Audi Q6 E-Tron vs Mazda BT-50

What's the difference?

The Q6 e-tron knocks the luxury SUV formula out of the park, regardless of the fact it’s an electric vehicle. It has a slick, sporty feel, a high level of standard equipment for a premium car and at least on paper it’s a solid EV with plenty of driving range.

But here’s the thing: To me, the Q6 e-tron feels exactly how you would expect it to. It’s the same Audi formula, just upgraded for the electric age and in an era where rivals both old and new are using this once-in-a generation opportunity to truly innovate, there’s something a little disappointing about that.

The MY25 Mazda BT-50 benefits from its robust Isuzu underpinnings to excel in this dual cab-chassis configuration, particularly with Mazda’s premium heavy-duty aluminium tray as fitted to our test vehicle. Fact is, apart from the big drop in payload required to tow 3500kg (but it’s not alone there) it’s hard to find any major flaws. Overall, it’s an excellent workhorse that would be well suited to a multitude of tradie tasks. 

At a distance, the Q6 sticks to the same Audi formula. An inoffensive overall shape with the same core design cues as something like a Q5 are all part of the plan according to the brand, as it attempts to make the idea of switching to electric as easy as possible for its loyal buyers.

Things like the inverted grille (where there’s body colour where black would normally be) framed by a sporty black insert in the shape of Audi's usual combustion grille feels more tactfully executed than Mercedes’ attempt to bring an electrified touch to its EQ range.

Up close though, I must admit this car looks a bit meaner than your average Q-series SUV. The way the wheels sit wide and bold, accentuated by the inflated wheel arches (or blisters as Audi calls them) give the Q6 a tough feel, sitting boldly on its haunches.

Audi fans will love the exterior design, and it may convert some to electric car buyers, but it’s hard to see this car bringing new buyers into the fold, especially with more radical designs out there to catch the eyeballs of aspirational EV buyers.

Inside, Audi has traded away the somewhat ageing feeling of the outgoing Q5 for something much more tech-y in the Q6. The dash is dominated by the three large screens, which are also sharp, fast and responsive, with improved software this time around.

It is a lot though. While the exterior design plays it safe and the interior avoids the kind of obnoxiousness of an overbearing portrait-oriented screen, it feels almost unnecessary for every grade to get the three-screen layout.

Elsewhere the textures and patterns feel the part, and there’s no shortage of attention to detail when it comes to soft trims down the centre console, or clever new air vent fittings, for example.

It must be said that Mazda’s stylists did a commendable job with the third-gen BT-50 when it launched in 2020. Five years later it still looks fresh and we’re yet to find anyone who doesn't like its styling, which is in stark contrast to its polarising predecessor.

Its exterior sculpting embodies Mazda’s design language to maintain a strong family resemblance to the popular CX line of SUVs, yet does not detract from the tough and purposeful appearance expected of a 4x4 ute.

The MY25 facelift includes a newly designed front bumper, radiator grille and unique LED headlights. At the rear, pick-up models incorporate what Mazda describes as a ‘mountain-inspired ridged design’ along the bottom edge of the tailgate, along with new LED tail-lights and a larger Mazda logo.

Apart from the mountain-inspired ridged design, also evident on the glove box lid, the latest XTR interior is largely unchanged, blending different shades of grey with satin chrome highlights on the dashboard and door linings, contrasting fabric seat trim, exposed stitching on seams and adjustable centre console air conditioning vents for rear seat passengers.

This brings us nicely across to practicality, because along with the enormous set of screens, the Q6 brings with it a significant reduction in the amount of switchgear available. The centre console still features a physical volume dial, and there are a handful of shortcut buttons, but the climate functions are exclusively controlled via touchscreen menus. 

Additionally, the Q6 features an array of haptic buttons on the steering wheel (which some will remember, were much maligned on Volkswagen products) alongside a huge haptic panel on the driver's side door controlling everything from the headlights to the windows and mirrors.

It feels as though Audi has dressed the cabin up with new stuff rather than cost-cutting, which is often the case with its rivals. To Audi's credit, these functions are well enough laid out they didn’t bring much frustration on our test drive. Mercifully the screens are fast so adjusting functions is instantaneous, but these features are never as easy to use as physical buttons when you’re trying to concentrate on the road.

No matter how well they work, not everyone will love them (especially rusted-on Audi buyers who will be used to a decent array of physical switches).

There’s plenty of storage in the cabin. The doors feature a big pocket and bottle holder, with a further two bottle holders in the centre with adjustable ridges and a gloss roller cover to keep things tidy when you’re not using them.

Up front there’s a large storage bay with the phone charger mounted vertically on its side to minimise the amount of space it uses. The centre console box is shallow but extends quite far under the console owing to the car’s electric platform, and the array of charging ports are easy enough to reach.

As usual with Audis, the front seats are bolstered nicely and there’s no shortage of adjustment on offer to find a comfortable seating position.

The back seat is spacious enough, although I was expecting more for a car on a new EV platform designed to be larger than the already-spacious Q5. At 182cm tall I have decent, but not a massive amount of room behind my own driving position, with airspace for both my knees and my head. As a saving grace here, the floor is more or less flat and the car is quite wide so the centre position will still be useful for a full-sized adult.

Storage comes via bottle holders and pockets in each door and nettings (which I don’t love as they tend to age poorly) on the backs of the front seats. Unlike the Q5 the rear row is fixed instead of on rails, but it does feature individually folding seat backs, which means you can drop the centre position to put long objects in the cabin and still have two rear passengers (kind of like a ski port, but better).

The boot measures 526 litres (or 1529L with the rear seats down) which seems about right, although we didn’t have a chance to test it with our usual luggage set. It has some space under the floor for the storage of cables, although like many EVs it doesn’t have a spare wheel, only an inflator kit. It also has a frunk, which measures 64 litres. These spaces might seem like a bit of a gimmick but the Q6 comes with a clever little fitted duffle bag which slots perfectly into the void where you can keep both your wall socket and Type 2 to Type 2 charging gear.

Our test vehicle’s 1910kg kerb weight and 3100kg GVM results in a meaty 1190kg payload rating. However, that drops to 891kg after you deduct the combined weight of the premium heavy-duty aluminium tray (243kg), nudge bar (9.0kg) and towing kit (47kg).

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6000kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time), towing that weight would require a substantial 590kg reduction in payload to avoid exceeding the GCM.

Even though few (if any) BT-50 owners would need to tow 3500kg, it’s important to be aware of these numbers if the need arose, to ensure the combined weight of your vehicle and trailer does not exceed the legal limit.

The premium heavy-duty aluminium tray from Mazda’s genuine accessories range is a nice bit of kit with its Mazda-branded tailgate decals and mudguards.

The tray is almost square with internal dimensions of 1800mm length and 1777mm width. And it has numerous internal load-anchorage points, external rope-rails and a sturdy mesh-style rear window protector, plus removable ‘quick-lock’ ladder racks with fold-down load retainers up top.

There’s also a 1500mm-long underbody drawer with adjustable internal dividers and a four-stage incremental locking system. An HDP (High Density Polyethylene) 25-litre water tank complete with tap and handwash bottle-holder resides under the right side of the tray, with a sizeable and lockable HDP toolbox under the left side.

The driver and front passenger have comfortable bucket seats and the rear bench is also accommodating, with ample head and kneeroom even for tall people.

However, shoulder room would be tight for three big tradies, so like most dual cabs short of a full-size US pick-up it’s tolerable for short trips as a five-seater but works best as a four-seater for longer drives.

Cabin storage includes a large-bottle holder and bin in the base of each front door and the dash has upper and lower glove boxes, an overhead glasses holder and a pull-open compartment to the right of the driver’s knee for small items.

The centre console has an open tray at the front, dual small-bottle/cupholders in the centre and a small box at the rear with a contoured lid that doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a large-bottle holder and small bin in each door, plus storage pockets on the front seat backrests and a pair of pop-out cupholders in the fold-down centre armrest.

The 60/40-split rear bench seat’s cushions can also swing up and be stored vertically if more internal load space is needed. This also reveals two underfloor compartments with lids for keeping valuables out of sight.

Our test vehicle is the XTR cab-chassis, which is available only with a 3.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine and six-speed automatic transmission, for a list price of $59,650.

The XTR is an upgraded version of the base model XT cab chassis equivalent which lists at $54,620, so for the extra $5030 you’ll pay for the XTR the standard equipment list expands to include 18-inch machined alloy wheels with 265/60 R18 tyres (and a full-size alloy spare), LED headlights/DRLs/front fog lamps, side-steps and power-fold mirrors.

The XTR cabin also comes standard with carpet, a leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob, three USB-C ports and a 12-volt socket, fold-down rear centre armrest, eight-speaker audio with digital radio and wired/wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity.

The cabin has smart keyless entry (with auto central-locking when you walk away from the vehicle), dual-zone climate control and 9.0-inch multimedia colour touchscreen, now thankfully with physical volume and tuning dials.

In addition to the facelifted styling, is updated software for the touchscreen which includes tyre pressure monitoring and various off-road-focused displays. The driver also gets a new 7.0-inch customisable 'Multi-Information Display' (MID).

Our example, finished in optional 'Ingot Silver Metallic' ($695), is also fitted with several items tailored for tradies from Mazda’s genuine accessories range, including a premium heavy-duty aluminium tray ($7888), SP nudge bar ($1432) and 3500kg tow pack ($1389) which combined add more than $11K to the price.

A lot of the bigger innovations for the Q6 e-tron can’t be as easily seen because they’re primarily a result of its new platform. This Premium Platform Electric (PPE) architecture is new to Volkswagen Group and is designed specifically by and for Audi and Porsche rather than the MEB platform which underpins both the Q4 e-tron from Audi and ID.4 from Volkswagen.

Benefits include a primarily rear-drive orientation, the ability to accommodate more sophisticated suspension layouts, software capable of reaching deeper into the car (when it comes to updates), and of course a new electrical architecture with the capability to support 800-volt systems.

Power is impressive across the range. The base Performance puts out 225kW/485Nm from its rear motor, and can sprint from 0-100km/h in 6.6 seconds. The Quattro adds a second motor on the front axle, which combines with the rear motor for totals of 285kW/580Nm. It can sprint from 0-100km/h in 5.9 seconds.

The range-topping SQ6 ups power significantly to 360kW/580Nm from its dual motors, lowering the 0-100km/h sprint time to just 4.3 seconds using launch control.

The BT-50’s drivetrain, shared with its D-Max donor, comprises Isuzu’s proven Euro 5-compliant 3.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel that produces 140kW of power at 3600rpm and 450Nm of torque between 1600-2600rpm.

This is paired with an Aisin-sourced six-speed torque converter automatic featuring ‘intelligent’ protocols that prompt downshifting to assist with engine-braking on steep descents (great when towing) and overdrive on the top two ratios optimises fuel economy during highway driving.

It also offers the choice of sequential manual-shifting, which can be handy when hauling and/or towing heavy loads particularly in hilly terrain.

The part-time, dual-range 4x4 transmission features 2.482:1 low-range reduction and a switchable locking rear diff

Driving range is excellent no matter which variant you pick. You’d hope so given the size of this car’s nickel-manganese cobalt battery pack. The usable 94.9kWh capacity grants the Performance 558km of range, the Quattro 542km of range, and the SQ6 568km of range, all measured to the WLTP standard.

The 800-volt architecture which forms part of the new PPE platform unlocks ultra-fast DC charging times, which are impressive given the size of the Q6 e-tron’s battery pack.

A claimed peak charging speed of 270kW will take the battery from 10 to 80 per cent in just 21 minutes if you can find a fast enough charger. Audi says the charging system is optimised to maintain its peak charging for as long as possible (something we’ll have the opportunity to test at a later date, although we’ve found these claims to ring reasonably true for the e-tron GT on the older J1 platform).

On a slower AC charger (the kind you might find at the local shops), the maximum charging speed is an acceptable 11kW, although the max rate of 22kW would be nice to see. At 11kW to charge from 10 to 100 per cent will take around eight hours. In an unusual touch, the Q6 gets a second AC charging port on the driver’s side to go with the AC/DC combo port on the passenger side.

Sadly, there’s no vehicle-to-load or vehicle-to-grid features for the Q6 e-tron range, particularly given the size of its battery pack. While you might not use these features initially, it would be good to have them long-term as more use-cases become apparent.

When it comes to energy efficiency the Q6 e-tron’s official numbers are 19kWh/100km for the Performance, 19.5kWh/100km for the Quattro, or 18.4kWh/100km for the SQ6. Interestingly, the SQ6 has the most impressive efficiency rating, which, according to Audi is due to the lower ride height and better aerodynamic performance afforded by the air suspension.

The consumption numbers are about on-par for a vehicle this size, but are far from impressive numbers I’ve seen in the real world on similarly sized rivals like the Ford Mustang Mach-E for example. As we were jumping in and out of vehicles on this launch, expect a more thorough real-world efficiency evaluation at a later date.

Mazda claims an official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) average of 8.0L/100km and the dash display was showing 10.2 at the completion of our 369km test, which comprised a mix of city, suburban and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a near-maximum payload.

Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was slightly higher again at 10.6L/100km but still within the usual 2.0-3.0L/100km discrepancy between official and real-world figures and not bad for a two-tonne-plus 4x4 ute.

So, based on our figure, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 700km from its 76-litre tank.

Here’s the thing, Audi has talked a big game about this new PPE platform, but from behind the wheel the Q6 e-tron doesn’t offer the kind of massive step change I was expecting. In fact, just one look at the car and I felt like I knew how it would drive, and it didn’t stray from this expectation.

The Q6 e-tron is defined by its balanced weight distribution, its sharp steering and the powerful follow-through its electric motor provides. It defies its weight in the corners, but at the same time its SUV body struggles to shake the sheer mass which remains present under the floor.

As a result, it doesn’t have the reactive athleticism of its combustion counterparts, instead offering a more sturdy feel of the road, bolstered by thick tyres. Still, no matter which variant you pick, you’re getting more power delivered more quickly than entry-level engines in the Q5 range, for example.

There’s something to be said for how exhilarating these can be. These new motors also don’t have the same disappointing hollowed-out acceleration feeling lesser MEB-based cars can have when it comes to overtaking manoeuvres.

And yet, there’s something disappointing about how the Q6 feels to drive. It’s exactly what you’d expect from a powerful Audi EV and nothing more, where some rivals, and even Audi’s own e-tron GT feel more like an absolute generational leap.

There’s more, too. Versions that don’t feature the acoustic glass had a surprising amount of road noise on coarse chip surfaces. I’d expect better for a premium car on a new platform, and the standard suspension had the odd jilted moment as it wrangled with the sheer weight of the Q6.

The air suspension package was a massive improvement on this, damping both noise levels and the undulations and imperfections the road can throw at you. It stood out to me as a very worthwhile option to have, even on base cars if you’re chasing the best handling and ride this platform has to offer.

The SQ6, featuring the lot, is of course an absolute monster of a car, with even more powerful acceleration, and the air suspension as standard, although on the road at least the additional power over the Quattro was hard to quantify. 

We didn’t have the chance to sample the base Performance at the launch. The rear-drive dynamics and lesser weight over the front axle as well as smaller wheel will make for a different feel compared to the Quattro and SQ6 we did drive, so we’re hoping we can bring you a review of this car at a later date.

The cabin is spacious and, with side-steps plus large handles on the front windscreen pillars, it’s easy to climb aboard and find a comfortable driving position.

All-around vision is good and active driver aids like blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and reversing camera instil confidence, particularly when hauling taller loads that block rear vision through the central mirror.

The engine is responsive in city and suburban use, thanks largely to its broad spread of torque across a 1000rpm-wide band from 1600-2600rpm that showcases its useful flexibility. The six-speed automatic has well-spaced ratios and shift calibrations that feel like they get the best out of this engine, either unladen or when hauling heavy loads.

It feels well-planted on the road and displays sure-footed handling if driven at appropriate speeds for a high-riding 4x4 ute, combined with excellent steering feel and responsive braking.

The unladen ride is firm, as you’d expect given the heavy-duty rear suspension unique to cab-chassis models, but the combined sprung weight of the tray and tow bar ensure it’s not too harsh.

To test its payload rating we strapped 830kg onto the load tray, which with driver and half a tank of diesel was a snip under its GVM limit. Even so, the rear leaf-springs only compressing 40mm under this loading, which left more than 40mm of bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming-out on our test route.

It hauled this big load with competence and a smoother ride quality, given the large increase in sprung weight allowed the heavy-duty rear suspension to do what it’s primarily designed to do.

There was also minimal effect on steering and braking response and the engine’s ample torque was not phased by this payload, particularly on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h.

Engine-braking on the way down was also robust, highlighting the advantage of larger displacement engines (3.0-litres-plus) on overrun when restraining heavy loads on steep descents.

It also has low engine, tyre and wind noise at highway speeds, where the engine requires less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h thanks to its overdriven top gear with full torque converter lock-up.

This ensures the BT-50 is a comfortable and economical highway cruiser, with average fuel consumption that quickly drops into single figures on long hauls.

It has a maximum five-star ANCAP rating originally awarded in 2020 and updated in 2022 in accordance with D-Max upgrades.

The benchmark safety menu is packed with passive and active safety features highlighted by multiple airbags including full side-curtains and the latest in low/high speed AEB with pedestrian/cycle/motorcycle detection, lane-keeping, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, reversing camera, trailer sway control, tyre pressure monitoring and much more.

For junior tradies there are ISOFIX child-seat anchorages and top-tethers for the outer rear seating positions.

The usual five-year and unlimited-kilometre warranty applies to the Q6 e-tron, alongside six years of roadside assistance and an industry-standard eight-year or 160,000km battery warranty.

Additionally, Audi throws in one year of a Chargefox subscription, theoretically making your first 12 months of fast DC charging free (provided Chargefox administers your local charging infrastructure).

At the time of writing, Audi was yet to provide service pricing, but the interval is nice and long, at 24 months or 30,000km. A pre-paid service package covering six years and 90,000km comes in at just $2080 which is super affordable for a car from a traditional luxury brand, even if it only covers the first three workshop visits.

Our test vehicle comes with a five-year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Mazda’s ‘estimated service cost’ for the first five years/75,000km totals $2547 which is an average of $509 annually.