Opinion

Is Range Rover planning to go even more upmarket and price out a big chunk of its current buyers? It sure seems that way, with Range Rover’s global boss announcing the removal of the brand’s most affordable models - the Evoque and Velar - from its line-up. Welcome to a new era where high end vehicles could become even more out of reach for most. The news of the Range Rover Evoque and Velar’s end came during an interview Range Rover boss Martin Limpert was giving to British motoring publication Autocar. “The Range Rover Evoque and Range Rover Velar will not be replaced when production of the pair ends later this decade,” Limpert confirmed to Autocar. Not replacing them is a seriously strong clue as to Range Rover’s business model for the coming decade. The 2010s and 2020s saw luxury brands such Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Audi and even Range Rover offer affordable entry models into their ranges. For Mercedes-Benz it was models like the CLA small sedan and GLA small SUV for about $60K - expensive for a small car, cheap for a Benz. It was a great way to top up the brand’s annual takings, with the larger more expensive models bringing home the big bucks. Range Rover did the same with the Evoque and Velar. It was a prestige badge on a budget - in this case less than $100K, which is lots, but compared to the $300K starting price of a full-fat Range Rover, it’s nothing. Sales of the Evoque and Velar, which launched in 2014 and 2017 respectively, have tanked in recent years.   The Evoque’s sales fell 78 per cent from a peak of 2732 in 2016 to 614 in 2025. Why did this happen? I think you know why. Well, I think I know why, and it starts with BYD and ends in Zeekr. Yep, one of the common bits of the feedback we’re getting from our readers is that the most desirable cars now for those looking to spend $50-60K are models such as the BYD Sealion 7 and Zeekr 7X.  Chinese cars are not only fitted with the best electric vehicle tech but they’re now among the most beautifully styled high ending things on the road. The upcoming Range Rover GT is a low-slung-wagon-styled SUV and it will be fully electric, but at an expected $175,000 and an arrival date of 2028, it’s probably too much and too late for previous Evoque buyers who are now in a Zeekr. It’s not like Range Rover should care. The strategy of having a car for (almost) everyone is dead - the Chinese have thwarted that plan, so the way forward is to go where those brands can’t - stratospherically high end. Range Rover knows this and will retreat to make big money through the models its core base is buying. Range Rover’s rugged sister brand Land Rover will offer some affordability with models like the Defender Sport. That’s because the off-road niche of Defender is protected by a whole lot of iconic nostalgia that Evoque and Velar don’t have, plus there aren’t any Chinese models that can do what a Defender can with the iconography to go with it. So it’s a strategic retreat by Range Rover out of an area it can’t compete in and doubling down in the places the Chinese brands can’t get them. What will happen to the Land Rover Discovery model? Sales for this once hugely popular model started at a peak of 2470 in 2016 when the new-generation model launched in Australia and fell by 83.3 per cent in a decade with just 413 sales in 2025. The result is worse than Evoque’s numbers for the same period and yet JLR has confirmed work is underway on a new-gen Discovery. Discovery is also a separate sub brand along with Range Rover and Defender. So along with Discovery there’s also the smaller Discovery Sport.  JLR obviously still thinks there’s a place for the Discovery brand, which it presumably sees filling the role of more family focussed suburban duties, while Range Rover fulfils the glamorous high society ones and Land Rover is for the muddy fields. And that leaves no place for an Evoque or Velar, and not really any budget focussed entry point into what will become a more exclusive group. But that’s probably exactly what JLR wants - exclusivity. For now other prestige brands are still selling more affordable models but as consumers migrate to new brands from China they may follow JLR’s move to higher priced ground to save themselves.

Australia, you have two weeks before a massive fuel price wave hits us, and this time there’s no government fuel excise relief to save us. The price of Brent crude oil has risen to US$117.35 a barrel. That’s the highest level we have seen in six months, foretelling a looming spike in the cost of petrol and diesel in Australia… again. But this time around it'll hot a lot harder with no cut to the Fuel Excise to cushion the blow.   Brent crude is fascinating. It’s a kind of oil found in 1971 in the Brent oil field in the North Sea, and even though it’s not a particularly special oil in itself, the price of it has become the indicator of the world’s oil price. When the price of Brent crude goes up, oil prices are raised globally and then the clock starts ticking before the increase reaches petrol and diesel prices. The ACCC says two weeks is generally the time for an increase in Brent crude oil price to flow through to a hike in petrol and diesel prices at the pump in your suburb. The price rise process is a chain that starts with a rise in Brent crude price, that causes a rise in refined fuel prices in Asia, that causes a rise in wholesale prices in Australia, which then causes your local service station to raise the price of diesel and petrol at the bowser. Unfortunately, you’re the last link in the chain, and the price rise is passed the whole way along to you. Following the outbreak of the war in Iran on February 28, and then disruption of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, Brent crude’s price went from $72 a barrel the night before military action to $106 on March 20. Australian petrol and diesel prices skyrocketed from an average of 168.1c/litre for 91 RON in NSW in February to 222.5c/litre by the end of March.   The federal government then stepped and cut the Fuel Excise, which ran from April 1 to August 2 and gave us a discount of 32c a litre. The relief came at exactly the right time and sheltered us from the worst of the price hikes. Brent crude’s price during this time hit US$118.03 on April 29. The price of 91 RON could have sailed past 250c/litre. Which is where we are headed for now.  How much will the price of fuel rise? After falling back to a low of US$72.17 on July 1 Brent crude’s price has risen again through September and October to US$117.35 on Monday this week. The last time the price was this high was on April 29 when Brent crude peaked at US$118.03.  We are feeling early October’s Brent price rise now with 91 RON averaging 237c/litre as the month draws to an end.  Early to mid-November could see us reach the highest fuel prices we’ve endured this year. My guess is 91 RON will hit 250c/litre and the highest grade unleaded 98 RON will hit 280c/litre. That’s about $154 to fill up a car with a regular 55-litre petrol tank. The good news is Australian fuel reserves have stayed at the same level since March. According to the Federal government as of October 20 there remains 39 days left of petrol, 31 days left of diesel and 28 days left of jet fuel. If you remember it was the threat of fuel rationing that caused people to start panic buying back in March. And while this time around there doesn’t seem to be the same sense of panic, the rising cost of fuel results in an increase in the price of goods and services, which is a hard pill to swallow for households after being hit by successive interest rate hikes. I don’t know about you, but EVs are looking more attractive. So’s the bus.

It has taken nearly a decade of development, but Tesla has finally done it - they have made the world’s dumbest car. And, in true Tesla style, they have over-delivered on their promise (a decade in the making), making it incredibly dangerous, too.  I’m not mad at the world’s media, including many of my motoring colleagues, for falling for the hype, I’m just disappointed. Because there are some pretty major holes in what Elon Musk and his team at Tesla showed off last week. Of course, that was the point, show off some flashy gimmicks and make everyone pay attention to these wild stunts and not question the ‘how’ and the ‘why’, as well as the major safety issues it raises.  Let’s start with the obvious - it’s not a flying car. As Buzz Lightyear would say, it was “falling with style” rather than taking flight. As for its ‘flip’ over the rest of Tesla’s line-up, to say that it was ‘flying’ would be akin to saying skateboards can fly.  The demonstration, while unquestionably real and not AI and understandably attention-grabbing, was not a true reflection of what Tesla and Musk are promising. Evidence suggests it was basically a full-scale drone, with no human inside and it was seemingly just a simple ladder-frame chassis with a body on top and thrusters and fans underneath. Musk admitted that they didn’t have a human inside the car “to make sure we don't kill anyone!” Which is not particularly reassuring from a brand that has consistently ‘beta tested’ technologies on public roads with owners.  Musk also said: “Now I should say that this is not necessarily a safety optimised car, but it takes the fun meter to 11 out of 10.” I’m all for having fun with cars, but safety must come first. To be candid, most motorists have a hard enough time driving safely on the ground. Adding in the complexity of flight is simply a recipe for disaster. Tesla has said the ‘flying’ elements will be autonomous, but again, based on the autonomous functions already in cars not exactly working with a perfect track record, launching cars into the air with rocket thrusters just seems like a recipe for disaster.  It was able to climb the vertical ramp because it has a series of fans to suck it to the ground. But this is not new technology, it was introduced in Formula 1 in 1978 and more recently the McMurtry Sterling has demonstrated it too can hold itself in place upside down. Of course, no-one is actually going to drive upside down, that’s just more attention-seeking behaviour from Tesla, but it will help produce more downforce for the road and track. Lars Moravy, VP for vehicle engineering at Tesla, told US media that the car can produce so much downforce that: “When we’re accelerating, we can break the laws of tyre physics.”  Hopefully that means they’ll develop newer, stronger, physics-defying tyres. Or else I guess your tyres will be destroyed every time you accelerate too hard.  Tesla’s own disclaimer on the website makes it clear the Rocket version of the Roadster will not be available in all regions and will be “subject to each region's legal requirements and applicable laws”, which means each country will need to decide if it feels kick-flipping cars are something they want on the road.  Musk’s gloating about the car almost sounds like an admission that it will have very limited scope.  “This will be an actual car that's on the roads. I'm not sure it's necessarily legal in all jurisdictions, but there will be such a car that someone can own,” he said.  The Plan B, or perhaps it's actually Plan A, is for a purpose-built test track facility to be built at Tesla’s headquarters in Texas. That would allow those invited to own the Roadster Rocket (because it is ‘invite only’) to have their fun in a private space, leaving the roads for proper cars. Although, once again it demonstrates the cult-like pull of Tesla and its limitation. If the special Texas facility is the only place you can fulfil its full potential, what does that mean for owners who don’t live in Texas? It’s hard to imagine Porsche or Ferrari telling customers they can only drive their expensive supercar in one specific location on Earth. Finally, perhaps the most important element that has been overlooked is that what we saw was not a production car. Nearly a decade after taking US$250,000 deposits for the second generation Roadster, Tesla is still yet to actually fire up the production line. No other car company on the planet, not even Ferrari or Lamborghini, could get away with taking people’s money and not delivering a car for over a decade. Sure, they’ve said it will enter production by 2028, but they’ve said it was going into production in the near-future since 2017. The fact that this car looks nothing like the original 2017 concept is another thing only Tesla can get away with, with its blindly-loyal customers. I do feel like Tesla will eventually put the Roadster into production (although I’d only say I’m 60 per cent confident), but the fact they have focused on the Rocket version and revealed little in the way of details about the Performance and Thrust variants that people will actually be able to buy is yet another red flag. While the attention-seeking unveiling of the Roadster did what it set out to do, making headlines and distracting from the massive delays, ultimately this is a car that answers questions nobody asked. People were happy with the idea of a second-generation Roadster that wasn’t based on a Lotus Elise and felt like it was built in an industrial estate by hand (which is very much what the first generation Roadster felt like). Instead, in what has become his calling card, Musk has pushed Tesla into unchartered territory for the car industry - for better or worse. I hope I’m wrong, but it feels inevitable that we’ll be writing about the first death of a Roadster driver not long after it enters production - whenever that may be. I loved watching Back to the Future II and day-dreaming of a flying car as much as the next kid, but when I grew up I realised the pure impracticality of flying cars and the dangers they create. There’s a reason why getting your pilot’s licence takes a lot longer than getting your driver’s licence.  This feels like the automotive equivalent of Google Glasses or Apple Vision Pro, technology designed by billionaires in Silicon Valley for millionaires in Silicon Valley (or, in this case, Texas) and that makes it as dumb as it is dangerous. But, after all this, if you’re still looking to buy a Tesla Roadster so you can jump over traffic or drive up walls, don’t spend your money yet because I have some magic beans to sell you…

China’s automotive industry is facing an unexpected speed hump on its road to relentless global expansion, and it is from an unlikely place. As highlighted by this week’s Paris Motor Show, Europe’s biggest and busiest in years, carmakers have started looking back to move forward, with a number of affordable yet evocative production or near-production concept models leaning heavily into post-modern – or retro - realms. Most are electric or electrified, and all major on emotional design to lure consumers in. With little to no history, tradition or heritage for Chinese manufacturers to also lean upon, it seems that France and Italy especially are mining their back catalogues for their next big hits – and the world is hungry for it. In essence, European marques are leveraging their single biggest asset – brand character and national identity – to survive today. In fact, the key, recurring message from nearly every European manufacturer during their new-model press conferences and presentations at the Paris event could be distilled down to five words: “Made in Europe, for Europe!” The aim is to send the world in general and China in particular a loud and clear message that European manufacturers are not taking the actual and existential threats from rivals like BYD, Zeekr, XPeng, MG and GWM lying down. Not on their own turf at least. Making waves is Stellantis, with its brands Peugeot and Citroen from France and Alfa Romeo and Fiat from Italy, all putting on the rose-coloured glasses. But it was immediately apparent on the first press day that arch rival Renault – the 127-year old carmaker from Boulogne-Billancourt that predates even Ford – created the biggest stir, and a home-ground one at that. In what turned out to be one of the show’s genuine surprises, it presented no fewer than five retro-inspired models, which, in turn, attracted probably the longest and most sustained attention from the assembled media on press day. The stunning Renault E-Space people mover ushered in the revival least expected in today’s SUV age. Harking back to the avantgarde 1984 Espace original, it would return Renault to the multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) class it helped pioneer but is nowadays scarce for choice (barring the Kia Carnival and some electrified Chinese MPVs). But only the green light is given. This one’s a firm maybe. More importantly, a production E-Space could sit on the Renault Group’s coming next-gen electrified skateboard platform. Dubbed RGEV Medium 2.0, it follows China’s lead as a software-based EV-first architecture. Highlights include up to 750km of EV battery range or over 1000km with a range-extender powertrain, along with an 800-volt electrical setup for ultra-fast charging. Referring to China, as Renault Group CEO, François Provost, put it: “… we are not afraid of anyone.” Widely regarded as Europe’s best small EV, it was only a matter of time before the R5 E-Tech would receive the Turbo treatment. In 80s Renault-speak, and for motorsport homologation purposes, that meant stuffing the front-drive supermini with a powerful 1.4-litre turbo engine out back, driving the rear wheels. That necessitated massive biceps in the form of bulging arches, creating an instant classic in the process. Fast-forward to today and the EV is set to score a similar makeover, this time switching to an Alpine-tuned chassis with twin rear electric motors out back, to create a new breed of electric hyper hatch. Just 1980 of them will be built from 2028. Now largely forgotten in Australia, the original Renault 8 of the early 1960s was a small four-door rear-engined sedan, with the Gordini being Europe’s rally special sporty edition. Based on the R5 E-Tech’s flexible EV architecture, the reimagined R8 Gordini is a beguiling visual throwback that also conjures up other period classics with similar crisp styling – the Ford Escort, Datsun 1600 and BMW 2002 to name a few. A real knockout. As an exercise of intent, this is breathtaking. Will Renault build it? Time will tell. For a hot minute in the early ‘80s, the Alpine A310 V6 looked like it could become a serious Porsche challenger. Handsomely angular with gorgeous flared wheelarches giving it a total supercar stance, the Dieppe-based tuner of humdrum Renaults seemed on the same trajectory as AMG and M were with Mercedes and BMW respectively. Tragically, that never happened, as every consequent Alpine never looked as sensuous. But as Renault’s in-house special-vehicles department, reviving one of the sexiest models in the back-catalogue would be a no-brainer. Right now, Renault is saying this won’t be built, concentrating on the coming A110 EV first instead. But, this is the exactly the car that people think of when they hear the word Alpine. That and a pack of ciggies, but that’s another story. Enjoying a rapturous international motor show debut in Paris, the Twingo must have struck enough terror in compatriot Citroen’s heart when revealed last year for the latter to come up with its own beloved retro baby, the 2CV. More on that later. The Twingo is a tiny four-seater EV with looks evoking the 1992 original that influenced a generation of quirky city cars, most notably the 1999 Toyota Echo (Yaris outside of Australia and the US). This time around, it’s all-electric, of course, has won several car-of-the-year awards, and costs from about $31,000, or around $24,000 apres EV incentives. There’s economy of scale at play here, too, with Nissan (Pivo) and Dacia (Spring II) versions also being produced. Citroen’s twin-chevron logo literally denotes advancement. Going retro seems the opposite of what the brand used to stand for. But the world has changed since the pre-war design/post-war productionised 2CV put France on wheels. This one may look cartoonishly twee up front, but – like the original – this one promises to be an ultra-affordable (low-$20,000 AUD) urban EV with clever engineering for maximum efficiency at minimum cost. So, Citroen’s heart is in the right place. And, at the show, the boss promised that it will be built. Plus, China seems to have already cornered the avantgarde cheap-EV market already with models like the BYD Atto 1, so why not look back. Just don’t get into the habit, Citroen. PS. The van version, the Fourgonnette that nobody anticipated at the Paris show, is achingly cool. That’s the one we’d have. What you’re looking at is another reinterpretation of an ‘80s motorsport homologation special, and this time, there’s a mainstream affordable next-generation supermini lurking underneath. Peugeot’s e-T16 is an incredibly spot-on reimagining of the famous 205 T16 from 40 years ago, balancing retro themes with progressive design that makes us eager for the production e-208 coming next year. And the best news is, Peugeot is contemplating making an e-T16 hyper hatch like what you see here too! Just hurry up and sort out your Australian distribution mess, Stellantis. This could be the rebirth of cool, Peugeot-style. This is based on a cheap electric quadricycle originally marketed by Citroen as the Ami in 2020, though the Fiat Topolino version is prettier and truer to the Italian brand’s heritage for slow and cramped city cars that are barely any larger than a Smart ForTwo. The Multiplina is the four-seater version, with more space inside and greater performance, capable of hitting about 90km/h. And, evocative of the 1956 Fiat 600 Multipla (that was actually briefly sold in Australia), it’s super cute to boot. As far as retro revivals go, bringing back the RCZ seems a bit premature, given the last one was made as recently as 2015. But there aren’t enough 2+2-seater sporty coupes nowadays, so we’re glad that Peugeot is contemplating returning to the segment with this slick and slinky all-electric beauty. Especially as the Audi TT is no more.

Think you’ve been snapped by a camera while holding your mobile phone? Here’s how you’ll find out if a mobile phone detection camera caught you, how these cameras work, the penalties you could face for each state of Australia, the loopholes and what to do if you think the camera got it wrong. We’re not going to ask why you’ve found yourself in this situation where you really want to know if you were caught by a camera holding your phone while driving. You know it’s not just against the law, but incredibly dangerous to hold or use your phone while driving. But we’re not here to judge, just to (Cars) guide you. So here’s a state-by-state and territory-by-territory guide to how you’ll find out if you’ve been caught with your phone while driving, the penalty you’ll pay and ways to use your phone legally while driving. First a little explainer on the mobile phone detection cameras themselves. Mobile phone detection cameras, also known as distracted driver and seat belt detection cameras, come in two forms - fixed and portable. Fixed mobile detection cameras are often located over gantries above motorways and highways. Portable mobile detection cameras are sometimes mounted on a small trailer parked on the side of the road. These have a large boom arm that holds the camera and sensors above the road and often have solar panels. The cameras themselves are about the size of a shoe box and may be accompanied by multiple sensors. If you see one while driving and holding your phone, it’s probably too late, so just don’t be tempted to pick it up at all. Mobile phone detection cameras operate in all states of Australia except for the Northern Territory. The phone detecting technology works by Artificial Intelligence (AI) first identifying the suspected use of a device and snapping an image, which is sent off to a human to verify with their own eyes. What if they make a mistake? More on that below. Here’s how you’ll find out if you’ve been caught by a mobile phone detection camera and the penalty you’ll face state-by-state. In NSW you’ll generally find out if you’ve been caught by a mobile phone detection camera through the post about a week after the offence, although reports say this can also take up to 30 days.  You’ll receive the penalty notice and you’ll be able to check the camera image online through the Service NSW app. The penalty for holding and using a phone while driving in NSW is five points and $410. In Victoria you’ll be notified of any mobile phone detection camera infringement by post, and as with other states, you’ll be able to check the actual camera image online through Fines Victoria The penalty for holding a phone while driving in Victoria is four points and $627. South Australians you’ll find out the bad news through the post and there’s not a standard delivery time. The penalty in South Australia for holding and using a phone while driving is $592, plus an $108 victims of crime levy for adults and $20 for people under 18. You’ll also have three points taken off your licence. Queenslanders you’ll be notified by mail and the notice includes images of the alleged offence. The Queensland Revenue Office handles the infringement and you’re looking at a fine of $1295 and four demerit points.  Tasmanians you’ll also be notified of a mobile phone detection camera offence by post and you’re looking at receiving that infringement within 21 days.  If you want to view the images you can do so online using the photo ID printed on the physical notice in the mail. The penalty for holding and using your phone while driving in Tasmania is $426 and three points. Western Australians you’ll get the infringement notice in the mail, but there are some interesting twists to where you get caught and what you were doing. First if you were snapped by the cameras on the Mitchell Freeway, then from June 1 for six months you'll receive a caution notice. If you’re reading this in late 2026 or 2027 double check this as the period of leniency may have ended. Next, your penalty or penalties vary because WA has two categories for mobile phone infringements - ordinary illegal phone use and serious illegal phone use. Ordinary illegal phone use refers to just holding or touching the phone and the fine is $500 and three demerit points Serious illegal phone use refers to actively using the device to do things such as texting, filming, posting and so on. The fine is $1000 and four demerit points. In the ACT drivers are posted an infringement notice for mobile phone detection camera offences and you should receive this within 28 days. Like Western Australians your penalty depends on how you were using the device which makes sense. So in the ACT if you’re snapped just holding the phone the penalty is $615 and three demerit points. And if you’re actively using the device to message, search or post then you’ll receive a $745 fine and four demerit points. There are no mobile phone detection cameras in the NT, but holding and using a phone while driving is still against the law and police are on the lookout. The penalty for holding and using a mobile phone while driving is $500 and three demerit points. You would have seen plenty of cases in the media where phone detection cameras have detected other things that aren’t phones, or possibly phone shaped, or just a case of somebody maybe scratching their ear.  Even then mistakes can be made and so it’s always important to check the images of you allegedly using your device. You may have just been eating a banana, or yawning, or both. As for loopholes, such as passing the phone to somebody or using the phone in an emergency. This varies around Australia, but if you’re unsure then don’t touch it.  In NSW you can pass the phone to a passenger legally and this is detailed in Transport for NSW mobile phone usage guidelines 2025. That said we have read accounts on forums recently where NSW drivers have had this exemption denied and asked to front-up to court to fight it.  Victoria on the other hand has a blanket rule that says you can’t hold the phone no matter what. The only legal way to use your phone anywhere in Australia while driving is by mounting it in a phone cradle - unless you’re a learner or P-plater then there’s no allowance for ever touching a device even in a cradle. Fully licensed drivers can only use some phone functions. These include GPS navigation, music or podcasts and phone calls - using hands free.  Messaging, scrolling, posting, searching by hand are not allowed even in a cradle. Again as with all this information and guidance given here it’s important to check the rules in your state because they are constantly updated and changed. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are legal to use everywhere in Australia and all new cars these days come standard with these apps. You can make calls and send messages hands free, and listen to music and podcasts using the central media screen as your interface If your car is a bit older you may still have been able to use Bluetooth connectivity to set up your phone and if you’re driving something verging on ancient/classic we suggest an aftermarket Apple CarPlay or Android Auto system.

The Tesla Model Y is clearly the new Holden Commodore and the BYD Sealion 7 is the new Mazda CX-5. That’s how much things have changed, and it’s also how unscientific this story is - but I’ve included a table that makes me look as if I've based some of this on facts. Yep, the top 10 best-selling cars in Australia in 2026 looks very different to the top 10 from 2016. What were the big sellers back then and what’s replaced them now? Have we progressed onto better cars or was 2016 the peak and it’s all been downhill since? If you were to travel back 10 years in time and show anybody the top 10 best-selling cars for September 2026, even a car journo would look at you and say: "What’s a Geely EX5?". And you’d tell them it's a fully electric mid-sized SUV that came in at No.8 in the list of best sellers for September, 2026. But do not tell them anything else, you’ll risk altering the time line.  If you look at what car placed No.8 in 2016 you’ll find it was the Mitsubishi Triton ute. The Triton has fallen out of today’s top 10 in fact only two of the cars from the 2016 best sellers are still in the 2026 list, some of them like the Holden Commodore don’t exist at all anymore. Check out the table below for a side-by-side comparison of September 2016 v September 2026 In 2016, all of our top 10 cars had internal combustion engines (ICE) and only the Corolla was offered with a hybrid powertrain.  Currently, three of our top 10 cars are fully electric, five are offered in both hybrid and ICE formats, while only two models are only offered with ICE. The Corolla is gone, well it’s still on sale in 2026, but it’s left the top 10. See 2016 was one of the last years when hatchbacks ruled. The Corolla, Mazda3, Hyundai i30 were the three little kings, with the Hyundai Accent thrown in there, too. But they’ve been replaced now by new small rulers. I would even say the Chery Tiggo 4 and Haval Jolion are the new Corolla, i30 and Mazda 3. They are almost exactly the same size, price and target demographic for a Corolla in 2016. Following this gut logic I reckon the Tesla Model Y is the new Commodore. Holden fans won’t like to admit it, but they know I’m right.  The BYD Sealion 7 — that is the new Mazda CX-5. They’ve everywhere and they appeal to people who think they’re a bit better than a RAV4. Who’s now buying the RAV4? That’s a trick question because we all know RAV4 owners go on to buy another RAV4. So the RAV4 is the new RAV4. The EX5 is obviously the new Hyundai Tucson because it's one of the best but under-appreciated cars here. The D-Max is the new Triton. And that’s because the D-Max is no longer the runt of the ute litter, but it's still cheaper than a Ranger. What’s left. Ranger hasn’t changed - the same people are buying it and more of them and the same goes for HiLux. Those folks who would have loved V8 Commodores and Falcons are now in the tough ute group. Basically anyone who’d have a HSV or FPV 10 years ago is in a Ranger Raptor or HiLux GR Sport now. Prado is interesting and I think they are Toyota buyers who don’t want a Kluger and didn’t like their Fortuner but aren’t up for the 300 Series big dog. What do you think? If the Tesla Model Y isn’t the new Commodore then what is?  And were things better in 2016 when everything was ICE? Is our top 10 now looking like a list of best-selling electrical appliances? Are the Ranger and HiLux the last bastions of the best era ever? Or has their time come to move aside because EVs make far more sense? Also as a side note just to reassure you somewhat that not all of this is complete rubbish. Not only was in the same role at CarsGuide in 2016, but I'm pretty sure I also took most of the pictures of these cars from then, too. Stay tuned for my next unscientific round up of what’s what in 2036 when I’ll tell you that the super popular Mooflander Huckster 4 is the new Tesla Model Y.

Jeep’s future in Australia is coming into focus - and it looks very different to its past. For decades the American off-road brand has built its reputation, for better or worse, on the back of its American-made SUVs. But it is now looking increasingly likely that its future models are likely to be built in China and not the USA. According to overseas reports, Jeep will introduce more European-focused vehicles rather than simply exporting what suits the American market. That’s driven by the fact Jeep is one of four ‘global brands’ that Setallantis will focus on (in its stable of 15), alongside Fiat, Peugeot, and Ram. Stellantis signed a partnership with Chinese automotive giant Dongfeng earlier this year and it is looking increasingly like this will be the source for the next wave of Jeep models to land in Australia. “The agreement announced by Stellantis and Dongfeng in May strengthens a long-standing global partnership and supports the development and production of future Peugeot and Jeep vehicles for China and other markets,” a Stellantis spokesperson told CarsGuide.  “We look forward to sharing additional details for Australia at the appropriate time.” Stellantis Australia isn’t ready to reveal exactly what sort of models will be headed our way, but reports indicate there will be two models and they will both be available by a choice of plug-in hybrid or fully-electric powertrains. They will also be built at Dongfeng’s Wuhan factory, which has a long history with another Stellantis brand, Peugeot, which pre-dates the latest partnership. Dongfeng has had a joint-venture with Peugeot-Citroen since 1992, so has plenty of experience building the French-badged cars in China. This also opens the door for Peugeot to make another run at the Australian market, with either a new independent distributor or under the Stellantis Australia umbrella. Chinese-built Peugeot and Jeep models would give both brands with mixed reputations for both value and quality a fresh start in Australia. Chinese made vehicles now dominate the Australian market with over 244,000 already sold in 2025, ahead of Japan and South Korea sourced cars. Meanwhile, American-built models have only amassed 14,810 sales in the same timeframe. Given the repeated recalls and quality issues that have plagued Jeep in recent years, along with the rise and rise of Chinese-built cars in this market, a switch of production bases could be the brand’s best hope.  Especially if Dongfeng and Jeep can ensure competitive pricing to correct course after an ill-conceived plan to try and pivot the brand more upmarket. Getting Jeeps more price-competitive again and with a higher quality standard is the only way for the brand to revive its fortunes in Australia. The days of the Grand Cherokee selling more than 30,000 examples every year are long gone - as is the Grand Cherokee. Jeep has managed to notch just 378 sales in the first eight months of 2026, which has led to the inevitable questions about its future. But it seems the move to more Chinese manufacturing has been in the works for some time and Jeep Australia will simply have to endure a bit more pain until it can try again with a refreshed range. This is likely the same scenario for Peugeot, as it awaits more Chinese-built options to reinvent itself in Australia. But China won’t be Jeep’s only option, with Europe set to play a bigger role as Stellantis management tries to give it a new chance alongside its more successful French, Italian and German brands like Peugeot, Fiat and Opel. Reports have said the new ‘STLA One’ modular platform will underpin a range of Stellantis small and mid-size models across multiple brands, including Jeep. Crucially, it will feature an 800-volt electrical system that will allow it to accommodate fully-electric, plug-in hybrid and conventional hybrid powertrains.  A small SUV to sit slightly above the new Avenger, as well as a larger model that will sit just below the Compass are speculated to be on the way. This would create the potential for a more comprehensive line-up of Jeeps in Australia, and one that potentially distances itself from its American heritage (at least in a production sense). Whether or not it succeeds or fails will depend on many factors, not least the price and positioning of each model. But for Jeep fans, or just anyone questioning why the brand hasn’t given up and left Australia already, it’s clear there is a plan to once again make Jeep a popular choice for Aussie SUV buyers.

You have to feel for the good folks at Toyota. The executive team spends years downplaying EVs for Australia – suggesting they’re not the right fit for most Australians, are too expensive, and can’t do all the things ICE engines can do – and then they have to go and bloody launch one. I was at the launch of the bZ4X in 2024, the brand’s first-ever EV, and so was on hand to see the spectacular verbal gymnastics on display. One of the brand’s then-most senior executives had described EVs as “impractical”, suggested that “hybrids can have a greater impact than full electrification”, and – if you go back as far as 2019 – said he had no plans to launch EVs in Australia at all. "I always get concerned when pure electric vehicles turn up at fairly big prices, and people instantly think people will buy them and they'll take off," Toyota’s then VP of Sales and Marketing Sean Hanley told me back then. "But if there's one thing I've learned on the hybrid journey it's that they have to be affordable. I get frustrated when people say electrification isn't being taken up in Australia as quickly as it should be. Well, who is going to buy these small cars for $50,000?" And then here we were, launching the bZ4X — the brand's big push into the EV space — which started at a cool $66,000. And yes, there was other stuff holding the Toyota back. It was probably too expensive, it didn’t travel far enough on a single charge, and it arrived at a time when Chinese EVs were turning up offering more for less, increasing competition in our market seemingly daily. But surely at least part of its sluggish sales performance (in 2025 the brand shifted 1041 examples, compared to the Tesla Model Y’s 22,239 sales) is down to the fact that Toyota had spent so long telling its customers to ignore EVs, right before trying to sell them one? The good news for Toyota is that the tide is now slowly turning. This new and improved bZ4X is finding new buyers, with the brand already doubling its 2025 total over the first seven months of 2026. The brand is investing in advertising to increase awareness, and its EV fleet is growing. The Touring (or wagon) version of the bZ4X has already arrived, and the electric CH-R will arrive next year, too. Also here, but less relevant, is the Toyota HiLux BEV, which is aimed fairly squarely at mining companies, but you can in fact buy one if you really want to. “The (new) bZ4X is, from a value point of view, compared to the previous one, you can see that sort of step up. And the bZ was doing really well even before the sort of fuel crisis spike of demand,” Toyota’s new VP of sales and marketing, John Pappas, told me at the launch of the Touring. “Now what we're seeing is, we just launched bZ4X Touring, we're already seeing that the normal increased run rate of the bZ with the Touring has literally doubled the run rate of the family. “So that's a really good step for us, right? Now, into the future, yes we've got the Hilux BEV as well, but next year we're bringing the C-HR in a BEV in the middle of 2027.” Toyota has another ace up its sleeve, too. There is no other brand, and certainly no newcomer, that can offer the depth of coverage Toyota does from a dealership perspective. Trust is important when you’re dropping big money on a new car, and Toyota has a ton of it. Don’t rule Toyota out of the EV game yet. It has a heap of work to do to chase down its rivals in the space, but the brand appears to be at last beginning to take that challenge seriously. If you’ve read any of my long-term dispatches on the bZ4X you’ll know that I think it has the goods to take on Tesla and BYD in the electric SUV space. Now Toyota just has to convince its customers that it cares about EVs in the same way it cares about hybrids.

The true successor to the Ford Falcon is finally coming, with a new name, fresh body styles and the right powertrain for our times, and it should be huge. This isn’t speculation or hyperbole either, but the facts behind an upcoming entire family of electric vehicles (EVs) recently announced by Ford’s global CEO, Jim Farley. With the first model badged Fathom, they represent a return to brand values at a most critical time in the company’s 123-year history. While not yet announced for Australia, the Fathom name has already been trademarked in this country, while its architecture has been engineered for right-hand-drive, auguring well for an eventual local launch. Starting from around $A40,000 in the US when orders commence early next year, the Fathom will initially launch as a four-door, five-seater mid-sized dual-cab EV of monocoque construction. Despite what the styling implies, this is not a ladder-frame pick-up, but an integrated ute around the size of the existing and highly successful Maverick, which is sadly unavailable in Australia. The Fathom is expected to eventually be part of a wider family of EVs that will likely include an SUV spin-off. In other words, Ford is devising a range of models that sit at the heart of the global new-vehicle market. Van and possibly passenger-car and crossover versions are also set to arrive in time. These are all possible due to some smart thinking behind what Ford calls the Universal EV Platform (UEP). New from the ground up, this is a modular architecture designed and engineered to be as flexible as possible. A key component of the UEP’s flat, skateboard framework is an integrated lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) battery module to provide extra strength and packaging efficiency. Other details, including range and specifications, will be released at a later date. Created to keep costs down, UEP is a direct response to the dramatically increased competition from China, as well as from South Korea, Japan and Europe. China in particular has rewritten the rules on hybrid and EV affordability, so Fathom is part of Ford’s wider fightback strategy. And not for the first time since 1903, either. Have no doubts. Philosophically, Fathom is a modern Falcon in all but name. The Fathom is a textbook return to everything the Falcon was and represented when Ford unveiled it in America in September, 1959. Back then, the company was struggling amid recession and the financial fallout of the multi-billion-dollar Edsel premium brand disaster. These were happening against the backdrop of booming sales for smaller and cheaper European (and later Japanese) models, like the Volkswagen Beetle and Renault Dauphine – something that none of the major American carmakers foresaw nor had adequate responses for. Described as a “compact”, it’s mad to think the Falcon was Ford’s direct answer to the Beetle, but until then, the Blue Oval’s smallest US offerings were still massive, like the 1959 ‘Tank’ Fairlane. With demand far outstripping forecasts, in one fell swoop, the original Falcon turned Ford around, outselling all before it. And let’s not forget – the Falcon also spawned the phenomenon that was the original Mustang. After all these years, Ford is hoping that magic Falcon lightning will strike again with Fathom. And, in the latter 2020s, it makes sense for that to be dual-cab ute. Going where the buyers are. The first Falcon was released in Australia in September, 1960, starting a 56-year battle against Holden, finally toppling it from number one for the first time in 1982. Before utes and SUVs ruled, sedans and wagons were on top, something the also-modular Falcon provided, along with ute and panel van alternatives. Fast forward to today, and Ford is profitable in North America but struggling in Europe, China and elsewhere, including in Australia. The least expensive new Ford passenger vehicle is the Everest Active 4WD from $58,990 before on-road costs. That’s why the Falcon handbook has been dusted off and modernised to better-suit consumer tastes, as the 2027 Fathom. Ford is returning to its roots by going back to basics. Here’s why the Fathom would be relevant for Ford Australia. We might be a ute and SUV-loving nation, but our appetite for EVs is now amongst the strongest in the world per-capita, so the timing couldn’t be more crucial. Especially as Ford is facing massive fines under the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) because its carbon pollution-heavy internal combustion engine-powered T6 II Ranger ute and its Everest diesel SUV spin-off account for around 90 per cent of total brand sales volumes. Plus, it will be increasingly difficult for Ranger and Everest sales to sustain the same cadence as before, coming under pressure from newer and mainly hybridised competition pouring into Australia. Of course, Ford will continue to evolve the T6 II models, and it’s believed that body-on-frame replacements – likely from China – are in the pipeline as the end of the decade nears.

Earlier this month, Audi unveiled a retro-inspired small electric vehicle that is a homage to a car that failed a quarter of a century ago. Spectacularly. Chances are the timely and handsome new A2 will succeed where the overpriced and oddly styled original from 2001 could not, but referencing a flop seems risky. It’s like Ford reviving the AU Falcon (though to be fair it is having a moment), or General Motors exhuming Holden with an ode to the ZB Commodore. Or Epica. Which has us thinking: this isn’t the first time that nostalgia, perhaps served with a side plate of delusion, has led to some confounding decisions. Whether they sold or were received poorly, we outline five resurrections that flopped. And if you disagree, let us know why in the comments below. How the millennial Monaro came about requires context. Holden enjoyed two golden eras: the early years, and for half a decade from 1997, after the then-new VT Commodore became a runaway smash hit. And the next year’s Australian International Motor Show in Sydney was pivotal. Codenamed Monica, the 1998 Holden Coupe Concept – essentially a VT with two doors, a slightly more-rakish windscreen and four (lower) seats – stole the show like no other car ever had before or since. At the time, Holden wasn’t even planning to build it. After all, coupe shelf lives are notoriously short. The original HK Monaro of 1968 proved popular initially, but its HQ-HX successors from 1971 struggled. The Coupe Concept utterly overshadowed Ford’s debuting AU Falcon at the Sydney show, made national news and created a buzz that helped bolster the brand. It was nothing short of sensational. Journalists immediately dubbed it Monaro, something Holden was understandably wary of. Despite what some articles today state, the resulting V2 Monaro failed to meet internal sales expectations when it arrived far later than scheduled, in November, 2001. Priced beyond most buyers’ reach from nearly $95,000 adjusted for inflation today, it went on to account for only a fraction of Commodore volume, at 4274 versus 88,478 units, putting it at 47 spot. From there, sales never improved, and the US-market Pontiac GTO export version of 2004 also failed to find a large-enough audience. By then, GM was floundering as the world moved away from sedans and coupes, in favour of SUVs, with the planned next-generation VE Monaro promptly canned, save for the 2008 Coupe 60 Concept to celebrate Holden’s 60 Anniversary. The Datsun 1600 is regarded as one of Japan’s earliest greats. Launched in 1967, it combined elegant styling with European-style chassis sophistication, to create a brilliant little sedan that dominated world rallying as effortlessly as it won over owners’ hearts. However, the larger and heavier 180B and 200B replacements of 1972 and 1976 respectively completely lacked the 1600’s sporty charm. Stung by widespread criticism, Datsun attempted to recreate the magic with the Stanza in 1978. But, built down to a price, it sorely lacked the fun and finesse that endeared so many owners to the old 1600. Critics were ruthless in their reviews. And though relatively popular and successful in motorsport, the Stanza couldn’t replicate the old 1600’s greatness and lasted only a single generation in Australia. By all objective means, any NSX is a masterpiece. Be it the exquisite 1990 NA1 original that became the first mid-engined supercar in history to love you back, or the NC1 tri-electric motor petrol/hybrid AWD successor of 2016 that was a breathtaking technological showcase, the name signifies engineering mastery. However, while neither generation achieved the sales volumes Honda required, the original has enjoyed a glorious afterlife as one of the all-time sports car greats. But the latter? Sadly, the second – or American – NSX remains misunderstood as being too advanced, and not “analogue” enough for drivers to truly connect with. That Honda cancelled it early (except in Japan) has not helped. Maybe the NC1 was just a decade before its time. Still an amazing achievement. One of Japan’s earliest Volkswagen Golf clones, the Pulsar became a beloved small-car staple in Australia over 25 years and six generations from 1980. That was until Nissan was forced to switch to a smaller replacement with awkward styling, ambitious pricing and a silly name. Inevitably, the 2006 Tiida tanked, even as Australians were clamouring towards smaller cars in the wake of soaring fuel prices. This was the era where the Mazda 3 and Toyota Corolla were king, but Nissan missed the party completely. The reason why the Pulsar ended was that it never properly challenged the Golf, so instead Nissan devised the Qashqai crossover, which immediately became a sales phenomenon. Somehow, Nissan Australia convinced a reluctant Japan to allow the redesigned Tiida hatch of 2012 to be rebadged Pulsar, along with the Thai market Sylphy sedan. Hopes were high of a sales revival but neither interloper possessed the required sophistication or appeal to lure local consumers back. Both Pulsar iterations never saw out their model cycle. The rear-engined air-cooled Beetle, which changed comparatively little between 1937 and 2003, remains the world’s best-selling vehicle of all time, at 21.5 million units. In contrast, the Toyota Corolla regenerated 12 times to date for it to find 50 million buyers. The re-imagined New Beetle, released globally in 1997 and 2000 in Australia, based on the versatile Golf IV architecture and built inexpensively in Mexico, sold strongly at first. But demand tapered off markedly as per most fashion statements, especially when BMW’s Mini reset the bar for retro remakes from 2001. However, after nearly 1.2 million units, VW’s third attempt, officially known as the “The Beetle”, struggled from the outset in 2012, despite featuring significantly more sophisticated drivetrains. Gone by 2019, barely 550,000 units were produced worldwide.