Safety is a design issue

Ford Ford Advice Ford Territory Ford Territory Advice Ford Territory 2006
...
SO FAR I have been very, very happy with my 2006 Ford Territory Turbo, but I became aware of the balljoint/control arm issue only when the car went in for its routine 75,000km service. I was stunned at what needed to be done. I am also lucky that my car has had all of this rectified under warranty this week, but I am wondering why all of this was required after my car has done only 76,000km and has never been off-road. My dealer has been fantastic about it, but said to me only that there had been a revision of the bushes and balljoints and this then ``should fix'' the problem. However, it sounds more like an inherent design issue than a material issue, and one that will probably recur. Can you shed any light on this?

I ALSO believe it is a design issue. That impression is backed up by Ford's move to change the front balljoint/control arm in the just-announced Series II Territory. I cannot comprehend how a carmaker can release a model with such a flaw and not do anything about it until now. It is completely unacceptable that such a critical safety issue like a balljoint could wear to the point of needing replacement at such a low number of kilometres.

Disclaimer: You acknowledge and agree that all answers are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied upon as bespoke advice. Carsguide is not liable for the accuracy of any information provided in the answers.

Comments

Have a new question for the CarsGuide team?
More than 9,000 questions asked and answered.
Complete guide to Ford Territory 2006
Complete guide to Ford Territory 2006 CarsGuide Logo
Reviews, price, specs and more