What's the difference?
Once upon a time, people would dream about owning a Mercedes-Benz 450SLC – the C107 sports/luxury coupe flagship of the 1970s.
Sexy, stylish, secure and incredibly solid, it embodied the brand’s ‘Engineered Like No Other Car' mantra of the era.
Today’s all-new, second-generation, C192 AMG GT Coupe is something of an indirect descendant of this sort of thinking, changing tack from its supercar-esque 2014 C190 predecessor, with more space, more seats, more sensibility and, conversely, even more steak and sizzle from its glorious V8.
A modern-day SLC? The Porsche 911, Aston Martin DB12, Maserati GranTurismo and Bentley Continental GT’s worst nightmare? Or something else entirely?
These questions and more are answered below.
The Duster is finally in Australia! Anyway, moving on…
Dated Top Gear reference aside, Renault has just launched its version of the boxy Duster small SUV in Australia.
Badged as a Dacia in Europe, the Renault Duster features different badging, as well as more noise insulation to create a quieter interior.
This is the first new Renault passenger model to launch in Australia for a while now, following the Megane E-Tech electric SUV and updated Arkana ‘coupe’ SUV in 2024.
Balancing a fine line between the bland-looking Subaru Crosstrek and the hardcore Suzuki Jimny, is the Renault Duster worth considering? Read along to find out.
The GT63 4Matic+ is a breathtaking example of everything that Mercedes-Benz and AMG are.
Ferociously fast, incredibly agile and superbly sophisticated, it should be on anybody’s shortlist, if that also includes a Porsche, Aston Martin, Maserati or even a Lamborghini. And it’s definitely much more than yesterday’s SLC ever was – for similar money in today’s terms, as it turns out.
But, around Tasmania’s glorious roads at least, the Mercedes-AMG lacks the ride comfort and road noise isolation to be a fully-rounded-out GT, and that’s a disappointment for a brand with such formidable history in making such cars.
The Renault Duster looks set to put the French carmaker back on the map here in Australia.
While there will likely be general appeal thanks to its cool looks, it holds special appeal for us off-road enthusiasts as a new, cost-affective option that’s filled to the brim with character and charisma.
While it may not be perfect, it also doesn’t matter. In fact, this makes me like the Duster even more.
The manual AWD feels like the purest and most correct way to experience the Duster as it’s so smile-inducing. However, this isn’t to discredit the automatic FWD version as it’s arguably more liveable day-to-day.
Pick your poison. You’re bound to love it no matter which way you go.
Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.
This is still clearly a Mercedes AMG GT coupe, like the 2014 C190 original, but a ground-up redesign sees it subtly yet significantly altered.
Some 270kg heavier than before, the larger-in-every-dimension body combines aluminium, steel, magnesium and fibre composite materials for improved rigidity and a lower centre of gravity. Length (4729mm) and wheelbase (2700mm) have been stretched by 177mm and 70mm respectively. Width (1984mm) and height (1352mm) are also up.
The nose treatment is similar to before, especially with the bulgy bonnet and signature vertical slatted grille fitted. These, combined with the LED digital headlight shape effect, is reminiscent of, but far-better executed than, the goofy-looking MG5’s face.
Underneath, it's an all-new platform shared with the SL, with the rear transaxle of the old car replaced by a permanent AWD system, leading from 46:54 front/rear weight distribution to 50:50 as a result.
That aggressive, exaggerated cab-backward/ultra-long bonnet silhouette that visually connected it with the SLS gives way to more-conventional and practical coupe proportions that is striking if not especially original, since they do look quite 911-esque. Along with the longer wheelbase and wider tracks, the result allows for two small rear seats to be fitted, while liftback cargo access remains.
Similarly, in the name of way-more usable interior packaging, Mercedes-AMG says it pushed the driving position nearly 180mm forward compared to the previous GT. Let’s see what that all looks like inside.
When you see a Renault Duster parked up or on the road, you’ll instantly be able to tell what it is.
This small SUV is essentially a rebadged Dacia for international markets and the design changes are minimal.
The most noticeable departure is the front grille has ‘Renault’ badging written out instead of a Dacia badge. It’s a departure from any other current Renault model on offer locally and gives the car a tough, unique presence.
There are also Y-shaped LED daytime running lights that look cool and modern.
Depending on the Duster version you opt for, the lower section of the front bumper looks different. All-wheel drive (AWD) versions sit higher to improve the approach angle and ground clearance.
Around the side there’s plenty of plastic cladding to drive home that this is a tough all-terrain machine and not your everyday crossover. I prefer it to the glossy and chrome accents on rival SUVs as it's no-nonsense.
The black body cladding around the wheel arches and along the door sills is recycled and has a fleck throughout it. There’s also a recycled icon near the side mirrors which is a touch too on the nose for my liking.
Towards the rear there are angular haunches that make the Duster look tough, as well as hidden rear door handles on the C-pillar.
At the back there are even more angles that make the Duster stand out. The most obvious is the triangular tail-lights which look funky and cool.
There’s little else to note about the rear design besides a subtle Renault badge and Duster written out on the bottom of the tailgate. I appreciate how clean the rear is because some carmakers can go over the top with badging.
Inside, the Duster defies its budget roots with a high-tech and modern-presenting design. The Y-shaped air vents continue the motif from the headlights, while the 10.1-inch touchscreen multimedia system is mounted prominently on the dash and is smartly tilted towards the driver.
After spending some time behind the wheel, however, you start to notice a lot of the Duster’s finishes inside are hard, scratchy plastics. It’s most noticeable on the dashboard.
Depending on which version you opt for, the door armrests are also finished in hard plastic. The top-spec Techno gets a softer padding on top, however.
While there is a lot of hard plastics, it’s nowhere near as noticeable as a Suzuki Jimny.
The first impression inside is that of space, despite the falling roofline and coupe-like upsweep of the side windows and you look back. While, again, similar to a 911s, a kink at the door gives the GT a unique character.
Even larger people will appreciate the generous amounts of room up front, with space to stretch, sat in sumptuously comfy bucket seats. Note that the standard ones are better than the racier but firmer Sports versions.
The driving position is perfect, ahead of a dashboard that is very typical modern Mercedes in appearance and layout.
To that end, the tablet-style integrated touchscreen (11.9 inches) is clear, fast and intuitive once time is taken to learn it. And points are also won for the multi-configurable electronic instrumentation, that allows for a variety of screens, including track, classic and minimalist views.
The trademark turbine air vents, the quite beautiful material and trim finishes and just the general solid feel are further typical contemporary Mercedes cabin treatments, as are the excellent ventilation and ample storage options.
And while rear vision isn't great, that's what cameras are for. It's all pretty much on brand.
It is a shame, given how elevated the Mercedes-AMG engineering is underneath, that the GT’s interior look and ambience is so similar to those of a (albeit higher-spec) C-Class or GLE. It's simply not as special as some of the company’s previous sports cars.
More annoyingly, the ride is too firm and bumpy for a GT, and this has the unhappy effect of provoking random rattly trim sounds within the cabin. It’s a bit like scrunched-up cellophane. In a $420K (as tested) Merc, that’s very disappointing, especially as it can be heard over the copious amount of road and tyre noise droning through, particularly on coarser bitumen surfaces.
Further back, the rear seat is strictly two-plus-two, and nobody over 150cm tall is recommended to travel there by Mercedes itself. That sloping roofline is the culprit. That said, brief trips with a bowed head are possible, as the fixed cushions and split-folding backrests are actually surprisingly comfy. But only for short journeys. Kids should love it though, and the second row does open up the GT’s usefulness enormously.
As does a near-doubling of the AMG’s cargo capacity, jumping 146 litres to 321L with backrests erect, to a whopping 675L (+325L) in two-seater mode. The flat floor is accessed via a large electrically-operated liftback door, offering quite a large aperture for easy loading/unloading.
Having no spare wheel helps here, with a tyre inflation kit included in lieu of that.
Meanwhile, at the front, under the bonnet, things have definitely changed for the better as well.
In terms of practicality, this is one small SUV that punches above its weight.
Up front both the seats are manually adjustable, which is expected at this price point. There’s nothing wrong with this as they still allow you to find your desired seating position.
The entry-level Evolution comes with cloth upholstery which feels nice to touch and allows for decent breathability, whereas the top-spec Techno has a premium textile that almost feels like neoprene (wetsuit material). I’m thankful there’s no leather upholstery option in this car because it wouldn’t suit its character.
Ahead of the driver is a leather-wrapped steering wheel which feels more premium than you’d expect. It feels lovely in the hand and is complimented by the squared-off shape.
Another reason why I like this steering wheel is it offers a generous amount of tilt and reach adjustment. This means people of all different sizes and statures will be able to find a comfortable driving position.
There’s a nice smattering of physical buttons on the steering wheel for critical things like the cruise control and changing the content on the digital instrument cluster, though if you want to change the volume or track, you need to interact with the stubby stalk behind the steering wheel.
This is a classic Renault quirk that’s been in a number of its cars for years. It takes a bit to get your head around, but once you do it’s second nature.
Behind the steering wheel is a 7.0-inch digital instrument cluster which looks a little small in its housing. Clear analogue dials for the rev counter and speedometer would have been better and likely more timeless.
As standard, however, there’s a big digital speedometer readout that’s easy to read, as well as a few layout styles and informative pages to cycle through.
I wish the digital rev counter was featured on more of the page layouts and it also had more numbers denoting the rev counter markings, rather than simple lines. This is particularly annoying in the manual.
Moving across, the 10.1-inch touchscreen multimedia system is clear and bright. It also helps that the native interface is simple and easy to navigate.
There’s wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto across the line-up which is fantastic to see and almost expected now. Complimenting this is a standard wireless phone charger at the base of the centre tunnel.
Additionally, if you opt for the Techno, you get a phone mount on the dashboard. I still haven’t decided whether this is helpful or not given there’s already wireless phone mirroring and the phone mount doesn’t provide charge as standard.
Unlike many newer cars, the Duster retains plenty of physical switchgear up front so key functions like the dual-zone climate control and drive modes.
In terms of storage up front there are two cupholders, a handy shelf for stowing things above the wireless charger, a big centre console box, as well as a deep glove box.
Moving to the second row there’s plenty of headroom, though legroom is minimal for adults above (183cm) six feet. You have to remember this is a small SUV so it’s actually not too bad.
The second-row bench seat is laid back, allowing you to get comfortable on longer drives. Two adults can easily fit back there, though pushing it to three would make it squishy.
Second-row amenities include air vents and two USB-C ports. There’s also a special connector on the back of the centre console which allows you to fit a wide range of optional 'YouClip' accessories. These include a cupholder, light or hook.
In the same vein, you can also add a phone or tablet holder to the back of the front-seat headrest. The configurability is to your heart’s content.
A downside of the second row, however, is there’s no fold-down centre armrest. This also means there are no rear cupholders as standard, which is disappointing.
At the back the entire Duster line-up has a manual tailgate, which is fine for the price point.
The boot space itself is decent as there’s no load lip, but if you’re wanting a larger space overall, it’s best to opt for the front-wheel drive (FWD) versions as they have 472L with the rear seats upright. AWD versions, on the other hand, have 358L with the rear seats up.
The Techno 4x2 in particular has a two-tier floor which allows you to stow things underneath the main boot floor, or you can create a partition to stop things moving around.
Boot-related amenities include a light, hooks and a 12V socket. There are also extra YouClip points, including one on the tailgate. This allows you to add extra lights or hooks.
As standard, all Duster variants get a full-size spare wheel, which is fantastic given this type of vehicle may be spending a lot of time out on the open road.
Starting from $370,400 (all prices are before on-road costs), the Mercedes-AMG GT63 4Matic+ is priced and positioned as something of an eagle amongst some pretty delectable doves, given its combination of four seats, 430kW of power, 800Nm of torque and four-wheel drive.
No rival equivalents can match the Mercedes on paper. The 398kW/610Nm 911 Carrera 4 GTS T-Hybrid offers less power but starts from $400,000-plus. The 410kW/650Nm GranTurismo Trofeo begins at $450K, the 500kW/800Nm DB12 from $455K and the 404kW/470Nm Continental GT from $460K.
Only the 460kW/750Nm BMW M8 Competition comes closest to the Mercedes-AMG, from $380K.
Side note, today’s GT is only slightly more expensive than what the 450SLC was nearly half a century ago when adjusted for inflation.
And, just like with that classic old Benz, it shares much with the brand’s legendary SL convertible stablemate – including, in this case, standard all-wheel drive and active rear-axle steering… aka 4WS to select third and fourth-generation Honda Prelude owners out there.
What else does $400K-plus buy you? As you’d expect, the GT63 4Matic+ comes choc-full of standard equipment, much of it typical of the luxury coupe breed, with leather-covered and electrically operated everything.
How about a front-axle lift system with GPS-enabled memory that automatically raises the GT’s nose to help clear bumps and then remembers to do so next time?
There are climate-controlled AMG sports seats with inflatable bolstering and massaging functionality, a fixed glass roof, a head-up display, augmented-reality satellite navigation, 360-degree surround views, performance telemetry data as part of an extensive multimedia system, an 11.9-inch portrait touchscreen, 11-speaker Burmester audio, a handsfree-powered tailgate, 21-inch alloys and cutting-edge driver-assist safety tech. More on that in the Safety section below.
Then there are the myriad option packs, bumping the GT63’s price up towards $500,000. These include a $2.7K seat trim package; a $10K AMG Night Package that adds darker trim treatments (often where chrome was); an aerodynamics package with fixed spoiler replacing the standard active spoiler; a $2.6K AMG Performance Seat package; a $13K Carbon Fibre package and $13.2K Ceramic Brakes.
Now, while the new GT does ditch the previous model’s unique rear transaxle spaceframe pioneered by the gull-winged SLS of the early 2010s, the resulting longer wheelbase and shorter overhangs do provide less outlandish and more practical design.
Let’s check that out in more detail.
In Australia the 2026 Renault Duster is being offered in two trim levels with two powertrain options.
Pricing starts at $31,990, before on-road costs, for the Duster Evolution 4x2 automatic and extends to $37,990, before on-roads, for the Duster Techno 4x4 manual.
This is competitive pricing for the small SUV segment, especially when you consider the rugged and considerably smaller Suzuki Jimny costs similar.
As standard the Duster Evolution comes with 17-inch alloy wheels, a 7.0-inch digital instrument cluster, a 10.1-inch touchscreen multimedia system with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a wireless charger, dual-zone climate control, an electric park brake, as well as black and grey cloth upholstery.
Stepping up to the Techno gets you larger 18-inch alloy wheels, front fog lights, privacy glass, modular roof rails, keyless entry and walk-away locking, push-button start, a smartphone holder, as well as black and grey premium textile upholstery.
While the entire Duster line-up has LED low-beam headlights, the high-beams are only halogen, which is a disappointing cost-cutting move.
Despite this, there’s still plenty of standard equipment, even from the base Evolution trim.
If that’s not enough, however, you can further personalise your Duster with a wide range of optional accessories. There are clip-on cupholders, lights, hooks and tablet holders inside, as well as Rhino Rack and Thule accessories outside.
There’s a plaque signifying which engineer “handcrafted” the GT’s engine – in this case, the famous M177 in 3982cc, 4.0-litre twin-turbo intercooled V8 petrol guise.
Delivering 430kW of power at 6500rpm and 800Nm of torque from 2500-4500rpm, it sends drive to all four wheels via a nine-speed multi-clutch transmission (dubbed MCT in AMG-speak), catapulting the GT63 4Matic+ from 0-100km/h in just 3.2 seconds, on the way to a top speed of 315km/h.
How does it do that?
With AWD, the GT is now nearly 15 per cent heavier than before, but it still manages a punchy 218kW/tonne. Active aerodynamics over, inside and under a more-rigid body structure also helps.
The AMG 4Matic+ AWD system goes from 50/50 front/rear, to 100 per cent rear, variable torque distribution according to conditions and settings, and backed up by an electronic limited-slip differential. Among the many driving settings are Race Start, Drift Mode and good-old Comfort, if it all becomes too much.
Also keeping all that performance in check is a high-performance composite brake setup with improved cooling for faster responses.
Interlinked active roll bars improve body control, the five-link independent suspension features adaptive dampers for a softer ride.
And, as for that 4WS tech, the rear wheels steer opposite to the fronts at up to 100km/h (by some 2.5 degrees) for tighter and tidier handling, or 0.7 degrees in the same direction above 100, for greater stability and road-holding.
Its effect on the way this near-two-tonne coupe zigs and zags around corners is something you need to experience to really appreciate.
As noted earlier, the Renault Duster is offered with two different powertrains.
The most affordable option is a 1.3-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine which produces 113kW of power and 270Nm of torque.
This is mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission with drive sent to the front wheels only. It’s worth noting this is the same powertrain that propels the Renault Arkana and Captur, as well as certain entry-level Mercedes-Benz models.
Renault claims this version of the Duster can do the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.2 seconds.
The second powertrain option is a 1.2-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol with 48V mild-hybrid assistance which produces 96kW and 230Nm.
This is less powerful than the four-cylinder petrol but it’s mated to a six-speed manual gearbox with drive sent through an all-wheel drive system.
Renault claims the AWD Duster can do the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds. That’s not very fast at all…
Claimed top speed for the entire Duster line-up in Australia is 200km/h.
Unfortunately there’s no automatic AWD Duster available globally yet so if you want to maximise your all-terrain capability, you’ll need to opt for this mild-hybrid manual powertrain option.
All versions of the Renault Duster have a braked towing capacity of 1500kg, though it’s worth noting the towball download limit is only 75kg. This could prove to be a hassle if you’ve got a towball-mounted bike rack and you put a hefty e-bike on it as this could easily send it over this threshold.
Actually, the GT’s economy isn’t horrendous considering how fast it can go.
Even blasting a few times around beckoning country roads, we managed an indicated 13.0L/100km, which is an improvement on what Mercedes-AMG says the GT averages the 14.6L/100km average that Mercedes-AMG officially states.
That translates to a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 334g/km.
Using 98 RON premium unleaded petrol, an average of just under 480km between refills of the 70L tank is possible. The urban run sees consumption rocket to 21.8L/100km (for just 321km of range), or 10.4 out on the highway run, meaning that over 670km is possible should you decide to drive in a docile manner.
Renault claims the four-cylinder, FWD Duster consumes 6.5L/100km, whereas the three-cylinder, AWD is claimed to consume 5.7L/100km, both on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle (ADR 81/02).
The former has a 50L fuel tank and requires a minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol, while the latter has a slightly larger 55L fuel tank but requires higher quality 95 RON premium unleaded petrol.
We didn’t get a chance to properly get as-tested fuel consumption figures during this initial first drive, but the FWD Duster has a theoretical range of 770km and the AWD Duster extends that to 965km.
Nobody will drive the GT63 4Matic+ and think, ‘Oh, this is OK’, because its breadth of performance is phenomenal.
No matter which mode you're in, from Comfort through to track-tuned Race, the Mercedes-AMG blends forceful pace and commanding control without ever breaking a sweat.
Flex your right foot and the two-tonne coupe bounds into action like a giant on a mission, striding past posted speed limit signs in nanoseconds and way, way faster than the law will stand if diligence isn’t exercised.
And there’s no point relying on seat-of-your-pants sensations, either, because the chassis below embraces the road with an almost zealous devotion. Which is astounding, given how agile the four-wheel steering-enhanced handling is.
The 63’s super power is exactly that – it dulls your sense of speed. One tester admitted to exceeding 150km/h before noticing. An odd confession considering the sonic boombox that is the bi-turbo V8’s howl.
But jailbait performance is not even the 63’s most lingering joy. That would be its steering perfection, that delivers that rare trifecta of keenness, crispness and communication. The wheel feels eager and alive in your hands, even when powering between tight turns, backed up by sensational grip and control. How can a two-tonne GT handle so sharply?
Warm, dry roads were the order of the day, so we can’t tell you how the 4Matic+ permanent AWD system deals with wet or slippery surfaces, but the slick multi-clutch transmission, seamless torque-vectoring tech and sticky tyres more than cope with the 63’s formidable outputs.
So, that's the gushing part out the way, then.
Despite the adaptive dampers, rigid architecture and exquisitely sophisticated suspension, the ride is simply too stiff in Comfort mode, and downright jittery on some of the Tasmanian roads we tested on, for the 63 to be considered a true luxury grand tourer. It just isn't comfortable, luxurious or supple enough.
Plus, grippy as they are, the 21-inch wheels transmit too much road and tyre noise through to the cabin, meaning that the GT isn't as quiet as you'd hope. Add the aforementioned trim squeaks, and the expected cocooned silence isn’t always there.
The upshot is that the 63 possesses more of a sports car character than a luxury GT character. Great news if you're a 911 type buyer and are seeking a high-performance 2+2 alternative, but a disappointment if comfort and refinement are priorities.
Still, it is impossible not to be deeply moved by this Mercedes-AMG.
Depending on which version of the Duster you opt for, they’re rather different beasts. The most ‘normal’ version is the FWD auto.
This powertrain combination with the 1.3-litre turbo four-cylinder and seven-speed dual-clutch automatic immediately feels familiar if you’ve driven a current Arkana or Captur.
There’s enough power underfoot to get moving along briskly, though you won’t be breaking the land speed record anytime soon. There’s also a wealth of torque allowing the engine to feel like it’s not working hard.
It’s fun to listen to the turbo spool up during moderate acceleration, though the four-cylinder engine note doesn’t necessarily inspire you.
For the most part the seven-speed dual-clutch operates smoothly, though it can get caught out during low-speed manoeuvres. It’s also clearly tuned for economy as it likes to shift up to the next gear quickly.
The AWD Duster, on the other hand, is where the fun and true character of this quirky SUV shines. With the three-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine and the manual transmission, it’s far from the quickest vehicle out there. It’s faster than a Suzuki Jimny, though.
While progress may be relatively docile, the gruff three-cylinder engine note is addictive. There’s also plenty of torque on tap, so you don’t need to downshift to get things moving.
The manual selector feels chunky in the hand and the clutch biting point is easy to get your head around. Unlike some petrol-powered manual cars, this one’s hard to stall. Even if you do, once you put your foot back on the clutch, the car restarts automatically.
Where the AWD Duster gains extra character points is by having a 48V mild-hybrid system. It doesn’t do anything to drastically alter the driving experience apart from adding a tiny boost to acceleration and extending and smoothing the engine idle stop-start system.
During our launch drive program we had the opportunity to drive the front- and AWD Duster off the beaten path, as well. While you’d expect the latter to be good, the former surprised me in terms of just how far it could go. It’s clear the platform is set up for all-terrain capability, no matter the powertrain configuration.
For added peace of mind off-road, however, the AWD has a higher ground clearance (212mm vs 174mm), as well as a range of terrain modes, including a ‘Lock’ setting that splits torque evenly between the front and rear axles.
The AWD Duster is pretty unstoppable off-road. It’s not quite a Jimny tamer in terms of outright off-road-ability, but I estimate the Duster could do 80 per cent of what a Jimny could do.
While the Duster mightn’t be an outright off-road beast, it well and truly makes it up with on-road finesse. The most noticeable element is the suspension. It feels supple, balanced and controlled no matter the surface. Sure there’s some body roll in the bends, but this isn’t trying to be a sports car.
There are some differences between the front- and AWD Duster when it comes to the rear suspension. The former has a torsion beam set-up, while the latter has a multi-link arrangement. In practice, however, it’s hard to tell any difference between the two.
The steering is direct and on the lighter side which helps with manoeuvrability, though there’s a general lack of feel. It’s considerably better than the Jimny’s vague steering, though.
In terms of parking the Duster has a tight turning circle. Rear parking sensors and a reversing camera are standard in the Evolution, though the Techno adds front and side parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera.
The camera systems in this car are poor. They’re mushy-looking with poor resolution and horrible colour balance. It’d be great to see higher quality units installed, especially because the multimedia screen is so high-resolution.
Forward visibility from the driver’s seat is fantastic through the rather upright windscreen. You also get a good view of the muscular-looking bonnet.
Side visibility is great, which helps make checking blind spots easier, plus the rear envelope is sizable.
The safety systems in this car are largely easy to live with, though the lane-keep assist can grab at the steering wheel a bit too much on roads with tight lanes or poor lane markings.
Thankfully there’s a button on the dashboard that turns this, and any other safety system that annoys you off, so you can keep on motoring without safety nanny intrusion.
Lastly in terms of noise, vibration and harshness (NVH), the Duster is impressively quiet at low speeds. You can even travel at 60-80km/h along gravel roads and in the cabin it sounds like you’re on a sealed surface.
Once you get out on the open road at highway speeds there’s noticeable road and wind noise, but I’ve experienced much worse in small SUV rivals at a similar price point.
While the GT doesn’t score an ANCAP rating – probably because it’s too expensive to crash test – we’d wager that it would be above-average, given Benz’s track record as a pioneer in this field.
That’d due to the scores of active, passive and driver-assist safety features fitted, from multi-faceted autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and lane-support systems to Mercedes’ PRE-SAFE tech that anticipates a crash and then prepares the car for impact.
More specifically, the GT includes Active Lane Change/Keep Assist, adaptive high beam as part of its megapixel LED set-up, adaptive cruise control, Cross-Traffic Assist, Evasive manoeuvre support, an emergency services call-out system, 360-degree camera views, pedestrian protection bonnet and eight airbags.
In other Mercedes products of today, AEB operating parameters are 7-80km/h for vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, and from 7-250km/h for vehicle-to-vehicle, while the lane-keep support systems operate between 60-200km/h.
Finally, there are ISOFIX child-seat anchorages in the front passenger seat and two in the rear seats.
The Renault Duster hasn’t been crash-tested by ANCAP just yet, though the Dacia Duster did receive a three- out of five-star Euro NCAP rating in 2024.
As standard there are six airbags, autonomous emergency braking, lane departure warning, lane-keep assist, driver attention alert, traffic sign recognition, rear parking sensors and a reversing camera.
Stepping up to the Techno gets you blind-spot monitoring, front and side parking sensors as well as a surround-view camera.
Notably absent from the entire line-up is rear cross-traffic alert, as well as adaptive cruise control. There’s only standard cruise control on offer.
There are two ISOFIX points, as well as three top-tether child seat anchorage points on the rear seat bench.
What’s the GT like to own?
Mercedes-Benz offers a five-year/unlimited km warranty, with five years of roadside assistance. This is average for most mainstream and luxury brands, but superior to most sports-car makers like Porsche and Lamborghini.
Intervals are every 12 months or 20,000km, and while no capped-priced servicing is offered on the GT, pre-paid three-, four- or five-year service plans are available, ranging from $5165, $7700 and $8665 respectively.
Big performance demands big maintenance bills, it seems.
The Renault Duster is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty with five years of roadside assistance.
Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 30,000km, which is mainstream for the commercial vehicle segment, but incredibly rare for a regular car. These long intervals are handy for those who travel long distances.
The first five services have capped pricing. All up these cost $2685 for FWD Dusters or $2475 for AWD Dusters. These average out to $537 and $495, respectively, per service.
Alternatively, you can purchase a five-year, pre-paid service plan for $2150 for FWD Dusters or $2100 for AWD Dusters. This is a saving of over $500, depending on the version, compared to pay-as-you-go.