Ford Fairlane Problems

Back in the 1960s when Ford released the first locally designed Fairlane there was nothing better, or bigger, than the biggest Ford. It was a measure of success, in business, or down on the farm.Today it’s no longer alone at the top end of the town, it now has plenty of company at head office, but it still offers the very same qualities it did when it was the head rooster.The Fairlane formula was simple, and like most simple things, it was also very successful. The first Fairlanes to be sold here were based on Canadian models, there was the ‘tank’ model from 1959, replaced by the ‘Compact’ in 1963, which in turn was replaced by the ‘Aussie’ Fairlane in 1967.To create the local Fairlane Ford simply took the Falcon platform, then the Mustang-bred XR, and stretched the wheelbase to substantially increase the rear seat room, then lengthened the rear to produce a huge boot.In the mid-1960s it was unrivalled for luxury motoring. Holden tried to match the big Ford with, first the Brougham, then the Statesman, but neither managed to make serious inroads into the Fairlane’s domination.By the mid-1990s, when the NF Fairlane came on the scene, Holden’s Statesman had managed to claw its way into the lead, and the Fairlane was battling back.MODEL WATCHThe 1995 NF followed the traditional Fairlane formula in that it was based on the current Falcon, in this case the EF.Ford invested $220 million in the EF in an effort to make up some ground lost to Commodore as Holden sales recovered from the disastrous 1980s, and spent another $30 million on the long wheelbase models once the Falcon was up and running.Although based on the Falcon previous Fairlanes had been more distinct than the NF, which used the same front end sheetmetal as the EF Fairmont. The result was that the NF was shorter in the nose than most previous Fairlanes, but it still had the roomy rear seat, and large boot, which were seen as the key features of a local luxury model. All up the NF Fairlane was 98 mm shorter than the car it replaced.For the first time Ford adopted what they called a ‘High Jewel’ effect, which in effect meant more chrome and stainless steel trim, and clear turn signal lamp lenses. Central to the theme was the bright chrome grille, which combined with bright window mouldings and numerous chrome strips for sparkling highlights.Inside there were new trim fabrics, leather if you could afford it, and make believe woodgrain panels for added touches of prestige. There was a long list of features, from improved audio systems, a CD stacker, climate-controlled air-conditioning, cup holders, and an airbag for the driver.Based on the Falcon as it was, the NF Fairlane got the same mechanical improvements that went into the EF Falcon. That meant more responsive handling, with less of the roll-steer that was so apparent in earlier Falcons and made them wander about as they followed the profile of the road.The suspension was the same combination of wishbones at the front and live axle with Watts Linkage at the rear, but in the Fairlane it was tuned more towards a refined ride than sporty handling.When you bought a Fairlane you expected a smooth ride, and didn’t necessarily worry about handling precision, but despite its obvious bulk the big Ford still handled quite well. It was quite well balanced and went where it was pointed, even if it wasn’t quite as sharp as its family Ford cousin.Bigger brakes, in the form of thicker and larger diameter discs, with ABS, resulted in a firmer pedal feel and boosted braking performance.Buyers could choose between Ford’s fuel-injected single overhead camshaft 4.0-litre six that gave 157 kW at 5900 revs, and 357 Nm at 3000 revs, or the optional 5.0-litre V8, which boasted 165 kW and 388 Nm.Both engines were coupled to four-speed auto transmissions to ensure smooth progress.Ford released the NFII in 1995, and with it came an airbag for the front seat passenger, along with a number of other detail improvements.IN THE SHOPWith the same mechanical package the Fairlane suffers the same mechanical maladies as the Falcon.Both engines are quite reliable, the 4.0-litre six works well on gas, but can suffer head gasket problems.Fairlane drivelines are also reliable, the auto hangs on well into the high 100,000 kays, and the diff is tough. Listen for diff noise on high kilometre cars.Problems with electrical components can be frustrating, and the Fairlane can suffer similar electrical gremlins as the Falcon.Fairlanes, particularly if privately owned from new, are usually well cared for by fussy owners, and these are the ones to seek out. Others that could have come from the hire car business will be showing high mileage and should be treated with caution.Check for a car’s history of ownership to determine if it’s been in the hire business, and service to ensure it has been serviced according to Ford’s recommendation.LOOK FOR• simple Falcon mechanical package• smooth refined ride• great rear seat room• large bootTHE BOTTOM LINELocal prestige model has roomy rear seat, huge boot, smooth ride, and plenty of standard features. Feels like a Falcon from the front seat, but is great if you’re a back seat driver.RATING60/100

Ford dropped the Fairlane in 2007 when the penny finally dropped that Australian luxury car buyers had turned their backs on it, turning instead to brands like Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Lexus. But it was a different story back in the late-50's when the Fairlane was the car to be seen in if you wanted to flaunt your success.Ford first launched the Fairlane badge in 1959 and, apart from a brief hiatus in the mid-1960's it carried on until its ultimate demise at the end of 2007. It followed the same formula right to the end, but by then size wasn't the ultimate measure of a luxury car and size was the Fairlane's biggest selling point.MODEL WATCHAustralia was under the spell of America late in the 1950's and many local car buyers aspired to own a big 'Yank Tank'. The closest they could come to owning a big American car was the 'Tank' Fairlane Ford released in 1959 to replace the long running and very successful Customline series. The Fairlane had its roots in America, but the cars that bore the badge in Australia were supplied through Ford of Canada.Ford offered three models, the rather Spartan Custom 300, the more luxurious Fairlane 500, and the vast Ranch Wagon station wagon. All came in component form, they were already right-hand drive, and were assembled locally. In the process they were fitted with a handful of local parts, these including 15-inch wheels to increase the ground clearance for Australian conditions, glass, seats and interior trim.All had the distinctive rumble of Ford's 332 cubic inch (5.4-litre) overhead valve Y-Block V8; there was the choice of a three-speed column shift manual gearbox or a two-speed auto. The front suspension was independent with coil springs and telescopic shock absorbers, while the rear was suspended on half elliptic leaf springs with telescopic shock absorbers for damping.Steering was by worm and peg without power assistance, and braking was done with large unassisted drums all round. Vinyl and fabric trim was used inside where there was plenty of room for six or more adults with broad bench seats front and back. There was also plenty of capacity for luggage in the cavernous boot.The Fairlane continued with minor revisions until 1962 when it was replaced by the 'Compact' model.IN THE SHOPAny car that is 50 years old need careful checking before it's purchased, and the 'Tank' Fairlane is no different. It's most important that the body is thoroughly checked for rust. Cars built in the 1950's were particularly prone to rusting, the steel used wasn't of the highest quality and the rust-prevention measures used by carmakers were rudimentary at best.Check the front and rear floors in the cabin, and the boot floor as well, as these are known areas of rust. But also check the front and rear guards, the bottoms of the doors, under the trim across the top of the windscreen and rear window, and the windscreen pillar and the front of the bonnet.Mechanically the Fairlane is robust and reliable, and most parts can be found at specialist parts suppliers, either here or in the US, and the Internet is a good place to find them.ON THE ROADRoad testers of the day were generous in their praise of the Fairlane. They were particularly impressed with its steering, braking, ride, and even its handling. Today, of course, those things would be widely criticised for being crude.The Fairlane is a big lump of a car, its weight impacts on its performance, which could only be described as leisurely by today's standards. Weight also has the Fairlane wallowing through corners if pushed; its ride on the other hand is smooth and comfortable.Given its 1950s limits, however, the Fairlane is a smooth, comfortable cruiser that's great fun to drive.IN A CRASHWhile it seems safety was only discovered recently carmakers were paying attention to it a long, long time ago. In the case of the Fairlane there was a deep-dished steering wheel to prevent you from cracking your head on the steering wheel hub, and the switches were located behind the wheel so you wouldn't hit them in the event of a crash.There were no seat belts, but most cars would have had aftermarket belts fitted later on, so it's worth checking the installation to make sure it's sound, and also check the seat belt webbing for wear and tear. If they were not fitted it would be worth fitting self-retracting lap/ sash belts.AT THE PUMP There is no getting around it the Fairlane, with its V8 motor, is a gas-guzzler. But as they're more likely to be used as weekend cruisers than daily drivers, the impact on your wallet isn't likely to be great. The Fairlane was designed in the days of leaded petrol, but it will use 91-octane unleaded with an upper cylinder additive for valve protection. It would run better and more efficiently on 95-octane or higher. Be wary of using E10 ethanol in old engines like the Fairlane's, reports suggest it does terrible things to old engines.LOOK FOR Cool '50s styleGreat weekend cruiser for the familyLots of interior roomHuge bootV8 rumbleSusceptible to body rust.THE BOTTOM LINE: Affordable classic if you like to cruise the highways '50s American style.CLASSIC RATING: 70/100

The Fairlane is no longer at the top of the luxury car pile, but the nameplate that once defined local prestige motoring is still a revered one with many local prestige buyers. When Ford first introduced the Fairlane back in 1959 it stood out like a shining beacon of luxury in a market starved of prestige models. The Fairlane was the car most aspired to own, it was a shining symbol of success.In the years that have passed the Fairlane has lost much of its lustre, having been swamped by imported models seen to offer more prestige than the Falcon-bred Ford, but it still has a special place in the local market.MODEL WATCHThe Fairlane concept as we know it today was introduced in 1967 with the launch of the first locally designed model. It was a simple idea, but a brilliant piece of marketing.It was simple in that it was spun off the Falcon making use of the same mechanical package and much of the front-end sheet metal, but with the wheelbase and boot lengthened to create a larger sedan with heaps of rear legroom and a cavernous boot.The brilliance was that for such a small change Ford could offer a desirable model for those who wanted to step up from the Falcon.Ford followed the same simple concept when it launched the AU in 1999. Like its forebears it was spun off the Falcon, in this case the much maligned AU.If the AU was canned for its perceived ugliness, the Fairlane was a much better looking car. The down in the mouth front of the Falcon was much the same in the Fairlane, but with a neat styling makeover it took on a classier look.If the front was little changed the rear of the Fairlane was completely changed from its smaller sibling, and much the better for it. Where the Falcon sagged at the extremities the Fairlane sat high and handsome. It was a much better looking car than the Falcon.Inside there was the usual rear legroom associated with the Fairlane, the boot was enormous, and it boasted every feature Ford offered on its option list.The Fairlane Ghia, as it was badged, could be ordered with the 4.0-litre single overhead camshaft six-cylinder VCT variable cam timing engine which boasted 168 kW and 370 Nm, or the smooth 5.0-litre overhead valve V8 with 175 kW and 395 Nm. Both came with an electronic four-speed automatic transmission with a floor shift.Underneath the extended skin the Fairlane had independent suspension both front and rear, the double wishbone rear set-up a marked improvement over the compromise set-up under Holden’s Statesman.Brakes were disc front and rear, with ABS and traction control standard fitment.The Fairlane is often sought for its towing ability. In standard form it was rated to tow 1600 kg, but could be fitted with a towing pack that pushed that up to 2300 kg.Inside the Ghia had standard leather trim, six-way power driver’s seat, air-conditioning, dual front airbags and a premium sound system with CD player.Ford released the AUII upgrade in 2000 with a laminated firewall and hydraulic engine mounts for a quieter ride and improved brakes.IN THE SHOPContinuous development over many years has seen the Falcon and Fairlane evolve into sturdy cars that generally don’t have a lot of faults, at least major ones.Mechanics report few problems with the AU, there doesn’t appear to be the same issue with cylinder head gasket failure as there was in earlier models. A design revision on AU has cleaned up the problem pretty well, although further improvements to the head gasket in the BA would tend to suggest that Ford didn’t think the problems were completely solved in AU.Brake wear is a problem with the Falcon and Fairlane, look for regular pad changes and disc machining. The problems were reduced with the AUII upgraded brakes.Build quality has been a lingering problem with the Falcon and Fairlane over the years, and Ford made a serious attempt to put those problems behind it with the BA. That doesn’t matter to anyone with an earlier AU and the problems that seem to pop up with the AU are more than likely due to production problems than basic design flaws.With today’s fuel price concerns it should be remembered that the Fairlane is a large lump of a car, weighing almost 1700 kg so it will consume fuel at a high rate. Ford’s quoted fuel consumption was as high as 14.0 L/100 km around town for the V8 so it would be worth considering LPG to save money.IN A CRASHCompetent suspension design along with four-wheel discs, standard ABS and traction control give the AU Fairlane the dynamics to avoid a collision in the first place, but should the situation get to the point a crash is not avoidable the Fairlane’s strong body and dual front airbags come into play.OWNERS SAYPaul Karwacki owns a 2001 AUIII Fairlane sportsman which has clicked over 80,000 km. Apart from a leaking power steering high pressure line and pump he says it has been good reliable transport. He adds that the Fairlane may not be as refined as the Statesman equivalent, but it makes up for it with better on road dynamics largely due to its more sophisticated and robust suspension componentry. In six-cylinder guise he says it out-points both V6 engine options in the Statesman offering greater refinement and just as much power as the supercharged unit. The Fairlane, especially the AU II models with better brakes, is underrated which makes it excellent value. The looks may not appeal to everyone, but he reckons they look great lowered with a nice set of mags off an XR6, XR8 or T series car. He chose this model because on paper the driveline and suspension set-up is superior to that of the Holden equivalents.LOOK FOR• stately styling• ability to tow• enormous boot• heaps of rear leg room• high level of equipment• generally reliable engines and transmissions• high fuel consumptionTHE BOTTOM LINEIf you value cars on a metal for money basis there’s lots of value in the Fairlane, but expect to pay for it at the pump.RATING60/100