Honda Problems

Are you having problems with your Honda? Let our team of motoring experts keep you up to date with all of the latest Honda issues & faults. We have gathered all of the most frequently asked questions and problems relating to the Honda in one spot to help you decide if it's a smart buy.

Browse by

Show all

Used Honda Civic review: 1992-1995
By Graham Smith · 01 May 2004
The Civic quickly won a following in the early 1970s. It was stylish, economical, performed well and was well built, the same qualities that drive Civic sales today. The Civic was never a cheap small car and lost ground to rivals such as Mazda, Subaru, Nissan and Toyota which closed the gap through the 1980s.  It was still stylish and well built, but its performance was lacklustre. Perhaps the thing that brought the Civic out of the doldrums was the arrival of the VTEC engine.The heavily revised fifth-generation Civic launched late in 1991 wasn't anything special.  The new range opened with the Breeze, a bright three-door hatch with a 1.3-litre engine that produced 55kW at 6300 revs.It had a five-speed manual gearbox and power steering was standard.  The mid-range GL, a four-door sedan or three-door hatch, had a 1.5-litre engine with twin carburettors which produced 74kW at 6300 revs.This was a disappointing per former, and thirsty to boot.  Top of the range was the Si, as a four-door sedan or three-door hatch. It had a 1.6-litre, double overhead camshaft, fuel-injected engine which boasted 96kW.It had four-wheel disc brakes, upgraded trim and tilt adjustable steering wheel.  The VTEC variable valve timing engine made its first appearance in the four-door VEi sedan which was released in February 1993. It was a 1.5-litre engine configured for fuel economy. It produced 66kW, and was offered only as a five-speed manual.  Other standard features included a driver's airbag, power steering, central locking, power windows and mirrors, tachometer, and cloth trim.In September 1993 the Civic came in for a mid-life makeover, with a raft of revisions, particularly to the engines offered.  The Breeze got a 1.5-litre engine which now had throttle body injection and 67kW.  The GL was replaced by the GLi with a 1.5-litre engine which developed 74kW.  Fuel economy continued to be the main focus of the VEi with its 1.5-litre VTEC/E engine which produced peak power of 66kW.If economy was a priority for the VEi, the new VTi was a breath of fresh air, with the emphasis on performance.  The VTi had a 1.6-litre double overhead camshaft, four-cylinder engine with 96kW on tap at 6600 revs. Standard equipment on the VTi included an electric sunroof.  Driver's side airbags became standard across the Civic range in August 1994.The trade likes the Civics after the revised engines arrived late in 1992. Before that, they say, the engines were generally thirsty and lacked performance.  Performance and economy issues apart, Honda engines -- as well as gearboxes, drive lines and diffs -- are robust and give little concern.  Rear wheel bearings are a source of trouble.The problems are mostly related to ancillaries such as airconditioning compressors, which are a known source of trouble.  There are no real problems with the Civic body. They're well built in the first instance and stand up well in service.  Check for service record, and evidence of regular maintenance.Kristen Jones has owned her 1993 Breeze for four years, and says it has been cheap to run, and easy to drive and park. She has had no problems with it and would happily recommend it.Debbie Williamson bought her 1993 Civic GL new, and has now done 210,000km. She says it is reliable, comfortable, economical, attractive, roomy, easy to drive and to this point has had nothing go wrong.Jim Liaskos has owned his 1994 Honda Civic manual GLi for 10 years. It has now done 240,000 km, and he says it handles well and is economical.  Apart from normal service items, he has replaced the front wheel bearings, the clutch master cylinder, noisy gearbox bearings, thermostat and the brake master cylinder.The Civic was struggling to live up to its reputation before the revised engine range arrived in late 1991, and improved both its performance and economy.Good build qualityRobust and reliable mechanicalsPoor performance and fuel economy prior to 1991 engine upgradeNoisy rear wheel bearings
Read the article
Just watch the cam belt
Answered by CarsGuide team · 27 May 2004

AS YOU rightly say, the Accord is generally a good car, and I wouldn't expect any major problems, as long as it has been serviced according to the Honda recommendations, and you continue to do so. The most significant thing is to make sure the cam belt has been changed at the recommended time. If it hasn't, think about having it changed.

Hatching a plan
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 07 Oct 2004

UNDER normal circumstances you should change auto oil every 20,000km or so, leaving it no longer than a year. Use Honda-recommended oil. If you're towing or doing some hard high-speed running, think about changing it more regularly. It's a good idea to regularly check the oil; it should be clean. If it isn't, get it changed.

Camp companion
Answered by CarsGuide team · 14 Jan 2005

SIT down and make a list of the musts and the wants for your car, then look at each. The first and most important thing is to decide how often you will go camping and how far off the beaten track you plan to go, if at all. I would choose the Subaru and I'm assuming here that you're talking about the Outback. It isn't as high as the others, but it's a much better road car than any of the four-wheel-drive wagons you list and it has good ground clearance, which means it is surprisingly adept at beating around the bush.

Civic duty
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 05 Aug 2004

BEFORE doing anything I would try to confirm with the dealer what has been done to the car. Because it has done such low mileage it should have been serviced on the basis of time, not distance, so it should still have been regularly serviced despite the low km. If that's the case I wouldn't worry about doing anything extra now. The same goes for the timing belt, which should have been changed on the basis of time not km, so it may well have been changed. If not, I'd change it now for safety's sake.

Forester vs CR-V
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 03 Jun 2004

THERE really isn't much to separate these two -- they're the class acts in the compact all-wheel-drive category. The CR-V offers a little more interior room, and it's a more flexible interior set-up as well, but the Forester is a little better equipped, with four-wheel disc brakes and cruise control. Both will perform well around town and have limited ability to go bush, but I'm assuming you won't be doing any heavy-duty bush bashing anyway. Look underneath for battle scars, scrapes and bumps on suspension parts, underbody and other bits and pieces of exposed hardware. It's also hard to get sand and dust out of cars, so look for evidence of dust build-up in door openings, under carpets and elsewhere.

Honda CR-V 2001: How to install CD player?
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 20 May 2004

THERE are many sound-system specialists who could advise you on the best way to install a CD player in your CRV. Recently, when I wanted to fit a CD player to my 1997 BMW, I had to go to an aftermarket sound-system specialist because BMW no longer stocked the CD player that was compatible with the factory system. In the end I had to compromise. There was simply no way of doing what I wanted to do. For starters, try Chris Watson at Central Car Radio in Bentleigh.

Going sporty at 41
Answered by Graham Smith · 16 Sep 2004

WHEN you say Supra and Skyline, I take it you mean imported models rather than the older models sold here when new. If so, I recommend you don't buy either of these unless you are car-minded and have a friendly mechanic who can fix them if they break down. Go for a Prelude or Celica -- both are stylish coupes, well built, making the sort of statement you want. If you want a real sports car then you can't go past a Mazda MX5.

Wheel or imaginary
Answered by Graham Smith · 01 Jul 2004

THE rate of wear on the rear tyres on all-wheel-drive cars will be higher because they're driving when the rear tyres on a front-wheel-drive car aren't. That said, the front tyres of both all-wheel-drives and front-wheel-drives wear at about the same rate, so the added wear is related to the rear tyres of the all-wheel-drive cars which will wear out at about the same rate as the front tyres.

Is this price fair?
Answered by Graham Smith · 10 Dec 2004

WITHOUT actually seeing the car, I can't give you an absolute price, but the value put on it by the dealer is pretty much on the money. It has the average odometer reading for its age, and isn't in pristine condition.

Disclaimer: You acknowledge and agree that all answers are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied upon as bespoke advice. Carsguide is not liable for the accuracy of any information provided in the answers.
Have a new question for the CarsGuide team?
More than 9,000 questions asked and answered.
Complete guide to Honda
Complete guide to Honda CarsGuide Logo
Reviews, price, specs and more