Browse over 9,000 car reviews

Ford Mustang 4 Cylinder 2015 review

EXPERT RATING
8

Joshua Dowling tests the new four-cylinder Mustang in the US before it goes on sale in Australia next year.

Push the 'start' button on the new Ford Mustang and you expect the rumble of a V8.
 
But what I have here is an eerie silence. I've grabbed the keys to a four-cylinder Mustang. And I can barely hear it.

That's right. A four-cylinder Mustang.

Ford has added a four-cylinder to the Mustang range to broaden the car's customer appeal and to meet strict fuel economy targets in Europe.
 
Australia will get both the four-cylinder and the V8 when it arrives in showrooms in the second half of 2015, but I've grabbed the keys to the four-cylinder first because that's the one everyone is most curious about.
 
Australians have had an aversion to large cars and four-cylinder engines since the asthmatic four-cylinder Commodore from the 1980s.
 
Holden chopped two cylinders off the red six to create the Starfire four in a kneejerk reaction to the fuel crisis in the 1970s; in the end the four-cylinder used as much fuel as the six-cylinder because it had to work so hard to move the Commodore's weight.
 
But times have changed and so has technology.
 
The four-cylinder in the latest, sixth-generation Mustang (Ford also fitted four-cylinder engines to the Mustang in the US between 1978 and 1993) has new turbocharger technology and has almost as much power as the previous V8.
 
BMW and other German car makers are also now getting epic performance from turbocharged four-cylinder engines.
 
But this is a Mustang. Can you get away with four-cylinder sacrilege in an American icon?
 
On first impressions, the answer is no. In stop-start Los Angeles traffic the four-cylinder sounds, well, ordinary.
 
It sounds like a small French van, and not at all like a Mustang should.
 
The side mirrors are also too small (here's hoping Ford Australia fits convex mirrors on both sides), making it hard to pick your way through the bump and grind.
 
The bland standard seats are designed more for broad behinds rather than comfort and support. And you can forget the back seats; their only purpose is to somehow convince your life partner than you might, just might, be able to squeeze the kids in the back there.
 
The Mustang suspension is too firm and busy over even modest bumps at suburban speeds. On the bigger bumps it almost made me motion sick.
 
Fortunately, the traffic eventually clears and we find ourselves on the winding mountain roads behind Hollywood and into the great blue yonder.
 
In another twist of fate, we don't have any traffic ahead of us, save for some aspiring Olympic cyclists on a morning hill workout.
 
Only then does the four-cylinder Mustang start to shine. Rev the engine above 4500rpm and the small French van sound starts to develop some character, with a subtle engine growl.
 
A small dose of the exhaust note from the Renault Megane RS275 or Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG would be a welcome improvement. At this point, I'd prefer to hear nothing at all than a weak attempt at an engine note.
 
But all is quickly forgiven after the first series of twists and turns. The four-cylinder Mustang steers beautifully.
 
Because the four-cylinder engine weighs less than the V8, there is less weight over the nose and better overall balance in the car front-to-rear. (For the tech heads, the weight balance is a near-perfect 52:48 for the four-cylinder and 55:45 for the nose-heavy V8).

The suspension that was too firm around town is in fact just right once you hit the open road. It's nothing short of superb.
 
Power delivery across the rev range is the other surprise. The power is there and ready, whenever you need it.

Ford does not publish 0 to 100km/h times, but the four-cylinder is said to be only slightly slower than the V8. It certainly feels quick enough for most tastes. (We'll know for sure when we test it in Australia next year.)
 
With less weight to bring to a stop (compared to the V8) the brakes have a sharp, responsive and reassuring feel.
 
The Pirelli tyres on the "Performance Pack" model tested stuck to the curves like chewing gum to a thong on a hot summer's day.
 
Before I know it, I'm grinning like a kid with a new toy. And I've forgotten what engine is under the bonnet.
 
In fact, once you're on the move there almost no way for anyone else to pick the difference between the four-cylinder and the V8 versions of the Mustang. They both get dual exhaust pipes and the same good looks.
 
For the anoraks among us, though, the V8 grille has a pair of vertical 'blades' and a GT badge on the rear, while the four-cylinder gets the Mustang 'pony' badge on its rump.
 
Both models get the super-cool three-step indicators in the tail-lights, that light up from the inside out, one vertical bar at a time.
 
Another piece of trivia: this car may be Ford's most recognised model globally, but it doesn't have a Ford badge on it anywhere. There's a tiny Ford logo stamped in the shaded area of the windscreen.
 
With a car this good, Ford deserves to put a badge on it. Regardless of what engine is under the bonnet.

Pricing guides

$45,433
Based on 22 cars listed for sale in the last 6 months
Lowest Price
$37,888
Highest Price
$54,990

Range and Specs

VehicleSpecsPrice*
Fastback GT 5.0 V8 5.0L, PULP, 6 SP AUTO $33,880 – 40,370 2015 Ford Mustang 2015 Fastback GT 5.0 V8 Pricing and Specs
2.3 Gtdi 2.3L, ULP, 6 SP AUTO $30,690 – 36,960 2015 Ford Mustang 2015 2.3 Gtdi Pricing and Specs
Fastback 2.3 GTDI 2.3L, ULP, 6 SP AUTO $26,510 – 32,670 2015 Ford Mustang 2015 Fastback 2.3 GTDI Pricing and Specs
GT 5.0 V8 5.0L, PULP, 6 SP AUTO $37,840 – 44,550 2015 Ford Mustang 2015 GT 5.0 V8 Pricing and Specs
EXPERT RATING
8
Joshua Dowling
National Motoring Editor

Share

Pricing Guide

$37,888

Lowest price, based on 18 car listings in the last 6 months

View cars for sale
Disclaimer: The pricing information shown in the editorial content (Review Prices) is to be used as a guide only and is based on information provided to Carsguide Autotrader Media Solutions Pty Ltd (Carsguide) both by third party sources and the car manufacturer at the time of publication. The Review Prices were correct at the time of publication.  Carsguide does not warrant or represent that the information is accurate, reliable, complete, current or suitable for any particular purpose. You should not use or rely upon this information without conducting an independent assessment and valuation of the vehicle.