The Aussie driving age debate
By Paul Gover · 17 Feb 2011
Young Brock was skidding around the family property at the wheel of a home-built special at a time when most of his school mates would probably have been learning to ride their first bicycle. Todd and Rick Kelly, two of the current V8 Supercars stars, both learned to drive before they were eight years-old on a family properly at Mildura.
Motorcycles came first, when the Kelly kids were less than five, followed by a range of farm machinery including tractors.
It's a similar story for most top-level racecar drivers and not just because their sport of choice often includes a go-kart or motocross bike. They learn to drive early because it's a passion and because they have a talent for the multi-tasking challenge of taming a car - then driving well. This early start gives them an obvious advantage, but every racer tells us it also helps them on the road.
But how can that be true, when racing is all about speed and skill and daring, racing rivals in the same direction in a battle to the chequered flag? The advantage comes from learning the mechanics of driving before they hit the road, and it works for other people.
A pre-license start means you're not learning the basics of driving - gear changes, turn signals, mirrors, braking ... and the dreaded clutch - at the same time as coping with traffic and road rules and nasty weather a darkness.
Knowing how to manipulate a vehicle gives a novice the chance to concentrate fully on roadcraft - the sort of stuff that veterans take for granted, like anticipating traffic lights, or just 'knowing' what the car in front is about to do - without worrying about holding the wheel or shifting gears. It also means the fear factor is much, more lower.
This comes to mind this week after a survey that says some Australians want the minimum driving age raised, perhaps - according to South Australians - to 21. As usual, there are all sorts of experts in both camps, some arguing for a younger start and more training, others suggesting that an older start and more maturity is the right answer. Except there is no right answer - until Australian governments get truly serious about driver eduction.
So what's the best answer? In a Gover world, children would learn to drive at 12. They would spend their early years at the wheel of a cheapie junker car practising somewhere totally safe and carefree, like a paddock. This early experience would include basic maintenance, understanding of the costs of motoring - starting with earning money for fuel - and the consequences of a crash.
Just before license time, they would have intensive coaching from experts in a range of fields, from drivers - perhaps even racers - and police, as well as solid book learning on the road rules. Plus a visit to a crash scene, to see the major consequences of a minor mistake.
Then a top-quality safe driving course, the purchase of a low-powered first car, and strict supervision of where, when and how any driving is done. Then more training for the next 20 years or more, with regular safe- driving refreshers and updates in every new car through the garage. So far it seems to have worked fairly well - for me.