Are you having problems with your Ford? Let our team of motoring experts keep you up to date with all of the latest Ford issues & faults. We have gathered all of the most frequently asked questions and problems relating to the Ford in one spot to help you decide if it's a smart buy.
Show all
You can work it out simply by calculating the amount of additive you need to add per litre of fuel. The instructions on the packaging will tell you how much to add per tankful, and you know how many litres your tank holds (if not check your owner's manual, which will contain the capacity of the tank), so divide the amount of additive by the tank capacity in litres and then multiply that by the number of litres you usually buy. Add that amount and you should be OK. Add a little more for safety if you like.
Carbon build-up in the combustion chamber is normal and can effectively reduce the size of the chamber and increase the compression ratio, which can then lead to a pinging noise. The old way to deal with it was to blow the carbon out by giving the car a long run at high speed. You would then usually see a cloud of brownish smoke from the exhaust. The other way to de-coke the heads is to remove them and clean the carbon out by hand. I'm guessing your mechanic hasn't suggested that because it is an expensive option.
It has been generally held that running slightly higher tyre pressures than those recommended by the carmakers improves braking, handling and fuel consumption, while reducing ride comfort. There is some truth in all of that, but remember that whatever pressure you settle on it will be a compromise, and that is the same compromise that carmakers wrestle with in determining their recommendations. Instructors at high-performance driving schools strongly advocate higher tyre pressures for the handling benefits they deliver, and that works for a racetrack environment, but it's not optimum for a road environment where your tyres have to perform several important functions. The belief in the tyre business now is that drivers should follow the carmakers' recommendations for the best all-round tyre performance.
Are you sure the temperature gauge is working correctly? It would be worthwhile making sure it is so you can rely on the reading you're seeing. Assuming it is working correctly, check the radiator and overflow reservoir and make sure they are filled to the correct level. Check the owner's manual for your car and you will find the correct level for the fluid in the reservoir when the engine is cold. Do not fill beyond that level. When the engine warms, the coolant in the system heats up and expands and some coolant will flow through to the reservoir. You'll find a maximum fluid level marked on the reservoir and the coolant should not exceed that when the engine is hot. That coolant will be drawn back into the radiator when the engine cools again.
There's virtually no similarity between the Bathurst racers and the road cars you and I buy from Ford or Holden, apart from a vaguely similar appearance. The engines are purpose-built 5.0-litre V8s. Neither Ford nor Holden have a production 5.0-litre V8 on sale. The gearboxes are purpose-built for racing and the suspensions are special, as are the brakes, wheels and tyres. The bodies may look like the production equivalent, but they're specially built, incorporating roll cages and other reinforcements. And get this: the Commodores now run a Falcon-type wishbone front suspension instead of the MacPherson strut the production cars run. The Commodore racers have long-run Ford nine-inch diffs as well.
Generally the Falcon auto gives little trouble. Geoff Clay, of CPA Automatics, says irregular servicing can result in a blocked filter, which can then cause the pump to work harder to get the fluid through which often results in a noise like you describe. It's not possible to say the Falcon is better than the Commodore, or vice versa, as each has strengths and weaknesses. I would say the build quality of both is about the same, the performance of the Falcon is slightly better, basically because its six-cylinder engine is marginally larger, but the Commodore has lower fuel consumption.
Your Falcon would have tested about 13 litres/ 100km when new. For comparison purposes, the Commodore V6 would return about 11.5 litres/100km, the 3.5-litre V6 Magna about 10.5 and the Camry closer to 13. Clearly, on that basis the Magna is the car for you.
Without driving your car it's impossible to provide an answer, particularly when noise is such a subjective thing. It's rare to find objectionable wind noise in a car today so I would suspect that something is wrong with yours. Perhaps you could drive another Escape -- perhaps take a demo for a test drive -- and compare it to yours.
I'd venture to say you don't see many later Falcons with bumpers hanging loose like you do with the older ones. Basically, it's the improvement in the production of the plastic parts. There are many things that have contributed to the improvements, not the least being better mountings. Put it down to progress.