitive to use, safer across the board and a huge improvement to drive. On the evidence of the C200 and C300 launch grades, there's newfound depth and consistency to savour.

Sure, prices have gone up, the C200 could use a bit more power, the steering could benefit from a bit more feel, the odd build-quality glitch made itself heard and there's a fair bit of road noise at times, but overall, the C-Class now deserves to be at the top of your luxury medium sedan shopping list.

Particularly if you can afford to stretch to the rorty C300.

The Tiguan Allspace was not really an iconic Volkswagen badge, not in the same way as the Golf, Polo or even just the Tiguan itself, so the brand has taken a smaller risk than many in changing names. But, to be blunt, it doesn’t really matter what the badge on the back is, as long as, at its core, it lives up to the Volkswagen attributes buyers expect - and the Tayron definitely does that.

This new seven-seat SUV is a very welcome addition not only to Volkswagen’s line-up, but to the entire family SUV segment. It’s competitively priced, enjoyable to drive and very practical. The Tayron has a lot to offer those in the market for family-friendly transport.

That doesn’t mean it’s best-in-class, and there are areas where it can be improved, but there’s no reason why the Tayron shouldn’t enjoy the same level of success the Tiguan Allspace enjoyed.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

If you're checking out the new C-Class for the first time from the front, you'll probably think… hmm, it looks just like the old one, and that's largely true.

But a side view reveals proportions that have changed significantly, thanks to the more raked windscreen, shorter overhangs and cleaner lines, which give it a slightly smaller S-Class look.

Which is more in fitting with where Mercedes wants to place this car against its 3 Series and A4 competitors.

Additionally, the taillights are split for the first time, allowing for a wider boot aperture since the lid now contains some of the lighting elements.

The shrunken limo looks aren't just the whim of some designer or Mercedes-Benz marketing department copywriter, either.

Underneath is an albeit highly modified version of the latest S-Class' MRA2 platform, which results in the longest (at 4755mm) and widest (at 1820mm) C-Class in the series' 40-year existence, as well as the first with this level of electrification capability.

Height and wheelbase dimensions also see a stretch, by 8mm and 25mm to 1450mm and 2865mm over the previous model respectively, and to the benefit of passenger accommodation.

Speaking of which, get used to this new interior aesthetic and general layout – it's a look that's probably going to filter through to most coming non-EQ-branded Mercedes models over the next few years.

From S to C to future E and A classes and beyond. It's a rare instance of trickle-down economics actually working!

Despite the name change, the resemblance between the Tiguan and Tayron is strong, largely because they still share a lot of commonalities.

From the front windscreen forward, they are the same, but the Tayron gets a different lower bumper treatment across the variants to give it a unique front, as well as squared-off wheel arches for further visual separation from Tiguan.

It’s a similar story at the rear too, with a unique lower bumper to make the pair look different when parked side-by-side.

But where you see the most obvious differences between the pair is from the side, with the Tayron 280mm longer than the Tiguan. 

Crucially, the wheelbase has been stretched from 2681mm for the Tiguan to 2791mm for the Tayron, adding an additional 110mm of interior space. This means the side profile of the Tayron looks longer too.

Ultimately, while the changes are obvious when the two are side-by-side, there’s still a clear visual connection between the pair, despite the different names.

One of the best things about the new C-Class is that it's larger and therefore roomier than before. It's also higher quality, easier to use, more comfortable to sit in and - overall - more of a delight to behold.

In contrast, the old C-Class dash looked and felt like it was designed for a much cheaper car, especially compared to Audi's efforts.

Obviously related to the S-Class this time around, it's clear Tesla provided the inspiration for the twin floating screen look and layout, which are just right in their driver orientation and ease of functionality.

There's never really been anything wrong with Mercedes' old front seats, but these AMG Line items are both sumptuous and bracing, keeping their occupants well located ahead of the clever and thoughtfully laid out dashboard.

The brilliantly high-resolution MBUX multimedia and voice-recognition system now works as it should - intuitively and logically, with the screen menus simple to recognise and easy to use, and most without the need to get lost in confusing sub-menus. Just like BMW has managed for years.

If you want to change the instrumentation design, it's now a couple of clearly marked steps, using handily placed switchgear. The same goes for the superb climate control and audio systems. And the wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connected faultlessly and worked a treat. Effortless see-and-push operation all round, backed by concise and classy graphics.

No more degree in Earth-to-Mercedes comm skills required to master this C-Class interior.

Yet there's just enough old-school Benz features to appeal to brand diehards, from the eternal door-card mounted electric seat controls and column-mounted gear shifter, to the deep centre console and turbine face-level air vents. They meld together beautifully with the advanced tech also on offer, like the optional augmented-reality head-up display with 3D-graphics.

Annoyingly, on one of our test cars, that tradition also extended to a couple of squeaks and rattles, proving that maybe Mercedes hasn't quite conquered all its past quality gremlins. And, like most luxury cars nowadays, endless ambient lighting choices are available of dubious taste.

Never mind. This is the finest C-Class front-seat environment since, well, probably the original W210 190E's of the 1980s.

And all those extra dimensions pay dividends in terms of interior space in the back seat.

There's plenty of knee room even with the tester sat behind their 178cm frame; head room is adequate even with the optional sunroof fitted, and there's ample shoulder space. So, it's more comfortable than any C-Class ever has been in terms of sheer dimensions.

Additionally, the rear backrest is well angled, while the cushion is deep enough to provide sufficient thigh support. But the centre perch is a bit of a squeeze for all concerned. Best avoided.

There's also added practicality to be found with the large and deep door pockets, front seat-back map pockets and folding centre armrest, that not only has a tablet holder, but when pressed in twice, also reveals sliding cupholders as well. Clever.

The C-Class rear seat is really lacking for nothing, with face-level air vents, overhead lighting, grab handles and coat hooks all highlighting the level of thought that went into making this a practical compact family sedan.

Plus, the C-Class comes with this folding ski port, which along with the folding rear seats, increases boot volume from 455L to, well, a lot more. While that's not quite as good as others like the BMW 3 Series, it's big enough for this car.

Note that there is no spare wheel, as the tyres are of the limited-distance runflat variety.

Volkswagen’s reputation for being ‘semi-premium’ came in part because it offered an elevated in-car experience compared to many of its mainstream rivals. And that is very much the case with the new Tayron, which is loaded with the latest technology but still looks and feels like a Volkswagen.

The interior is dominated by the central screen, which at 15 inches on the 150TSI Elegance and 195TSI R-Line pushes to the very limits of how big and how high an multimedia screen like this can be practically and safely included in a car. While it’s not the biggest in-car screen, it sits right at the top of the centre of the dashboard and almost gets in the way of vision across the bonnet.

The (slightly) smaller 12.9-inch display in the rest of the range is obviously better, but both screens are generous in size and offer good touchscreen usability, with fast reactions and relatively straightforward menus.

However, what neither offers is much in the way of physical switchgear, so most controls need to be changed via the touchscreen, which is not the easiest or safest way to interact with a vehicle you’re trying to drive.

But overall the cabin design is nice and what we’ve come to expect from Volkswagen. The materials look and feel high quality and there’s a nice mix to create a more premium-feeling environment.

One notable element is the extra storage in the console between the front seats, which includes a clever spot for two smartphones to wirelessly charge, with a lid on top for added usable space.

As for the practicality, that really depends on your point-of-view and reasons for needing a seven-seat SUV. That’s because the Tayron, like the Tiguan Allspace before it, is not really a true seven-seater but rather more accurately described as a ‘5+2’ SUV. 

What that means is, the third-row seats are for occasional use rather than regular use. So, if you need something to carry five or more passengers (most likely a family with multiple children) on a regular basis, then the Tayron is likely too small for your needs.

If, however, you need a five-seater the majority of the time but would like the option to carry two more if the need arises, then the Tayron is very much worth considering.

Even then, it’s worth noting that the third row is both tight on space (even with the second row slid forward) and there is only limited storage and no air-con vents, charging outlets or even child seat restraints.

Space in the first two rows is good, though, with the second row able to slide backwards and forwards depending on how much space your passengers need.

As for the 150TSI Life, with its unique five-seat layout, well it takes advantage of one of the biggest selling points of the Tayron - it’s big boot. 

The five-seater gets 885 litres of boot space, thanks in part to some underfloor storage where the seats would normally be. So it will appeal to those who like a mid-size SUV, like the Tiguan, but need extra cargo room on the regular.

As for the seven-seat versions, Volkswagen claims the Tayron has 850 litres with third-row stowed and 345 litres with third row in use. The former is excellent, while the latter is adequate.

The addition of the extra seats means the Tayron is equipped with a space-saver spare wheel, rather than a full-size one.

Volkswagen Australia has spent the last two decades carefully positioning itself as a ‘semi-premium’ car brand, selling buyers on its European design and dynamics while still undercutting the genuine luxury brands.

However, with the influx of new brands and the post-pandemic inflation across the industry, Volkswagen knows it cannot price itself out of reach of the typical family buyer that would look for a Tayron.

That’s why the entry-level 110TSI Life starts below $50,000 and both the five-seater 150TSI Life and seven-seat 150TSI Elegance come in under $60k. It’s only the flagship 195TSI R-Line that blows past $70,000 and pushes back into that true ‘semi-premium’ part of the market.

The decision to have the Tayron around that $50-60,000 mark is no accident, the brand revealed that's the price range many of its buyers prefer to shop in, so they’ve met them where they are.

The 110TSI Life starts at $48,290 (all prices exclude on-road costs) and the more powerful 150TSI Life from $53,990. Both come with 18-inch alloy wheels, keyless entry and ignition, a power tailgate, digital instrument cluster, a 12.9-inch touchscreen multimedia system, in-built navigation, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, as well as a wireless charger.

Interestingly, the 110TSI comes standard with seven seats, while the 150TSI only has five, but we’ll dive into the details on that later.

Next up in the range is the 150TSI Elegance, which is priced from $59,490. It has seven seats as well as 19-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights with an illuminated grille strip, LED tail-lights, chrome roof rails, rear privacy glass, heated steering wheel, leather-appointed upholstery, power adjustable front seats with massage function and heated rear seats.

Finally, the range is crowned by the 195TSI R-Line, starting at $73,490, and equipped with Matrix LED headlights, R-Line exterior and interior styling, progressive steering, a 15-inch touchscreen multimedia system, a head-up display and a Harman Kardon premium sound system.

Probably the biggest departure compared to any previous C-Class is this generation's switch to direct-injection four-cylinder-only powertrains – including the coming Mercedes-AMG high-performance versions. Now that should be interesting.

As mentioned earlier, the C200's four-cylinder turbo engine is now about 25 per cent smaller in capacity, down from 2.0L to a 1496cc 1.5L twin-cam 16-valve turbo engine. Dubbed the M254, it pumps out 150kW of power at a high 6100rpm and 300Nm of torque between 1800-4000rpm.

That's not to say it's lacking in muscle, though, since it can sprint from zero to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds, on the way to a 245km/h top speed. These outputs are at least a match for the bigger-engined 3 Series and A4 equivalents, by the way.

If it's more you want, then the C300 features a 1999cc 2.0L turbo version of the M254, delivering 190kW at 5800rpm and 400Nm between 2000-3200rpm. This slashes that 0-100km/h time to a speedy six seconds flat. There's also an extra 20kW of overboost available for short periods if you're really in a hurry, while - where legal - it's possible to hit 250km/h.

Both send drive to the rear wheels via a nine-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the 48V mild-hybrid system, dubbed EQ Boost, employs an integrated starter-generator and lithium-ion battery that provides an additional 15kW and 200Nm of electric boost at low engine speeds.

So, while it doesn't ever run purely on electricity, the electrification tech certainly either brings more punch or takes the load off the petrol engine, depending on how you're driving it.

There are three powertrain choices for the arrival of the Tayron, but the company has also confirmed two plug-in hybrid variants are coming in 2026.

For now it’s an all-petrol-powered line-up. The 110TSI Life is powered by a 110kW/250Nm 1.4-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine. This is paired to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and sends all its performance via the front wheels only.

The 150TSI gets a bigger 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine making, you guessed it, 150kW and 320Nm. It also has a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic but adds all-wheel drive.

Finally, there’s the 195TSI R-Line, which VW claims offers ‘GTI levels of performance’, so it gets a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder unit pumping out 195kW and 400Nm. Once again, this is mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and gets an all-wheel drive system.

While the performance offered by all three powertrains is good, the lack of the hybrid option from launch does cost Volkswagen a point or two.

Remember when I said that the C-Class moved to an all-four-cylinder engine range? Well, that's primarily to help it better meet fuel consumption, efficiency and lower emission targets.

On the Australian combined fuel consumption cycle, the C200 manages 6.9 litres per 100km – and that's extremely impressive for a medium-sized sedan weighing almost 1.8 tonnes. So is the fact that the larger-engined C300 returns only 0.4L/100km more at 7.3L/100km. Fitted with a 66-litre tank, these numbers suggest that the former can average nearly 960km between refills while the latter can manage just over 900km.

These figures translate to averages of 157 and 164 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide emissions respectively. On the flipside, both these Euro-6 emissions rated engines require 98 RON premium unleaded petrol to deliver their best.

So much for lab tests. Out in the real world, we drove both cars for several hundred kilometres on a hot summer's day, from inner Melbourne during peak-hour traffic, to some great curvy rounds out in central Victoria, featuring some tight corners and ample opportunity to really stretch both cars' legs.

Over these routes, we averaged an indicated 8.4L/100km in the C200 and – astonishingly – 7.4L/100km in the C300. Yes, the larger and more powerful engine proved more economical.

Clearly, along with the advanced aerodynamics, engine stop/start system and 48V mild-hybrid tech, all that downsizing works. No wonder Mercedes deemed it unnecessary to bother with diesel engines for this generation C-Class.

Going with a line-up of turbocharged petrol engines means the Tayron isn’t the most efficient SUV in its segment, but the addition of the eHybrid PHEVs next year will change that.

In the meantime, what you need to know is that the 110TSI uses 7.6L/100km, the 150TSI has a  7.7L/100km claim and the 195TSI is unsurprisingly the thirstiest at 8.6L/100km.

Those are all relatively high when you compare them to key rivals, such as the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid, which uses just 5.6L/100km, the same as the Toyota Kluger Hybrid - and both of those are conventional hybrid systems. 

The saving grace for VW is the non-hybrid Santa Fe uses 9.3L, so it makes the Tayron look better. But until the Tayron plug-in hybrids arrive, VW is at a disadvantage.

As for driving range, the 110TSI has a 55-litre fuel tank, so a theoretical range of 720km between fueling stops. The 150TSI and 195TSI get a slightly larger 58-litre tank, which means the former has a 750km range and the latter approximately 675km.

There has been a philosophical shift in how the C-Class is presented.

Even with their standard-in-Australia AMG Line package, the regular grades like the C200 and C300 are now leaning into the brand's luxury heritage, while the BMW-baiting sports sedan versions will be left to the coming AMG versions.

And this in turn profoundly informs how the W206 drives.

Even with the optional Sports Pack on 19-inch wheels, the C200 as tested finally feels like a premium midsized sedan experience. Muted at start up, the 150kW/300Nm 1.5L turbo steps off the line smartly and smoothly, its nine-speed auto shifting effortlessly through the gears to keep the engine feeling lively and lusty.

Around town it's easy to mistake the engine as a larger-capacity unit, since throttle response is instantaneous, with little to no lag detectable. It's a strong start for a base powertrain, especially as the C200 settles into a relaxed cruise at freeway speeds. Cycling through the driving settings also reveals how feisty the 'Sport' mode is.

But the 1.5L's lack of size becomes obvious the moment you need to overtake quickly, or when a quick squirt of acceleration up a hill is required, because the engine needs plenty of revs to approach that 6100rpm power peak. While still pretty brisk in these situations, it's also fairly vocal too, with a sense of having to work hard to maintain momentum.

Switching to the C300 highlights how much better suited the 190kW/400Nm 2.0L turbo is to highway driving, leaping forward with much more force and conviction, across the entire performance spectrum. In every metric, this is a better choice – throttle response, mechanical refinement, cruising ease. And the fact that the onboard computer showed less fuel consumption cements our preference for the larger-hearted C-Class.

In fact, both models possess a chassis that feels like it could do with a whole lot more power. Light and tight around town, the steering weighs up nicely at higher speeds, with a linear and reassuringly planted feel. The same also applies to how confident and controlled the Mercedes feels through fast, tight turns, yet settles into a relaxed and comfortable tourer along long, straight stretches of road.

It's a pity, then, that such dynamic agility and prowess doesn't really involve the driver, since the steering feels quite isolated from what's going on underneath; for the vast majority of C-Class buyers, that's fine. But, as a quick spin in any latest BMW 3 Series or Jaguar XE will reveal, there isn't an intimate, two-way connection going on here. That's probably going to be reserved for the AMG models.

Our C200 rode on bigger wheels and steel springs, while the C300 was fitted with optional adaptive dampers. In the previous-generation C-Class, the differences would be stark: a busy and jittery ride in the former, compared to soft yet still unsettled suspension in the latter.

That's all ancient history now, as even the 'passively' suspended C200 now isolates its occupants from the rough and tumble of our inconsistent roads. Still firmish, but no longer harsh.

And the C300 with adaptive dampers seems downright plush by comparison, while offering the driver personalisation options within the aforementioned driving models to tailor the steering, performance and engine sound settings that best suit the prevailing mood.

Too bad there's some road and tyre noise intrusion heard inside when driving over coarse bitumen roads. This is a common pitfall amongst German vehicles in Australia.

Still, it doesn't detract from the fact that the whole chassis set-up can at-last cushion and cosset occupants like, well, a mini S-Class.

Which is the whole point of the W206 C-Class. It now majors on comfort and reassurance like the better Mercedes-Benz models used to, while still being suave and sprightly enough to be a memorable – if not over-exciting – drive.

As a result, the C300 especially is a much-more likeable car than past iterations. Just remember to tick the adaptive damper option for the most optimal experience. Job well done, Mercedes.

Family-friendly SUV or not, a big part of Volkswagen’s ‘semi-premium’ reputation came from its more dynamic and engaging driving experience. While other brands have certainly caught up, and in some cases surpassed VW, it remains a core attribute.

That is very much the case with the Tayron, which has a very well-sorted powertrain and chassis, and that means good performance when you put your foot down and excellent response when you turn the wheel. 

Obviously nobody really buys a seven-seat SUV for its dynamic qualities but it’s a nice bonus, especially when you are paying this kind of money.

One downside of the dynamics is the responsive handling comes at the cost of firmer suspension, so it can feel busy on bumpy roads.

However, there was a bigger issue on the cars we drove at the official launch event, with several suffering from noticeable rattles from the doors, especially when the road gets choppy.

This is very much not a traditional Volkswagen feature, which typically have very solid build quality, so it will be worth listening for if you take a Tayron for a test drive. 

As you’d expect from an all-new model, the Tayron comes loaded with safety equipment, including both passive and active systems.

On the passive side, there are nine airbags, including a centre airbag between the passengers and side curtain ‘bags that cover the third row occupants.

On the active safety front, there is all the usual stuff you expect these days, including freeway-speed auto emergency braking (AEB) with vulnerable road-user protections and intersection features, lane keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring, both front and rear cross-traffic alert (including pedestrian and cyclist detection), driver attention alert, traffic sign recognition, adaptive cruise control and exit warning.

Volkswagen has also rolled out a new system called Travel Assist, which combines the adaptive cruise control and lane assist to create a semi-autonomous driving function under the right circumstances.

Notably, if you don’t like all these systems, Volkswagen says that some of them can be switched off and stay off (rather than defaulting to on every time you start the car). These include the acoustic speed warning and adaptive cruise control for speed limit response and road layout response. However, all the other systems will switch back on every time you start the car.

Which is actually not a bad thing in the case of the Tayron, at least based on our initial drive. Unlike many rivals which feature overly-sensitive systems with annoying ‘beeps and bongs’ that can actually become distracting at times, the Volkswagen system is both well calibrated and offers subtle warnings. It makes for a more enjoyable driving experience, while retaining all the benefits of these safety systems.

The Tayron has already earned a five-star rating from Euro NCAP, so the company is expecting the same from ANCAP.

Kudos to Mercedes-Benz for being the first luxury manufacturer in Australia to offer a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty – matching most other mainstream makers. Lexus and Audi have only recently followed suit.

A five-year roadside assistance subscription is also included. Service intervals are 12-monthly or at every 25,000km, whichever occur first.

Additionally, a four-year capped price service plan is available, at $550 for the first year, $900 for the second, $1000 for the third and $2450 for the fourth, totalling $4900.

Alternatively, buyers can also choose three pre-purchase service plans to save a bit of money, but these must be bought prior to the first service.

The Tayron is covered by VW’s usual five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty. While that’s not bad, per se, it also not particularly outstanding given the growing number of seven and 10-year coverages.

As for servicing, the Tayron requires a check-up every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. VW Australia offers either three or five-year Care Plans, which save you money compared to the pay-as-you-go offer.

For the 110TSI a three-year plan costs $1595 (saving $178) and the five-year plan $2910 (saving $528). The 150TSI and 195TSI cost the same, with three years $1891 (saving $211) and five years for $3550 (saving $554).